« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

Mitch McConnell Signals the GOP Will Do Nothing Against Sotomayor

He Wants Us to Believe Mediocrity is a Sign of Success

One must wonder what Mitch McConnell paid or did to have the Washington Post’s Perry Bacon, Jr. write this total fluff piece on Mitch McConnell.

When he was fighting campaign finance reform a decade ago,  Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) was dubbed Darth Vader by his critics. He embraced the nickname, even announcing “Darth Vader has arrived” at a news conference.

Well, when the article starts out with a gross distortion of the facts, we can only conclude that McConnell is desperate to hang on to power and distract from his failures as the Senate Republican Leader.

What gross distortion?

“Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) was dubbed Darth Vader by his critics,” writes Perry Bacon, Jr. today.

“The Kentucky curmudgeon who dubbed himself the Darth Vader of campaign-finance reform is whipped, and he knows it,” wrote Jonathan Alter in Newsweek on April 9, 2001.

“Sen. Mitch McConnell, the Kentucky Republican who aptly describes himself as the “Darth Vader” of the campaign finance debate,” wrote the Kansas City Star on April 8, 2001.

“The antipathy is well known between Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), the self-described Darth Vader of campaign finance reform, and Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), who recently likened his presidential campaign to the adventures of Luke Skywalker,” wrote Mary Lynn Jones in the Hill on February 16, 2000.

Yes, Common Cause gave Mitch McConnell the designation once, but it says more about McConnell that he had to embrace and recycle the nickname for anyone to pick it up and use it “against” him.

Now Perry Bacon, Jr. in his fluff piece, recycles it to make McConnell seem more than the limp wristed leader he has been lately.

McConnell has persuaded his Senate colleagues to pick targeted, potentially winnable fights against the Democrats, such as the party’s current push to make sure health-care reform does not include a government-run insurance option.

In other words, McConnell does not want the GOP to make much of a show on Sotomayor. You don’t have to read the rest of the article to understand why this article is even showing up.

If you will remember from a few weeks ago, Manny Miranda, who heads an organization of conservatives who are organized to help defeat the Sotomayor nomination, sent Mitch McConnell a letter demanding the GOP not kowtow to Obama on the nomination.

A staffer for McConnell attended the Grover Norquist Wednesday meeting, an off the record meeting, and took that information back to McConnell’s leadership office where it makes it into the Politico. In the process, McConnell felt the need to bash Miranda — a loyal conservative activist.

McConnell helped orchestrate one of the Republicans’ most convincing victories of the year: a 90 to 6 vote rejecting Obama’s plan to start closing the military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and to move some of the detainees to U.S. soil. McConnell delivered the same speech on the Senate floor day after day during April and May, attacking the proposal and saying Obama had no idea how to implement it.

In other words, a majority of Democrats supported the same proposal — some Republican victory.

The longtime senator, elected in 1984, has actively recruited moderate candidates, such as Gov. Charlie Crist of Florida, even though McConnell himself is one of the Senate’s most conservative members. He has repeatedly warned that the party must be tolerant of those who might hold more liberal views on some issues.

Here’s the catch — McConnell votes on all the socially conservative issues if they make it to the floor. But if you ask the conservative Senators, they will tell you that McConnell’s staff works overtime making sure conservative issues never make it to the floor. Likewise, McConnel, at every opportunity, works to undermine fiscal conservatives. With the exception of tax cuts, McConnell does not just not care, he actively works to undermine the issues.

McConnell portrays himself as an ally of the president when he agrees with him, such as Obama’s strategy for the war in Afghanistan, but he doesn’t mind being cast as an obstructionist, as he was a decade ago.

And there you have it — if you like Mitch McConnell, it is because you like his support of the war. And you probably, like me, remember him fondly from the campaign finance reform battle. But he lost that one.

And while McConnell has been leader of the Senate GOP, we’ve gone from 55 seats to 40 seats.

