David Brooks is shocked, shocked I tell you, that Barack Obama is a leftist.
Those of us who consider ourselves moderates — moderate-conservative, in my case — are forced to confront the reality that Barack Obama is not who we thought he was. His words are responsible; his character is inspiring. But his actions betray a transformational liberalism that should put every centrist on notice. As Clive Crook, an Obama admirer, wrote in The Financial Times, the Obama budget “contains no trace of compromise. It makes no gesture, however small, however costless to its larger agenda, of a bipartisan approach to the great questions it addresses. It is a liberal’s dream of a new New Deal.”
David Brooks, you are an idiot. You should be disqualified from voting ever again. Why? Any reasonably objective person who bothered to actually look at what Obama did, instead of what he said, would have reached the conclusion he is a leftist radical at heart.
David, you’re just stupid. It was obvious. Hell, if you’d paid any attention at all, Obama’s willingness to take the New Party’s pledge to seek their endorsement should have told you Obama is a leftist. His speaking out against the Born Alive Infant Protection Act should have told you he is a leftist. His surrounding himself with people like Bill Ayers should have told you he is a leftist.
But you wanted to believe. You wanted to believe because you stand for nothing.
All moderates stand for nothing. That is why moderates do not lead movements.
In Brooks’ column today, he calls out for a new movement of moderates. He wants a real “Moderate Manifesto”, which sounds about as exciting as three square meals a day followed by a nightly bowel movement.
Moderates stand for nothing. That is why they are parts of coalitions. Liberals and conservatives pick off moderates issue by issue because moderates do not have a prevailing set of principles to guide their choices. Each issue is up for debate with a moderate. Each position can be infinitely nuanced to get a moderate aroused enough to support that position.
Conservatives and liberals lead. Moderates cry in the New York Times that they’ve been tricked again. And again. And again.

David Brooks: Pathetic, Sissified Pantywaist
Jeff Emanuel Tuesday, March 3rd at 10:53AM EST (link)Seriously, We spent the last two years telling him that Obama was not who he thought he was, but rather was who he was. What a pathetic fool.
At least he can admit it partially, though (Kmiec)
JE
damn straight we did
generalgrant Tuesday, March 3rd at 2:33PM EST (link)and his response? He’s afraid that conservatives will be in charge. Without saying it, he admits that conservatives were right all along about Obama. As such, you’d think that it might cross his mind that maybe we right about other stuff, too. But no, he issues a call to moderate arms. Well, no one ever went to war to defend moderation.
________________________________________________________
Halls of Justice Painted Green, Money Talking.
Power Wolves Beset Your Door, Hear Them Stalking.
notatool.com
Strong words, Jeff...
Fred Maidment Tuesday, March 3rd at 6:02PM EST (link)Precisely what I’d expect from you.
And totally correct.
How to Start a Business - Fred’s News
Follow Me on Twitter
“I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.”
- - Thomas Jefferson, to Archibald Stuart, 1791
Why not say what your really think?
jackbenimble Tuesday, March 3rd at 10:54AM EST (link)David Brooks, you are an idiot. You should be disqualified from voting ever again.
Hahahaha …..
But couldn’t you have come up with some better adjectives?
Moron, ignoramus, retard, Xanax crazed chimpanzee, etc
“I repudiate the idea of voting for a Democrat
Joe The Plumber's Intelligence >>> David Brooks' Intelligence n/t
Swamp_Yankee Tuesday, March 3rd at 10:58AM EST (link)n/t
Not Dead Yet!
where
Rod_Patrick Tuesday, March 3rd at 11:01AM EST (link)>>>> means “much much more than”
Same idiocy goes to Buckley! nt
Rod_Patrick Tuesday, March 3rd at 10:58AM EST (link)Lots of idiots fell for the one
izoneguy Tuesday, March 3rd at 11:01AM EST (link)I have been getting into knock down drag out arguments with friends who voted for the one. Of course I told them before the election what a crock Obama was. All they would say is how horrible Bush was.
And Obama is better? Not by a longshot. So as my friends get fired and their business slows down I “get in their face” and say “How do you like Obama now?”.
If you know a lib it is time to turn the tables - get in their faces - and tell them Obama is the worst President evah!!!!!!
“When the government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny.”
Thomas Jefferson
Yeah. And the queue line for idiots is getting longer each day. nt
Rod_Patrick Tuesday, March 3rd at 11:07AM EST (link)Amen to that brother!...nt
JadedByPolitics Tuesday, March 3rd at 11:08AM EST (link)…
Whoever has his enemy at his mercy &
does not destroy him is his own enemy
"You wanted to believe because you stand for nothing".
zeebeach Tuesday, March 3rd at 11:03AM EST (link)Therein lies the truth. He was hedging his bets. He stands for David Brooks. He was hoping to become relevant. He lost the bet. ‘Bye David.
David will always have a place as long as PBS, NPR and the NYT need a token Republican!
AceInTX Tuesday, March 3rd at 12:25PM EST (link)RINO more befits him…
Que the hyperventilating mods!
House Conservatives Fund
Michael Williams for Senate
Toomey US Senate
SarahPAC
Erick you have called this on the money!...
JadedByPolitics Tuesday, March 3rd at 11:11AM EST (link)Moderates STAND FOR NOTHING…they are moderates because they have NO CORE VALUES! they demean the majority of Americans by not STANDING FIRM on any set of PRINCIPLES!
The bottom line moderates SUCK!
Whoever has his enemy at his mercy &
does not destroy him is his own enemy
Amen, Jaded!
tcgeol Tuesday, March 3rd at 4:52PM EST (link)If moderates had any guts, they wouldn’t be moderates. If they had any firm foundation for their worldview, they wouldn’t be moderates.
Just your typical bitter gun- and God-clinger
I didn't help that our Presidential
TxCon Tuesday, March 3rd at 11:12AM EST (link)nominee refused to go after Obama on anything.
John McCain not going after Obama
Streiff Tuesday, March 3rd at 11:33AM EST (link)affected David Brooks’s ability to reason? I don’t get the connection. The seem to be fairly independent of each other.
“A man does what he can and endures what he must.”
