« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

Going Where I Shouldn’t Go

Michelle Malkin is reporting this morning that John Edwards will finally admit what we’ve known all along — he’s the daddy.

It is about time.

But I’m going to go where smarter people probably would not.

As Michelle quotes from the book Game Change, “Confronted then with the Enquirer photo of her husband cuddling Hunter’s baby, she insisted to Palmieri that she still believed he was not the father. ‘I have to believe it,’ Elizabeth said. ‘Because if I don’t, it means I’m married to a monster.’”

Having read the stuff about the relationship between Elizabeth and John Edwards, I think if Elizabeth Edwards wants to see what the monster looks like in their marriage, she should look in the mirror.

I am in no way excusing or justifying John Edwards cheating on his wife. But I was really shocked that the man who admitted he has “increasingly egocentric and narcissistic” is married to someone more narcissistic than himself. Elizabeth comes across as a demeaning witch.

She belittles her husband. She belittles his work. She belittles his family. She belittles his education.

Neither John nor Elizabeth Edwards comes off looking flattering. John Edwards has, thankfully, been driven from the public stage, hopefully permanently. Elizabeth is still sometimes trotted out as a leftwing hero for a bunch of socialist causes, but she too should be dismissed. From the book:

With her husband, she could be intensely affectionate or brutally dismissive. At times subtly, at times blatantly, she was forever letting John know that she regarded him as her intellectual inferior. She called her spouse a ’hick’ in front of other people and derided his parents as rednecks. One time, when a friend asked if John had read a certain book, Elizabeth burst out laughing. ’Oh, he doesn’t read books,’ she said. ’I’m the one who reads books.’

Guess he got his revenge. If the psychobabble is true that men marry their mothers, Edwards’ mother must have been a piece of work.

What is equally disturbing is how the press continued to portray the Edwards family as some sort of loving genteel southern family still tied to their working class roots. It is clear nothing is further from the truth and it is equally clear at least two reporters knew it — I venture to guess more knew it than will admit it.

Instead of a genteel southern family, we’ve got the War of the Roses. Someone please queue the falling chandelier.

COMMENTS

  • http://www.theminorityreportblog.com/blog/loren_heal Socrates

    Starting to get clearer whose idea that was.

  • adamwatkins

    Let the book speak for itself. I’d have thrown some stones at their situation too, but my house is rather glassy. This is the first post I’ve read from you that strikes the wrong note, and I’ve read a lot of your posts in the email before finally logging into your excellent site. Between you and Rush Limbaugh (not so hot for Beck), I keep on top of where the right is at. Let’s focus 100% attention on getting the right people elected in the primaries. Filing deadlines are coming up fast, we have to seize the opportunity before the RINOs in the national committee gum up the works with more establishment types. We’re counting on you. Every word you type about the has-been Edwards is a waste of your time that could be spent motivating us toward that effort. OK thanks for being a leader, I respect you a lot, just had to let you know your first instinct not to write that post was the right one. Bye!

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    Seriously. Why are you here? Just to throw tomatoes?

  • http://www.theminorityreportblog.com/blog/loren_heal Socrates

    That’s DiCaprio’s house. Nice place, from the looks of it.

  • proudgop

    Am I the only one who finds it funny that he announces this just as the Dems heads are spinning off? Like typical loyal Democrat he did it too get attention from their disaster on Tuesday

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    When proudgop and I both think you’re a moby, you’re really in trouble.

  • 6eorge Jetson

    Good observation!

  • JadedByPolitics

    of the Republican Party who likes to fight with one hand tied behind their backs. Well unlike you WE enjoy KICKING the crap out of LYING, STEALING members of the Democrat Party when they are DOWN! Edwards made a living out of DESTROYING businesses in the courtroom his wife made a living out of being a VICTIM and in the end the analysis would stand that they DESERVE each other!

