« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

Joe Scarborough: How History Repeats Itself

There is something about New York’s 23rd Congressional District that reporters and the GOP establishment are ignoring. According to the PPP poll and the Sienna poll, Doug Hoffman is expanding the base of voters willing to vote for a conservative, not shrinking the base as the press alleges.

In talking about this race this morning with Joe Scarborough on his radio show, he talked about the parallels to his race in 1994. Getting on Lexis-Nexis and doing some digging was an eye opening experience.

It is also a powerful reminder for House Republicans wanting to take back the House that they are going to need to ignore the NRCC and instead go right where right can win.

In 1994, Democrat Earl Hutto announced he would be retiring from Florida’s 1st Congressional District. A conservative Democrat, Hutto was old and saw what was coming.

Several people, according to Roll Call on May 9, 1994, had jumped into the race “including attorney Joe Scarborough.” Roll Call continued, “But with Hutto out of the picture, first-tier candidates are now taking a look at the race. State Rep. Lois Benson has a strong base in Pensacola and is likely to run.”

Benson, a Republican who turned Democrat then turned Republican again was recruited by Newt Gingrich and the NRCC as the strongest contender for the open seat in a year the media had proclaimed “the Year of the Woman.”

On September 5, 1994, Roll Call noted there may be a runoff in Florida’s 1st Congressional District. The newspaper proclaimed the “Republicans’ strongest candidate is state Rep. Lois Benson”

The Orlando Sentinel, on September 4, 1994, wrote “A crowded field of Republicans is vying for the nomination in Thursday’s primary: frontrunner state Rep. Lois Benson of Pensacola, a former Democrat; Basil Bethea, a Fort Walton businessman; W.A. “Buck” Lee, a Buick dealer and Escambia County commissioner; high school teacher Jim Paul; and attorney Joe Scarborough.”

Behind the scenes, establishment Republicans funded Benson’s race.

Why was Scarborough an after thought and the establishment lining up behind Benson? The Miami Herald gave away the game on October, 4, 1994. “District 1 Republican runoff candidate Rep. Lois Benson is pro choice and Joe Scarborough opposes abortion and had petitioned court to represent Michael Griffin, who killed abortion doctor David Gunn” The GOP Establishment found Scarborough to be too far to the right on social and . . . get this . . . fiscal issues.

Joe Scarborough tells me and the record of newspapers and television transcripts from the time confirms that Scarborough rarely talked about abortion, but editorialists across the country did. Scarborough was all about taxes, regulation, and small business.

Of course, on October 6, 1994, Roll Call had to report, “In the state’s 1st House district, being vacated by retiring Rep. Earl Hutto (D), Republican attorney Joe Scarborough defeated state Rep. Lois Benson in the GOP primary runoff, 54 to 46 percent. Democrats hope their candidate, former auto dealer Vince Whibbs Jr., will be able to portray Scarborough as a far-right candidate out of step with the district.

The press then did what they are doing this year. Scarborough and the GOP were — and I had forgotten this — portrayed as “The Party of No.”

From the New York Times on October 23, 1994:

When they catch their breath from hounding President Clinton, Republicans like to boast about what they will not do, or what they will dismantle. The bare issue papers put out by the campaign of Representative Michael Huffington, a California Republican running for the Senate, did not, until recently, tackle staples like health care, foreign policy or education.

At an issues forum last week in Fort Walton Beach, Fla., Joe Scarborough, a Republican House candidate, offered one answer for every question about policy. Welfare reform? “I personally don’t believe the Federal Government should be involved in welfare.” Health care? “That’s an issue for the states.” Crime? “The Federal Government shouldn’t be involved.”

It is not a matter of candidates’ not caring about issues, so much as their sense that the public does not want to hear about them. Many Republicans linked to the Christian right were drawn to politics because of their opposition to abortion and homosexual rights. But such candidates do not dare raise those issues out of fear of alienating voters.

