« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

Dear Senator Mike Enzi and Heritage Foundation: Shut Up. [updated]

[updated]: As if on cue, Stuart Butler from the Heritage Foundation, has decided to take issue with Sarah Palin’s use of the phrase “death panels.” Butler is defending Ezekiel Emanuel, Rahm’s brother, who has written that we need not guarantee healthcare benefits to people with dementia because they cannot be full participants in the body politic.

Emanuel’s actual quote: “[S]ervices provided to individuals who are irreversibly prevented from being or becoming participating citizens [in the body politic] are not basic and should not be guaranteed. An obvious example is not guaranteeing health services to patients with dementia.”

Butler is defending Emanuel and attacking Palin at the precise moment the Democrats are in full scale retreat on the issue because of Palin’s offensive. Sigh. These guys have the political instincts of amoebas. They cannot afford to hide behind being policy guys. That policy plays hand in hand with politics and political instincts must be brought to bear in this fight. If they cannot or will not, Heritage must shut these guys up before they cause great damage in the fight.

——————–

Because I am a big fan and come from a family of donors to the Heritage Foundation, I take no pleasure at all in writing this post. But this must be said.

The Heritage Foundation, which played a vital part in building conservative support for Romneycare in Massachusetts, is setting the stage for Republican capitulation on healthcare. This is the second time in less than a year that Heritage will have been instrumental in organizing a conservative collapse in opposition to big government. The first time was when Heritage gave conservatives cover to support TARP, calling it “vital and acceptable.”

Now with healthcare, because Heritage is trying to be “helpful”, confusion is starting to crop up among Republicans in Congress at a very critical time in the healthcare debate. Capitulation and compromise are now on the table using a bastardized version of a Heritage proposal.

[Editor's Note: It appears the Hill totally misread or misunderstood Congressman Price and I'm fixing throughout below. CNN has a more accurate description, according to Price's office, and have made changes below to correct the impression that Congressman Price was supportive of the cooperatives idea.]

Today, Congressman Tom Price rejected the possibility that he would support healthcare cooperatives as a compromise on reform.

Unlike Congressman Price, many on the Hill are following all of Heritage’s talking points. Because I can’t seem to get Heritage to realize just how badly it is about to shoot conservatives in the foot, I must endeavor to get Senator Mike Enzi (R-WY) to shut up.

Congressman Price, in talking about cooperatives,noted that

“The specifics of including a co-op are murky at best,” Price said in a statement. “Patients should be wary of a wolf in sheep’s clothing. A co-op that is simply another name for a public option, or government-run plan, will be rejected by the American people.”

Senator Enzi, on the other hand, is giving full throated support to cooperatives.

Enzi supports health insurance cooperatives, an idea proposed by Sen. Kent Conrad, D-N.D.

Enzi said they are very similar to the small business health plans he proposed several years ago, which would allow small businesses to pool together across state lines and even nationwide to effectively negotiate for lower insurance costs.

“That is something I am still pushing for,” Enzi said. “Small business health plans are one way of increasing choices. Co-ops will increase choice.

The problem here is two-fold and it comes back to the Heritage Foundation’s healthcare experts attempting to be helpful. By throwing untested cooperatives out as an idea, the Heritage Foundation gave an option to Democrats struggling to keep their “reforms” from sinking.

The Democrats have latched on to cooperatives as their fallback with useful idiots like Enzi on board. After all, Enzi’s logic goes, Heritage likes them so they must be okay and conservative.

But they are not. Why? Because as Congressman Price noted, they are “a wolf in sheep’s clothing.”

Last night on Fox, Senator Jim DeMint (R-SC) said any senator voting for the Democrats’ co-op proposal should be voted out of office, regardless of party. He’s right. But I hope he recognizes what has happened because of Heritage.

The Democrat proposal is nothing like what Heritage suggested, just with bits and pieces from Heritage’s proposal thrown in so people like Enzi have something to vote for. But as we’ve already noted at RedState, the co-op proposal right now will not foster competition, it will just insert the government referee into the health insurance business in competition with private insurers. And private business cannot compete with a business run on taxpayer dollars that also gets the set the rules for everyone else to follow.

The Heritage Foundation was instrumental in getting RomneyCare passed in Massachusetts. Because the program had Heritage’s blessing, it gave conservatives cover to support it. The plan is now sinking the Massachusetts budget. Why? Because all legislation is part of a series of compromises. Heritage laid a foundation onto which special interests and others could add heaping piles of dung — all the while with Heritage’s imprimatur on the plan. Now the dung heap that is RomneyCare, as passed by the Democrats in the Massachusetts General Assembly is a stinking, flaming pile of budgetary pooh.

You would think the fine folks working on healthcare at Heritage would have learned their lesson. But they haven’t. They have now waded in with healthcare cooperatives. When Democrats mark up the legislation and alter Heritage’s plan, they can still point to Heritage, comfort people like Mike Enzi, and put us on the road to socialized healthcare.

Even Harry Reid is using the lingo:

“We’re going to have some type of public option, call it ‘co-op’, call it what you want,” Reid said, adding that Democrats are working on “some verison of a co-op that may satisfy everyone.”