    OBTW if you think that decorum is the way to win you are BLIND. The left lives in the gutter including Pelosi “they are Nazi’s” and Reid “the war is lost” and Obama “the worst economy since the great depression” and they WON the whole shebang which just goes to show you can WIN by being hateful and disgusting and I am willing to jump down off my perch into the gutter to FIGHT and you should to! WE don’t have to stay there because that is where the LEFT lives but oh WE should visit!

    Good Job Erick keep on SMACKING em!

  • makemyday
  • adamwatkins

    Have a nice day!

  • Trelaina

    I have very, very strong feelings about infidelity, but the Edwards have played this for all it is worth. That tempers my feelings a bit.

    A liberal wouldn’t waste the blink of an eye to demonize a Republican for this. A Republican wouldn’t have been allowed to wait 18 months after the fact to quietly admit, on the tail end of Brown’s win where it probably won’t be noticed by many, that he is the father of that baby.

    John Edwards is a useless ambulance chaser whose looks nearly got him a job one heartbeat away from the presidency. His wife, if rumors are true, is an opportunist with a superiority complex.

    I’m sick of being told I have to be nice just because I am a member of the Republican party. We have to show the liberals that we will not take this [nonsense] lying down anymore, and I’m terribly sorry if it offends you but that’s going to mean pointing out their hypocrisy every now and then, and maybe slinging a little mud ourselves when the situations warrant.

    The tea parties are fantatic, but we’re not going to win on tea parties alone.

  • http://www.erickerickson.org Erick Erickson

    Having reviewed now ever comment you’ve made to date, either you are a leftist pretending to be a conservative, or you are the preachiest whiner to ever exist on RedState. Either way, you might want to step away from the keyboard.

  • adamwatkins

    Do tell what it all means…moby? someone else typed a bunch of fives. I didn’t go to the initiation session I guess I missed that memo. This isn’t just YOUR little club boys, I get to join too, and if ya dont like it dont read my comments, kthanx.

  • yoyo

    I agree with Neil (as if he needs me to do so). What is wrong with Erick pointing this out?

    Most people, like myself – and you too, if you were to admit it – have only the MSM view of the Edwards’. The John-is-a-JERK-Elizabeth-is-a-saint-martyring-herself-for-her-husband,-and-who-BTW-has-CANCER view of them. We had our suspicions, and our gut tells us that all is not as it seems, but ….

    I have no intentions to read Elizabeth’s book (whatever it was called) nor did I intend to read “Game Change”. Since Erick is one of the few (if not the ONLY) paid contributors here, I appreciate his “reading it for me” and letting me know what is really in it.

    If you have truly read a lot of his posts – as you claim – you will notice that many, many, many, many of them are centered not around politics (per se) but around the FAMILY, VALUES, and PRINCIPLES. How those apply to politics and how they apply to our elected representatives (or DONT APPLY, in a lot of cases) is what makes this an ACTIVIST site, not a COMMENTARY site. He writes to motivate and inspire. Not to just add “his two cents” on politician “X” on a daily basis.

    Keep it up Erick. Instinct is for animals. Intelligence, wisdom, and discernment is our ability to resist that instinct.

  • adamwatkins

    I thought it was enough to be conservative and add the two cents of mine that are just as valuable or invaluable as anyone else’s two cents. Now that I know posts must not contain any disagreement of other people’s posts, I will adjust my opinion of redstate accordingly. Please correct me if I am wrong, thank you. Certainly I am abiding by the rule below of “be respectful no profanity”

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    You’re not being respectful of our community with your zero value add posting.

    The above is just so silly I should ban you for it alone, but I’ll give you another chance.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    Erick’s the managing editor and I’m a contributing editor. If it’s anyone’s club it’s ours.

    And neither Jaded nor proudgop is a ‘boy.’

    Double fail.

  • yoyo

    the only thing you do IS dissent.

    And contrary to popular belief, the “Be respectful, or be banned. No Profanity” is not the only rule, and Profanity is not the only way to be flushed.

    I am Neil, Moe, Pluberis, Erick and any of the other Mods will be more than happy to ‘splain it to you and show you how it works.