But that’s okay, McConnell is, in his mind, Darth Vader — the man who oversaw the loss of two Death Stars and in the end betrayed his own side.

COMMENTS

  • Mike gamecock DeVine

    McConnell picks and chooses an occasional, winnable battle.

    Obama wins more battles because he fights in more battles.

    McConnell’s strategy doesn’t understand the educational impact of losing battles over time. To lose the battle but clarify positions so that when the results of the Dems’ wins are clearly seen, is how you can win over more voters, but McConnell’s strategy leaves us having to constantly re-invent the wheel and re-educate.

  • ashevillelib

    Maybe it would help if McConnell understood better what happened to Vader. At least McCain was a little more idealistic in his hero association, however misguided.

  • NeoKong

    Like warm jello.

    And while McConnell has been leader of the Senate GOP, we?ve gone from 55 seats to 40 seats.

    I think it is time to admit that the strategy of squishiness is not working. If McConnell keeps doing his job the way he has been we will be down to just thirty seats in no time.

    Compromise=failure.

  • Kyle-MI

    There is absolutely no reason for any Republican to support any of Obama’s agenda or judges. The Dems control the White House and both houses of congress. If Obama and the Dems succeed they will give no credit to the Reps whether our guys vote for or against any bill or nominee. It is more likely that Sotomayor will end up with a judicial activist voting record. It is also likely that no matter how many Reps vote for her, Dems and liberal Hispanics will run ads against Reps accusing them of hating all Hispanics.

  • Mike gamecock DeVine

    if they are nominated by a democrat, even more so that their judicial record, since they must follow precedent.

  • eburke

    to send him some cash last fall (a fool and him money and all that) along with a letter constructed around the ‘not one thin dime for squishes’ meme that I sent to the NRSC.

    What a putz!

  • Maggie_in_Indiana

    there’s always been something that keeps from supporting him wholeheartedly. When not if we take the senate back a new majority leader should rise as well.

  • http://edwardcropper.blogspot.com/ edward_cropper

    This wimp from Kentucky is disgrace to his state and the Senate.
    He has always been a butt kisser and compromising fink.
    There are not 10 Republicans with real back bones in the entire Senate.
    I recently attended the viewing of an outstanding genuinely honest Republican office holder who had passed away. There were a number of other politicos and party lackeys in the line who didn’t have a clue who I was. They were spewing the same old spineless political BS that is common place among this ilk. Suggesting devious ways to replace the deceased with some party hack who could be handled.
    Scruples be damned let’s keep the good old boy system regardless

  • Mike gamecock DeVine
  • ColdWarrior

    And of course, in my humble opinion, our “steel-spined, courageous” (sarcasm) Republican contingent in the House and Senate have no reason to oppose everything. That’s because as long as there is no dramatic surge of conservatives joing the Party at the grassroots level as precinct committeemen, there is no reason for them not to be spineless. If the complexion of the Party turns more conservative, they will then fear primary challenges and will fear havng the leadership of the Party change. They will not and do not fear that now, and I surmise they certainly don’t fear anything written here. It also does not appear the tea parties had any effect on them. Tea partiers don’t vote for the Party leadership. Unless they happen to be precinct committeemen.

    Conservatives can sit back and cross their fingers and hope that the American people will right everything at the polls in 2010 and then 2012. Or they can make a difference now by voting with their feet, so to speak, by taking a break from their TV and keyboard and trotting down to their local Republican legislative district organization meeting and announcing they want to join the Party, now, as a precinct committeeman (to be appointed now and then elected in the primary election in 2010).

    Maybe we can just hope that our fearless Republican public servants in the Congress will all have an eipiphany, caused by the status quo, and see that if they were to oppose everything Obama is doing, and explain they are doing it for the good of the American people and explained they were on their side, not Obama’s side, they could win big in 2010.

    And maybe not.

    Thank you.

  • http://www.ssce.net/Web-Articles/Web-articles-indexed-authors.html#authors-l JLenardDetroit