We can only hope the Senate Republicans learned their lesson today.
As so many of us have tried to tell Mitch McConnell for weeks and weeks and weeks, the Senate GOP must throw everything they can at killing the health care bill. Instead, we have seen the Senate Republicans working collaboratively with the Democrats on a series of messaging amendments that no one has paid attention to.
Finally, Senator Tom Coburn decided to fight. Yesterday, Senator Sanders of Vermont introduced a 700+ page amendment and asked for unanimous consent that the reading of the amendment be dispensed with.
Senator Coburn objected.
The Clerk began to read the amendment.
But then something curious happened — something that violates the sacrosanct nature of the Senate’s rules; rules so inviolable that until yesterday neither Democrat nor Republican ever risks crosses the rules in over 200 years.
In short, the Democrats have now crossed the rubicon.
For over 200 years, the Senate’s rules have ensured orderly and very fair debate. The minority has rights that the majority has never and would never trod upon. One of the chief rules of the Senate is that when one Senator has the floor, no other Senator may act.
Tom Coburn had the floor. He made the clerk read the amendment. Somehow, however, Senator Sanders was able to have his amendment yanks mid-reading.
Under Senate rules, that is flat out impossible.
Riddick’s the guide used by the Senate for instruction on how to apply parliamentary procedure is very clear.
Under Rule XV, paragraph 1, and Senate precedents, an amendment shall be read by the Clerk before it is up for consideration or before the same shall be debated unless a request to waive the reading is granted; in practice that includes an ordinary amendment or an amendment in the nature of a substitute, the reading of which may not be dispensed with except by unanimous consent, and if the request is denied the amendment must be read and further interruptions are not in order.
Because the amendment had to “be read,” “further interruptions [were] not in order.” Despite that very clear language and past precedent, the Senate Democrats chose to recognize Senator Sanders and pull the amendment.
Hopefully the Senate Republicans now realize they are dealing with third world kleptocrats, not American legislators. Mitch McConnell’s “messaging” strategy bought the Democrats time to cut a deal and now the Democrats are willing to throw away over 200 years of Senate tradition and order to confiscate 1/6th of the American economy from the private sector.
The irony is that after Senator Coburn decided to fight, Mitch McConnell sent out his staffers to take the credit. Considering I put up my post this last Saturday entitled “Fight,” I think I deserve more credit than Senator McConnell.
Neil Stevens
Caleb Howe
Daniel Horowitz
Lori Ziganto
dirty harry reid didn't get his name
bobojake (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 12:29AM EDT (link)being honest.
I heard Coburn and Demint on the radio today.
shadowtax (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 12:42AM EDT (link)There are plans to obstruct aggressively. There was a decision made to not deploy parliamentary tricks too early. They consider the current floor version of the bill a decoy and are waiting for the real bill to come out of Harry Reid’s chamber of secrets.
They convinced me that contrary to Erick’s assertions, the Senate GOP is not without a strategy,
If the Democrats break the rules, blaming the Republicans for it will not stop Obamacare.
5.
Third Street (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 12:58AM EDT (link)I have confidence that McConnell knows what he’s doing here. It’s significant to me that not one of the conservative GOP senators (Vitter, DeMint, Coburn, etc.) have voiced any dissent over the current strategy.
In ’94, during the last attempt to socialize healthcare, Phil Gramm warned that if it succeeded people would be hunting down Democrats with dogs within ten years. After what’s happening now my guess is that Dems are not going to get off so easily.
“Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen six, result happiness. Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery.” –Wilkins Micawber, “David Copperfield”
Not my dog..
ecroper Thursday, December 17th at 12:48PM EDT (link)I wouldnt let my dog sink its teeth into somthing as nasty and disgusting as they are.
Not my dog..
ecroper Thursday, December 17th at 12:48PM EDT (link)I wouldnt let my dog sink its teeth into somthing as nasty and disgusting as they are.
you are totally missing the point
E Pluribus Unum (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 1:47AM EDT (link)We already knew the Senate Dems were liars, skunks, cheaters and thieves. It’s the Senate Republicans who keep walking around with the kick-me signs. Nobody here blames OBamaCare on the Republicans. We’re just saying (with perfect clarity and accuracy) that the Repubs could have done a much better job of torpedoing it if they just played knuckle-and-skull instead of mother-may-i. McConnell has been a sucker, and a self-serving frankfurter as a whole, and worse than usual with the fate of the nation at stake.
If they had used the denial of unanimous consent at every turn possible, the entire business of the Senate would turn into sludge, no matter what was a decoy and what was real. As everybody knows, if we make it to January 4, this game is over.
So frankly, stick your attitude in your butt and light it. Erick is, as pretty close to always, balls on. We don’t call them “assertions” when they’re right.
Kill the Terrorists
Protect the Borders
Punch the Hippies h/t IMAO
5 nt
Aaron Gardner (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 8:26AM EDT (link)conform and celebrate diversity….or else!!!
“We’d be much better off if We The People had desired small government enough to keep it.” acat
Follow @Aaron_RS
And I'll raise you another 5. nt
janis (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 8:57AM EDT (link)Yuo left off "Traitors" who should be tried and shot. nt
Tbone (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 10:13AM EDT (link)Envisioning when all that is Left is the Right.