Meanwhile, Mike Enzi, the Heritage Foundation, and many, many others will be left trying to explain in sound bite form how not all cooperatives are equal.

So Mike Enzi: shut up. You too Heritage. I value your contribution, but trying to helpful in a debate where it is clear what Democrats really want just sets you up to be used and abused. You should have seen this coming and your judgment must be suspect on this as a result.

Call Mike Enzi today and tell him to oppose healthcare cooperatives. His number is (202) 224-3424. Chuck Grassley, who has also been muddying the waters on co-ops can be reached at (202) 224-3744. Senator Grassley, however, has backed off some of the rhetoric. Thank goodness. Now we need Enzi to do so.

The Heritage Foundation is a profoundly good organization. I have many friends there. I hate to ding them for this. But this must be said. Their continued push for cooperatives at this time muddies water, confuses congressmen, and plays right into the hands of Democrats eager for a new talking point to sell a government healthcare option.

COMMENTS

  • Scott Mustian

    It must be said Erick … well put. When will conservatives understand that compromising on their principles means they don’t really stand on those principles? When will they learn there is NEVER enough government to satisfy the liberals. They will take any victory and build on it for the next battle. You have to oppose government expansion every single time.

    In my lifetime I have only seen big government somewhat reversed once with welfare reform that was passed in 1996. The Democrats wiped that clean in the stimulus bill the minute they had the majority. Does anyone have the slightest doubt that the “planned failure” of co-ops would simply generate the next push for further government involvement?

  • Alphonso

    Why is it when the American people may be on the threshold of stopping government-controlled healthcare that the likes of Enzi, Price and the folks at Heritage decide to muddy the waters with their siren song of healthcare cooperatives? This kind of foolishness and treachery can only dishearten and demoralize those who have worked so hard to keep the government from growing and further controlling their lives. With opposition demoralized, unsure of the people they trusted to aid in the cause against monster government, the statists can go ahead and push through their takeover, whatever the sophists in ourr midst end up calling it.

    Dr. Botkin

  • dudette

    I can’t trust anything that has a govnerment influence so good bye t coops though a coop gave me the best health insrance with a small company i ever had bt that as 20 years ago. And with this heavy handed congress/admin, i have no doubt that they will stick back the govt whip hand in conference.

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    If Republican Senators and Congressmen sign onto this bill after all the grassroots opposition, they can kiss the 2010 elections goodbye.

  • tahdeetz

    Rush & Sean should immediately set Heritage straight on this issue.

    Rush has said from day one, any national healthcare would be ‘game-over.’

    I suggest that Erick write them both with an open letter & remind them that capitulation on Coops is the same thing as full-on obamacare.

    The devil will be in the details & a path for an eventual government takeover will be in there.

    That is their aim, nothing less.

  • Old_Crow

    Just another private non-profit government sponsored entity that will soak up billions of taxpayers money.

    Fannie Mae, Freddy Mac, Healthcare Cooperatives… EPIC FAIL

    Big government – just say no.

  • http://www.fredsnews.com Fred Maidment

    …We’ve switched from the German and Italian style of economic fascism to the Chinese style of communism (or rather, state capitalism).

    Got it.

    The system you describe, state-owned businesses set up by region that also act as regulators and investigators, is precisely how the Chinese economy operates. Frequently, successful private businesses are forced to sell out to the government (or consumed by fiat). Often this is done when the owner does not want to sell. The Chinese have variously used regulatory investigations to bankrupt these companies, gotten court orders to take them over, or used their regulatory powers and government coffers to run them out of business.

    Not just the wrong move for America, but increasingly, the wrong system for China.

  • http://www.werushdaily.com Steve Baetz

    … and to that point, I find it shocking that Heritage doesn’t even mention this (they may have but I haven’t seen it anywhere)… and again, the only one’s referring to this fundamental point are the opposition at the Town Hall meetings… you hear at least one reference to it at just about every meeting… Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-6th MN) is the only one so far that I’ve heard make a point of this in just about every floor debate.

    What is this fundamental point? How about there is nowhere in the US Constitution that gives this authority to the Federal Government. NO WHERE! And if someone brings up the “General Welfare” clause, you would be in error.. the General Welfare clause is a preamble to the actual Enumerated Powers granted TO the Federal Government by the states to define its authority. Beyond those powers the Fed is operating illegally.

    If anything Heritage should be shouting this point from the mountain tops, not trying to help the socialists usurp Constitutional power from the people.

    Sounds to me like their are a few Republicans, et. al. (its lost on Democrats already) ought to read those little pocket Constitution books sometime rather than using it as a prop and taking up lint space in their jacket pockets…

    To those in Congress, I recommend taking the time to read it… the reading room at the end of the hall with the porcelain chair should be a good place to concentrate on this… after all, you do the same task on the House and Senate Floors everyday.

  • penguin2

    I was wondering why the Heritage Foundation seemed like they were supporting co-ops and thus looked like they could be in favor of this bill. Many conservatives go to that site looking for answers and direction. I hear them promoted by Hannity and Rush all the time. Heritage should have figured this out.

    Are you in contact with them?

