Pam and Tim Tebow’s message of life is powerful. And that’s what scares the abortion industry the most.

CBS needs to be recognized for accepting the ad in the first place, and for not bowing to the pressure to pull the ad.

Even if it’s just business, it shows more gonads than we’ve seen from an MSM outlet EVER.

Question: What will happen when one of the three (okay, two - NBC will never consider it) major broadcast networks wises up and takes a hint from FOX? As a purely business decision, being mindful of the stockholders, one of them decides to try the ‘fair and balanced’ approach over the airwaves?

Answer: Dominance.

About a woman who made a similar choice. She was accused by NOW, and the pro-abortion crowd as using her baby as a political prop.

I think she has a facebook page now. I wonder if she’ll write about this…

nt.

I have no other explanation for their decades long assault on traditional women and the mainstays of a society grounded in
family - marriage, motherhood, fatherhood and passing on to the next generation, a better life. Their shrill voices, IMO opinion, have only increased the burden on women, and caused women to actually be degraded in a society that places sexual exploitation over modesty and restraint.

Their “pro-choice” is a smoke-screen for pro-abortion, and they indeed are enraged if they perceive that something or someone will be able to expose them for the hate they live by.

I read that article by Sally Jenkins, this morning, and it was excellent.

with the sincere assessment by Sally Jenkins - especially for a WaPo journalist. Maybe we need more sports columnists writing about issues! She pretty much nailed it!

Join the RedState Strike Force

while we were talking about this “controversy.”

To me it shows, very simply, that we’re talking about a deep-rooted culture of murder. This is about ending the life of a child — and they know it.

Otherwise, as has been stated, they would applaud an ad about a woman who “chose” for herself and her son.

NOW, Planned Parenthood, NARAL, etc. are not simply social activists concerned about “women’s rights.” They are murder-endorsing fascists, and they know it. They just don’t want US to know it.

is death.

As a woman, I do not want to take away the option of abortion in extreme cases. But as a former high school teacher and now college professor, I know from my students that often a young woman who is sexually active has two or three abortions before she is 20.

Then we wonder why we have an infertility epidemic among late-marrying 30 year old women.

Worse, in the Sara Palin hysteria from the “women’s groups”–who really have low membership numbers–several “feminists” said they now view a first abortion as a rite of passage, like getting a driver’s permit. Whadda disgusting proposition.

Abortion is at best a filthy action full of blood and fluids that ends a life. At worst, it is now an altar for ideological worship, enshrined only in a bad Supreme Court decision that is now seriously at odds with the advances in medicine and neo-natal care.

The groups opposing the Tebrow ad on CBS are delusional, and we have to acknowledge that CBS has shown some guts in not backing down or backing out when confronted with such vehement opposition.

From what I’ve read, the ad simply presents one option to women. It’s pro-choice, and it is presenting the option of life. How the pro-choice people oppose that position just absolutely reveals them to the core. They are very bad people. Un-American.
You get a sense that perhaps the Scott Brown pro-choice guy is different than the radical NARAL pro-abortion type. Some people support the choice because they don’t want government involved and some people say they’re pro-choice but in reality they want to destroy undesireables in some psycho-commie fugue state wacko plot of some sort to undermine America. I get that now.

This all leads me to think that our side needs to distinguish between the two - the Goldwater conservatives who want government out of our reproductive health/abortion decisions but hate abortion and desire to eliminate it and regulate it; versus the militant baby-killers, with whom very few agree.

Needless to say, of course, that any living being with its own DNA and blood supply is a life that must be protected. It is not a mass, tumor, growth, or part of a woman’s body. It is a life and a separate biological entity. It could be the life that cures cancer or saves his/her platoon in combat or raises a family with a kid that cures cancer, etc. Abortion is antithetical to what we’re all about as a species.

God bless the Tebow family for taking the slings and arrows so the rest of us can revel in the hypocrisy of the advertisement’s opposition.

The other side put’s “Choice” on the alter and have sacrificed 50, million plus children to their great god…yet along comes the Tebow Family to celebrate their “choice”…and they are to be condemned to eternal Hell fire and damnation.

For NOW and the rest of the slime in this country…the fact that Tim Tebow exists is an affront to them because the fact he lives is proof that abortion KILLS

As for the rest of it…Brangelina and their tribulations and Tiger Woods are what we should all aspire to….Sure their lives are a cess pool of self obsessed pleasure seeking…and it’s led them and their families to misery…But don’t you dare point it out…

Anyone who would judge the home wrecking Bad and Angelina…or the degenerate behavior of Tiger woods are to be silenced at all costs! The Tebows…who represent fidelity to ones spouse, (present or future)…and an un dying dedication to home an hearth…and who deny their own carnal pleasures for a greater harmony with those around them and their GOD are a reminder of the vapid emptiness of the pro choicers…and hedonists existence…and they hate them for it!

