« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

A Lack of Presidential Leadership

You remember Tom Kean, don’t you? He’s the former chairman of the 9/11 Commission — that same commission whose policies in its massive report Barack Obama guaranteed to implement.

Obama has not. In fact, one of the chief priorities of the 9/11 commission was the ability to effectively cross reference people on terrorist watch lists with passenger manifests for airlines. Hasn’t fully happened.

Commission Chairman Kean was on State of the Union with John King earlier today. He made some real news.

Keep in mind this guy is the guy Democrats and Republicans both trusted to lead the commission because he is one of those New England Republicans who eschews partisan politics.

According to Kean

“We had an administration which was not focused, as it should be, on terrorism and that’s understandable,” Kean said. “They were focused on health care and global warming and the economy. That’s very understandable. Secondly, we weren’t really focused on Yemen and the terrible things that are happening there. Now we are and that’s a good thing. And, thirdly, there were holes obviously and the [intelligence gathering] system wasn’t working well. We found out it wasn’t working well and the president understands it’s not working well and now we’re focused on fixing it.”

And that’s it precisely. And it is understandable. Obama has been focused on everything under the sun except keeping America safe. The Chairman of the 9/11 Commission recognizes this. The country no doubt recognizes this.

The question is: if Obama is too busy working on health care to take that 3 a.m. phone call, who is answering the phone?

COMMENTS

  • mbecker908

    Why would anybody need to. Given his performance so far why the hell would anybody call him?

  • http://jakespeaks.wordpress.com/ Jake W

    Kean is dead on, BTW. The administration, if it had it’s priorities straight, would focus a lot more on terrorism.

  • badkarma6

    What part of dereliction of duty is understandable?

  • NeoKong

    If you want to get a hold of the President you need to get him on his Blackberry.
    Obama does not want to be a war president. He despises the military.

  • http://www.voterubio2010.com nelsa

    Near the end of the video they had a graphic showing the 911 commision giving the airport screening process an “F”. The report was from 2005.

    Question? Is is criminal to ignore existing laws and fail to carry out assigned dutiies when trusted to do so?

    My point is that the laws are in place. The policies are set in writing. Lord knows they have provided enough funding to support them. The problem is apathy on the part of some of those entrusted with our security.

  • drfredc

    We are getting just what the PRESSSSident wanted, a clueless President that does pretty much everything the PRESSSident wants and what he does that doesn’t meet PRESSSSidential standards, we’ll that’s just not reported.

    Face it, Obama’s a train wreck that will keep the PRESSSidential reports filled with self inflicted national, state, local and individual misery far into the future. Just what is needed to sell more soap and paper towels on the 6 o’clock and 10 o’clock news. Life doesn’t hardly get any better.

    Bend over and assimilate,
    Obama is so great.

  • Paul Seale

    As nelsa eluded – if we got an F in screening in 2005, what has been done to correct messures?

    Apparently nothing.

    I would also note that there have been several well written articles by the press in the UK, of all places, which are spot on regarding the issues we face.

    Where I disagree with Kean is that this whole mess is “understandable.”

    National security should be number one item (basic/essential) for any President of the United States, no matter what party they come from.

    Yet, it seems not only is it on the back burner – but delegated to nothing more that political hot potato.

    Sad – see Erick’s earlier post on leadership and its effects on our nation.

  • http://www.obamafailblog.net obamafailblog

    Despite all his grand domestic programs, it is becoming obvious that BHO intends to outsource foreign policy and domestic security decisions to anyone who wants the gig – Clinton, Holbrooke, Mitchell, Brennan, Holder, Napolitano, etc.

    The 3am call will go to voicemail. An administration rep will return the call in a few days. That’s pretty much the standard operating procedure for these clowns.

  • http://www.obamafailblog.net obamafailblog

    Kean is about as middle-of-the-road a politician as you’ll ever find. That’s probably why he headed up the 9-11 commission.

    That is why these comments are stunning. Watch for Obama to hit -25 in Rasmussen this week. Moderate support is gone and it ain’t comin’ back.