No need to be crude.
shadowtax (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 10:18AM EDT (link)The bar is set quite low. I have seen the assertion repeated that the GOP leadership is listless and without strategy. There is a strategy
As evidence I present the testimony of two rock solid conservative GOP Senators, Demint and Coburn. The latter being the Senator who denied unanimous consent, yesterday.
So the inaction you note is a result of the command, “Keep your powder dry and don’t fire until you see the whites of their eyes.” That’s discipline and courage.
Surely they may lose this fight, especially if the Democrats lose, but I will not let you call them cowards. The critics are panicking and, as I can see, already blaming the GOP for losing a fight not yet fought.
Correction
shadowtax (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 10:23AM EDT (link)That should read “especially if the the Democrats cheat”
Also, I should mention that the strategy includes stretching out debate on the Defense Appropriations Bill which is being debated today.
when you punk Erick Erickson, I will be crude
E Pluribus Unum (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 4:11PM EDT (link)I will only say this once more. They are not called assertions when they are demonstrably, obviously true. Your interpretation of the current scene is naive, even if you are privy to special, inside dirt.
McConnell has a long history that does not lend comfort to any real American watching at the momsent. And I don’t care if you heard it from the man himself, this ‘keep your powder dry’ BS is just another excuse not to doing the difficult thing.
You have fun with your opinion. You’re entitled to it. You’re even entitled to make your case, which you have. What I find noxious is the way you call people stupid for believing near-provable things.
For the record, I assert that water is wet.
Kill the Terrorists
Protect the Borders
Punch the Hippies h/t IMAO
What does punk mean?
shadowtax (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 5:02PM EDT (link)I do not understand. What is the appropriate protocol for disagreement?
My statements are made to rebut the assertion that the GOP has no strategy, is doing nothing, not fighting, etc… I keep reading that and it bothers me because it sets up a straw man. The may have a poor strategy, a stupid strategy, an arrogant strategy, or a liberal strategy as a matter of opinion, but I laid out the existence of the strategy in my earlier post. Coburn and Demint went on Hannity and talked strategy.
The assertion of no strategy is demonstrably false.
If I called anybody stupid, then I apologize. Don’t hold back. Feel free to punk the GOP leadership and me all day long.
Did I say that right?
OK, shadowtax
E Pluribus Unum (Diary) Friday, December 18th at 3:26PM EDT (link)Please give me till tomorrow to properly respond (I’m at work keying this on my cell). But I’ll leave a couple of notes.
First, I’m prepared to go past first impressions; you may be an OK chap. Second (which I’ll expand on tomorrow) I am a scientist and a software developer, fighting off OCD perfectionist tendencies with limited success. I object strenuously to your application of the word ‘assertion’ , but I’ll adress that later. Third, yes I overreact. I’m very fond of EE and a handful of other editors here and I got their backs, to an extent most redstaters would not understand.
So look for a better, more thought out response tomorrow.
Kill the Terrorists
Protect the Borders
Punch the Hippies h/t IMAO
GOP lost house vote with Stupak
GregInFla (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 12:00PM EDT (link)They should have voted present on Stupak. NRL people would just have to understand the vote was in their best interests. If GOP lose Senate vote, they need to reassess their goals.
– A true evolutionist would let endangered species die off. Think about it.
– The sign outside the courthouse said no signs allowed. So I took it down.
– Atlas Shrugged is now on the non-fiction aisle at Amazon.
I'm one NRL type who did understand
The_Gadfly (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 12:47PM EDT (link)and would have specifically preferred that strategy.
The Stupak obstruction strategy would have been
gator_hoo (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 2:36PM EDT (link)a total failure.
If they obstructed Stupak, the fact that the GOP voted against it would have given the Dems political cover for passing the bill in toto, and a number of representatives would have to face uncomfortable questions about why they voted to fund abortion in a bill that passed.
Instead, the Dems have a poison pill that has created a lot of internal divide and practically guaranteed that the Senate will not pass the house bill by reconciliation. Stupak passing was the right thing, morally and strategically.
We'll have to disagree on that.
The_Gadfly (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 10:42PM EDT (link)I think a straight party line abstention on the bill would have worked just fine. The dynamic for the pro-life Dems wouldn’t have changed. Voting for a bill that pays for abortion is voting for a bill that pays for abortion, no matter what anybody else does. That’s essentially what is happening with Nelson.
They would have voted Present, not nay
GregInFla (Diary) Saturday, December 19th at 4:32PM EDT (link)They would not have voted against it, and they could have explained that their Present vote defeated the entire bill. Of course, defeating the entire bill would mean explaining to people why they wanted people to continue dying in the streets, but there’s always a battle to fight somewhere.
– A true evolutionist would let endangered species die off. Think about it.
– The sign outside the courthouse said no signs allowed. So I took it down.
– Atlas Shrugged is now on the non-fiction aisle at Amazon.
Have every (non-HCR) read from the floor as well.
SoFiMil (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 6:22AM EDT (link)The House just left town after passing a few bills, some of them pertaining to the continuing budget resolution. Having those read in their entirety would help gum up the works.
