<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not one dime to the NRSC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/05/13/not-one-dime-to-the-nrsc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/05/13/not-one-dime-to-the-nrsc/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 02:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Karina</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/05/13/not-one-dime-to-the-nrsc/#comment-23826</link>
		<dc:creator>Karina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 09:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=2017#comment-23826</guid>
		<description>I read your analogy and pardon me if I'm a little foggy.  Your opinion is that the deli owner would work harder to please the customer buying the soup, right?  I don't see where the motivation would be if he's getting his money anyway.  I would think the owner would try to get the income back that he lost from his changes, in other words the customer who walked.  

I do see what you're saying though about the dime.  Can we paint them red?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read your analogy and pardon me if I&#8217;m a little foggy.  Your opinion is that the deli owner would work harder to please the customer buying the soup, right?  I don&#8217;t see where the motivation would be if he&#8217;s getting his money anyway.  I would think the owner would try to get the income back that he lost from his changes, in other words the customer who walked.  </p>
<p>I do see what you&#8217;re saying though about the dime.  Can we paint them red?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLenardDetroit</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/05/13/not-one-dime-to-the-nrsc/#comment-23824</link>
		<dc:creator>JLenardDetroit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 07:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=2017#comment-23824</guid>
		<description>I agree with DON’T FUND THEM …. MUCH......

You get more with withholding some, but providing, perhaps only a $1 (&lt;a href="http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/05/19/the-problem-with-the-nrscs-crist-endorsement/#comment-23629"&gt;Deli-story&lt;/a&gt;) as a protest donation insisting WE still intend to work STRONGLY and as forcefully as possible within the Party given any avenues possible.

The &lt;a href="http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/05/19/the-problem-with-the-nrscs-crist-endorsement/#comment-23629"&gt;Deli-story&lt;/a&gt; provides the best example of how/why this would be the BETTER STRATEGY, imo....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with DON’T FUND THEM …. MUCH&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>You get more with withholding some, but providing, perhaps only a $1 (<a href="http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/05/19/the-problem-with-the-nrscs-crist-endorsement/#comment-23629">Deli-story</a>) as a protest donation insisting WE still intend to work STRONGLY and as forcefully as possible within the Party given any avenues possible.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/05/19/the-problem-with-the-nrscs-crist-endorsement/#comment-23629">Deli-story</a> provides the best example of how/why this would be the BETTER STRATEGY, imo&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbecker908</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/05/13/not-one-dime-to-the-nrsc/#comment-23555</link>
		<dc:creator>mbecker908</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 02:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=2017#comment-23555</guid>
		<description>I got beyond that in '88.  Newt got me back for a little while in '94 but I was back to way beyond despising them by '96...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got beyond that in &#8216;88.  Newt got me back for a little while in &#8216;94 but I was back to way beyond despising them by &#8216;96&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLenardDetroit</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/05/13/not-one-dime-to-the-nrsc/#comment-23554</link>
		<dc:creator>JLenardDetroit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 01:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=2017#comment-23554</guid>
		<description>I would NEVER stomach that kind of tactic as the Primary must be held if for no other reason that any/all candidates can/must keep each other honest.... A good healthy debate for a Primary can/does build momentum.... I just hope they can/will go about being REASONABLE in having the discussions/debates and not look to rip each other apart - or again we ALL lose. I want Rubio to push, pull, and by any other means necessary demonstrate to Crist he MUST not abandon the Conservatives of this Party (or does so at his peril, and all of ours).... The reminder that LOYALTY is a 2-way street, if he wants Conservative support for/in the General Election he MUST be willing to RESPECT us if he expects us to respect him in return.... He is in the Republican Party and we have a Conservative Platform and purpose.... If he does demonstrate he will be nothing more than a RINO he will be ripped a new one, and again, WE ALL LOSE as he WILL lose the General Election by completely abandoning us and the prediction that Conservatives will sit out will occur and he may not make up enough numbers to overcome the ones that sit out AND THE ONES A.C.O.R.N. MAKES UP FOR THE OTHER SIDE!!!! If Rubio steps up and puts forth such a stellar campaign so-as to not be denied the Crist-first (not me, I only advocate reluctantly because of how "I" see/analyze the race) must stand beside Rubio (or if some other more-prominent Conservative steps up).....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would NEVER stomach that kind of tactic as the Primary must be held if for no other reason that any/all candidates can/must keep each other honest&#8230;. A good healthy debate for a Primary can/does build momentum&#8230;. I just hope they can/will go about being REASONABLE in having the discussions/debates and not look to rip each other apart - or again we ALL lose. I want Rubio to push, pull, and by any other means necessary demonstrate to Crist he MUST not abandon the Conservatives of this Party (or does so at his peril, and all of ours)&#8230;. The reminder that LOYALTY is a 2-way street, if he wants Conservative support for/in the General Election he MUST be willing to RESPECT us if he expects us to respect him in return&#8230;. He is in the Republican Party and we have a Conservative Platform and purpose&#8230;. If he does demonstrate he will be nothing more than a RINO he will be ripped a new one, and again, WE ALL LOSE as he WILL lose the General Election by completely abandoning us and the prediction that Conservatives will sit out will occur and he may not make up enough numbers to overcome the ones that sit out AND THE ONES A.C.O.R.N. MAKES UP FOR THE OTHER SIDE!!!! If Rubio steps up and puts forth such a stellar campaign so-as to not be denied the Crist-first (not me, I only advocate reluctantly because of how &#8220;I&#8221; see/analyze the race) must stand beside Rubio (or if some other more-prominent Conservative steps up)&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cwilson</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/05/13/not-one-dime-to-the-nrsc/#comment-23553</link>
		<dc:creator>cwilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 01:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=2017#comment-23553</guid>
		<description>The FL State GOP, in the person of Chairman Greer, has just tried to &lt;a&gt;Rule 11&lt;/a&gt; Rubio. In other words, because of the "significant support" that Crist has already garnered, we don't need a divisive primary. So they just won't hold one.