  • reddog53

    Heritage and Rep. Price are using the word “co-op” to mean a strictly private sector entity, and they favor that. This seems to be an ok idea.

    The Democrats use “co-op” to mean something more like Freddie Mac, which we should oppose.

    We should highlight the fact that the left is hijacking the term and move away from it to the larger issue — no matter what form it takes, government control of health care is something we need to oppose. Both Heritage and Rep. Price have been very consistent on that position.

  • libertymt

    I’m not sure you can lay the blame for this on Heritage, at least with Enzi. I spoke to Rep. Rehberg (MT) a few weeks ago, and he mentioned them too, totally unprompted.

    Remember, a lot of the rural people out here are farmers and ranchers or work in those industries. I’d guess the majority of folks here belong to farm/ranch co-ops, buy agricultural goods from co-ops, get electricity and phone service from co-ops, bank at co-ops (credit unions). They’re used to them, use em, run em, and like the idea. And they have major problems purchasing health insurance, partially because of cost, partially because of some other unique factors at play in very rural states like our’s.

    I can see why it’s a ND congressman that suggested the idea (seemingly over the objections of the rest of his party), and why Enzi and Rehberg might support them as well. Remember, these guys both have pushed hard to have the gov’t fully cover kids. It’s a winning issue out here with our base, even if it’s not nationwide.

  • rifralex

    Thank you Erick, you are so 100% correct. I left a message on Sen. Enzi’s voice mail. What is it with Heritage to behave this way? It is so puzzling, I wish someone there would speak out front and center and explain why Heritage is opromoting this view, at least invite debate and discussion before putting something like this out.

  • sasulli915

    I dropped my support with Heritage, even though it wasn’t much through the years. I will always appreciate their professionalism, expertise and well thought out analysis of projects. However, their recent support of the RINO, Mitt Romney shows just how such an intellegent think tank from such humble beginnings can use such poor judgement.

    I cancelled my membership with GOP and the RNC because of their endorsements of Mitt Romney and Michael Steele. I intend to continue to oppose all of the present obama and the democratic Congressmen in anyway I can, but until koolaid drinking groups that keeps these RINOs in the media spotlight and get someone to run our country that knows our enemies and know them well, I will distance myself.

    Watched you Erik on C-Span with AFP, very good solutions and strategy; need some people to get that going. Thanks

  • blooch

    The acronym just rolls off the tongue.

  • americanmale

    Being in the super minority and wanting to avoid being perceived as obstructionist is one thing, but justifying a ill conceived, pseudo Public Option is totally another. If they’re (Heritage) going to do that kind of crap, at least be clever, think of the future, and give us the mechanisms to get out of this crazy co-op experiment at a later date. Recommending this thing at face value paralyzes us forever. C’Mon Heritage, rethink your brainfart.

  • WarEagle01

    I was considering joining Heritage after hearing the ads on Hannity, but I think I will hold off, at least until they get back on the proper message.

  • http://www.erickerickson.org Erick Erickson

    They are a great organization. But on healthcare, they have been repeatedly too helpful and the left has repeated taken what Heritage has done and altered it just enough to ruin.

    But time and time again, Heritage keeps playing along on this issue.

  • marshmom

    on Fox News Sunday this past Sunday when he said he thinks co-ops are an option worth “looking at” when Senator Conrad suggested them. I immediately wrote him and told him that a co-op was unacceptable, as it was just another vehicle for the administration to push through government run health care.
    How is it that we see this, but people at Heritage don’t? Obama is a radical and as he has stated many times, his goal is to “transform” our country. He’s not going to just give up on that because he gets a little push back from the American people.
    We all need to be unified on this front. This is the worst time in the world to be sending mixed messages or giving any concessions.
    I agree that Sean Hannity and Rush need to get on board with you Erick and denounce this endorsement by the Heritage Foundation.

  • freedomforce

    “We The People” started and own this townhall uprising against healthcare reform. “We The People” did it without any “help” from the establishment. “We The People” have them backpeddling and fighting among themselves. “We The People” have turned support for this sham into a majority who do not support it. “We The People”…not wishy-washy RINOs and others who don’t know when to keep quiet. We did this ourselves…please don’t screw it up. Any person with Any sense knows these people will never give up on a government-controlled system…call it whatever you will. They will sucker you in by making you feel good and then get what they want. So…instead of helping them accomplish their ultimate goal, why not just stay out of the way and let us continue to stop this power grab. In the end, if they vote it through against the will of “We The People”, they will have to answer to us in the next election. “We The People” would rather deal with it that way than have you jump in at the last moment and try to reach a compromise…which will be nothing more than what they want, with YOUR stamp of approval on it. They pop open the champagne over their victory and we are left to wonder why in the heck you just couldn’t keep quiet. Please stop treading on OUR liberty with compromise…principled conservate non-compromise can stand and fight on it’s own…and stop this power grab.

  • JadedByPolitics

    like AARP and they better get out of the Kool-aid district of DC and speak with the up and comers in the Conservative movement to see where this party is going and it is NOT co-ops!