Don't think they are related necessarily
TxCon Tuesday, March 3rd at 11:57AM EST (link)but McCain has gone after him harder in the last month than he did in the whole campaign. The “shock” seems to be a theme with these pseudo-conservative, moderates types.
The message about Obama’s leftist ways should have been drilled into everyone’s mind during the campaign, then this “shock” wouldn’t have happened.
Don't think they are related necessarily
TxCon Tuesday, March 3rd at 11:57AM EST (link)but McCain has gone after him harder in the last month than he did in the whole campaign. The “shock” seems to be a theme with these pseudo-conservative, moderates types.
The message about Obama’s leftist ways should have been drilled into everyone’s mind during the campaign, then this “shock” wouldn’t have happened.
Not so much!
AceInTX Tuesday, March 3rd at 12:29PM EST (link)I get your point…bringing McCain into this is a bit of a stretch but not as big a stretch as you seem to think…McCain and Brooks come from the same school of thought about gentile politics and being bipartisan…Whether McCain influenced Brooks’ thinking or brooks influenced McCain’s thinking, or none of the above matters little because the problem stems from the same attitudes and the moderate’s sense of fair play.
House Conservatives Fund
Michael Williams for Senate
Toomey US Senate
SarahPAC
Ace, you said it
TxCon Tuesday, March 3rd at 12:51PM EST (link)a little better than I did.
:>) What else are fellow Texans for? nt
AceInTX Tuesday, March 3rd at 1:22PM EST (link)House Conservatives Fund
Michael Williams for Senate
Toomey US Senate
SarahPAC
Very true
TxCon Tuesday, March 3rd at 3:08PM EST (link)I hope you had a Lone Star or two yesterday to celebrate Texas Independence Day
I'm a tee totaler but I had a big glass of lemonade! nt
AceInTX Tuesday, March 3rd at 9:31PM EST (link)House Conservatives Fund
Michael Williams for Senate
Toomey US Senate
SarahPAC
Very true
TxCon Tuesday, March 3rd at 3:08PM EST (link)I hope you had a Lone Star or two yesterday to celebrate Texas Independence Day
Genteel, not gentile.
cwilson Tuesday, March 3rd at 2:05PM EST (link)genteel:
1 a: having an aristocratic quality or flavor : stylish b: of or relating to the gentry or upper class c: elegant or graceful in manner, appearance, or shape d: free from vulgarity or rudeness : polite2 a: maintaining or striving to maintain the appearance of superior or middle-class social status or respectability b (1): marked by false delicacy, prudery, or affectation (2): conventionally or insipidly pretty
gentile:
1 : a person of a non-Jewish nation or of non-Jewish faith ; especially : a Christian as distinguished from a Jew
Sorry, it’s a pet peeve of mine. Every time I see it my first thought is “what does religion have to do with this discussion?”
Well I am a Gentile....does that work? nt
AceInTX Tuesday, March 3rd at 9:33PM EST (link)House Conservatives Fund
Michael Williams for Senate
Toomey US Senate
SarahPAC
McCain...
generalgrant Tuesday, March 3rd at 2:40PM EST (link)The irony of it all is that John McCain is exactly the kind of candidate that Brooks should have been drooling over. And he was exactly the kind of moderate squish that Brooks would want the GOP to nominate again.
Well, guess what? McCain got his ass handed to him in the election, largely because he didn’t inspire conservatives to go vote for him. He didn’t stand for anything other than squishy moderate bipartisanship and big government Bushism, which is precisely what Brooks is demanding now that he’s woken up to the reality that Obama is a far left statist.
________________________________________________________
Halls of Justice Painted Green, Money Talking.
Power Wolves Beset Your Door, Hear Them Stalking.
notatool.com
Yeah...well...McCain is Brooks' candidate as you say but he backed Obama...go figure! nt
AceInTX Tuesday, March 3rd at 9:34PM EST (link)House Conservatives Fund
Michael Williams for Senate
Toomey US Senate
SarahPAC
actually that is not why McCain lost
kyle8 Wednesday, March 4th at 8:12AM EST (link)Conservatives, and rank and file republicans did vote for him in pretty big numbers. But he lost nearly ALL of the independents. Which sort of makes your point in a different way.
The point being that he intended to reach out to independents and failed. Once again, if you actually have a strong conservative message and are sincere about it then you can win national elections.
If you are a squish, then you will probably be beaten.
“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle
I agree on this.
Rod_Patrick Wednesday, March 4th at 8:35AM EST (link)Trying to front yourself as a conservative even though many of your political, philosophical and personal actions in the past say otherwise is deceitful to many independents and moderates who are generally skeptics.
To get the independents, you need to establish Credibility.
In the last election, the independents were faced by a choice between two less credible candidates. McCain really looked less credible than the zero-accomplishment Obama. Obama’s plus factors include: (i) his seemingly perfect family (the public loved that picture of a good Black family potrayed by Michelle, Barak and their kids); (ii) his own successful story of American Dream (which he opposed, ironically); and, (iii) the great cover made by the MSM to all the inconsistencies and lies of Obama.
Thus, independents went for Obama.
Obama’s performance and actions in the next 4 years will be crucial.
40 days and some of the lies are becoming obvious and can nolonger be downplayed by the MSM.
But please don’t discount the demographic change in many Redstates.
The not-so-hidden program of the ACORN and other Democrats’ strategists in spreading the liberal base (people state migrations) in many states including Texas, Colorado, Virginia and South Carolina in the last two decades have really paid off for the democrats. And the next 4 years will a better season for more cultivations. The last election showed a very strong democratic roots growing in Texas. Illegal immigration also served the Democratic Party very well.
You forgot to mention cowardice - by and large, "moderates" are also cowards. [nt]
Martin Knight Tuesday, March 3rd at 11:22AM EST (link)To me, “consensus” seems to be the process of abandoning all beliefs, principles, values and policies. So it is something in which no one believes and to which no one objects … There are still people in my party who believe in “consensus” politics. I regard them as Quislings, as traitors … I mean it.