The “Big Tent” analogy isn’t the correct one…the correct one is a MAGNET…we need to be a MAGNET that draws these independents in who are sick and tired of what’s going on in Washington—Fred Thompson

Senate Conservatives Fund House Conservatives Fund Michael Williams for Senate

Marco 2010 Toomey US Senate SarahPAC

If he had gone to any other school in the country, I’d probably like the guy. I might like him once he gets to the NFL, if he shuts up bout Florida. But as long as he wore a Gator uniform?

Pure loathing.

Imagine the irony in advocating poll tested positions such as “pro-choice” while simultaneously wanting to disarm the opposition by taking away their right to speak. If their argument against life is so strong, why do they always have to shout and deny others the right to tell stories which expose their lies?

I suppose it is the egregious harm that may come to some who view this ad which is probably the “pro-choice” motivation. After all, if it causes one person to abstain from sexual activity, one young man to see women as something more than a sexual conquest, one person to change their mind on choosing an abortion, one person to see the possibilities in life, not death- it would cause such terrible harm to our society. Why it actually might help create a few more responsible adults in our country rather as opposed to legions of spoon fed, dependent, irresponsible liberals who are nothing but acolytes of a sad, self indulgent, destructive political religion.

I believe the more appropriate descriptions are the Pro-life groups, and, Pro-terminate-life groups.

At least in the political arena, there is no such thing as ‘pro-choice’. There is only pro-life and pro-abortion (or if you prefer, pro-abortion and anti-abortion). The whole ‘pro-choice’ moniker is a cleverly crafted and misnamed position designed to give pro-abortion politicians a political base from which to fight against the pro-life majority in the country. They have been very successful in suckering many Americans into believing it is some kind of “individual rights” issue (most recently referred to as “reproductive rights”) while completely ignoring the rights of the unborn.

Remember, at one time Ted Kennedy was fervently pro-life. And my first exposure to Bill Clinton was on a special episode of Phil Donahue’s show where he was introduced as a “new” kind of politician: a Southern Pro-Life Democrat. Both of these guys and many other Democrats who are politically ambitious have latched onto the “pro-choice” label and used it towards their own benefit, leaving the 50 million to bear the price.

Thanks, Erick for helping to shine the light on this dark corner of American history that will hopefully be remembered in the future with the same kind of shame we feel toward slavery and the treatment of Native Americans.

Join the RedState Strike Force

…when the Leftists saw they were losing the debate on whether human life began at conception, or the (silly) debate on whether a fertilized egg is “human” life at all.

William Safire traced the phrase to an essay written by a certain Alan Otten:

http://www.nytimes.com/1990/09/16/magazine/on-language-right-on-dead-on.html?pagewanted=1

The point is that the Left does NOT want to be known as “Pro-Abortion” since the language is too blunt in that phrase. They use therefore the euphemism “pro-choice” to refer obliquely to the equally oblique phrase “a woman’s right to choose.”

They are willing of course to use the phrase “anti-abortion” to characterize their opponents, which does reveal the nature of the game.

…when the Leftists saw they were losing the debate on whether human life began at conception, or the (silly) debate on whether a fertilized egg is “human” life at all.

William Safire traced the phrase to an essay written by a certain Alan Otten:

http://www.nytimes.com/1990/09/16/magazine/on-language-right-on-dead-on.html?pagewanted=1

The point is that the Left does NOT want to be known as “Pro-Abortion” since the language is too blunt in that phrase. They use therefore the euphemism “pro-choice” to refer obliquely to the equally oblique phrase “a woman’s right to choose.”

They are willing of course to use the phrase “anti-abortion” to characterize their opponents, which does reveal the nature of the game.

Pro-abortion is, pure and simple, about the freedom to have sex whenever and with whomever you want, and to be able to “clean up the mess” that lifestyle leaves. It is not surprising, then, that the proponents of abortion would have no objection to sex-driven advertising.

Join LifeNews.com, Americans United for Life and 121,000+ people as we support Focus on the Family and their pro-life ad celebrating Tim Tebow and his mother’s decision to not abort him. http://www.facebook.com/TebowSuperBowlAd

I hope everyone realizes that despite any “text your favorite SuperBowl ad to…”, which will happen, this will be the advertisement Americans will be talking about for days, nay weeks after.

When you are at the water-cooler, Starbucks, the bagel counter, wherever Monday morning, feel free to stand up for your own beliefs — and remember, use not the oft-repeated phrase “pregnant”, use what we know is true, these are girls, women “with child”.

As ElRushbo scribed near 20 years ago… Words Mean Things.

Since Roe v. Wade abortion has turned into a multi-billion dollar business. Anything that can jeopardize it is considered to be radical right -wing extremism. Any Pro-Choice idea that doesn’t end with an abortion is not to be tolerated. Pam and Tim Tebow will hopefully have a huge impact on the abortion business. There are possibly cases that might justify an abortion but 98% of the time it can’t be justified. “There is no right way to do a wrong thing” (rwt).