  • Joe_Cor

    of what has plagued America for decades. The left we have always had with us, and always will, but the real problem is how often the right acts as useful idiots to prop the left up. Too many on the right think it is their sacred duty to “reach out” to, cooperate with, and assist the left. They think if they only do it often enough, that then the leftists will start saying real nice things about them and they’ll earn their very own Bipartisanship Merit Badge, just like the super-cool one John McCain gets to wear. May the Lord protect us from such people.

  • gman_2008

    Post link: http://tinyurl.com/lnkr9v

    We can kill ObamaCare (see here and here), but with few exceptions, nobody is talking about this. National exposure is what is needed and I can think of no other issue in the health care debate that screams for national attention at this time. Currently, the best shot for ObamaCare Lite that would later morph in full-fledged ObamaCare rests with the Senate Finance Committee. As I describe below, there are five Republican Senator?s crucial to assuring this bill is killed.

    I had a discussion with Lewis K. Uhler after a teleconference with the American Liberty Alliance. Mr. Uhler is Founder and President of the National Tax Limitation Committee (NTLC) and held many positions under then Governor Ronald Reagan, including serving on Reagan?s cabinet as Assistant Secretary of the Health & Welfare Agency.

    The topic is still, to my knowledge, not being covered by any reputable organization other than the NTLC and Social Secuirty Institute (SSI). This strategy holds great promise to derail Obama?s health care agenda. The following information needs to go, to borrow the vernacular of the day, viral:

    There were two amendments offered by Senator DeMint prior to the health bill conferences and debate in the Senate ? a point-of-order amendment and instruction to conferees. The following is taken directly from an email Mr. Uhler received from Dr. Lawrence Hunter of the Social Security Institute that was forwarded to me and placed in the first link above. Dr. Hunter also has a very long and distinguished career and served as policy advisor to President Ronald Reagan during Reagan?s second term. He also served as a Member of the Board of Advisors for the NTLC:

    [During deliberations on the Senate Budget Resolution earlier this year, Senator Jim DeMint (R-SC) introduced a point-of-order amendment that would require a 60-vote majority to pass ?any bill, joint resolution, amendment, motion, or conference report that eliminates the ability of Americans to keep their health plan or their choice of doctor (as determined by the Congressional Budget Office).? The Senate approved the DeMint Amendment unanimously.

    Subsequently, before the Senate Budget Resolution went to a Conference Committee where differences with the House Budget Resolution were to be worked out, DeMint offered a motion to instruct the Conferees not only to insist on retaining the 60-vote provision in the final Conference Report but also to widen the scope of the provision to cover any provision and so forth that decreases the number of Americans enrolled in private health insurance while increasing the number enrolled in government-managed, rationed health care. The Demint motion to instruct passed the Senate by an overwhelming vote of 79 to 14.

    As a matter of congressional comity, the House ordinarily would have been expected to accede to the Senate provision since it affected Senate rules that applied only to the Senate. Remarkably, Senate Budget Committee Chairman, Kent Conrad, allowed the Demint 60-vote requirement to be removed from the Budget Resolution in Conference.]

    Prior to the above statements by Dr. Hunter is information of great importance:

    [However, with a united Republican front in the Senate, Democrats would be hard pressed to jam a bill as comprehensive and detested as ObamaCare down Americans? throats. Current polls indicate that more people oppose ObamaCare than support it. Moreover, Senate Republicans stand on very strong procedural grounds for resisting a bum?s rush on government-run healthcare through the Reconciliation process. It would take an act of extraordinary arrogance and recklessness for the Democratic Leadership to use Reconciliation this way.]

    Think about this for a second ? which Senators would be willing to ignore their own rules under public scrutiny for a bill that has support that is plummeting daily.

    If agreed upon to be enforced, the Demint amendments would in effect kill the reconciliation process and force 60 votes to pass ObamaCare in its present form ? even with the co-operative option, which is nothing more than a Trojan horse for what ultimately will become a single-payer system. Mr. Uhler has identified five Republican Senators that need to align themselves with the party and forgo their proclivity to reach across the aisle. If this story goes national and pressure is brought to bear on these five Republican?s to stand firm with their party, then it is reasonable to assume the above conclusion from Dr. Hunter to be correct. Under these circumstances I do not believe the Democrats in the Senate would have the votes to commit ?an act of extraordinary arrogance and recklessness?. However, wide public knowledge of the amendments and the subsequent pressure on Senators to follow their own rules requires national exposure. The average American is completely unaware of the procedural hurdles that Senator Jim Demint placed to block the ramming of a very unpopular plan onto the American people.

    One could reasonably ask themselves why the public must follow rules, where the Senate can choose to ignore them. It will focus attention on the contempt that some Senate elitists have for the public. However, to date no major conservative talk show, media outlet, or think tank has covered this tactic. Everyone is talking about Blue Dogs killing the legislation. While certainly one strategy to pursue, I personally believe Blue Dogs have a habit of growling but, at the end of the day, many of them will roll over. I prefer a multi-pronged strategy that would include the above approach outlined by Dr. Hunter. On the legislative front, what is called for is combining public pressure on the Blue Dogs in the House and placing pressure on five Senate Republican?s to stand firm with their party and not negotiate ObamaCare Lite with the cooperative option replacing nationalized health care. Instead the public should insist the Demint rules be followed. This could very well kill the bill as it exists today. We could then press the reset button and start talking about real reform.

