So why are the taxpayers paying for ACORN, why did BO send his lawyers from the New Party to challenge alll of those signatures when BO first ran for office. Why did BOs minons try to subvert all of the Dem cacuses in the Primaries by take the Captians jobs and delaying the votes until late in the night/wee hours of the morning before calling for a vote, you know after all of those working Hillary supporters had go home (reports for Texas)

Never mind, I know, BO is ‘The One’ so he can do whatever he wants.

I really am tough enough to tolerate this guy for a couple years, if he wasn’t such a moron…that’s right, I said it..

I don’t want to hear any complaining when Barry goes on vacation….I don’t care, spend lots of money, just go on LOTS of vacations and stay out of World affairs…you’re doin it Wrong!

The rule of the majority (democracy) versus the rule of Law (constitutionalism). We know the founding fathers preferred the rule of law, but I guess Obama disagrees.

No matter that a democratically elected leader violates the law, the constitution, and thus the rights of the people, Obama believes such a leader should remain in power.

I don’t think most of us here at Redstate are surprised by his preference, but what must be at least ironic for his fellow African Americans is that he apparently is espousing a position that the majority ought to rule - the rights of others (minorities) be damned.

That could possibly make sense of Obama’s foreign policy on such issues is that he is trying to keep the leadership of pretty much all countries static, so that he won’t have to deal with uncertainty, or with the loss of his efforts at personal overtures that would result from new leadership. Pretty stupid foreign policy, if you ask me, but it’s the only thing that explains why the President would be so committed to keeping anti-American regimes in power on a fraudulent basis. Of course, it could be that his initial prognosis was wrong, and that he’s too arrogant to admit that it was. At any rate, foreign policy under Obama is a wreck so far, unfortunately.

And to give the devil her due, she is loyal, something Obama and those of his ilk cannot understand.

Please continue to keep this one front and cener, Erick. It has defined Obama and what passes for his foreign policy.

Universal principles versus state sovereignty. So much for our first African American president being an advocate for diversity or self-determination.

I am outraged, but not surprised, about Obama’s take on the Honduran issue. He’s siding with Zelaya, because he zelaya too.
Seriously, though, Obama knows that someday his charm is going to wear off, and the Press is going to wake up with a huge hangover.
Someone will finally run the story about how dual citizenship actually precludes a Natural Born status (who knew???), and how that makes him a usurper.
You don’t unelect usurpers. You don’t impeach usurpers. You lawfully remove them by force, and throw them in prison.
Obama sees his future in Zelaya, and he is afraid.

My daughter is on a mission trip in Guetemala until she comes home Sunday. It seems the military police are on a high state of alert. Would Chavez invade Honduras thru Guatemala? Does anyone know the history there?