Is there any way the Senate Rs can challenge this parliamentarian ruling on the house floor? This is outrageous.
www.suvstrategery.blogspot.com
Kowlaski - Senate Floor
SoFiMil (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 7:04AM EDT (link)As I understand the rules, at the very least the full Senate can call for a vote. Every Senator needs to be put on the record as to whether this was in order or not. I hope a reporter asks Gibbs about his as well.The vote may have to be asked for immediately after the parliamentarian ruling, however.
www.suvstrategery.blogspot.com
Sanders Yanked the Amendment
AndrewHyman (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 12:47AM EDT (link)As you say, Erick, Sanders yanked his amendment, so the amendment never got to the point of being up for consideration or debated. This episode would be a lot more outrageous if they proceeded to consider the amendment or debate the amendment without first finishing with reading it aloud.
Having said that, if the precedent is to read an amendment even if a Senator wants to withdraw the amendment, then that precedent ought to be respected. Senators would then be more inclined to think twice about proposing stupid and verbose amendments.
Anyway, let’s hope that Senator Nelson holds firm, and that Senator Lieberman continues to use some independent common sense.
It is outrageous on its face
gunnerbs (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 5:07AM EDT (link)When one Senator has the floor, no other Senators may act.
Period.
It does not matter what the Senator who has the floor is pontificating about–that’s what a filibuster is.
Coburn had the floor, and Sanders was out of order in being allowed to act (pull his amendment). The Senate minority has rights that until now were sacred (for lack of a better term). If they violated the one-Senator-at-a-time rule this time, they’ll do it again.
I start with the premise that NO ONE has a right to my Life, Liberty, or Property. Beyond that I’m open to discussion.
———————————
When you send a contribution to the candidate you support, send a copy of the check, or at least a note to his or her opponent, telling them why your money didn’t go there!
To some extent, the GOP propensity to try to
The_Gadfly (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 12:55PM EDT (link)reasonably accommodate the opposition is to blame for this. Gibbs referred back to an earlier exchange in which a GOP senator agreed to suspend the reading of a bill so the Dem could withdraw it. While that was entirely within the rules of order because the GOP senator yielded to the Dem, it opened the door to the current abuse.
Dems play dirty and the GOP needs to stop expecting them to play clean. Frankly, I think a campaign of objecting to all unanimous consent requests until such time as Gibbs’s ruling is overturned is in order. Then we can once again commence with the reading of Sander amendment.
that really isn't the point
streiff (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 8:57AM EDT (link)what you’re arguing is analogous to saying that if you slow down before the traffic cop catches you he can’t ticket you for speeding.
“What keeps me here is the reek of beer, the ladies and the craic”
Next Steps
AndrewHyman (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 9:50AM EDT (link)The GOP Senators should provide details about why this was a violation of precedent (including details about what happened in 1992), and should appeal this ruling — or else shut up. IMHO.
At the Same Time
AndrewHyman (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 10:53AM EDT (link)Coburn did a great job on this.
Q
AndrewHyman (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 5:46PM EDT (link)Durbin pointed to rule XV, section 2, in the Standing Rules of the Senate: “Any motion, amendment, or resolution may be withdrawn or modified by the mover at any time before a decision, amendment or ordering of the yeas and nays, except a motion to reconsider, which shall not be withdrawn without leave.” Anyone know why the GOP thinks this is inapplicable?
Actually, this is an awesome precedent that I hope the Democrats continue using...
Third Street (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 12:52AM EDT (link)…considering that Coburn’s next plan is to read the whole bill itself.
“Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen six, result happiness. Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery.” –Wilkins Micawber, “David Copperfield”
I get what you're saying, but
gunnerbs (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 5:09AM EDT (link)the only precedent set here is interrupting a Senator who has the floor.
THAT is a dangerous precedent.
I start with the premise that NO ONE has a right to my Life, Liberty, or Property. Beyond that I’m open to discussion.
———————————
When you send a contribution to the candidate you support, send a copy of the check, or at least a note to his or her opponent, telling them why your money didn’t go there!
Senator Tom Coburn,
proudmarinemom (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 1:03AM EDT (link)You are an American hero.
God Bless you, sir.
“O’er the ramparts we watched, … our flag was still there!”
I Say Fight Harder Now
fpete13527 (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 1:39AM EDT (link)I respectfully disagree with some of the above comments regarding faith in the GOP strategy and hope for Nelson to hold firm against.
I’m willing to be wrong, but I say it is time to fight harder now….or at least get more agressive and DYNAMIC in the opposition…NOW.
The American people are clear that this bill is garbage and they are willing for it to be sent back to drawing board.
Obama and the Dems, however, will do ANYTHING, probably including commit felonies, to pass it. However, the Dems do not do well when they are FOUGHT….. especially when fought with COURAGE and INTEGRITY as demonstrated by Sen Demint and Coburn…..empowered and generated by Erick!!
Kudos to Sen Demint, to Sen Coburn, and to Erick!. Dont stop!
No more “rope a dope delay” or “passive resistance.” FIGHT!!
"Rope a dope delay" IS fighting.
Third Street (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 2:01AM EDT (link)It may not be the tactic everyone wants to see, but it is a legitimate one.
We have 40 senators. Count ‘em.
“Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen six, result happiness. Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery.” –Wilkins Micawber, “David Copperfield”
And if we can keep them on stuck on the Obamacare debate until
The_Gadfly (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 12:59PM EDT (link)oh, about November of 2010, I think I could stand whole heartedly behind rope a dope. Even if I currently prefer killing it dead with a silver bullet, a stake through it’s heart and enough holy wafers stuffed in its mouth to feed a province in China.