- Margaret Thatcher
NOTE: “consensus” = “Bipartisanship™”/”Centrism™”
Great blog. We must forgive the voters who were fooled,
spainishirish Tuesday, March 3rd at 11:27AM EST (link)and seek them out in the upcoming special elections, 2010, and 2012. I’m sure they truly are madder than hell. As for Brooks and the other moronic commentariat, they can burn in hell. That tiny sliver of slime might as well join the Democratic Party because they are not welcome back. Brooks is such a damned fool that he cannot help but revert to form at the end of his “essay,” which would have earned a C or D in your average state college political science class. At least he has admitted he is a moderate so that when he gets his last few seconds of his last minute of his 15, the left-wing interviewer will know it is a blatant lie when he presents Brooks as a “conservative spokesman.”
OK, now we have Buckley and Brooks in the gallery of fools. We’ll watch as their numbers increase. These men simply have put their finger to the wind and know a storm is about to bjlow over this Administration they aided and abetted. They are little more than populists who ingratiate themselves with high society rather than people who work on the line. They are even more despicable than the latter.
We now must focus on winning elections…from NY20 onwards. Laughing at Brooks and company is fun sport but shouldn’t divert our attention from winning.
I agree and disagree...
AceInTX Tuesday, March 3rd at 12:38PM EST (link)We absolutely need to focus on winning elections…but we need to drive home the point that Brooks, Buckly, Colon Powell and the rest of the spineless, unprincipled, arrogant twits who went ga ga over the golden child do not represent us and never have!
I say when you get em on the ground…start kicking em in the ribs and don’t stop!
House Conservatives Fund
Michael Williams for Senate
Toomey US Senate
SarahPAC
If you recall
Dan McLaughlin Tuesday, March 3rd at 1:16PM EST (link)we called this bunch out by name in an editorial before the election. Willful blindness, it is.
Ten to one says Brooks didn’t read a single word written by David Freddoso, Stanley Kurtz or Jen Rubin in 2008.
“No compromise with the main purpose, no peace till victory, no pact with unrepentant wrong.” - Winston Churchill
No way I'd take that bet...
AceInTX Tuesday, March 3rd at 1:20PM EST (link)I have little doubt he listened or read anyone outside his own little corner of the cocktail circuit!
House Conservatives Fund
Michael Williams for Senate
Toomey US Senate
SarahPAC
Sorry...that came out wrong...
AceInTX Tuesday, March 3rd at 1:21PM EST (link)I have NO doubt he listened or read anyone outside his own little corner of the cocktail circuit!
House Conservatives Fund
Michael Williams for Senate
Toomey US Senate
SarahPAC
If Brooks read those writers, Crank,
spainishirish Tuesday, March 3rd at 3:31PM EST (link)it was under the cover of darkness. Odd how much on the money the people he perceived as rabble were while he was proved the sucker.
We can do both. The need is to prioritize and win.
spainishirish Tuesday, March 3rd at 3:26PM EST (link)And believe me, brother, to watch these squishes choke on their own vomit pleases me to no end. Just kick these irelevant SOBs in between undermining every elected Democrat we can (note the word “elected”). Obama must be stopped, and while stomping these turncoat worms as they try to slither back to the fold is great sport, it must be secondary to picking up House and Senate seats from now until November 2010 and taking back the White House in 2012.
These fools were jokes before the election and they especially are now as they don their hairshirts. They deserve our utter contempt, but our main focus must be regaining the majority and then dismantling as much of the Left as possible. This includes the Kristol-Brooks-Parker, ad nauseum, Fifth Column, but in due time.
voters who were fooled
kyle8 Wednesday, March 4th at 8:16AM EST (link)We are going to need principled and articulate conservative leadership to take advantage of this and unfortunately we savaged our own conservative politicians in the last cycle.
Everyone was attacked and smashed, but I guess it’s time for new leadership.
It really will be a teachable moment for the millions of voters who were too young to remember Carter, we could make millions of permanent conservatives, but we have to offer a real alternative.
Which won’t be hard to do.
“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle
"...his(Obama's) character is inspiring."
Spartan4Life Tuesday, March 3rd at 11:28AM EST (link)Really, Brooks?
Based on what? Was it the drug snorting in his formative years or the sweetheart real estate deal he got from felon Tony Rezcko that inspires you?
This is the thing that bothers me the most about the sycophants in the press. They make broad statements that don’t have an iota of fact as if they are just accepted truths about Obama.
I, for one, am not fooled.
'Inspiring' in the same way Bernie Madoff's
Old_Crow Tuesday, March 3rd at 12:14PM EST (link)personality is inspiring.
There is a reason why most employers require resumes and check references, it’s because your past often speaks of your values and performance. Ever wonder why we didn’t see folks join Obama on the campaign podium declaring that they had known him and worked with him for years and that he was a moral guy with outstanding values… It’s because such people don’t exist and he has not demonstrated moral behavior.
Obama’s resume and source of success points to benefiting from public sector grants and government programs. That’s why he thinks more of these things will benefit the public now. The problem is that for every one person who is successful from government programs, there are dozens if not hundreds of taxpayers supporting the program. We simply cannot afford to have trillions of dollars of government programs floating around because we cannot afford to pay the bill.
“Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm.” — James Madison
“So this is how liberty dies.. with thunderous applause” — Star Wars III
Note the inconsistency of Brooks in this post...
AceInTX Tuesday, March 3rd at 12:41PM EST (link)on the one hand he touts Obama’s character while the whole post is about how Obama isn’t what he said he was and fooled them all!
House Conservatives Fund
Michael Williams for Senate
Toomey US Senate
SarahPAC
I never considered voting for Obama...
liberalrepublican Tuesday, March 3rd at 11:37AM EST (link)but I never thought he would be as wrong on the economy as he is.
I knew he would expand government, but I’m shocked to the extent.
“Broadly speaking, liberalism emphasizes individual rights and equality of opportunity. … including extensive freedom of thought and speech, limitations on the power of governments, the rule of law, the free exchange of ideas, a market or mixed economy”
Good Morning!....you slept in...time to get to work..
$peciallist Tuesday, March 3rd at 12:40PM EST (link)here’s a couple bucks, stop at Mcdonalds and get some breakfast….
LOL
AceInTX Tuesday, March 3rd at 12:56PM EST (link)Or to paraphrase a great philosopher of Comedy Central fame…
HERES YOUR SIGN!!!