    Using Reconciliation to force feed ObamaCare to an unwilling nation would backfire in ways that Democrats will find difficult to imagine. That is the type of atmosphere some liberals, such as Schmuck Schumer are willing to create now and for the foreseeable future. The end result?

    Given the growing exposure of the White House flag (spy) program thanks to the work of Fox News, the ALCJ, and now the ACLU, Obama?s plummeting poll numbers, and support for ObamaCare diving, Obama?s coattails have become an anchor. With the defeat of ObamaCare, Obama will have burned through political capital faster than he is burning a hole through our wallets. In the second link above, I describe how two states ? Florida and Utah ? as well as possibly up to ten other states are already attempting to amend their State constitutions to assert state?s rights under the Federal 10th amendment to resist ObamaCare. This could tie up any legislation in the courts for years. Tie it up until 2012 and then repeal the entire health care legislation, and repeal any rule that gets in our way.

    For all of Senator John McCain?s faults, one of the reasons he created the gang of 14 when the nuclear option to kill the filibuster rule was being discussed by the Republican?s for Supreme Court nominations is he understood only too well that once one party does it, the other will return in kind when they are governing, and our entire system of debate and the collegiality of the Senate would be all but wiped out. As Schmuck Schumer is the barking dog for the Senate, history will remember this weasel as either the dog with no teeth or the man that heralded in a Republican revolution that repealed every liberal piece of legislation under the sun. Ask any Senator if they would be willing to risk their careers for legislation that, even should it come to pass, would very likely be repealed at a later date.

    Here is the link to the story on the Social Security Institute article from Dr. Hunter:

    These posts at the beginning of this email contain additional links to a blog post by Dr. Hunter at the Social Security Institute that was the source of Dr. Hunter?s email to Mr. Uhler, as well as a link to a post identifying the five Republican Senators on the Finance Committee and how to contact them. Or just go here. Here are the five Senators:

    * Chuck Grassley
    United States Senator, Iowa
    * Olympia J. Snowe
    United States Senator, Maine
    * Susan Collins
    United States Senator, Maine
    * Michael Enzi
    United States Senator, Wyoming
    * Lindsey Graham
    United States Senator, South Carolina

  • gman_2008

    Any missing links in my previous post concerning the Demint amendments can be found in the original post. The link is repeated here: http://tinyurl.com/lnkr9v.

  • Toneman

    As I recall, staffers at Heritage actaully wrote a good portion (if not all) of the Romneycare legislation.

  • dhorowitz3

    When are “conservative” groups and politicians going to realise that we are engaged in a political war for the direction of our country? Why do they always give aid and comfort to the enemy and snatch victory away from us. They are always there to save the democrats and give cover for them when we are about to defeat them.

    Mike Enzi? I thought he was one of the few conservatives. Who else do we have left except for Coburn and Demint?

  • Toneman

    As I recall, staffers at Heritage actaully wrote a good portion (if not all) of the Romneycare legislation.

  • johnt

    Squishy little things that float aimlessly about wither the currents take them. Unlike sharks.
    Damn few on our side, such as it is, want to be thought rude, or radical. The problem with that is that the media decides who that is.
    The media, ignorant but contemptuous of the rest of the nation, and seeing collectivist control as being a good in itself.

  • diakrioi

    I have heard it argued many times that this clause in the constitution gives the government powers to provide a social safety net for all of us. I refute it thus…

    “With respect to the words general welfare, I have always regarded them as qualified by the detail of powers connected with them. To take them in a literal and unlimited sense would be a metamorphosis of the Constitution into a character which there is a host of proofs was not contemplated by its creators.”
    - James Madison, Father of the Constitution

  • http://clevergael.wordpress.com clevergael

    …there’s nothing stopping anyone from starting one now. You could start with any group of people, say your high-school classmates, organize, create by-laws, file the necessary papers and badda-bing! Co-op.

    Erick is right, Heritage needs to get off of the health-care “reform” bandwagon.

    Here’s where Sarah steps up with another reasonable observation and smacks down all this nonsense. Her influence shouldn’t be underestimated (as so many of the RINOs have done).

  • Tbone

    the Democrats are in full scale retreat on the issue because of Palin?s offensive. ”

    Sounds like the Hick Foundation is much more astute and media savvy than the Heritage Foundation. Who could have guessed?

  • diakrioi

    He is a Republican first and a Conservative second. Is he still shilling for GM? If so, that should tell you a lot.

  • peg_c

    Which is a sibling of communism. I would dearly like to hear Rush and Mark both come down hard on Heritage for this today. (Sean’s relationship with Heritage I take much less seriously.)

    If conservatism has lost Heritage, we as Americans have lost our country.

  • diakrioi

    It happens to politicians all the time and it is happening to our friends at Heritage. When one spends a lot of time in DC there is constant pressure to conform to the liberal society that permeates the town. Many politicians with high ideals succumb to this siren call to negotiate away their principles. Heritage is based in DC and they are falling prey to this same phenomenon.