Erick,
Mayhem (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 2:06AM EDT (link)It was BECAUSE of the very clear language and past precedent that they did what they did, not in spite of it.
When the Dems start losing they start saying, “Gosh that’s inconvenient. We can’t have that. We’ll have to change that.” It’s ends justify the means. It’s situational ethics. It’s rules for thee but not for me.
The Democrat M.O. is, “If it doesn’t fit, force it. If it breaks, it needed to be replaced anyway.”
James Madison, Jim DeMint, Margaret Thatcher, Ronald Reagan… You get the picture.
Today was the tipping point
hickorystick (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 2:32AM EDT (link)It’s all downhill for the Democrats now. Lieberman jerking the Public Option out single-handedly will I believe be recognized as the point health care was doomed . The fiasco with Saunders Single Payer plan confirmed it for me. Why I believe HC is unrecoverable at this point is
1.) The majority of the Public is against it
2.) It is a terrible bill
3.) There is nothing to be gained politically by it. If any thing a Politician can be trusted to do, it is to act in his own self-interest, Joe Lieberman realizing this sooner than the others.
4.) All the arguments against it are out there and have been tested. I don’t know of one that has been shot down or disqualified (including Death Panels). As long as HC out there these arguments will be hammered home.
5.) The Public is now ready for this thing to be shot down. Decency expectations have been fulfilled in dicussing it. The Republicans won’t be held in contempt for killing this thing.
6.) People are tired of the Health Care debate.
This thing has dragged on forever and the Republicans have not even begun to play parliamentary games with this. I believe they will now. They will roast the Democrats very slowly over the spit and I for one am planning on enjoying it.
Except one thing...
autiger89 Thursday, December 17th at 4:56AM EDT (link)Democrats definitely have something to gain by passing this bill – destruction of the American economy, and by extension the world economy, so that everyone will become dependent on the government, i.e., dependent on them.
Then they will have complete control.
And fpete13527 is right, they will stop at nothing to obtain complete control.
5 nt
gunnerbs (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 5:11AM EDT (link)I start with the premise that NO ONE has a right to my Life, Liberty, or Property. Beyond that I’m open to discussion.
———————————
When you send a contribution to the candidate you support, send a copy of the check, or at least a note to his or her opponent, telling them why your money didn’t go there!
Democrats no, The Big 0, Pelosi, Reid and a bunch of other
The_Gadfly (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 1:06PM EDT (link)high level muckety mucks yes.
The problem here is that The Big 0 knows his presidency is doomed to failure worse than Carter and Grant put together if Obamacare fails. So what we have now is the classic Zeno’s paradox: the immovable object (politicians always working to ensure re-election) is about to meet the irresistable force (The Big 0′s political godhood). And for the first time in my life I’m rooting for the politician’s instinct to focus on being re-elected.
I have to reject your premise
gunnerbs (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 5:15AM EDT (link)The current majority leadership in Congress–both houses–does not care a rat’s a$$ about numbers 1-6 in your list.
The One wants this, and is willing to move the goal line to claim victory. Pelosi said yesterday that she wants a bill on the President’s desk by…wait for it…the State of the Union address.
This thing is not “doomed” until it is tabled in the Senate long enough to get a Republican majority in Congress. And even then, I’m going to be cautiously optimistic.
I start with the premise that NO ONE has a right to my Life, Liberty, or Property. Beyond that I’m open to discussion.
———————————
When you send a contribution to the candidate you support, send a copy of the check, or at least a note to his or her opponent, telling them why your money didn’t go there!
It's Subjective Analysis
hickorystick (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 10:53AM EDT (link)But I’m saying the dynamic has changed. The idea that the Senators can act as a group and The President can ride in and save the day at election time is through. The Public is souring on the Agenda and Each Senator is going to start looking out for himself. That is what they do, represent theirself
Dynamic is pointing down
Freedoms Truth (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 1:48PM EDT (link)I think you are right about the dynamic, the momentum has shifted away from the bill, and if others didnt know, I saw a Chamber of Commerce ad on the bill on CNN yesterday, and just contemplated how HC was killed in 1994 with ads like that. The Dems are already looking to the next election, with horror.
… but these bills are like vampires.
They are not really dead until a stake is driven through their heart.
Obama and Pelosi and other Dems still WANT a bill … now wanting and getting are two different things. If we keep the pressure up, they will not get the votes they need to get a bill.
Freedoms Truth,
Travis Monitor – http://travismonitor.blogspot.com
Austin, TX
It's Subjective Analysis
hickorystick (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 11:17AM EDT (link)But I the dynamic has changed. Whereas they thought sticking together would get them somewhere, now this Agenda has become a stinker to the American Public. Senators self-preservation instict will kick in.
HC is unrecoverable at this point
edintexas Thursday, December 17th at 9:09AM EDT (link)I would hope I am wrong, and you are correct, about this. But history shows us that once any bill is passed, and signed into law, there are two major factors to contend with:
1. If the goal isn’t fully met, and compromise was necessary to get this far to achieving the goal, the Left will be back with another bill attempting to get closer to the goal. In this case, you can guarantee that if there are Leftists remaining in Congress after 2010 they will be back with another attempt to move the “ball” closer to “single payer universal health care”. They are quite willing to work incrementally for what they want when they can’t get it all at once.