House Conservatives Fund
Michael Williams for Senate
Toomey US Senate
SarahPAC
Brooks totally deserved this
Dan McLaughlin Tuesday, March 3rd at 11:42AM EST (link)Really, how anyone could have talked themselves into thinking Obama was a moderate is beyond me.
“No compromise with the main purpose, no peace till victory, no pact with unrepentant wrong.” - Winston Churchill
Well, at least half the conservative "punditocracy" did.
Achance Tuesday, March 3rd at 12:04PM EST (link)And that includes people I generally respect. They were all a’twitter about how he was going to be a moderate, govern to the center, and do no more whackiness than was necessary to placate the nuts. I read his damn books!! How anyone who read what the man said and who looked at who his friends were could beleive there was a centrist or moderating bone in his body is beyond my ken.
In Vino Veritas
Brooks is still over his head in that river in Egypt
civil_truth Tuesday, March 3rd at 11:54AM EST (link)No David, actions proceed from character and reveal character. And the more that comes out, the less tenable it is to claim:
What Brooks is saying here is either contradictory or he’s holding on to a forlorn desperate hope that somehow Obama is just a bit misguided in his actions and with some nudging will become inspiring once more.
But that “inspiring” was strictly air - the reality is far different. We’ve got a dangerous character on our hands.
The only question is whetherl David figure this out before or after his one-way trip to the gulag.
And Rightly So!
"We moderates are going to have to assert ourselves."
USNJIMRET Tuesday, March 3rd at 11:59AM EST (link)Yeah, “assert” your moderate core values.
Sheesh, what an idiot.
I found a great pic of some moderates hanging out.
mbecker908 Tuesday, March 3rd at 10:34PM EST (link)Note the quality of their core.
All us Bible-thumping, knuckle-draggers saw what Brooks refused to
EagleWatcher Tuesday, March 3rd at 11:59AM EST (link)Why is it the more education you get the more likely you are to reject what’s right in front of your nose. Hamas charter says “we will destroy the Zionist entity” and liberal elites say “see they want peace.”
Obama grew up with leftists, was educated by leftists, went to church with leftists and palled around with leftists and Brooks saw this and said “See? He’s really a moderate like me!”
Adopt a Congressman
Soldiers’ Angels SarahPAC
Top Conservatives on Twitter
Sarah Palin and Joe the Plumber saw 6 months ago what Brooks is now just realizing
generalgrant Tuesday, March 3rd at 2:45PM EST (link)Really, who’s supposed to be the intellectual? Maybe if Palin and Joe read the New York Times everyday, they would have missed it, too.
________________________________________________________
Halls of Justice Painted Green, Money Talking.
Power Wolves Beset Your Door, Hear Them Stalking.
notatool.com
Perfect idiocy if I may say.
Rod_Patrick Tuesday, March 3rd at 3:38PM EST (link)This one fully describes the unbelievable idiocy of Brooks, Buckley, etc:
Obama grew up with leftists, was educated by leftists, went to church with leftists and palled around with leftists and Brooks saw this and said “See? He’s really a moderate like me!”
Perfect idiocy!
Uhhm....
AceInTX Tuesday, March 3rd at 12:06PM EST (link)In a word:
YES!!!
House Conservatives Fund
Michael Williams for Senate
Toomey US Senate
SarahPAC
A moderate Manifesto? What would it say?
AceInTX Tuesday, March 3rd at 12:19PM EST (link)We believe in nothing? Principles are for dummies? We’ll compromise on any leftist issue as long as we can stick it to the right wing? We’ll sell out for civility, comity and bipartisanship?
I mean…seriously. What would a moderate manifesto consist of?
Please write one for us David…you’re so much smarter and high brow than the rest of us…can you please climb down off your mountain top perch and enlighten us please?
House Conservatives Fund
Michael Williams for Senate
Toomey US Senate
SarahPAC
A Moderate's Story: My Life as a Happy Loser
TxCon Tuesday, March 3rd at 1:00PM EST (link)by Bob Michel.
You da man!!!
AceInTX Tuesday, March 3rd at 1:24PM EST (link)House Conservatives Fund
Michael Williams for Senate
Toomey US Senate
SarahPAC
A Moderate's Story: My Life as a Happy Loser
TxCon Tuesday, March 3rd at 1:00PM EST (link)by Bob Michel.
Brooks is Canadian...
Jack Tuesday, March 3rd at 12:26PM EST (link)I don’t believe he ever became a US citizen. I might be wrong, but I don’t think so. He can’t vote all he can be is an idiot. He does that very well.
Jack
“If at age 20 you are conservative you have no heart. It at age 30 you are liberal you have no brains.” Sir Winston Churchill
Where is Kathleen Parker?
azaeroprof Tuesday, March 3rd at 12:26PM EST (link)Wonder what sort of mea culpa she’s experiencing? Maybe the shame is too great to actually fess up like David Brooks?
Moderates are like the squishy, slimy oysters that live in the center of and with the protection of the hard outer shell (the shell representing principled conservatives of course)!
Join the RedState Strike Force
I don't think so. Parker's not an idiot.
Rod_Patrick Tuesday, March 3rd at 3:48PM EST (link)It was just unfortunate that Parker caught a malignant mental disease called Palin Derangement Syndrome (PDS). She was under medication when she said those piece against Sarah Palin.
Sadly, a conservative doctor recently announced that there is no cure for PDS. Too bad, Parker can no longer post an article in Townhall. The conservative bloggers will just diss her and her article.
Brooks, Buckley the minor, Parker, and Noonan...
SteveM Tuesday, March 3rd at 12:28PM EST (link)…all thought they’d be toasts of the town with their newfound “enlightenment” on HopeandChange.
Peggy, at least, probalby got invites to all the best parties. I can’t see anybody wanting to really hang out with the other two.
All 3 sold their major principles down the river and trashed the rest of us in the GOP. Brooks needs to suck up somewhat to the left to keep his job - he IS at the old gray hag, after all. The others? I don’t waste my time on them anymore.
The best way to give these columnists the heave-ho is to ignore what they write. Note to you folks at Hot Air: Stop linking to Parker. I don’t care what she says and won’t waste my time. Don’t help her out by redirecting traffic her way.
New York Times
angryred Tuesday, March 3rd at 12:39PM EST (link)My MIL was telling me today how left wing!!!! Obama was, and how he “lost” her.