    Remember…ACTIVIST SITE. LIKE MINDED INDIVIDUALS. You can disagree with a point or two, but you cannot whole cloth. THAT makes you a moby and a seminar commenter.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    You should know that EPU was never a mod though, and has stepped down from the FP.

  • yoyo

    insert “sure” between “am Nell”.

    (I wasnt attempting to imply I am a Mod…you can keep that job!)

  • Trelaina

    RedState LET you join, and they can “un”join you.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    We let you into this site, and we can take you OUT.

  • yoyo

    He is still posting diaries, though….right?

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    I’m glad he’s still doing that at least.

  • http://www.erickerickson.org Erick Erickson

    Incessant whining is frowned upon. And thus far, that seems to be all you do.

  • Duke

    I’ve heard reports of the behavoir of many of the other “first couples,” and wannabe “first couples.” Some of this came from retired federal employees that were probably not supposed to ever talk about it.

    Hillary actually had to invent more epithets because there weren’t enough already in our language, slang included. The Gore’s were about as disfunctional as a marriage of satan and Jesus. The history of these pretend marriages, perhaps better described as marriages of convenience, goes back to the ’60s.

    And the comparison between the ingrained contempt and disrespect of the liberals and the grace and aplomb of the likes of Mr. & Mrs. Dubya is stark and in a political way, very telling. How can someone with little or no respect for their husband/wife have any for mere subjects of the realm like you and me?

    I wonder what it’s like to be Mr. Pelosi?

  • Scope

    but you are forgetting that you don’t just get to join the club and say what you want, and, force your comments on others. You don’t get to set the tone or the content of Redstate. You are one click away from participation.

  • adamwatkins

    I should not have taken it for granted that everyone knows how long and involved I’ve been in the conservative cause and how dear it is to my heart, and how much I appreciate the redstaters for holding the line on keeping our Republican party a viable alternative to the Democrat stranglehold. I should have realized that my comments were a first impression, and I see how I left the wrong one. I should have been commenting earlier and all along in a positive way with the 98% I agree with and find enlightening on here. So please everyone accept my apology for coming across the wrong way and understand I respect you as my political allies and thank you for blazing this trail online. I will behave.

  • yoyo

    Jenny Sanford is the PERFECT example of how to treat infidelity, regardless who the husband is or aspires to be.

    DO NOT stand by him, DO attempt reconciliation PRIVATELY, and if that fails, DIVORCE HIS @ZZ!

    The Hillary’s, Elizabeth’s, and … what was the NJ Gov – the one who came out of the closet? – his wife and Idiot Spitzer’s wife’s of the world make me sick when I see them “Standing by my Man”.

    I am a man. They (Bill, John, Idiot, and the other one) are not. They are Boys who never had their toys taken from them.

  • BooBooKitty

    On a serious note though- RedState can be a little clubby but just announcing oneself as conservative or Republican does not grant acceptance. We do things here the old fashioned way; you earn your place through time and contribution.

    Just as one wouldn’t walk into the boss’s office in his first week of employment and demand changes, it’s not a good idea to come in and tell the RS Director how to do his job- regardless of the merit of your comments.

    I have seen RS members accept or at least put up with and debate even hard core liberals for years on this site, but only because they have earned it.

    The little boys club is a nice shot- or would be if you were thick enough to let Erick and many other of the front pager’s prominence in the national media over the last few months go unnoticed. Right now you are standing on the wrong side of their “little boy’s club” throwing a tantrum and demanding entry, and everyone inside is laughing at you.

  • makemyday

    How does a predator bring down a much larger prey? He hunts in a pack, attacking the herd at their weakest point. He selects a target and together the pack attacks the flank of the animal until it is brought down. They go where the strongest aren’t at and they go for the soft underbelly first.

    It can be said that Erick is doing the same with this on “Can’t keep it in his pants” and “Can’t keep it on the bridge”. As the prey concentrates on one direction of attack, he opens his flank to another pack member.

    Where will Erick and RedState come from next? Don’t know, but he keeps exposing their flanks and I for one am glad he does.