2. The bureaucrats will implement the law, often in ways totally unanticipated by those who read the statute. The Left operates on the idea that the bureaucracy belongs to them and is an excellent way to thwart the will of the people and the Congress. The Left stacks the bureaucratic “deck” with Leftists and ensures they are buried deeply in the system. The Left also makes sure that every single political appointee from a previous Republican administration is promptly removed, even (as we have seen with this administration) if it means leaving senior positions vacant for extended periods. Repubs have a terrible track record in this regard. Witness when “W” took office and failed to remove the Clinton appointees from many positions. And then they wondered why there were “leaks” to the press on almost everything. Contrast that with Clinton’s removal of every single US Attorney from the Bush 41 administration. The Left knows how to work the spoils system.
As I said, I hope I’m wrong – but passing anything is a potential path to the Left getting everything eventually. And they recognize it as such. Heck, they’ve already stated this.
edintexas- You are absolutely correct
Scope (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 10:36AM EDT (link)The Progressives, even when they were still known as Democrats, never give up. And yes, if they don’t get the full cookie jar now, they will be back. As I have posted before, they snatched alot of money in the stimulus, and are already using it to incrementally set up the infrastructure for government run healthcare. The death panel/rationing board is already in place with 15 members. There was a large amount of money, something like 48 billion to set up the computerized health record system, which all will connect back to the panel who will be deciding on what care you get, if any. The clinics are being expanded and new ones set up. The major source of their revenues, as stated by an HRSA person is Medicaid. The over 4,000 existing co-ops already see everyone even if they have no insurance or any ability to pay, and no matter what their immigration status is. You can get free healthcare even if your are at 400% over the poverty level, or your fees are adjusted down. The premise, that the liberals are pushing, is to make everyone believe that people are dying in the streets because they can’t afford healthcare. Oh, and the Comparative Effectivness studies were also funded in the stimulus. The stimulus funds, passed soon after Obama took office, was the liberals way of being dang sure they had a backup source in case their healthcare bill did not succeed. Shouldn’t the billions awarded in the stimulus be added to the CBO cost estimates for each of the bills being costed? There are 2 bills right now in the House and Senate committees giving Sebelius and the administration complete control over healthcare in this country. I guess if no healthcare bill is successful, the house and senate will vote to accomplish what they couldn’t with Obamacare.
Passing anything is a garauntee of something...
lunarmanathome (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 10:47AM EDT (link)that will lead to a single payer system in the future.
Look at the history of every entitlement program and all you can see is how far we’ve come from the original intent and scope of each. Progressives will eat “this elephant” one bite at a time – they were just stupid and myopic to see that their current effort is a bigger bite then the public is comfortable with.
I have zero faith in the Republican party in fighting the overall battle – large and intrusive government.
I agree the Left operates this way
hickorystick (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 12:07PM EDT (link)I’m saying the political space has changed, and the Public is favorable to to the Republicans objections. I’m planning on enjoying the disintegration of Dem’s Big three agenda.
I would hope that the Republicans in both Houses....
JadedByPolitics (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 5:50AM EDT (link)would FINALLY recognize the hatefulness of Democrats. WE have watched with DISGUST for years how Democrats and their demons around the internet and their LAPDOGS in the media have diminished and DESTROYED anything relative to CLASS.
WE have watched the Republicans treated as if their were second class citizens and yet those same Republicans constantly want to “work across the aisle”. IF this is not the moment in time for them to learn that these people are ENEMIES (not in the AQ sense) and MUST be treated with the same LEVEL of disrespect that the Republicans have been shown since 2000 and BTW you can trace the actual HATE and CONTEMPT from liberals/leftists/Democrats to the loss of Gore. That election gave these leftists the opening to become ANIMALS and in such they should be treated as ANIMALS.
I will SCREAM if I ever hear another person say WE must be kinder, gentler and more “inclusive” because the bottom line is the Democrats are a NASTY, DISGUSTING bunch of LEFTIST’s and deserve NO kindness from Republicans. I PRAY when WE have the whole shebang again that it is remembered and that WE use EVERY bill to DISMANTLE the Federal Government back down to its intended purpose and to get OUT OF THE WAY of Americans!
Unified Patriots – How-To:
Activists Taking Action
The way to a socialistic run government
mutantone Thursday, December 17th at 5:52AM EDT (link)The way to a socialistic run government is to stop following the rules of the government. Force unconstitutional laws and regulations on, We The People. Allow the majority to dictate what the people will and will not do. Force upon us Taxation without representation. International intervention with out congressional approval. All these things they are doing can be seen as treasonous actions against the well being of our Nation. They have ruined our once good credit rating, placing China in control of our financial well being. What more can they do to ruin our great nation before the people step up to be counted as for or against their philosophy of ruination?
Thanks, Dr. Coburn
hoosierdad Thursday, December 17th at 6:20AM EDT (link)I called Tom Coburn’s office to simply thank him for his efforts yesterday afternoon and urge him to keep it up. I also like the way that his office answers the phone: “DOCTOR Coburn’s office,” instead of “SENATOR Coburn’s office.” Hmm, Barbara “Call me Senator” Boxer could learn something here.