I see it all clearly, now: I should have known that she must have read it in the NYTimes. This paper is the Bible for some folks… I guess we just better thank Zeus that this article found it’s way into that rag…
1-20-13 Hope for Change
I have one question.......
The_Rebel Tuesday, March 3rd at 12:48PM EST (link)If Brooks and so many other moderates were fooled by Obama and are having buyers’ remorse, then why, at every opportunity, does the press and their minions keep telliing us that the public is solidly behind him with such high approval numbers? One such suckup is John Harwood of CNBC, formerly of the Wall Street Journal. I couldn’t stand his writing there, and I can’t take him on the tube now either. I have to change the channel when he is speaking.
With all of this disappointment in Obama, why are his polls not reflecting it?
Youve gotta ask yourself...who conducts the molls and who designs the questions? nt
AceInTX Tuesday, March 3rd at 1:06PM EST (link)House Conservatives Fund
Michael Williams for Senate
Toomey US Senate
SarahPAC
Moll is a fine time-honored euphemism for whore
civil_truth Tuesday, March 3rd at 1:14PM EST (link)So it’s perfectly accurate to ask who is the media’s pimp (i.e. “who conducts the molls and designs their questions”).
And the answer of course is Rahm Emmanuel, as Warner Tood Huston reminded us earlier today.
And Rightly So!
Its Hard To Admit Your Wrong; People Want Obama To Succeed
Swamp_Yankee Tuesday, March 3rd at 1:19PM EST (link).. Its tough to quit on someone so soon after you cut checks for them and voted for them.
But there is a creeping suspicion that they bought a load of horse manure. Reservations are growing. Anxiety is growing. You see this more with the Jim Cramer types and the David Brooks types.
Once people of influence start bailing on Bambi, it will trickle down. Then the masses will realize that they are still poor and Obama isnr going to give them a free house. The unraveling has begun.
Not Dead Yet!
Not horse manure, Swamp...
Xasteius Tuesday, March 3rd at 2:09PM EST (link)There’s no pony.
According to JLDetroit, it’s actually donkey manure.
Don’t leave the party, hijack it back!
Eternal vigilance is the price of freedom.
When I grow up, I don’t want to be Reagan. I want to be Art Chance.
~Aaron Gardner
Rasmussen reports...
azaeroprof Tuesday, March 3rd at 1:20PM EST (link)show Obama “strongly approved” by 40%, “strongly disapproved” by 27%. Not exactly overwhelming numbers, especially when one considers that we’re still in the honeymoon phase and only one week after his “magnificent” (cough, cough) non-SOTU speech.
If a few more weasels like Brooks start writing these kinds of articles, and the Dow Jones goes south of 6000, and I think we’ll see a real avalanche of his approval numbers.
Join the RedState Strike Force
Duh...Polls...nt
AceInTX Tuesday, March 3rd at 1:07PM EST (link)House Conservatives Fund
Michael Williams for Senate
Toomey US Senate
SarahPAC
Bahahaha!
DefendUSA Tuesday, March 3rd at 1:23PM EST (link)Brooks is not only an idiot…
He must be the Village Idiot number one.!!
3 more years of the Pied Piper’s pretentious Presidency. Thank God for small favors.
If David Brooks had paid any attention at all...
The_Gadfly Tuesday, March 3rd at 2:06PM EST (link)he would have known Obama was a pure Marxist leftist when he wanted to spread Joe the Plumbers wealth around, even though Joe didn’t have any yet. And if Brooks had paid any attention at all, he would have confirmed that Obama was a crook when he nominated a Treasury Secretary who owed more in back taxes than Joe probably makes in a year (and didn’t seem interested at all in spread the TS’s wealth around).
We’ve been called racists enough now that it shouldn’t bother us any more.
-AChance, http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2009/11/03/what-men-may-do-we-have-done/#comment-24463
If NY23 was a beat down for Conservatives, what do you call what happened to Progressives in NJ and VA?
inspired by ColdWarrior, http://www.redstate.com/hooah_mac/2009/11/04/ny-23-the-agony-of-defeat-not-so-much/#comment-156
the educated idiot
rrpjr Tuesday, March 3rd at 2:41PM EST (link)Yes, Brooks is one, but he is hardly alone. I encountered scores of them over the past year. Obama was hugely successful at seducing them.
Brooks
generalgrant Tuesday, March 3rd at 3:12PM EST (link)it seems to me that his prescription is to join the conservatives in fighting the Obama leftward statist agenda. All of his recommendations ask moderates to do what conservatives are already doing in objecting to the current Administration’s plans. Of course, he doesn’t put it that way. He couldn’t admit to himself that the conservatives were correct, but in a round about way, that’s exactly what he’s saying.
________________________________________________________
Halls of Justice Painted Green, Money Talking.
Power Wolves Beset Your Door, Hear Them Stalking.
notatool.com
Middle of the Road
Brian Darling Tuesday, March 3rd at 3:25PM EST (link)Dead Skunks, David Brooks and yellow lines. What is a Moderate Conservative anyways? Somebody that believes in conservatism — sometimes. What was it that Goldwater said “moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.” How about moderation in the pursuit of anything is not a virtue. Stand for something or stand for nothing. Erickson has, yet another, excellent post.
I'm still shocked
Common_Cents Tuesday, March 3rd at 3:41PM EST (link)at how duped people were. Of how ridiculously they projected their wild utopian dreams on the Obama’s blank slate of change. They invented fantasies wayyy beyond Obama had even hinted at. I read on some architectural blog about “If Obama was a building….he’d be….” and described some feel good piece of concrete. Good gawd people, you are truly pathetic.
I didn’t like history subjects in school and thought they were a waste of time. Oh now I know how important it is to be in a position to write history and teach its lessons so we don’t repeat history’s mistakes.
“Never interrupt your enemy when he’s making a mistake.” Napoleon - Well, unless he is ruining your country! Common Cents
A cult of personality arises when a country’s leader uses mass media to create a heroic public image, often through unquestioning flattery and praise.[1] Cults of personality are often found in dictatorships.