  • Scope

    in the basement? It’s equipped with spiked whips, chains and a life sized dog house where Mr. Pelosi can only stand up, and turn around. The water bowl has been removed so as to avoid having to be taken out on a leash to pee.

  • BooBooKitty

    Find a Christmas with the Chipmunks LP circa 1962 and proceed to play it backwards- all codes and secrets of the RedState Army shall be revealed.

  • Darin_H

    It was at the RBC Center back when I lived in Raleigh with my (now) wife (this was sometime prior to 2004). During one of the commercial breaks, they show a couple of people up on the big board – first one was the UNC basketball coach, he was booed a little (NCSU territory after all) but there were plenty of cheers too. The next guy got all boos, LOUD BOOS. That man? John Edwards.

    Yes, I got to boo John Edwards along with 19,000 ‘fans’ of his.

  • Trelaina

    We need more conservatives on the team.

  • conservvoter

    Why this is even being covered on two of my favorite blogs, I’ll never know. What, is today a slow blog day? Moving along to real news . . .

  • yoyo

    …Now you are pissing me off (pardon my language, please Nell/Erick).

    I don’t need you patronizing me.

    Adam, STOP WHINING. My sons get timeouts and (gasp) paddled for whining. If I wanted to listen to whining, I would turn on MSNBC.

    Your whiny apology about whining is disrespectful to ALL of us here. Sometimes, you should just be quiet. As Erick said, “Step away from the Keyboard.”

  • eburke

    within arm’s reach.

  • JadedByPolitics

    comment did you? It must have interested you enough to make you READ MORE and then go to through the process of noting your disapproval. It is apparent this is INDEED something worth covering for the APPROVAL of those of us who recognize the hypocrisy of the LEFT & their State Run Media.

  • eburke

    them and *now* you tell me where they’re revealed.

  • chbroussard

    The biggest issue for me is not that Elizabeth Edwards is a condescending witch, but that women like her and Hillary Clinton KNOW that their husbands are philandering scums and still choose to stand beside them. If they are such proponents for the rights of women, why do they continue to stand by men that obviously have little regard for women other than to boost their insatiable egos and serve as vessels for their sexual appetites.

    Don’t believe that Hillary was shocked by the Monica story. Bill had been messing around since way back in Arkansas, and she knew it. And don’t believe Elizabeth didn’t know about her philandering husband either. These women both like power and money, and they are willing to sell their dignity for it.
    They were only outraged when these guys got caught, and we’re supposed to feel sorry for them? I don’t think so..

  • chbroussard

    The biggest issue for me is not that Elizabeth Edwards is a condescending witch, but that women like her and Hillary Clinton KNOW that their husbands are philandering scums and still choose to stand beside them. If they are such proponents for the rights of women, why do they continue to stand by men that obviously have little regard for women other than to boost their insatiable egos and serve as vessels for their sexual appetites.

    Don’t believe that Hillary was shocked by the Monica story. Bill had been messing around since way back in Arkansas, and she knew it. And don’t believe Elizabeth didn’t know about her philandering husband either. These women both like power and money, and they are willing to sell their dignity for it.
    They were only outraged when these guys got caught, and we’re supposed to feel sorry for them? I don’t think so..

  • yoyo

    WWI was fought in the trenches.

    It was dirty, bloody, up close and personal, and it was won by LITERALLY beating the opposition to a pulp – relentlessly.

    It was the utter LACK of decorum that won that War.

  • Vladimir

    here.

    It’s got a barn and stuff. Oh, and about 20 acres of denuded forest. Green and all.

  • yoyo
  • johnt

    They must be bred that way.
    Fatty Edwards was only to quick to jump for the spotlight, the one created for and by her husband, another characteristic of liberal wives. Fatty Clinton and Vulgar Heinz Kerry come to mind here.

    They must be bred on a farm somewhere, or a gene factory.

  • penguin2

    Like you, you I had the same image of scoundrel John Edwards, and “oh how difficult it must be for Elizabeth.” And, having little time or inclination to read about either of them, had not known anything more than that. We got to bash John, who deserved it, and they sold us the martyr, Elizabeth. Frequently, the radical feminists like to portray themselves and other women as victims.