    There is a Senator who spends as little time as possible in DC. He is home almost every weekend. Jeff Sessions is also arguably the most conservative Senator. Coincidence? I don’t think so.

  • mblack

    Somebody over at the Heritage Thinkosphere has forgotten to think at all over this.

    They need to be arguing that “Comprehensive Health Care Reform” cannot be addressed without tackling ILLEGAL Immigration first. I say this because the costs of ILLEGAL Immigration is breaking the backs of state governments everywhere, & when ILLEGAL Immigrants will be eligible for benefits under any plan the Democrats push for there is something wrong with this.

    The AMERICAN PEOPLE across the board are outraged at excesses of government, and the drains on services ILLEGAL Immigrants use especially in the form of health care system use, they know that if they spent like the government they would be out on the streets. Yeah, they max “pay taxes doing jobs Americans won’t do” committing identity fraud with someone else’s SSN, but they use far more in services than what they may “pay” in taxes.

    Revenue is down, unemployment is on the rise, & the AMERICAN PEOPLE are bearing the brunt of all of this & they are worried. There are plenty of things that could be done to move the economy forward, & get people to work, but it is not on the agenda of the Democrats.

    The platform that Conservatives should be running on appear are not part of the GOP strategy at all. Energy could be a key point for the GOP but they don’t use it. The left states we are “4% of the world’s population, but consume 25% of the world’s resources” yeah only because we have allowed Congress to legislate all of our known energy finds of limits by the EPA at the behest of the ECONAZIs on the left, I say NAZI because they were leftists & they also used the environment as one of their policy platforms.

    Jobs could be created here domestically, infrastructure for refining could create jobs, along with many others, we could supply our needs & then export surplus on the open market. Nuclear plants could be built & provide for our domestic electrical needs but the ENVIRONAZIs obstruct all the way these and other policies along with tax cuts to small business, and other Conservative arguments could be used to reign in spending get the National Debt under control, & stop us being subjugated to foreign powers that wish us ill.

    Quit equivocating, and trying to be Liberal Democrats, Conservative principles when put into effect win hands down.

  • Scope

    http://www.heritage.org/about/contact.cfm

    I just checked the healthcare page at Heritage, and there are plenty of articles written by Heritage Fellows that are absolutely not in support of Obamacare. Could it be that a few have infiltrated the Conservative Think Tank?

  • smitch61

    Heard you this morning on WJR with John Mccolough .. great interview. I share your concern about the GOP, but then again, that is always are problem with the GOP.

  • http://clevergael.wordpress.com clevergael

    is because it really is “us” against “them”.

    I hate to put it in this type of light, but what the political class wants and what the American people want are always going to be in opposition. We will get concessions from the few conservatives in the political class, but frankly, once inoculated with the notion that we are merely serfs to be benevolently ruled over, they become inefficient and dangerous over time. We’ve seen the inside-the-beltway mentality infect even the most arduous conservatives eventually. The vaccine consists of leading a “real” life in their home district. Something which few ever manage to maintain.

    My prayer is that the likes of say, Michele Bachmann, or Darrell Issa maintain enough of a life outside of Washington to keep them grounded in reality and effective in their positions.

  • mblack

    Amen to all you have said, the GOP couldn’t find it’s rear end with it’s hands firmly planted in their back pockets.

    The kind of backlash, the GOP, MSM, & the Organizer In Chief could never dream of what is going on right now.

  • janis

    Our phone system in the rural area I live in is a co-op. It behaves as a monopoly by making sure that it’s “customers” [ read 'hostages'] have land line phone service, internet service and cable service through them. They charge high rates for internet, both dial-up and highspeed, and they won’t let you go with another carrier. If you try to, they charge you long-distance rates. Their service is relatively poor for the prices they charge and getting worse.

    That’s what I think of when I hear the word “co-ops” as applied to health care by either side. It’s not a comfort.

  • farstar99

    Both elitist groups completely out of touch with America, and arrogant about it.

  • izoneguy

    The Heritage Foundation: The Economic Consequences of Waxman-Markey

    http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=115312783434

    http://www.heritage.org/Research/EnergyandEnvironment/cda0904.cfm

    I just wonder if Heritage & some republician congress people are feeling left out of the Palin effect?

  • janis

    and her ideas anywhere near the public consciousness. She’s too apt to call a spade a spade for their tastes. They refuse to recognize that many of us appreciate her plain speaking and wish more of them would do the same thing. Instead, we get “Yes, we’re conservatives, BUT……”

    No buts. Not any more, and definitely not on this issue.

  • peg_c

    which ought to make Heritage (a BELTWAY org, remember) shudder.

  • http://dreamsfrommyforefathers.com RoguePolitics

    and Dr. Freddie Krueger sitting in a tree….

  • izoneguy

    Palin is stealing the thunder.

    And why does Romney go around saying how great his healthcare debockle in MA is?

    A republican tried and failed in “reforming” a state heathcare system. How do the democrats think they can succeed with “reforming” a nationwide healthcare system?

    The answer: They don’t care. it is not about “reform”.
    If they succeed in passing this monster of a bill then years from now when the healthcare system seizes up – what??? They will say oppss? We did not know how complicated this was. Sorry….