I'm unsure ...
dabeall Thursday, December 17th at 7:31AM EDT (link)so, maybe someone can enlighten me. Under Riddick’s Rules, does the same rule apply to the underlying bill itself? If so, can the Republicans force the reading of the entire bill, amendments included, at this point?
If so, they won’t be able to vote until sometime around Easter.
Mr. Smith where is Washington?
kmacwayne (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 7:58AM EDT (link)Someone should remake that old movie with these new rules -
Perhaps it could be called – Goodbye Washington, Hello Chicago
Mr. Smith......
scubadiver49er Thursday, December 17th at 9:41AM EDT (link)When I read what Erick put up, that movie was the first thing that I thought of. I wish that Harry Reid and this absolutely ridiculous Healthcare Bill would collapse!!! And is Cloward-Piven in our future???
“I Just Can’t Wait to be King” – Simba from “The Lion King”, 1994
Barry Soetoro – ???
whatever happened
spepper Thursday, December 17th at 8:06AM EDT (link)whatever happened to days such as when one of the most beloved Presidents of the United States, Abraham Lincoln, was a Senator, he physically jumped out of a window of the US Capitol, in order to prevent a quorum from being formed, once– in other words, it was not beneath ol’ Abe to use parliamentary procedural tactics in order to stop the opposition from getting their way in Congress– we need leaders in there with the same sort of spirit, which appears to be sorely lacking now, sadly– it certainly wasn’t beneath the Dems from using similar tactics during the Bush-43 years!
Remembering who your enemey is. Revolutionaries respect no rules, only the revolution matters.
archer52 Thursday, December 17th at 8:27AM EDT (link)http://truthandcommonsense.com/2009/12/16/harassing-the-families-of-political-leaders-who-are-no-longer-in-favor-democrats-no-maos-cultural-revolution/
As I’ve posted before, I’m working my way through the book on Mao’s last Cultural Revolution. Remember when this occurred- 1966 through 1976. The same time a number of the people we are dealing with were young men and women in school or entering school. Their professors in the universities they went to were in college about the same time as Mao’s revolution took hold which coincided with Vietnam. Reading the book is a powerful insight into what drove the Chinese to mass murder and mayhem. As I work my way through it I’m posting relevant passages and thoughts as they apply to what I see happening today.
First, to be successful in police work, business, sports and life in general, you must always know your enemy. Who is it that is facing you across the table, the field, or in the marketplace. The sooner you get what motivates them, the sooner you can use it against them. In this time period, with the accumulation of radicals on the left in such a small area, all pointing in one direction, it is critical to get a grasp on what it is that makes them tick. In an early post, long before understanding Mao, I listed what I saw as some of the players:
http://truthandcommonsense.com/2009/08/23/why-socialize-america-lets-play-the-agenda-game/
I managed to cobble together a number of known factions of the left, each with the own agendas, that are now assisting Obama’s crew. Imagine if you will a large rowboat with a number of paddlers, each rowing energetically, with Obama at the bow. Their backs are to the goal, but their faith in Obama allows them to pull hard on their strokes- initially. They are convinced by him their individual goal is where he’s headed, even though that is impossible. Still they pull hard. Now at the stern of the boat are Rahm/Soros and some others who are actually at the rudder. They too have convinced the now useful idiots at the oars, it is THEIR goal they are pulling for.
In truth, the goal, the motive, belongs only to a select few. In Mao’s case, he kept his goal close to his vest. Frankly, at this point in the book, I’m not sure he knew exactly what he was looking for, other than to avoid being cast aside in history as a monster like Stalin. He knew he had to shake things up, because China was not going in the direction (remember his policies killed millions, on purpose and by accident) he thought communism would take it.
Mao believed in revolution as a state of mind and a goal in of itself. He believed in chaos. One of his tools was the Red Guard, made up mostly of children indoctrinated in the ways of “Mao” as he was almost a demi-god by 1966. His words held a cult-like grip over the young and they followed him blindly in order to take part in the furtherance of the “revolution.” They killed and robbed and beat and repatriated MILLIONS of people in a short time as they fanned out across the nation in order to purge it of all non-Maoist thought. They were KIDS! (See Obama’s “Love me” attempt several months ago.)
Frankly I didn’t pay much attention to Mao beyond my general understanding of him because he was proven a fool by history and I had moved on. Like someone said, “If I have an arrow stuck in my chest, I don’t need to know who the archer was, how the bow was made, or why he shot me. All I need to know is how to get the arrow out of my chest.” That’s how I thought, back then. That was before I had my own nation be assaulted by men and women who are students of that archer and are now trying to put arrows back into my chest.
The author of the article seems surprised that the Senate leaders would violate the rules in order to achieve their agenda. “You cheated!” is the cry. I’m here to tell you, they aren’t cheating because the rules they are following aren’t the same you and I follow. In the last year we have seen Obama violate contract law, laws of decency, laws of etiquette, laws of finance, laws of honesty and duty, and worst- the law of common sense. From our perspective, he’s one goofy bast**d and we point and laugh continuously wondering, as I have said before, if they have childproofed the Oval office wall sockets.
That is our mistake. He’s not stupid, Rahm’s not stupid, Soros is certainly not stupid, nor Holdren, Jackson et. al. They are revolutionaries. They are following their rules and in reading Mao’s thoughts those rules include creating chaos for the sake of chaos. It keeps everyone afraid and watching each other, not the leaders guiding the boat into the rocks.