  • http://andrightlyso.com/ civil_truth

    …if I read his statement aright.

    Bush probably would not have gotten a mulligan, but hey, life isn’t fair. And it really doesn’t matter at this point.

    The test will be what happens next. If the Obama administration gets a clue and starts to take terrorism seriously and give it the priority it deserves, then the mulligan is justifiable in return for our national interest being enhanced.

    However, if the Obama administration merely does PR window dressing and goes back to ignoring terrorism, then Kean and others had better not give another mulligan when the next security breach happens.

  • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior

    Thank you,
    ColdWarrior
    No More Scozzafavas!

  • http://www.suvstrategery.blogspot.com SoFiMil

    Wow!

  • http://nanosecondinv.proboards.com/index.cgi? trapeze

    …before we (as a nation) take this situation seriously. The thing is GWB did his job too well. If we had had another successful attack on American soil during say, the last year of his admin, then maybe President Toonces would have been forced to shove domestic security to the front of the line instead of Obamacare.

    We (the public) had grown complacent during the previous admin because GWB didn’t let anything bad happen. This allowed us to elect a doofus. And President Toonces is a luxury (yeah, right) that we cannot afford.

    Sadly, what has happened in 2009 is still not enough to get the public’s attention focused on where it should be. We will probably have to lose several thousand more citizens before we wake up to the fact that we aren’t safe anymore.

    The enemy understands that we have a weak leader that is clueless about their intentions and capabilities. They are going to keep bringing it to us until we get serious.

  • http://pocketchangeproductions.net/ anotherindyfilmguy

    now that’s an understatement…

  • bk

    Isn’t that in effect what he said? It was all along the lines of “Obama blew this off for a year, but now it got his attention so that’s good.” It’s only “good” as compared to continuing to ignore it. It sure as heck isn’t what anyone with more than three brain cells would call “leadership”.

    Here’s Obama at the first debate with McCain. Is anyone in the MSM asking him to indicate progress he’s made on all these things he listed as important for our security?
    1) securing potential targets, particularly chemical sites, transit, and ports
    2) stopping nuclear proliferation in Iran and elsewhere
    3) continuing missile defense
    4) getting more cooperation from our allies in rooting our AQ
    5) restoring our standing in the world

    On 1) he’s done nothing. On 2) he’s made things worse because we are further away from any action on Iran. On 3) he’s slashed the budget so we’re worse off. On 4) we still seem to be where we were a year ago. On 5) we are arguably worse off – a year ago most of the world hated us; now most of those countries don’t even take us seriously any more.

    Well, first of all, I think that we are safer in some ways. Obviously, we’ve poured billions of dollars into airport security. We have done some work in terms of securing potential targets, but we still have a long way to go.

    We’ve got to make sure that we’re hardening our chemical sites. We haven’t done enough in terms of transit; we haven’t done enough in terms of ports.

    And the biggest threat that we face right now is not a nuclear missile coming over the skies. It’s in a suitcase.

    This is why the issue of nuclear proliferation is so important. It is the — the biggest threat to the United States is a terrorist getting their hands on nuclear weapons.

    And we — we are spending billions of dollars on missile defense. And I actually believe that we need missile defense, because of Iran and North Korea and the potential for them to obtain or to launch nuclear weapons, but I also believe that, when we are only spending a few hundred million dollars on nuclear proliferation, then we’re making a mistake.

    The other thing that we have to focus on, though, is al Qaeda. They are now operating in 60 countries. We can’t simply be focused on Iraq. We have to go to the root cause, and that is in Afghanistan and Pakistan. That’s going to be critical. We are going to need more cooperation with our allies.

    And one last point I want to make. It is important for us to understand that the way we are perceived in the world is going to make a difference, in terms of our capacity to get cooperation and root out terrorism.

    And one of the things that I intend to do as president is to restore America’s standing in the world. We are less respected now than we were eight years ago or even four years ago.

    And this is the greatest country on Earth. But because of some of the mistakes that have been made — and I give Senator McCain great credit on the torture issue, for having identified that as something that undermines our long-term security — because of those things, we, I think, are going to have a lot of work to do in the next administration to restore that sense that America is that shining beacon on a hill.