Brooks let himself be fooled,
Bird_Dog Tuesday, March 3rd at 5:11PM EST (link)but I wouldn’t blame on it his moderate conservative leanings. I consider myself a moderate conservative and I knew that Obama was a solid-core liberal who would likely lurch this nation to the left if given the chance.
Michael Medved had a fair point today. We lost an election, so as conservatives, we need to broaden our base and our appeal. David Brooks is not the enemy here, and notwithstanding his boneheadedness about Obama, he’s pretty smart, he’s reasonably articulate and he conveys a generally conservative message in his columns.
HA HAHAHAHAHAHA HAA HAA HAA!!!
AceInTX Tuesday, March 3rd at 9:46PM EST (link)House Conservatives Fund
Michael Williams for Senate
Toomey US Senate
SarahPAC
OK
Bird_Dog Tuesday, March 3rd at 11:32PM EST (link)So if we don’t broaden our base and appeal, how do we win the next election?
Not a lot of time to go in depth here, but,
barry915barry Tuesday, March 3rd at 11:46PM EST (link)We broaden our base by NOT diluting the message. The message IS the appeal. Tim Kaine sent out one of those infamous “need a $5 donation” letter today. In it he rips on Limbaugh. If the Democrats don’t like it, most likely means we are on the right track.
This link gives an idea about how to get the message out, which roughly equates to broadening our appeal. Again, of paramount importance is that the CONSERVATIVE message must remain un-diluted. People do want change. Just not THIS type of change. They want change back to the days of Reagan, and the ‘94 revolution.
This link?
Bird_Dog Wednesday, March 4th at 12:38AM EST (link)I guess it didn’t take. I’m glad you mentioned Reagan. I recall him talking about an 11th Commandment. I also remember him saying that the person who agrees with you 80 percent of the time is a friend and an ally. Go back to Brooks’ last half dozen columns prior to his “moderate manifesto” piece.
This one takes Obama to task for fiscal irresponsibility and gimmickry.
This one cites Burke in his criticism of Obama’s massive growth of government.
This one is about well…I’m not exactly sure. Something about individual responsibility, a quintessential conservative idea, tempered with an economic environment that merits attempts to stabilize the wilder oscillations.
This one is basically about the American dream. We want to live in Denvers (with yards, cars, and space), not Amsterdams.
This one offers a worst case scenario in the aftermath of Obama’s “plan”.
This one criticizes the so-called stimulus bill but is generally open-minded about Geithner’s proposal.
The general message Brooks conveyed is one of fiscal conservatism and skepticism of whopping governmental growth. The man has a decent-sized megaphone at the NYT and he is on our side much more often than not. He may very well have been idiotic about Obama’s alleged moderate tendencies, but I’d rather have him on our side. If we’re serious about winning elections, we’re going to need the Brooks to prevail. We can still try to appeal with a conservative message, but it’s not going to help us if we piss off or alienate the people we don’t think are conservative enough.
Sorry about the missing link.
barry915barry Wednesday, March 4th at 1:20PM EST (link)Lets try this again……
http://www.redstate.com/neokong/2009/03/02/an-open-letter-to-michael-steele-and-eric-cantor/#comment-380
I agree (to a very large degree) with the 11th commandment, the exception being if they are opposed to conservatism. Hence my belief that it is acceptable to target them from the right. I agree that we do not necessarily want to “…alienate the people we don’t think are conservative enough.”. We need to win them over because conservative ideas are better than “liberal” ideas.
It's been tried...and it's failed...not once...not twice...for 40 years
AceInTX Tuesday, March 3rd at 11:58PM EST (link)and we lose every time it’s tried!
House Conservatives Fund
Michael Williams for Senate
Toomey US Senate
SarahPAC
Then how did Reagan win?
Bird_Dog Wednesday, March 4th at 12:50AM EST (link)He broadened his appeal, getting “Reagan Democrats” to vote for him. He didn’t alienate the “squishes” in the party. He brought them along.
I can understand Erick’s sentiments, but if we’re going to regain the majority, it seems to me that we can work to spread the conservative message while at the same time attract the more moderate elements by refraining from insults like “idiot” and “disqualified” and “stupid”. It may feel good and cathartic to do that, but I’d rather have Brooks with us in developing superior alternatives to Obama’s big government grabfest.
Your historical revisionism is telling...
AceInTX Wednesday, March 4th at 8:38AM EST (link)Reagan didn’t sell out conservatism wholesale like most of you advocate doing…painting pale pastels isn’t leadership and he said so!
House Conservatives Fund
Michael Williams for Senate
Toomey US Senate
SarahPAC
Agree. He sold and promoted conservativism to the "squishes"
Rod_Patrick Wednesday, March 4th at 8:52AM EST (link)by pointing out why conservativism was good for America.
He molded himself and his ideas into an “extreme-right” Conservative making him very distinct from the rest.
To Bird Dog:
There were no Reagan Democrats then. MSM just created that up. They were actually ordinary Americans., who with the right message and alternative, easily saw the truth and promise being promoted by conservatism brought to them by its credible messenger…. Ronald Reagan.
Reagan was NEVER A PAMPERER.. he’s a chastiser of the independents and moderates. Now that I think of it, REAGAN HAD BEEN SO AGAINST THE MODERATES. He was even very close in saying that moderates were worse than the Democrats because of their indecisions, dishonesty and cowardice to admit in public who they really are… democrats.
5*5*5*5*5*5* nt
AceInTX Wednesday, March 4th at 9:51AM EST (link)House Conservatives Fund
Michael Williams for Senate
Toomey US Senate
SarahPAC
I was a Reagan Democrat
Bird_Dog Wednesday, March 4th at 4:31PM EST (link)I became a Republican after Reagan was elected, and never looked back. There is plenty of evidence out there to suggest that nominal Democrats pulled the lever for Reagan instead of Carter, hence the landslide.
As for him chastizing, I recall him doing to it Democrats and communists.
BTW...I think Brooks has his idiocy and stupidity on full display...
AceInTX Wednesday, March 4th at 8:41AM EST (link)Isn’t it funny that you would be offended on Brooks’ behalf when he’s the one who bought the golden child’s Utopian dream hook line and sinker?
Kind of says it all doesn’t it?