I'm gobsmacked that we even have such a rule.

Fortunately, the effort has failed -- thanks to the courageous vote of one woman (Sharon Day) who, while supporting Crist, is honest enough to state on the record "We have a process and it allows the voters to choose the candidate -- and that's called a primary."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The FL State GOP, in the person of Chairman Greer, has just tried to <a>Rule 11</a> Rubio. In other words, because of the &#8220;significant support&#8221; that Crist has already garnered, we don&#8217;t need a divisive primary. So they just won&#8217;t hold one.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m gobsmacked that we even have such a rule.</p>
<p>Fortunately, the effort has failed &#8212; thanks to the courageous vote of one woman (Sharon Day) who, while supporting Crist, is honest enough to state on the record &#8220;We have a process and it allows the voters to choose the candidate &#8212; and that&#8217;s called a primary.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sbowers3</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/05/13/not-one-dime-to-the-nrsc/#comment-23537</link>
		<dc:creator>sbowers3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 18:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=2017#comment-23537</guid>
		<description>&#62;You know, I can slightly understand the NRSC getting into the Chaffee race, though it was a stupid waste and mismanagement of funds.

&#62;I can kind of understand them getting behind Specter. Both he and Chaffee were incumbents.

It's barely understandable that the NRSC supported them in the general election but they should never have supported them in the primaries. Now, of course, both are Democrats.