    Just like they did on the economy?

    When really the “stimulus” was to hand out favors and start Nationalized healthcare systems anyway.

    BEWARE OF TROJAN UNICORNS

  • janis

    is quivering with shock and awe. It’s time and past time that “We, the People” take our country back from all of those who wish to rule us unruly citizens from the safety of their cushy ivory towers. I’m sick to death of watching deals made that sell us out in the name of politics as usual, comity, bipartisanship, or just rank political calculation.

    The sleeping giant that this issue has awakened will not be satisfied or pacified with half measures and mealy-mouthed compromises.

  • diakrioi
  • janis
  • http://dreamsfrommyforefathers.com RoguePolitics

    We always support RINOs

  • http://dreamsfrommyforefathers.com RoguePolitics

    And for now I might buy it.
    Maybe his contract is not yet run out. But how long will he take their money and be unwilling to soften a position to keep it flowing?
    I hope when his contract is up so is his support for GM. That would be a good sign.

  • ColdWarrior

    The problem “always” that causes limp “leadership” is that not enough conservatives are in the Party engaged as precinct committeemen. With fifty per cent of the precinct committeeman slots nationwide vacant, we conservatives could take back the Party leadership in the next round of internal Party leadership elections. Precinct committeeman elect the leadership. If we just became precinct committeemen and then cast our votes in the leadership elections, we’d have a more principled, conservative leadership across the board. Only Republicans who are precinct committeeman can vote for the Party leadership if you’re a precinct committeeman.

    Here?s a typical example of the situation: Maricopa County, Arizona. Includes Phoenix. About 6,000 precinct committeeman slots exist in Maricopa County for the almost 700,000 registered Republican voters. Only 2,000 of the slots are filled, and there’s about a 50-50 split in the ranks between conservatives and moderates. Of the 2,000 elected precinct committeemen, only about 800 showed up at the Maricopa County Republican Party Convention this spring to elect the leadership and vote on party resolutions. ONLY 800 Republicans OUT OF 700,000 registered Republicans were, on that day, ?the Republican Party.? Want to be one of them? Knowing what you know now, why wouldn?t you want to be one? If we conservatives could fill just 1,000 of the 4,000 vacancies, we’d have a solid 2 to 1 ratio of conservatives to moderates. (By the way, these numbers are changing for the better — there are a few of us here who are aggressively recruiting conservatives to become PCs.)

    We could cause a conservative revolution if we could get conservatives to fill just half of the fifty per cent of the open precinct committeeman slots nationwide. The current Party leadership would be afraid the ?new conservative blood? would throw them out in the next election. The incumbents would fear that the ?new conservative blood? would endorse the best conservative challenger in the primary instead of endorsing them. The only fear that will motivate them is the fear of losing their jobs. Precinct committeemen are in the BEST position to make that happen. So, please, if you care about the future of your country, become a precinct committeeman. Now! Go here for some detailed information:

    http://www.redstate.com/erick/2009/07/02/the-power-of-small-numbers-a-butterfly-effect/

    http://www.redstate.com/coldwarrior/2009/06/30/lets-change-the-world-now-like-the-obamabots-did-or-not/

    The Maricopa County GOP web site has a good explanation of the precinct committeeman position:

    http://www.maricopagop.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=15&Itemid=44

    Thank you,

    Cold Warrior

    I am only one. But I am a conservative Republican Party precinct committeeman and trying every way my feeble brain can think of to recruit more of them as fast as possible.

    www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com

  • bc3

    It’s time to write off the Heritage Foundation, National review, Weekly Standard and other DC or Manhattan-based organizations.

    They are so inbred with other Washingtonians and the cocktail party set that there is no reason to expect any help from them. They don’t want to challenge the status quo because they are part of the status quo.

    There are few that can spark a conservative revolution – Jim DeMint, Michele Bachmann, but mainly a housewive from Alaska.

  • http://dreamsfrommyforefathers.com RoguePolitics

    The left understands it and fights it like it is a war. They understand wars have overt troops like ACORN and the AFL-CIO. But they also understand wars involve covert ops like RINO’s and agents provocateur.
    Clearly somebody at Heritage is fishing from both riverbanks.
    http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9A5GCC80&show_article=1

    Meanwhile we are just sitting back Rodney King style wondering why we can’t just all get along.

    They don’t get along because they don’t want to get along.

    We, as Grover Norquist says, just want to be left alone. They are not willing that we should be left alone. As Michelle said Barack ain’t gonna let us do that.

    Why is it so hard to understand RINO is synonymous with “traitor in our midst”.

  • http://dreamsfrommyforefathers.com RoguePolitics

    It’s just LEAVE ME ALONE.

  • rifralex

    Agreed.

  • Cheryl

    such as co-ops for dairy farmers or orange farmers or walnut farmers, etc.

  • AceInTX

    They are Republicans on the gang of six.

    I’ve got a blog in mind and not enough time to write it that goers something like: So A Majority Of Americans Are Opposed to Obama Care…WE’VE WON!….Not So Fast!!!