House Conservatives Fund
Michael Williams for Senate
Toomey US Senate
SarahPAC
I need to wake up the Bunny...
mbecker908 Tuesday, March 3rd at 9:58PM EST (link)1. David Brooks is no “moderate conservative”. He’s a squish. Period.
2. Michael Medved is no conservative, he thought McCain was just the ticket for the Party.
3, David Brooks may not be “the enemy”, but he sleeps with them naked. And frankly, the French Resistance had the right idea concerning whores who slept with the enemy.
Thanks for posting this. We now know that you’re a Moby at best and an ignorant fool at worst. Or maybe both.
heh moderate conservative
redneck_hippie Tuesday, March 3rd at 10:07PM EST (link)That would fit the same category as a semi-precious gem.
You either have a precious gem or a cheap imitation.
Middle ground is for wussies.
“We must not lose our faculty to dare, especially in dark days.” - Churchill in March, 1942.
Remember NY-23.
The only thing in the middle of the road
Achance Tuesday, March 3rd at 10:11PM EST (link)is a yellow line and:
dead skunks
dead possums
dead armadillos
Depending on where you are.
Here, it’s dead porcupines, but lots of people think they’re cute, so I left it out. They’re about as dumb as a possum but they have those sharp quills.
In Vino Veritas
Ahhh, sharp quills.
mbecker908 Tuesday, March 3rd at 10:17PM EST (link)So they’re NOT moderates.
Pulling porcupine quills out of your dog
Achance Tuesday, March 3rd at 10:26PM EST (link)is one of life’s great joys! Dogs are stupid about porcupines - well dogs are stupid generally, but I like them. One of my Schipperkjes had a run-in with a porky in the back yard on a Saturday night and just got a mouthfull of quills. I loved the dog but not enough to take her to the vet at the Saturday night rate. So, armed with a bottle of Southern Comfort and a Leatherman, the situation was rectified. 27 quills and half of a half pint. Dog slept a while.
In Vino Veritas
I have actually SEEN a porcupine in the wild.
barry915barry Tuesday, March 3rd at 11:34PM EST (link)Apologies on the borderline thread-jack, but, they not only have sharp quills, but they have very sharp claws. Really cool to see it up in the tree like that.
LOL...the mind picture of you pulling quills out of a squeeling dogs is precious! nt
AceInTX Wednesday, March 4th at 12:05AM EST (link)House Conservatives Fund
Michael Williams for Senate
Toomey US Senate
SarahPAC
The Southern Comfort was for the dog; I don't drink that stuff. nt
Achance Wednesday, March 4th at 12:14AM EST (link)In Vino Veritas
Southern Comfort is a very conservative drink...
$peciallist Wednesday, March 4th at 12:24AM EST (link)when you get sick…it’s Red…..just sayin….
That sick part is the problem for me; too sweet!
Achance Wednesday, March 4th at 12:26AM EST (link)God will that stuff ever give you a bad head! I’ll stick to Scotch and cheap CA wine.
In Vino Veritas
25 years since praying to the
AKSteveB Wednesday, March 4th at 1:02AM EST (link)porcelain God after drinking SC, and I still get nauseated just seeing the bottle.
Hell is other people - Sartre
really? my atheist Ron Paul supporting vegetarian friend loves the stuff NT
Gyorc Nacain Wednesday, March 4th at 12:27AM EST (link)Diff'rent strokes, and all that. nt
Achance Wednesday, March 4th at 1:04AM EST (link)In Vino Veritas
LOL...I got that...it's still a picture though...LOL...nt
AceInTX Wednesday, March 4th at 8:33AM EST (link)House Conservatives Fund
Michael Williams for Senate
Toomey US Senate
SarahPAC
My grandma had a dead armadillo
redneck_hippie Tuesday, March 3rd at 10:21PM EST (link)made into a basket. She kept her letters in it.
I thought it was cool. She also had a bearskin rug at the top of her 2nd story stairwell. Head and all.
Thought it was scary.
“We must not lose our faculty to dare, especially in dark days.” - Churchill in March, 1942.
Remember NY-23.
or being almost pregnant! nt
AceInTX Wednesday, March 4th at 12:00AM EST (link)House Conservatives Fund
Michael Williams for Senate
Toomey US Senate
SarahPAC
What's not to like?
$peciallist Tuesday, March 3rd at 10:23PM EST (link)“he’s pretty smart, he’s reasonably articulate and he conveys a generally conservative message”
Bird I also would have considered
AKSteveB Wednesday, March 4th at 1:14AM EST (link)myself a “moderate conservative” before this, but the problem is, the “crazies” turned out to be right. Michael Medved is right to the extent that broadening appeal is generally a good thing, but being moderate against true socialism? I no longer think there is any such thing. In terms of our appeal, this was an anti Bush election, combined with a weak candidate on this side, and a charismatic blank canvas on the other. Yeah I’d like to see the hardliners drop some of the purity stuff, that is a ticket to the long term desert, but we, and I include myself in this, better know what we stand for. Something else I thought was total nonsense turned out to be true. The SoCons here have brought up a valid point. The fiscons bitch about the SoCons dragging the party down, but it turns out the the SoCons are actually much more reliable fiscons as well. We need to show them more respect.
Hell is other people - Sartre
Al Qaeda thought that David Brooks was a typical American
smagar Tuesday, March 3rd at 9:25PM EST (link)They thought that a country populated by fellows like Brooks would be an easy mark. So they attacked us on 9/11, and expected only a few airstrikes and lots of diplomatic hot air in response.
They didn’t count on Dubya. And the US military.
Now, be honest: if YOU were a jihadhi, and you thought David Brooks was a typical American, wouldn’t you expect America to fold at the first sign of any real trouble?
“Who will stand/On either hand/And guard this bridge with me?” (Macaulay)
Hey David Brooks...
HappyBunny Tuesday, March 3rd at 10:02PM EST (link)Oh, and Bird Dog that goes for you too.
Where’s my lettuce.
Did the posting rules expire here?
Bird_Dog Tuesday, March 3rd at 11:30PM EST (link)It used to be that when a person says “you suck big time” to a commenter, that person would at least get a warning. I also seem to remember a warning to “be respectful, or be banned”.
Alas.
Dude!...don't wake him up!!!
