« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

Washington Post Examines His Thesis. Finds an Honest Man Who Keeps His Word.

Finally, twenty years after it was written and several major campaigns he’s run, the Washington Post is finally picking apart his college thesis.

No, I’m not talking about Barack Obama. The Washington Post never bothered to track down and examine the college thesis of Barack Obama. But, it has found the twenty year old thesis of Bob McDonnell, the Republican candidate for Governor of Virginia.

With Creigh Deeds imploding, the media decided it had to do something to help the Democrat. So they are highlighting McDonnell’s twenty year old thesis. In it, they find a candidate who is, brace yourselves, conservative. He went, after all, to Regent University, and his thesis is publicly available.

In other words, they could have written about it when he was running for the Virginia House of Delegates or Virginia Attorney General, but they wanted to wait until now when the Democrat needs some help. And what do they find that the man believed twenty years ago?


[H]e described working women and feminists as “detrimental” to the family. He said government policy should favor married couples over “cohabitators, homosexuals or fornicators.” He described as “illogical” a 1972 Supreme Court decision legalizing the use of contraception by unmarried couples.

OMG?!?!! Bob McDonnell agreed with conservative Republicans twenty years ago?

During his 14 years in the General Assembly, McDonnell pursued at least 10 of the policy goals he laid out in that research paper, including abortion restrictions, covenant marriage, school vouchers and tax policies to favor his view of the traditional family. In 2001, he voted against a resolution in support of ending wage discrimination between men and women.

In his run for governor, McDonnell, 55, makes little mention of his conservative beliefs and has said throughout his campaign that he should be judged by what he has done in office, including efforts to lower taxes, stiffen criminal penalties and reform mental health laws. He reiterated that position Saturday in a statement responding to questions about his thesis.

So, McDonnell says people should judge him based on his record, not a thesis he wrote twenty years ago in an evangelical college. The Washington Post has decided that what he did in office was consistent with what he wrote about.

You mean to tell me we actually have a politician running for office in the United States who keeps his word? We actually have a man running for office who said if he got into office he would do certain things and then actually factually did them?! How dare Bob McDonnell be honest.

And so, if we are to believe the Washington Post — that McDonnell wrote a thesis twenty years ago and has, in his legislative career, kept his word — let’s look at McDonnell now. He’s committed to improving Virginia’s economy. He’s committed to cutting taxes. He’s committed to improving education for Virginia’s children. He’s committed to being tough on crime. He’s committed to Virginia.

If the past is the best indicator of future performance, then we have here a candidate who actually intends to keep his word to Virginia and fix things.

Then there’s Creigh Deeds. He’s made so many inconsistent and broken promises, all he’s left with is giving McDonnell’s college thesis from twenty years ago to the Washington Post and hoping they’ll do something with it.

They have. They’ve proven McDonnell keeps his word.

COMMENTS

  • archer52

    Instead of assuming the guy is some backwoods snake handling Christian, let’s ask if he was on to something. How did it work out, objectively speaking, with government favoring people out of wedlock, special interest groups with specific agendas, and those who believe that if it feels good do it.

    Are we really on stronger ground than twenty or thirty years ago?

    Are our children better mannered, more mature, exposed less to offensive concepts (rap music, disrespecting women, bananas/condom, Heather has two daddies, Mandy has two mommies, Tammy has an uncle that likes to dress up in leather and during a parade in San Francisco have pubic sex with one of Heather’s daddies, etc.).

    Are we on more secure ground knowing that transgendered people can have surgery to correct an error of nature and it be covered by insurance because it is a “right?” (and your premiums go up because of those dastardly insurance companies).

    Are we stronger as a nation now that the unwed motherhood crisis once limited to a certain population has exploded in all segments and actually found a spokeswoman in a TV character? (Murphy Brown)

    Are we better now that certain women are laughed at and hated by “feminists” because they decided to have a family and a successful career. (Dowd/Palin)

    Are we better now because we spent trillions of dollars indenturing a good segment of our society in exchange for their guaranteed political support?

    Are we better?

    Let us examine all that has happened and imagine a world different, where common sense, decency, restraint, and duty came first. I’m not saying he’s right, just asking a simple question. Which world would you chose to raise your kids in?

    Ask yourself. Wait, that would end up with the liberals and feel gooders having to say “oops.” Never mind.

  • Paul_In_Houston

    It is an asset; maybe the only one of yours with which YOU are the one to determine its’ value. The time can always come when it is the only asset you have.

    McDonnell seems (instinctively?) to understand this and his actions give value to his word, making it something you can count on.

    His opponent apparently doesn’t comprehend this, and has rendered his word to be nothing more than noise.

    -

  • Flagstaff

    Well done.

  • ModernAgeFan

    Isn’t it amazing when papers like the Wa Post get all hot and bothered by stuff like this? The principles he represents resonate with his constituents and sound quite reasonable, unless you are a liberal kook from the Wa Post. It illustrates to me how out of touch they are to think Bob McDonnell’s ideas are radical.

  • GregInFla

    5!

  • Rod_Patrick

    Hollywood movies, WaPo, NYT, Times, Newsweek, and other MSM have been very explicit in the last 8 years in their liberal and socialist propaganda. They have been brainwashing the ordinary people of the following:

    “Conservatives are anti-gay, anti-women, racists, hypocrite Bible-thumping Christians … yada yada.”

    “Conservatives = Right-Wing Extremist”

    To support their lies, they use revisionist and selective history. They have thrown the two most important rules of Logical Thinking: Deductive and Inductive Reasonings. Most of their conclusions are based on “intuition”.

    As the Midterm Election gets nearer, I EXPECT THAT MORE SIMILAR COLUMNS WILL BE PUBLISHED BY THESE PROPAGANDA RAGS against Conservative candidates, not only McDonnell.

    EPU is right. We should learn from our experience last year. LEFTISTS ARE PLAYING THEIR NASTIEST GAMES LIKE WHAT THE GERMAN LIBERAL SOCIALISTS AND NAZIS DID AGAINST THEIR OPPONENTS in late 30s and early 40s.

    It’s not enough to react and defend the leftist smears.

    It’s time for us to be wiser and shrewder.

    LET’S TAKE THE OFFENSE, NOT THE DEFENSE.

    We have been so enamored to euphemism and political correctness for the sake of civility. Truth and Accuracy is more important than Civility.

    For a starter, let me get nasty with WAPO:

    WAPO PEOPLE ARE DIRTY, UNCIVILIZED, CORRUPT LIARS AND IDIOTS!!!!!!!! THEY ARE JUST THE TOOL OF THE OBAMA WH!

    Paging Mr. Krauthammer. If you still want to save your legacy in journalism, Get out of WAPO!!!!!

  • Castor

    The Washington Compost and it?s partners in Obamamania, the New York Slimes and the Boston Blob are losing readers and money. Maybe they won?t be around much longer unless Soros props them up.