  • lynchsteele

    The former Gov of NJ did his study and reccomendations during Pres Bushs’ term, as a non-partison review of how thing came to pass, the short memoried Politicians disregard anything but what doesn’t work. They are a heedless lot, they will be the death of many if allowed to continue their ineptitude.

  • sarge324

    what does an community organizer with no background doing running our country,god help us .stay mad and vote them out.

  • edintexas

    I thought it would be worth pointing out that the graphic was basically BS. Yes, the original report gave an “F” for “screening” in 2005. Undoubtedly the MSM would love to help Dear Leader place blame on Bush. But the fact is that the physical screening which Abdulmutallab went through was in The Netherlands and whichever other airports he flew from.

    What did exist is a failure to properly evaluate intelligence, and MAYBE fail to properly share it (that we don’t yet know). Should State have pulled his visa? Absolutely. Should he have been placed on a “No Fly” list? No doubt about it. Which agency(ies) to attribute the failure has yet to be determined.

  • tanarg

    What do you do when
    the driver of the car
    you are riding in falls
    unconscious at the wheel?

  • conritwng

    As soon as the country wakes up and puts their collective foot down, then maybe there will be changes. We need a huge revolt back to the CONSTITUTION !

  • toledojim

    This is just the latest example of ‘kids trying to play govenment’. It obvious that in the past, almost, year since Obama’s innaguration, because of all the debacles; TARP, the budget, Afganhstan, healthcare, the czars, etc., this administration and the Democrats can’t be trusted with managing our economy, the military, our security, and the freedoms we demand. Al Qaida, either singularly or as a group, wants to inflict as must pain as possible, so, killing becomes a mute point. Thats why we will fail in this area; no matter the rhetoric, it never will be matched with actions. When push comes to shove we will still try to talk our way out of the corner.

  • Old_Crow
  • clowngirl

    that distracts from his business of socializing the country. I don’t think he considers the fact of the war at all except from a poltical standpoint. Peter Wehner wrote a piece called “Obama’s War” that documents all the various positions he’d taken on Iraq – several blatant contradictions and outright flipflops – the only consistency is in that each of his positions was consistent with public opinion of the moment.

    It was the same with his long awaited speech on Afghanistan. 53% of the country thought we needed more troops, 47% (probably the remaining 47% ) thought we needed definite timelines for withdrawal. So – he decides he’ll do both- and puts forth a strategy that has no coherency, that practically nobody likes – but which appeases all sides a little.

    Talking liberals about the war – some of them really think (though they won’t put it in these words) that it’s America’s fault, many cannot discuss the subject rationally because they get so heated about Bush and just go on about how we never should have invaded Iraq -with fierce resistance to being brought into the present , and a good number don’t have actively American views but on some level thing the war will go away if we don’t deal with it.

    It’s nauseating, but they are probably buying this “it’s understandable” argument because they think the same way. Horrifying to realize that no matter how incompetent/dishonest/ endangering Obama becomes, his base will probably never turn on him unless he suddenly does something right.

  • izoneguy

    He wants so bad to cut the head off of liberty – he can taste it.

  • http://www.dcworksforus.com Kenny Solomon

    Git-R-Done, Ambassador B.
    Git-r-done.

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/jan/04/global-threats

    Although President Obama spent much of his first year in office trying to revolutionize the U.S. health care system, the external world often inconveniently intruded. As the attempted Christmas mass murder of passengers flying from Amsterdam to Detroit demonstrates, our adversaries have not been idle. Nor will they be idle in 2010.

    A critical question, therefore, is whether the president has learned anything during his first year, or whether he will continue pursuing national security policies that leave us at greater risk. The outlook is not promising. Too often, Mr. Obama seems either uninterested in the global threats we face, unpersuaded that they constitute dangers to the country, or content simply to blame his predecessors.

    ===============

    Please click on the link and read it all.

    You can tell even in just text that Ambassador Bolton wants to let loose with both barrels.