Now we are seeing some fracturing among the left because they are now looking over their shoulders as they row and have realized the boat isn’t headed where they thought it would. The greenies, the anti-capitalists, the gays, and others are starting to say “HEY! You lied!” But their problem is they are in the boat, the boat’s moving, and their only other choice is to dive overboard and swim for it, certain death for sure. I mean, seriously, where are they going to swim to? The Republicans are in a boat behind Obama, trying to keep up, so that’s not much of a choice!
I’ve said many times, read history because you are bound to run into again. Here we are seeing what Obama and his wife promised we’d see if we elected him President, a fundamental re-ordering of our nation and way of life.
Are we living in a Maoist revolt? No, the citizens of our nation have a different mindset than the Chinese. If a group of middle school kids started running around robbing, beating and murdering us in the name of Obama we’d skin them alive and send them home. That kind of murderous intent takes generations to indoctrinate. But that doesn’t mean our children won’t see it, if we fail to act now. However, are there elements of Mao thinking in what we see? Absolutely! Mao believed in chaos, fear, distrust, hatred, pitting one set of people against the other in order to foster confusion and obedience to the state- his state. As we watch our “leaders” do much the same thing, violate rules in order to achieve their personal goals, do not be surprised. This is a revolutionary war and in war there are no rules, only those who submit and those who rule in the end.
*This*, Archer, should be a diary. Well written
eburke (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 8:48AM EDT (link)well thought out, and downright chilling because I believe you are dead on.
I’m guessing that Barack Obama and Bill Ayers weren’t sitting around exchanging Christmas cookie recipes all those years.
“All that need be done for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.”
Unified Patriots
Absolutely!! nt
nessa (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 9:20AM EDT (link)“If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.”—Samuel Adams
Contributor to Unified Patriots
teh twitter
555 nt
gunnerbs (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 9:11AM EDT (link)I start with the premise that NO ONE has a right to my Life, Liberty, or Property. Beyond that I’m open to discussion.
———————————
When you send a contribution to the candidate you support, send a copy of the check, or at least a note to his or her opponent, telling them why your money didn’t go there!
5555. nt
ColdWarrior (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 10:24AM EDT (link)Should be a diary.
Thank you.
ColdWarrior
In 2012, will YOU become a “voting member” of the Republican Party in your precinct?
Where it all started. Twitter @kaltkrieger
Unified Patriots.
Learn how to GOTV at The Concord Project and at Procinct and
Revolutionaries, Continued
scubadiver49er Thursday, December 17th at 10:01AM EDT (link)And every life lost since the days of George Wahington, Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson, defending the Constitution and the USA up until now will have been totally wasted, if this goes down. So why would anyone in the military these days be willing to put their life on the line defending an Administration and Congress, who are proponents of this crap?! And remember that Barry did say that he also wanted a “Public Army” within the USA that was just as strong as what we have with the five branches of service we presently have. He’s building it!! Control of the House, the Senate, SEIU, ACORN, etc., etc – the list goes on and on. I fear for the future of the USA operating under the Constitution. How does the name United Socialist States of America (USSA) sound to you??? I get sick every time I think about this.
“I Just Can’t Wait to be King” – Simba from “The Lion King”, 1994
Barry Soetoro – ???
The ends justify the means.
Common_Cents (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 11:50AM EDT (link)That’s what DEMS/socialists are all about. Look at affirmative action and redistribution of wealth. Everything about the left is about a result.
Conservatives are more about process. As long as everyone plays by the rules, let there be winners and losers.
The left is damn any rules, we’ll forcefully make things equal.
“Fathom the hypocrisy of a Government
that requires every citizen to prove
they are insured…. but not everyone
must prove they are a citizen.” -Ben Stein
“In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule.”[especially in DC] – Friedrich Nietzsche
Most excellent archer52
Scope (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 1:38PM EDT (link)The blueprint for the Obama administration’s march to communism.
PS- Anita Dunn where ever you are
Scope (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 1:40PM EDT (link)would be proud.
Trackback from Asheville Tea Party blog
snopercod Thursday, December 17th at 8:39AM EDT (link)Democrats Toss 200 Years of Senate Rules Under the Bus to pass Health Care
My conclusion: They don’t care about the U.S. Constitution, the Senate rules, 200 years of precedent, or anything else except their personal power. Harry Reid has become a third-world thug no different than Hugo Chavez.
Come to think of it....
AndrewHyman (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 11:44AM EDT (link)Couldn’t the GOP introduce a 100,000-word amendment, and insist that it be read, and NOT withdraw it? Now that would amount to some serious filibustering.
CBO score
proudgop (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 12:29PM EDT (link)Where the heck is the CBO score on this supposed bill??
Its been more then week and half and still no word??
Do Dems control CBO?
I Estimate Cost For A Living. This Reminds Me of A Dilbert Cartoon.
Repair_Man_Jack (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 12:33PM EDT (link)Block 1: “I need a budget estimate for my program. I have no strategic plan and no diagrams for it yet. I need that estiamte next week.”
Block 2: Dilbert Says. “$3,456,789.00″
Block 3: “You can’t do that. You know nothing about my program.”
Dilbert Says. “That makes two of us.”