The NRSC not only betrayed Republican principles, they angered many of their base. Stupid. And now apparently, they are doing it again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;You know, I can slightly understand the NRSC getting into the Chaffee race, though it was a stupid waste and mismanagement of funds.</p>
<p>&gt;I can kind of understand them getting behind Specter. Both he and Chaffee were incumbents.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s barely understandable that the NRSC supported them in the general election but they should never have supported them in the primaries. Now, of course, both are Democrats.</p>
<p>The NRSC not only betrayed Republican principles, they angered many of their base. Stupid. And now apparently, they are doing it again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SE-779</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/05/13/not-one-dime-to-the-nrsc/#comment-23382</link>
		<dc:creator>SE-779</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 13:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=2017#comment-23382</guid>
		<description>These guys need to get their principles straight. Crist is a RINO, Rubio is a true Conservative. Crist is a Tax-and-spend Obama Liberal, Rubio is not. Rubio would fight these unfair policies that the Obama Administration is jamming down our throats, while Crist would be an Obama Administration rubber stamp. Need I say more? Rubio is the better choice by far. Don't send a dime to the NRSC until they get their principles straight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These guys need to get their principles straight. Crist is a RINO, Rubio is a true Conservative. Crist is a Tax-and-spend Obama Liberal, Rubio is not. Rubio would fight these unfair policies that the Obama Administration is jamming down our throats, while Crist would be an Obama Administration rubber stamp. Need I say more? Rubio is the better choice by far. Don&#8217;t send a dime to the NRSC until they get their principles straight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flagstaff</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/05/13/not-one-dime-to-the-nrsc/#comment-23286</link>
		<dc:creator>Flagstaff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 19:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=2017#comment-23286</guid>
		<description>for Redstate to take.

I believe it's a first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for Redstate to take.</p>
<p>I believe it&#8217;s a first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Achance</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/05/13/not-one-dime-to-the-nrsc/#comment-23285</link>
		<dc:creator>Achance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 16:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=2017#comment-23285</guid>
		<description>with no political cred to buy an election.  However, an incumbent just buys up the party establishment back home and the people just come along, or enough of them do anyway.  They rarely get primary opposition beyond the Name ID run by somebody who just wants to get out there, and then it becomes a money contest in the General with the Democrat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>with no political cred to buy an election.  However, an incumbent just buys up the party establishment back home and the people just come along, or enough of them do anyway.  They rarely get primary opposition beyond the Name ID run by somebody who just wants to get out there, and then it becomes a money contest in the General with the Democrat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IJB</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/05/13/not-one-dime-to-the-nrsc/#comment-23282</link>
		<dc:creator>IJB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 16:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=2017#comment-23282</guid>
		<description>...It's only true in so far as it goes. 

All the money in the world doesn't necessarily buy you votes. Money does not guarantee electoral wins - we've seen that time and again, where the "rich" candidate goes down to ignominious defeat because they're too tied up with Washington and lobbyists and the Congressional leadership. 

If we can take a few of these incumbents down in primaries in 2010, the leadership will quickly change their tune and realize that they do, in fact, *need* us. 

Them, OTOH, *we* DON'T need. It's time we made that clear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;It&#8217;s only true in so far as it goes. </p>
<p>All the money in the world doesn&#8217;t necessarily buy you votes. Money does not guarantee electoral wins - we&#8217;ve seen that time and again, where the &#8220;rich&#8221; candidate goes down to ignominious defeat because they&#8217;re too tied up with Washington and lobbyists and the Congressional leadership. </p>
<p>If we can take a few of these incumbents down in primaries in 2010, the leadership will quickly change their tune and realize that they do, in fact, *need* us. </p>
<p>Them, OTOH, *we* DON&#8217;T need. It&#8217;s time we made that clear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Princeliberty</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/05/13/not-one-dime-to-the-nrsc/#comment-23280</link>
		<dc:creator>Princeliberty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 15:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=2017#comment-23280</guid>
		<description>Bush Sr. did not bring Reagan a single extra vote in 1980.

While Kemp would have helped him with minorities and helped Reagan fight the "hostile to minorities" smear that also cost him some moderate voters.

So Bush Sr. as VP was a mistake all the way.

Think of the idiots the leadership has shoved down our throats in Governor, Senator and Congressional races over the last 20 years.

That's why we now have almost nobody worth a spit in Congress.

Just a bunch of puppets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush Sr. did not bring Reagan a single extra vote in 1980.</p>
<p>While Kemp would have helped him with minorities and helped Reagan fight the &#8220;hostile to minorities&#8221; smear that also cost him some moderate voters.</p>
<p>So Bush Sr. as VP was a mistake all the way.</p>
<p>Think of the idiots the leadership has shoved down our throats in Governor, Senator and Congressional races over the last 20 years.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why we now have almost nobody worth a spit in Congress.</p>
<p>Just a bunch of puppets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Princeliberty</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/05/13/not-one-dime-to-the-nrsc/#comment-23281</link>
		<dc:creator>Princeliberty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 15:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=2017#comment-23281</guid>
		<description>Bush Sr. did not bring Reagan a single extra vote in 1980.