    Though RS really is a commentary site and an activist site, its’ foundation is based on Conservative principles, which include the family values you mentioned. Our ‘politics’ and promotion of ideas, issues, and candidates all connect together and you cannot achieve what we wish to here at RS, without that foundation.

    Everything about the Edwards family was packaged to the public, and bought by us with the help of the MSM. Even when the curtain was pulled aside, we still had to listen to the cover-up and victimhood stories. Now we see another example of the Lefts’ hypocrisy in the political world. The political world is the one that governs our nation, and when it is driven by those without principles…..then you see exactly why RedState exists.

  • conservvoter

    was the fact that this nonstory is being covered by not one, but two top blogs.

    “It is apparent this is INDEED something worth covering for the APPROVAL of those of us who recognize the hypocrisy of the LEFT & their State Run Media”? What does that mean? I already recognize the hypocrisy of the left & their media. Heck, my 11 year old recognizes the hypocrisy.

    This just smacks more of gossip than anything else to me, but whatever. Enjoy.

  • izoneguy

    And it is war. The marxist/socialist agenda is tying very hard to upend America. John & Liz Edwards need to be pounded into the dirt so that they can never be a factor again.

    Much like I pounded on Erroll Southers. Many here wanted to give the guy a break. He is toast. Gone to go cry with Van Jones. No more breaks allowed. It is all out war.

    We have to keep going after the socialcrats at every level.
    That includes all of Obama’s Czars.
    Once they are retreating it will be time to dismantle the federal
    government at all levels, starting with the EPA. Lisa Jackson must be stopped and thrown out.

    We need to stay after the Clintons. Bill & Hillary are very slippery and they are sensing that they can come back and defeat Obama.
    No way we can let them take the White House through the back door.

  • yoyo
  • mriggio

    and sorry to go off-topic, but

    I LOVE YOUR PASSION!!

    (It doesn’t hurt that I agree with you 99% of the time as well….)
    Thanks!

  • Scope

    and don’t forget the biggest victim Hillary Clinton. I can still picture her sitting there all prim and proper talking to the TV cameras, and saying that Bill had nothing to do with that woman, and, that it was all a “vast right wing conspiracy.” All the while she knew the truth, as, Monica wasn’t the first (the bought off Jennifer Flowers comes to mind), and, I’m absolutely certain that she wasn’t the last. Female martyrs are weak, spineless maggots on society. They stay with the louts for money, prestige and power, and, make whores of themselves in the process. They have no self-respect and, don’t deserve respect from anyone. Jenny Sanford was correct in “moving on” however, her vocalizing it in the national news only speaks to revenge which is not an admirable quality either.

  • tomw

    The most obvious point to be gleaned from this is that for Dems, no transgression, no foible, no scandal, no misstatement, if done by a Republican (especially a conservative) is too small that it shouldn’t be shouted from the rooftops, with said conservative dragged hounded from public life.

    Conversely, no transgression, no foible, no scandal, and no misstatement is so large that it can’t be explained away, excused, justified, or just plain ignored. We conservatives tend to go after anyone, regardless of political leanings,

    because we want to do the right thing and expect the same from our leaders. Dems don’t care about doing the right thing – they just want to win & accumulate more power.

  • yoyo

    And Jenny has attempted to remain as private as possible – considering.

    As for “revenge”, while not an admirable quality, it sure beats playing the victim. I reserve any judgement of JS on the basis of:

    “Hell hath no fury as that of a woman scorned.”

  • JadedByPolitics

    ….

  • http://www.criterionchemical.com Chemical Sam

    5 is a ranking based approval system that some blogs have built in, 1 strongly disagree, 3 ambivalent, 5 strongly agree, eventually becomeing a term on its own, like 5 5 5, agree and want to buy you a drink, 5 5 5 5 5 agree and want to exchange DNA, and so on.

    As for the term “moby”, it’s almost interchangable with troll, except I believe it specifically connotes left-leaning provocateurs.