Mr. Obama is pretending that an economic “recovery” is underway when he knows damn well that the banking system is just blowing smoke up the shredded *** of what’s left of that economy – James Howard Kunstler
If the CBO were accountants truly indepenent of Congress
The_Gadfly (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 4:57PM EDT (link)Anything related to Healthcare would come back as a failure. The underlying assumptions are at best untested and I am doubtful the Congressional reporting conforms to an GAAP standards. I believe in these instances the accepted practice is for the accountant to say the are UNABLE to offer an opinion on the finances, which is generally regarded as worse than an adverse opinion, because with an adverse opinion there is sufficient information to know SOMETHING about the state of the books.
I'm shocked the CBO hasn't been totally corrupted yet.
Common_Cents (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 6:49PM EDT (link)I’m sure they are on the radar.
“Fathom the hypocrisy of a Government
that requires every citizen to prove
they are insured…. but not everyone
must prove they are a citizen.” -Ben Stein
“In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule.”[especially in DC] – Friedrich Nietzsche
roll call vote
proudgop (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 1:02PM EDT (link)I assume thats just roll call vote and it requires and up or down vote and all 60 dems will vote to block the republicans from doing that
We need to chose the person...
wayneepalmer Thursday, December 17th at 1:43PM EDT (link)Eric, maybe you’ll be the one. We need someone to draft the articles of secession.
Hell, this government has thrown the Constitution, the Law, AND their own “gentlemanly” rules under the bus. The rule of Law no longer exists here and as such we are free to remove them.
The Founders never envisioned that the bulk of the government would need to be impeached for mass.treason. They never created a mechanism outside of the Second Amendment to do so. We The People have reached the end of the line with these criminals and we must remove them from office.
If they refuse to respect the law they must BY LAW be removed by force if necessary. The time has come.
True peace between two enemies has only ever been acheived when one side has utterly defeated the other…if you doubt this truth visit Nagasaki sometime.
Remember What You Promised
scubadiver49er Thursday, December 17th at 2:36PM EDT (link)Does this sound familiar???:
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God”.
I wonder how many Senators even remember this?? Did they have their fingers crossed behind their backs when they said this, or said something different when they repeated this, or had their left hand on the “Communist Manifesto” instead of a “Bible” when repeating it? These “progressives” need to be taken to task at every opportunity. We ARE at war. We are witnessing the next American Revolution and Civil War both at the same time!!! I guess since they no longer belive in God, they don’t have to hold themselves accountable to this oath that they took. I though I’d never be alive to see and hear this stuff in my lifetime.
“I Just Can’t Wait to be King” – Simba from “The Lion King”, 1994
Barry Soetoro – ???
Remember What You Promised - Part 2
scubadiver49er Thursday, December 17th at 6:44PM EDT (link)And does THIS also sound familiar???:
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
Same comments as previously posted on this one as well. Maybe he DOESN’T have the “ability” (or even cares to)???
“I Just Can’t Wait to be King” – Simba from “The Lion King”, 1994
Barry Soetoro – ???
Nana
nana (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 4:50PM EDT (link)Is it not possible to appeal the parliamentarian’s ruling, with all Senate business suspended until a decision is reached? That should keep them busy for a while. Can anyone other than the manager call for adjournment of the proceedings? With an appropriate second, that should be an interesting vote.
Nana
nana (Diary) Thursday, December 17th at 4:54PM EDT (link)Can Reid be forced to submit his bill before anything else can be considered? If nothing has been written as most believe, would he not have to withdraw this phantom bill?
I am appalled
romeg Friday, December 18th at 9:59PM EDT (link)by at least two elements of this event: I am, first of all, appalled that, with all those lawyers in the Republican Party, sitting in the Senate, that this action was taken by an MD rather than a JD and only after having it suggested by you. Can’t these guys come up with these tactics on their own.
Perhaps it is fitting that Dr. Coburn rose in defense of his profession. Given the uneasy relationship between these two professions, it is time they worked together to put an end to this attempt by the Socialists (quite literally in this instance) and Closet Communists.
But I am even more appalled by the behavior of these apostate Americans, these Democrats that claim such a high regard and deep affection for the Rules of the Senate. Where was Robert Byrd, the Conscience of the Senate? To quote another Liberal Demnocrat and attorney Joseph Welch, on the occasion of an ad hominem attack by Senator Joseph McCarthy on his client “Have you NO DECENCY, Sir? This is the question that should be posed to Harry Reid and Bernie Sanders regarding their behavior.
We are on the road to Perdition and these b***ards are leading the parade.
“Of all tyrannies a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victim may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated, but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.” – C. S. Lewis
Lieberman
proudgop (Diary) Friday, December 18th at 10:02PM EDT (link)Lieberman is no longer in DC and back in CT with his family to observe Jewish Holidays
We are getting a wicked snow storm this weekend and its supposed to be snowing into Sunday in CT
there is a chance Lieberman may not be able to be back in DC by earliest Monday ( if they are flying)
Let it snow, let it snow, let it snow
GregInFla (Diary) Saturday, December 19th at 4:35PM EDT (link)nt
– A true evolutionist would let endangered species die off. Think about it.
– The sign outside the courthouse said no signs allowed. So I took it down.
– Atlas Shrugged is now on the non-fiction aisle at Amazon.