While Kemp would have helped him with minorities and helped Reagan fight the "hostile to minorities" smear that also cost him some moderate voters.

So Bush Sr. as VP was a mistake all the way.

Think of the idiots the leadership has shoved down our throats in Governor, Senator and Congressional races over the last 20 years.

That's why we now have almost nobody worth a spit in Congress.

Just a bunch of puppets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush Sr. did not bring Reagan a single extra vote in 1980.</p>
<p>While Kemp would have helped him with minorities and helped Reagan fight the &#8220;hostile to minorities&#8221; smear that also cost him some moderate voters.</p>
<p>So Bush Sr. as VP was a mistake all the way.</p>
<p>Think of the idiots the leadership has shoved down our throats in Governor, Senator and Congressional races over the last 20 years.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why we now have almost nobody worth a spit in Congress.</p>
<p>Just a bunch of puppets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jburr</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/05/13/not-one-dime-to-the-nrsc/#comment-23279</link>
		<dc:creator>jburr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 15:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=2017#comment-23279</guid>
		<description>How many times has one super bowl team run the plays the other Super Bowl team tells them to run.  What about the World Series, does the pitcher normally throw the pitch the batter tells him to throw because it gives the pitcher a better chance to get the batter out.  It doesn't make any sense does it?  

So why would we listen to what the liberals and the RINO's are telling us to do?  They are both saying the same thing, the republicans are dead unless they move to the center.  When in the history of this country have liberals wanted anything from the conservative movement other than our utter failure.  So what has changed? The answer is nothing.  

If they thought that conservative thoughts would destroy the Republican Party, common sense would tell you that they should encourage us to keep talking, yet they are telling us to shut up.  Why???  

It is easy, they are threatened by conservative thoughts.  Moderates do not scare them because they believe in the same thing.  Republicans should support Conservatives not Liberals dressed as Conservatives.  I would rather lose the battle fighting on the right side than win the battle by becoming what I am fighting against.  The simple truth is that your moral foundation does matter, so don't compromise it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many times has one super bowl team run the plays the other Super Bowl team tells them to run.  What about the World Series, does the pitcher normally throw the pitch the batter tells him to throw because it gives the pitcher a better chance to get the batter out.  It doesn&#8217;t make any sense does it?  </p>
<p>So why would we listen to what the liberals and the RINO&#8217;s are telling us to do?  They are both saying the same thing, the republicans are dead unless they move to the center.  When in the history of this country have liberals wanted anything from the conservative movement other than our utter failure.  So what has changed? The answer is nothing.  </p>
<p>If they thought that conservative thoughts would destroy the Republican Party, common sense would tell you that they should encourage us to keep talking, yet they are telling us to shut up.  Why???  </p>
<p>It is easy, they are threatened by conservative thoughts.  Moderates do not scare them because they believe in the same thing.  Republicans should support Conservatives not Liberals dressed as Conservatives.  I would rather lose the battle fighting on the right side than win the battle by becoming what I am fighting against.  The simple truth is that your moral foundation does matter, so don&#8217;t compromise it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jburr</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/05/13/not-one-dime-to-the-nrsc/#comment-23277</link>
		<dc:creator>jburr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 15:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=2017#comment-23277</guid>
		<description>How many times has one super bowl team run the plays the other Super Bowl team tells them to run?  What about the World Series, does the pitcher normally throw the pitch the batter tells him to throw because it gives the pitcher a better chance to get the batter out.  It doesn't make any sense does it? 

So why would we listen to what the liberals and the RINO's are telling us to do?  They are both saying the same thing, the republicans are dead unless they move to the center.  When in the history of this country have liberals wanted anything from the conservative movement other than our utter failure?So what has changed? The answer is nothing.  If they believed that conservative thoughts would destroy the Republican Party, common sense would tell you that they should encourage us to keep talking, yet they are telling us to shut up.  Why???  