    Like my Dad used to tell me, “go look it up”. I recommend urbandictionary.com.

    These are all very old, and universally understood web terms. Even a n00b like me who avoids using them as much as humanly possible isn’t dumb enough to dismiss the jargon. Entymology is a fluid thing, and all that.

    If I were you, I’d start by attempting proper American English and wade into the web lingo…very…slowly.

    kbye

  • Scope

    for the stair’s are treacherous.

  • RedBeard

    The thing that makes the whole Edwards saga important is the position he held, and the one he wanted to hold. Looking into the personal integrity and family ties of people we entrust with national security is justified, and essential.

  • Trelaina

    …and steps into the liberal mud puddle waist deep.

    In other words, inappropriate and unnecessary.

    There are plenty of TRUE things to say.

  • Scope

    as you may start another whole round of discussion on the irrationality of emotions as a source of response.

    And-

    I suspect Obama is feeling a little scorned after the Republican win in Mass, and, it being a repudiation of his governance and policies. Let’s say, “Hell hath no fury like a narcissist President scorned.”

  • RedBeard

    Leftists provide a target-rich environment for legitimate criticism.

    The externally unattractive parts of people like Teresa and Hillary are simply unimportant when compared to the unattractive character found on the inside and the resultant agenda.

  • Scope

    still think that Bill Clinton was a great president. He was just a better liar than Obama, but, the Clintons still have the same “socialist” agenda. As Rush said yesterday, Hillary may as well as just start her campaign for the presidency in 2012 now. She can keep the seat warm until it’s Chelsea’s turn. We just got rid of one dynasty, the Kennedy’s, and, we need to get rid of the Clinton dynasty. They are as dangerous as Obama, and, are far ahead of him in collecting political favors from around the world.

  • hickorystick

    This guy got rich “channeling dead baby’s”, but he can’t acknowledge his own son till now? Erick, This is legitimate topic because in every other hiring decision character and past history do come into consideration. Past behavior is a predictor of future behavior. They don’t create credit reports for entertainment.
    If he doesn’t choose carefully in his marriage, why should he choose carefully in his cabinet.

  • yoyo
  • Ivan Yurkenov

    …and it is high time that the establishment GOP stand aside and allow those of us who are not squeamish, Ann Coulter comes to mind, engage “progressives” in similar manner as they engage conservatives,

    Unlike “progressives”, though, I would draw the line just short of slander and liable.

    Ivan

    PS: Thanks for allowing me to be a part of your “boys club”.

  • Scope

    n/t

  • irishgirl

    when it was revealed that she knew all along what was going on and she still supported and campaigned for her husband. That’s why it is relevant to post on this story because Mr. and Mrs. Edwards are not to be trusted and should not be allowed to slither back into any type of public service. Now that most of the facts are out in the open, they should both totally disappear and with good riddance.

  • momo

    so I am glad to have Erick reveal details about the Edwards that I always suspected-After all the names slung at us by liberal politicians, talking heads and news personalities, I think revealing Elizabeth as a “monster” and nag is pretty mild!!!

  • http://www.bloggybayou.com muckraker

    My Uncle is the ultimate uncle…Kind, gracious, always brought gifts when we were kids and was my Late Dad’s favorite brother (he had 5).. And he is a damn fine lawyer….

    I asked him about John Edwards and it was like seeing Lon Chaney Jr turn into the wolfman… He said Edwards had no honor, doesn’t keep his word and lies all the time. He claimed (actually “snarled”) that not one lawyer in NC trusted the SOB…

    We drank a beer and he calmed downed….

    “Beer, is there anything it can’t do?”—Homer Simpson

  • Repair_Man_Jack

    Just like Rielle. She couldn’t have not known that John would stick it in the mud if it were warm and moist!

  • 4life

    Brown is handsome, charismatic, and is in a position of power. I hope he has a good marriage and strong personal convictions, because you know the left would love to see him fall and would be glad to help.

  • jayburd

    into the forthcoming tell-all book by the scapegoat staffer Andrew Young.

  • Ivan Yurkenov

    …I meant libel.