  • azred

    There are no special interests to appease or get money/votes from when it comes to national security. With nobody to extort money/votes from, it is way down on the list of priorities. Chicago politics and national defense are on two opposite ends of the spectrum.

  • Scope

    Whenever I know he is going to be a guest on any show, I try to catch it. He has more brilliance and sense in his pinky finger than every Demoncrat combined. No wonder Bush had to get him in at the UN over a break.

  • edwlstr

    when I see these half hearted attempts at security. I believe they are half hearted only because Zerobama is sympathetic with his muslim brothers. If I believed for one moment he was just incompetent, I could forgive these non-measures he enunciates. The man headed the Harvard Law Review, stupid he is not! And please don’t come at it with this “common sense versus book sense” BS ’cause we all know that Zerobama knows exactly what he’s doing and how to do it, he is destroying a western way of life to establish a caliphate that his early muslim upbringing taught him would be the ultimate utopia. The man hasn’t figured out what it means to the future of his daughters, his wife, and 150 million other American women. In Islam, contrary to what some captive muslim women say, women are chattel to their men, they are beaten, killed, dismissed without writs of divorcement, and a thousand social injustices that American women will be loathe to endure. Our collective apathy will cost us our lives and freedom. Will future historians say of us that we let liberty die in her sleep?

  • jnoeagle

    I have never seen the Manchurian Candidate movie, but from hearsay have some idea of the thrust of the movie. Basically a plot to install an agent of a foreigh government into the White House??

    As for Obama, an awful lot of the things he does or pursues seem to be to the benefit of Islamic parts of the world. Even his love affair with the UN and other non-Islamic areas can be at least partially credited to a desire to support Islam. Maybe Rev Wright was/is a hidden agent and that is why Obama spent so many years in his church. If the 90 Yemeni are released to Al Quaeda, that will also be a sign of his real affiliation,

    Islam cares very little for any imagined rights of women, and an Obama who supports Islam strongly, even if not overtly, would feel that the appropriate place for his wife and daughters is in purdah. And expect them to learn to love their chains and veils. Instead of the Stockholm syndrome, it might be called something related to Islam.

    I have just read Whitley Streibers novel “Critical Mass” and recommend it for your consideration. There is plenty of blame to go around, but the worst evils seem pretty clear.

  • jnoeagle

    the ones you list are, or seem to be Americans. What really worries me are the foreign relationships and foreign policies that Obama seems to want to
    “outsource” to the UN.

  • jnoeagle

    the ones you list are, or seem to be Americans. What really worries me are the foreign relationships and foreign policies that Obama seems to want to
    “outsource” to the UN.

  • jnoeagle

    that Obama is distracted by too many alternatives and just lets of few security issues slip through the cracks. I suggest we should give some thought (a lot of thought) to the concept of deliberate inattention. What are his priorities and also, why are they his priorities? Why does he want to give so much of American sorereignty to the UN or various world bodies? Why does he repeatedly do things that inadvertently cause problems to us?

    Bad things do “just happen” sometimes. But sometimes they are caused and not always by true accidents.

  • jnoeagle

    that Obama is distracted by too many alternatives and just lets of few security issues slip through the cracks. I suggest we should give some thought (a lot of thought) to the concept of deliberate inattention. What are his priorities and also, why are they his priorities? Why does he want to give so much of American sorereignty to the UN or various world bodies? Why does he repeatedly do things that inadvertently cause problems to us?

    Bad things do “just happen” sometimes. But sometimes they are caused and not always by true accidents.

  • jnoeagle

    that appear twice?

  • martyinaz

    Either you or your computer entered it twice when you pressed POST COMENT.
    It happens all the time.

  • martyinaz

    There is an old military acronym BOHICA, Bend Over, Here It Comes Again. Now lets see if it applies to Obama?
    Health care, BOHICA
    Amnesty, BOHICA
    Foreign policy, BOHICA
    Stimulus package, BOHICA
    Bailouts, BOHICA
    Unemployment, BOHICA
    Cap and Trade, BOHICA
    National Security, BOHICA
    And we get three more years of this crap, BOHICA folks, BOHICA.