Touchy, perhaps, about the criticism that their party does not stand for anything, more than 300 Republican House candidates last month signed a “Contract with America,” an agenda of issues they would pursue if elected. It includes such old standards as the line-item veto and a balanced budget.

Note that the Contract With America was not unveiled and signed until five weeks before the 1994 election.

Local press ignored most of it. Scarborough was written off as too far right on fiscal and social issues. If only Benson had won, some Republicans said, the GOP would be picking up Florida’s 1st Congressional District.

In fact, Scaborough beat the Democrat with over 60% of the vote. The voters in the 1st liked his small government, pro-life rhetoric. The GOP establishment never did.

The more things change . . .

COMMENTS

  • http://cooperscopy.blogspot.com/ cooperscopy

    It’s becoming clear the NRCC is out of touch with the country, and has completely misread what the tea party/town hall events this year have meant. Conservatives no longer want squishy rino republicans and are going to challenge them with conservative alternatives in primaries all across the country. The eight years of Bush’s out of control spending blurred the lines of fiscal sanity between the parties, and conservative want that line reestablished….

  • spoutinghorn

    Probably the reason why Joe S has such disdain for the GOP establishment to this day.

  • jbristor

    Actually, Scarborough was elected because the city of Pensacola and Escambia county were being poorly run. Benson had previously served on the City Council a couple of years before and the City passed a 65% property tax increase… Benson got caught up in the “through the bums out” while Scarborough was known for collecting 3,000 protest signtures in 1993. His contacts from the irate petition signers plus some intelligence use of some local 30 minute cable ad buys, sealed the deal. I was there and the race had very little to do with pro or anit abortion.

  • clement
  • http://www.erickerickson.org Erick Erickson

    We’re looking at the same race from two different perspectives.

    Locally, yes, the tax issue was a big one.

    Nationally, Benson had NRCC backing and Scarborough was painted as fringe inside the beltway for being a budget balancing pro-lifer.

  • http://biggator5.net/archive.html BigGator5

    As the adage goes: “Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it.”

    Let’s not repeat it again in Florida.

  • vamoose

    “Note that the Contract With America was not unveiled and signed until two weeks before the 1994 election.”

    CWA was introduced on September 27, 1994 on the steps of the US Capitol. That would be five weeks before the election. Still, that’s a relatively short period in the context of campaign time lines.

  • http://www.erickerickson.org Erick Erickson

    I knew that didn’t sound right. Misread the article. Fixed.

  • bart

    with your thesis, Eric. JBRISTOR called it correctly. Joe’s current ridicule of the far right, on air and in his recent book, is the real Joe.

  • Chieftain1776

    I’m pretty sure I originally got it from Redstate. The whole thing is remarkable stuff, just substitute Ron Paul for Ross Perot. Here are some snippets:

    The Democrats came out of the political wilderness on Tuesday. The Republicans entered it.

    The Democrats set aside all the self-doubts, the years of feeling on the wrong side of history, the election nights when the proud party of Roosevelt, Truman and Kennedy seemed consigned to a painful irrelevance.

    Ahead is the challenge of governing, and the clear accountability that comes with controlling both Congress and the White House. No more political cover for the Democrats, no more room for fingerpointing between Capitol Hill and the White House, no more excuses.

    But the Republicans face the hard, brutal struggle of deciding who they are, resolving the tensions between moderates, conservatives, evangelical Christians, country-clubbers, supply-siders, suburbanites — all the disparate elements held together by Ronald Reagan that collapsed under President Bush.


    Republicans, for their part, face a much more fundamental task, as any Democrat who tried to pick up the pieces after 1980, 1984 and 1988 will attest. Their long hegemony in Presidential politics is over, and it did not leave the lasting gains in Congress or below that many Republicans had hoped for. Their political professionals seem sapped by the long, enervating campaign of Mr. Bush, and the exit polls carried chilling news, notably the strength of Mr. Clinton among the young.