It is easy, they are threatened by conservative thoughts.  Moderates do not scare them because they believe in the same thing.  Republicans should support Conservatives not Liberals dressed as Conservatives.  I would rather lose the battle fighting on the right side than win the battle by becoming what I am fighting against.  The simple truth is that your moral foundation does matter, so don't compromise it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many times has one super bowl team run the plays the other Super Bowl team tells them to run?  What about the World Series, does the pitcher normally throw the pitch the batter tells him to throw because it gives the pitcher a better chance to get the batter out.  It doesn&#8217;t make any sense does it? </p>
<p>So why would we listen to what the liberals and the RINO&#8217;s are telling us to do?  They are both saying the same thing, the republicans are dead unless they move to the center.  When in the history of this country have liberals wanted anything from the conservative movement other than our utter failure?So what has changed? The answer is nothing.  If they believed that conservative thoughts would destroy the Republican Party, common sense would tell you that they should encourage us to keep talking, yet they are telling us to shut up.  Why???  </p>
<p>It is easy, they are threatened by conservative thoughts.  Moderates do not scare them because they believe in the same thing.  Republicans should support Conservatives not Liberals dressed as Conservatives.  I would rather lose the battle fighting on the right side than win the battle by becoming what I am fighting against.  The simple truth is that your moral foundation does matter, so don&#8217;t compromise it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kyle8</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/05/13/not-one-dime-to-the-nrsc/#comment-23276</link>
		<dc:creator>kyle8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 15:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=2017#comment-23276</guid>
		<description>He could have beat Carter just as easily with Jack Kemp instead of GHW Bush as a running mate. 

Just think how much different history would be without the Bush's screwing up conservatism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He could have beat Carter just as easily with Jack Kemp instead of GHW Bush as a running mate. </p>
<p>Just think how much different history would be without the Bush&#8217;s screwing up conservatism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Gardner</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/05/13/not-one-dime-to-the-nrsc/#comment-23275</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 15:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=2017#comment-23275</guid>
		<description>I joined.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I joined.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Princeliberty</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/05/13/not-one-dime-to-the-nrsc/#comment-23272</link>
		<dc:creator>Princeliberty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 15:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=2017#comment-23272</guid>
		<description>The Republican elite in D.C. has held the party's base in contempt for a long time.

Hopefully, the base is finally waking up and will take down the leadership.

Frankly,  I think it goes all the way back to when the Republican party made the big mistake of running Bush Sr. in 88 instead of Jack Kemp.

The party made a big wrong turn from which is has never righted itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Republican elite in D.C. has held the party&#8217;s base in contempt for a long time.</p>
<p>Hopefully, the base is finally waking up and will take down the leadership.</p>
<p>Frankly,  I think it goes all the way back to when the Republican party made the big mistake of running Bush Sr. in 88 instead of Jack Kemp.</p>
<p>The party made a big wrong turn from which is has never righted itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Princeliberty</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/05/13/not-one-dime-to-the-nrsc/#comment-23273</link>
		<dc:creator>Princeliberty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 15:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=2017#comment-23273</guid>
		<description>The Republican elite in D.C. has held the party's base in contempt for a long time.

Hopefully, the base is finally waking up and will take down the leadership.

Frankly,  I think it goes all the way back to when the Republican party made the big mistake of running Bush Sr. in 88 instead of Jack Kemp.

The party made a big wrong turn from which is has never righted itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Republican elite in D.C. has held the party&#8217;s base in contempt for a long time.</p>
<p>Hopefully, the base is finally waking up and will take down the leadership.</p>
<p>Frankly,  I think it goes all the way back to when the Republican party made the big mistake of running Bush Sr. in 88 instead of Jack Kemp.</p>
<p>The party made a big wrong turn from which is has never righted itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kyle8</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/05/13/not-one-dime-to-the-nrsc/#comment-23274</link>
		<dc:creator>kyle8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 15:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=2017#comment-23274</guid>
		<description>elaborate</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>elaborate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Gardner</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/05/13/not-one-dime-to-the-nrsc/#comment-23271</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 15:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=2017#comment-23271</guid>
		<description>and I have joined the FB group.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and I have joined the FB group.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