    • Rage is rampant against Obama Care
    • Town Halls are exploding in outrage
    • New Polls show a growing majority of Americans are opposed to Obamacare
    • The Dems are in full retreat seemingly taking the public option off the table

    But let’s not count our chickens yet…We’re in more danger now than we were before this began…We’ve managed to whip up opposition to this and the rage has been real…but here is what I see coming from the Machiavellian playbook.

    First…the rage has almost played itself out…people can only stay angry and agitated for so long before the adrenaline leaves their system and their tempers settle down…The Dems are signaling defeat and surrender on the public option so as to expedite calming down the masses that are opposed to this. As they seem to make concession after concession…We’ll all settle down more and more as a result…

    Second…The Dems have tried to do all of this without the Republicans…they’ve shut them out of the process. Now is when the calls for bipartisanship will start being whispered in the press and throughout the land. The president is making public proclamations that he will have to pass health care with only Democrat Support…In the real world this sounds like a victory…but it’s designed to put pressure on the squishes in our caucus that they’d better sign on quick if they want their name on the legislation…or The One will pass it without them. It’s also designed to put pressure on the same squishes and moderates from the bottom up by getting the go along to get along crowd in their districts to raise hell with them for “Excessive Partisanship”.

    The final phase will be some other issue to come along and stir us up so they can pass their “Compromise” while we’re distracted. Obama has made statements lately that Immigration reform is next up on his agenda…so…give it a couple of weeks…we’ll all be raising hell about Amnesty….and this will pass with Grassley, Enzi, Snowe and others heralding a compromise that is good for all Americans because we killed, (renamed to Co-Ops), the public option.

  • AceInTX

    BLECH!!!!!

  • http://www.werushdaily.com Steve Baetz

    The Preamble is not a power unto itself, but defined by those that follow… ergo… they don’t have the authority that they perceive is vested in this clause since its not indicated to be a power, either in the Constitution or those that wrote it.

  • peg_c

    A sleeping giant formerly known as the Silent Majority is now awake, growling, and with absolutely no thought of backing down or shutting up.

    I note that today Rush has informed us that Krauthammer must have had some sense pounded into him and pretty much retracted the idiocies that escaped his beltway mouth last week. Rush has yet to mention Heritage in any way today. If he does the shilling thing before taking them to task I’m sending him an email. (Ooooh, he’s scared, I’m sure.)

    My fingers are sore from sending irate emails to Walmart, CVS and BestBuy today. I want a t-shirt with Bill Whittle’s LOL Obama icon on it for my 912 Project trip. Feeling pretty ornery here.

  • diakrioi

    With today’s technology, do Represenatives really need to spend their time in Washington? They could do 90% of what they do in DC from an office in their district. That puts them closer to the people the represent and takes them away from the corrupting influence of the Washington lobbyists.

    Since accommodations at the capitol are one of the reasons we limited representatives to 435, we could also increase the number of representatives. They would rarely gather at once so there is no need to limit the size of the House to an artificial number.

    Someone had a website promoting this idea a while back but I can’t find it in a search.

  • aesthete

    I’m not crazy about Heritage’s record on HC (they’re flat-out wrong), but that’s no reason to reject all of the organization’s good work out of hand. Heritage is a great org that just happens to be wrong on this issue, IMO, and it’s not “Palin vs. Heritage”, however much people want it to be. Palin herself has cited Heritage in her note on Facebook, and Heritage has defended her at times. Quite frankly, many of these posts have a Huckabee-like “Club for Greed” vibe to them.

  • AceInTX
  • janis

    For years, so many of us have been willing to tolerate the irritation we’ve felt when seeing our elected leaders sell out principle for expediency’s sake in matters large and small. But we’ve put up with it until our backs are now against the wall. All the incremental losses of freedoms and rights have piled up into one huge unavoidable battle for the soul of our country.

    Never before have so many been so focused on what the government is attempting to do in completely neglecting the oath it took to uphold and defend the Constitution. We will not go quietly this time.

  • AceInTX

    Tey’re strting to give into the dark side of the force like all those sucked into the 495 beltway do eventually

  • http://www.marklaiminger.org Lammo

    I’ll give three guesses about how to pronounce that and the first two don’t count.

    :-)

  • AceInTX
  • AceInTX
  • Aaron Gardner

    Federal Universal Healthcare Co-op & Pharmacutical

    which makes it…

    FUHCOPh

  • http://www.werushdaily.com Steve Baetz

    I can’t speak for Rush on this, only he can fill in the blank, but I think there may be a business decision he doesn’t call them on the carpet over this, they advertise on his program.

    Another reason is he may not be aware of it, but I highly doubt that since he is very well informed.

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    If the GOP as a whole caves in on this I believe we’ll see the same level of conservative voter apathy we have during the past two cycles.

  • http://www.marklaiminger.org Lammo

    to paraphrase another comment elsewhere. Actually, I really like Aaron’s modification below. I can just hear them answering the phone at FUHCOPh headquarters.

    :-) :-)

  • AceInTX
  • AceInTX
  • AceInTX
  • Flagstaff

    We don’t have to accept pronouncements from our own think tanks as if they were merely passing them to us from the Deity.

    If they are wrong, we can, in fact must, tell them so.