    Ivan

  • 4life

    I think this sort of behavior from Elizabeth is the logical result of feminism. In my own life I’ve had to fight feminism’s affect on me. Its an incipid way of thinking that we see in popular and works its way into our psyche. Maybe I’m speaking for myself here, but the destructive effect of feminist thought is real and prevalent. Having said that, it takes two to tango. I would be surprised if he was the kind of man who made a point of building up his wife.

  • barry915barry

    Stay above it is the best course, IMHO. Barry

  • Finrod

    Polling Firm Says John Edwards Is Its Most Unpopular Person Ever

    The article takes a couple cheap shots at Republicans, but it’s still amusing to read about how insanely unpopular John Edwards is.

  • discerningconservative

    for the best title ever.

  • Achance

    trying to trip him and beat him to the ground. They do it to old, ugly, and relatively powerless political figures, they’ll be thinking they might even enjoy doing him and then handing the story to the WaPo.

  • jayburd

    chasing ambulances, no doubt, ….or skirts?

  • SteveLA
  • blooch

    somewhere on when Hillary will ease off the Otanic. HRC knows HCR FAIL better than anyone, she knows Barry is an economic basket case, and she doesn’t want to be around to take a hit when the unconnected trail of dots goes boom. Yeah, she’s a short-timer…probably just waiting until after the midterms for a little more clarity, hoping nothing blows up before then.

  • adamwatkins

    I am absolutely shocked by your reply 15 minutes after mine. My apology pissed you off? Wow.

  • Jack_Savage

    Then you are toyed with until you move to Venezuela.

  • blooch

    is going to be swearing in some guy named Barocque Edwards in about 40 years? Maybe John will run out of mousse and have to come back before he can get in trouble down there.

  • Jack_Savage

    He was with his young (about 10) daughter and looked like he was down to about 135 pounds. I actually felt sorry for him in that instant – you know, spirit of Christmas and all.

    I think the common thread here is that both he and Clinton had wives that were intolerable. I always thought that if Bill Clinton had given a national address right after the Lewinsky scandal broke, held up a picture of Hillary, and said simply, “This is who I am married to – what was I supposed to do?”, the whole country would have immediately forgiven him.

  • Leopard1996

    I only know that, because it was under his administration I made my 1st departure out of NJ, the 2nd was Corzine.

  • SteveLA

    I always said if Slick had come out and just said, “Yes I did, and it was darn good”, people would have freaked out but in the end have gone big whoop.

    It’s not the crime, it’s the cover-up stupid.

  • Leopard1996

    Coming and taking a crap on the carpet, being a preachy idiot, calling this community a “little boys club”, is not being respectful. I haven’t been here a long time, but I do know certain things about this site.

    By the way Mr. /Ms. “This post is beneath you”, if the shoe was on the other foot, do you think bloggers like Andrew Sullivan, Kos, and DU would be taking the high ground.

    Sorry until we take this country back, we are going to have to fight as dirty as the enemy.

  • Leopard1996

    Earned her a NY senate seat, a failed presidential run, and a first class seat on the sinking shp S.S. Obama.

    So hind site being 20/20, maybe she shouldn’t have played that victim card after all.

  • Leopard1996

    Tells a woman to stay with a man that is treating her like garbage like that.

    My wife is a strong feminist type of woman, and I know if I pulled this garbage, I would not only be divorced, and losing more than 1/2 of my stuff, the next day after I signed the final check, I would probably have lost some manly parts.

    No, her sticking around is probably more about opportunism than feminism.

  • Leopard1996

    the fact that he was getting his privates waxed by the fat chick in the office ddn’t bother, I really did not care, it was the fact that when he put one hand on a Bible, and the other up in the air, and swore the oath to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth so help him God, and the proceeded to lie, and didn’t find his ass locked up for fined. I know that if it was me, my ass would have been sitting next to bubba in lockdown. That is what pissed me off with the Clinton thing.

  • jayburd

    So Hill needs to milk it. Timing will be critical I agree.