$peciallist Tuesday, March 3rd at 11:34PM EST (link)shhhhhhh…
mbecker likes to play with the envelope.
Moe Lane Tuesday, March 3rd at 11:36PM EST (link)Please don’t push it with Bird_Dog, mbecker: he’s old-school RS.
Check out my new blog at http://moelane.com/.
http://twitter.com/moelane
My (blogging-related) wish list.
I don't think David Brooks is/was a commenter
bs Tuesday, March 3rd at 11:52PM EST (link)If he was, we’d certainly have some serious fun here.
Decorum is fo’ suckas
Let me be pointed.
mbecker908 Wednesday, March 4th at 7:40AM EST (link)People like David Brooks and Michael Medved and David Gergin, on the “commenter” side and elected politicians like Arlen Specter, both Bushes and Robert Michel and Christy Whitman’s crew (amongst literally hundreds of others over the last 30+ years) have worked diligently together to make sure the expanded government envisioned by the farthest left wing of the Democratic Party is put in place and stays there, unchallenged. Every time there has been a challenge from the right vis the role of government and it’s expansion into controlling every aspect of our lives, the most faithful around at attacking the challenge have been the “moderate” wing of the Republican Party.
People like Brooks, etal led the attack against Ronald Reagan. They led the attack - specifically, the RMSP was started to oppose the Contract With America and Newt - against the conservative revival of the early ’90’s. They have been successful at limiting the ability to get conservative jurists on the bench. They were successful at keeping the “Bush Tax Cuts” from being made permanent (along with a feckless President who didn’t have the courage to fight them).
I could go on, issue by issue over the last 30 years, but I won’t. And I won’t because I don’t have the time right now, and even if I did, I doubt you have the ability to understand just how much damage people like Brooks, Specter and you have done to both the Republican Party and to the nation. I really hope you like the rest of Obama’s term and the decades that will follow it because people exactly like you are responsible for their success and the ultimate failure of the nation that not so long ago really was the Shining City on the Hill. Thanks to you, there is a brownout in The City and it soon will be a blackout.
I don’t have the ability to express the contempt and disgust I have for you and yours. Bunny is an optimist.
you include Micheal Medved in that?
kyle8 Wednesday, March 4th at 8:05AM EST (link)I don’t think that is even close to accurate. He is very small government, and for fiscal responsibility. He falls off the wagon on a few social issues like immigration reform. But not small government/personal responsibility.
“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle
Medved was an over-the-top supporter of McCain
mbecker908 Wednesday, March 4th at 9:58AM EST (link)and the idea that we have to move to the “center” to win “independents and moderates”. He was supported all of President Bush’s “compassionate” programs. The guy is a squish of the first order.
So much for that envelope
Bird_Dog Wednesday, March 4th at 10:16AM EST (link)It was shredded, not just played with, Moe. I guess the posting rules apply to some people but not others.
Maybe you should require conservative purity tests, becker. That would be a great way to get enough people on our side for winning elections and moving an agenda forward. If yours is the prevailing attitude in the party, get used to years upon years minority status while the Democrats drive the electoral bus.
I mentioned two people, Brooks and Medved, and I’m a little surprised that they’re just not conservative enough for Redstaters. I’m no fan of Specter or Whitman or Michel or Gergen or the RMSP. Bush 41 screwed up the Reagan legacy, and Bush 43 was a failed president because he failed to govern as the conservative he purported himself to be. Nevertheless, if we don’t broaden our base enough to accept the more moderate segments of the party, we won’t win elections and we won’t be implementing an agenda that will put our country on a saner track. The Brooks and Medveds are assets in that endeavor. As for where you think I am in this equation, you don’t know the first goddam thing.
I don't have purity tests.
mbecker908 Wednesday, March 4th at 10:35PM EST (link)And if you were a regular reader you’d more than likely know that.
I’m more than willing to shut down the government on an incremental basis. That’s basically what the CWA started and the RMSP helped to kill. The problem with pinheads like Brooks and Medved is that they don’t want the government scaled back. They’re perfectly happy watching it grow. Same for the others I mentioned, and especially the RMSP crowd.
As far as members of congress go, I have no particular problem with most moderates. The girls from ME don’t particularly bother me. What does bother me is moderates in leadership positions where they can impact policy, hence my problem with Specter.
The very fact that you think Brooks is an “asset” (as opposed to an ass) speaks all I need to know about you. Brooks is Obama in sheeps clothing. He stands for absolutely nothing that Obama or Durkin or Harry&Nancy would take.
I reiterate my disgust.
A conservative "purity" test is a flawed position
phxg Wednesday, March 4th at 10:47PM EST (link)primarily because conservative principals based on a big tent, inclusion ideal; which was proven to be flawed in 2008. But the presentation of what the conservative principles are and allow people to choose to come aboard. If we try to be everything to all then the GOP is destined to obscurity.
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. –Aristotle
Republicans win when
mbecker908 Thursday, March 5th at 7:51AM EST (link)they they define themselves as small government politicians. And that, BTW, is something that moderates know absolutely nothing about. It’s called leadership. I’m surprised that David Brooks and his ilk can actually find their way to a restroom without someone to hold their hand.
We should have more than enough evidence over the last 60 years that moderates like Brooks, Specter, Medved, MIchel, and - with his support of them and their positions - Bird Dog, are nothing more than blind followers of the left side of the Democratic Party. Lord knows they’ve never challenged them on the centralality of any issue, they just nibble on the margins and think they’ve accomplished something. Take Arlen Specter for example, with the Bail Out legislation that he let pass. He was very proud of the questionable “fact” that he got $100B taken out of the legislation. Whooptedoo. First of all, if Republicans had stood firm we probably could have gotten six or seven hundred billion out of it - by killing the damn thing. Second, how about the unintended consequences, only one of which is the reinstatement of the Great Society welfare programs.
Republicans can win when they offer the people something different than Dem-lite.
555 nt
phxg Thursday, March 5th at 10:48AM EST (link)It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. –Aristotle
David WHO? All the attention he deserves...nt
olsmithie Tuesday, March 3rd at 11:16PM EST (link)5!!!!!!!
Rod_Patrick Wednesday, March 4th at 2:04PM EST (link)We have better issues to discuss than what this “David Who” said or not.