    The faultlines in the party are clear, beginning with the social agenda of the religious right, including abortion. And ahead lies the challenge of finding a new governing conservatism that can regain the loyalties of voters who seem to demand a new domestic agenda and who simply seemed to lose faith with the Republicans on the economy, as they lost faith with the Democrats 12 years ago. All of this will play out in the early jockeying for 1996. Appeal to Perot

    Many Republicans are expecting a fight as the party enters its wilderness sojourn. “The first verbal assault will come from the right, which will argue that if the Republicans were just purer, they’d be in no trouble,” said Representative Jim Leach, a moderate Iowa Republican. “The second assessment, from the more mainstream and the public at large, will be that the party has become too co-opted by narrow groups.”

    Mr. Leach added, “I personally think a great challenge for the party will be to establish a sense of tolerance.”
    http://www.nytimes.com/1992/11/05/nyregion/1992-elections-world-analysis-dawn-new-politics-challenges-for-both-parties.html?pagewanted=all

  • scubadiver49er

    Here we go again. Conservative Jeff Danklefsen is running for the IL14 seat in Illinois on the Republican ticket, and will have his name on the ballot in the upcoming 2010 Primary. I found out yesterday that the NRCC has already “anointed” Hastert Jr. who is a moderate at best, to represent the constituents in this District. Hastert Sr. didn’t properly plan for his successor and left us high & dry, to where Dem. Bill Foster got himself elected on BHO’s coattails. ENOUGH ALREADY!!!!! Mr. Sessions & Co., WE THE PEOPLE want to choose who will represent us in the upcoming 2010 election, and not who YOU decide, in some out of state committee, who doesn’t represent what WE want. Will you ever get this message??? I wonder how many other Districts he’s done this to? I’ll bet more that we can guess, and maybe as far as “preselecting” all of them?!?!?

  • Jack_Savage

    I would be interested to learn more about it. The last thing we need is another Hastert in the House.

  • scubadiver49er

    From another of Jeff Danklefsen’s supporters on Ethan Hastert.

    “Ethan Hastert is a young attorney located in Elburn, (Illinois) with no worthwhile experience. He is probably a nice guy, but that is nepotism at its worst. His dad did a decent job of serving us, until the last year or two. Then he ?did a number on us,? possibly in anticipation of retiring. I know dozens of Republican voters who are STILL ?steamed? about that. And now he wants his son to take his place? No thanks. Ethan Hastert?s only ?qualification? is that his dad was Speaker. Now I wouldn?t give Denny Hastert the time of day. He has forfeited all the honor and respect I once had for him. There are some decent candidates running. The RNC?s action is an insult to (the Illinois) 14th District GOP voters. The RNC should ?get lost.? All it has done lately is screw up, waste money, lose elections and alienate GOP voters. Conservative voters are the largest voting bloc, but the RNC has been working overtime to drive them away”.

    Me again. I’m also one of those still “steamed” that Hastert quit on us in this District, IL-14. Jeff, a real conservative who believes in upholding our Constitution, is my guy, and many others as well, and I don’t want his efforts short circuited by the NRCC or the RNC, who know absolutely NOTHING about what’s going on back here. Please go to this site for more!! You will not be disappointed in what you’ll see.

    www.jeff14.com

  • luze

    You kinda make it seem like Lois Benson was a political flip-flopper when you wrote, “Benson, a Republican who turned Democrat then turned Republican again” but the truth is if you moved to Pensacola as a Republican back in the late 70′s, early 80′s, as she did you basically HAD to become a Democrat in order to have any significant voice in the political conversation. The Democrat Party WAS the party of the South. The Republican party had NO voice so being a Republican back then, especially as it related to local politics, was useless. That she then turned back to being a Republican doesn’t say as much about her changing her beliefs as it does about the South changing its voting behavior and leaving the Democrat Party.