  • Jack_Savage

    It is the cover up. I remember Mike Barnacle breaking the cartel in support of Clinton and saying, “You know, a paragraph of truth from him in the beginning and this whole thing would have been avoided.”

    Same holds true with Edwards, and this draws a parellel with Tiger. When he crashed his car, and I found out the time of the crash (around 2:30 am), I immediately told my wife, “He and his wife were fighting”. Of course no one knew what was to come, but I was right in a general sense. Anyway, every man in America knew that Edwards was the Dad, Slick Willie cheated and Tiger got clocked with a nine iron and his wife beat the back window out so she could pull him out and finish him off. And they all thought they could make it go away by denying and ignoring.

    Wrong. Which brings me to the economy and Obama….

  • jayburd

    except the camera shot would change to a still of Monica and guys all over the world would instantly think “the most powerful man in the world and that’s the best you can do?” But knowing the media bias at the time they would only show her from the neck up.

  • Achance

    is usually worth it to them. The kinds of people who can get elected and the kinds of people who live with and “support” them or at least look good beside them aren’t like real people. Wish I had a nickel for every post-election divorce I’ve seen. He loses the election, he loses her.

  • Jack_Savage

    And mentioning to someone that at least Jack Kennedy was having an affair with Marilyn Monroe. Having said that, Clinton was rumoured to have an affair with Markie Post, which brought him up a notch or two in quality.

  • Beasley Beesmeal

    I just tweeted that for ya…

  • freedomofthought

    Ok, so I’m a stupid old phart. I built web sites for years but
    didn’t read them much,. Only blogs I read are these
    dedicated to right wing extremist terrorists, of which I proudly claim to be one.

    So tell me. What does the annotation “nt” mean?
    I ask this question respectfully ’cause my mama told me to be that way.,

  • Achance
  • gekster

    After your comment title, put after your comment and nothing will be needed in the comment box. Some times a short sentence will sufice for your comment.
    Put with no space after the punctuation, and the nt will apear after your comment in the title.
    If you put with a space, and ithe nt will not appear in the comment title.
    sometimes just one sentence will do for your remark, and no further comment needed.
    some will still put nt in the comment box though.
    If still confused, don’t worry, so am I.

  • 4life

    I was refering to her belittling her husband in front of others that Erick was criticizing. Feminism preaches that women are in competition with men and need to promote themselves above men. The logical result is a condescending attitude toward men that does not make for a great marriage.

    And I agree with you. Sticking with a philanderer is more about opportunism than feminism.

  • blooch

    Good to see the Rambo crazy eyes again.

  • http://www.thecampofthesaints.com robertbelvedere

    Quoted from and Linked to at:
    The Truth About Elizabeth Edwards

  • Warrior

    But Cloris Leachman said they had to re-shoot that scene several times because every time she spoke the line you quote, Gene Wilder would bust out laughing…

    (Actually, it’s “Stay close to the candle, for the stairs can be…treacherous.” But of course, you could have been paraphrasing…)

  • Warrior

    came from, “Give me five!” or “High Five” as a sort of empahtic agreement with and congratulations to the recipient.

    And the Moby thing, well, from www.urbandictionary.com:

    MOBY — An insidious and specialized type of left-wing troll who visits blogs and impersonates a conservative for the purpose of either spreading false rumors intended to sow dissension among conservative voters, or who purposely posts inflammatory and offensive comments for the purpose of discrediting the blog in question.

    The term is derived from the name of the liberal musician Moby, who famously suggested in February of 2004 that left-wing activists engage in this type of subterfuge: ?For example, you can go on all the pro-life chat rooms and say you?re an outraged right-wing voter and that you know that George Bush drove an ex-girlfriend to an abortion clinic and paid for her to get an abortion.” Etc.

    Which is simply more evidence, if any more were needed, that leftists are scheming, devious twerps who hold no morality of any kind and live by the mantra, “I’m a super person and if you don’t agree with me, you suck…”

  • Leopard1996

    Thank God, my wife doesn’t pull that mess, and she never had. She just wants equality of opportunity, not necessarily outcome.