Explaining Obamacare Via Legos


Praise Mitt Romney. Three years ago, the former Massachusetts Governor had the inadvertent good sense to create the “universal” health-care program that the White House and Congress now want to inflict on the entire country. It is proving to be instructive, as Mr. Romney’s foresight previews what President Obama, Max Baucus, Ted Kennedy and Pete Stark are cooking up for everyone else.

Wall Street Journal, March 27, 2009

Category: ,

RSS feed | Trackback URI

10 Comments Leave a comment

Clever, illustrative, and tasteful. nt

Xasteius Tuesday, July 7th at 10:34AM EDT (link)

Don’t leave the party, hijack it back!

Eternal vigilance is the price of freedom.

When I grow up, I don’t want to be Reagan. I want to be Art Chance.
~Aaron Gardner

 

Count me out on Socialized Health

JHancock Tuesday, July 7th at 10:47AM EDT (link)

I’m a Medical Student that won’t be accepting the government plan in my practice. I’d rather work 2 days a week for “boutique” patient’s that actually pay for my time and expertise. I’ll take up real-estate or consulting in my remaining time to make ends meet, or I’ll practice medicine in another country where I will get paid for my work.

you think you'll be allowed to opt out?

bags64 Tuesday, July 7th at 11:01AM EDT (link)

honestly?

i imagine gaining access to a hospital will be next-to-impossible for your patients unless you ‘opt in’?

Best of luck, and I wish you will in your endeavors.

 
 

So explain to me why again

mustango Tuesday, July 7th at 11:08AM EDT (link)

that this same Mitt Romney remains a leading candidate for the GOP nomination in 2012?

I mean, yes, I get that Romney is a fine fiscal conservative, and, of the final three for the GOP in 2008, he was in fact my choice, but if we’re in a mode of finding reasons to disqualify candidates why doesn’t this destroy his prospects?

In my book it does

JHancock Friday, July 10th at 11:36PM EDT (link)

we can’t have socalism to this degree anywhere in our economy, especially the 20% that is health care. In my home city of Denver, Healthcare represents the largest source of high paying jobs (>80K), our economy would really go in the toilet if this was cut to 40K

 
 

Federalism

cbs Tuesday, July 7th at 1:34PM EDT (link)

I have no problem with Massachusetts trying (and apparently failing) to run a statewide version of socialized medicine. It limits the reach and can be an instructive case study for other states.

Likewise, I do not fault Romney for attempting this in Mass. It fits the states political proclivities. I would have a huge problem if he tried promoting this at the federal level.

Let’s not be fair-weather federalists. Part of that is allowing states to try bad policies. That’s often the best way for us to demonstrate they are bad policies.

 

Romney did indeed

kowalski Tuesday, July 7th at 4:30PM EDT (link)

Romney did indeed give the rest of the country a perfect example of what not to do.

I will say as a caveat for Romney that he didn’t have much choice in the matter himself. However his ongoing support for MassHealth during the campaign is pretty damaging. It’s a debacle here in MA and I was one of the early adopters (and one of the people who still have to adopt it).

MassHealth is like Windows Vista in that sense: the marketing campaign sounded super, and right up until you can’t boot from the licensed DVDs, you think it’s fantastic.

In reality it has actually been counterproductive, more expensive, more bureaucratic, less flexible, less intelligent, and more unfree than the alternatives. I live here and I know a lot of people share that view, several years into The Plan.

On one level, just speaking electorally, Romney is going to have to disavow his involvement with MassHealth if he expects to get elected to anything. It will be another in a long and unsuccessful series of attempts to convince people that he’s sincere. Maybe someone can help rehabilitate him, who knows?

MassHealth Might Have Worked

kowalski Tuesday, July 7th at 4:34PM EDT (link)

MassHealth might have worked if the rest of the state was conservative, but it isn’t: the doctors aren’t, the lawyers aren’t, the patients aren’t, and the illegal immigrants certainly aren’t. So what it becomes is a guaranteed way to spend waste tremendous amounts of money.

kowalski, and...

DONTREADONME Tuesday, July 7th at 5:13PM EDT (link)

if the people of MassHealth were not forced to have to get health insurance. Making everyone have health insurance only allowed the insurance companies to act like monopolies and not compete aggressively in a free market. With car insurance you do not have to get it because you do not necessarily have to have a car.

BTW 5555555, to everything else you pointed too.

“The UN is right? you can’t be any more “un”; Than you are right now, the UN is undone, Another mushroom cloud, another smoking gun, The threat is real, the Locust King has come, Don’t tell me the truth; I don’t like what they’ve done, Just give me ammo for the United Abominations”-Megadeth

 
 
 

I have a theory...

kowalski Tuesday, July 7th at 4:40PM EDT (link)

I have a theory that Universal Health Care is only viable in a Conservative society:

1) One in which people value work more than taking off work
2) One in which people don’t sue preemptively
3) One in which people take care of their own health and are reluctant to spend public money.
4) One in which people don’t try actively to cheat the system

Massachusetts fails all four of those tests and that’s one of the reasons the MassHealth plan is useless here. It’s a liberal state, full of liberal people, who think money grows on trees.

 

Leave a Comment

 

Be respectful, or be banned. No Profanity.