« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

How

I have gotten a lot of emails in the past 24 hours, mostly from senior citizens incidentally, asking simply, “How?”

How do we throw them out? How do we replace them with good people?

It is both harder and easier than it looks.

First of all, we need to be realists. Some of the candidates we love won’t cut it. Sometimes we will be split on candidates with you liking someone and me liking someone else — it is okay to disagree, but both of us must understand that at some point, if our candidate cannot raise the money, we need to unite behind one conservative lest the conservatives split the vote and get a moderate elected.

More importantly, we need to pick our battles carefully and wisely. I don’t mean to pick on Les Phillips in AL-05, but let me use him as an example.

Les Phillips got a lot of attention at CPAC and thereafter. He and Mo Brooks are battling it out with Parker Griffith, the Democrat turned Republican. Les Philips has raised $363,236.00 and Mo Brooks has raised only $214,339.00. But Phillips’ money was raised through expensive direct mail programs and he only has $66,107.00 on hand compared to $211,303 on hand for Brooks. Compare them both to Griffith who has $714,835 on hand and the backing of the GOP establishment.

This is neither a plus or a minus for either of the candidates, but if we want to improve that seat, we need to rally and we need to educate ourselves.

More importantly, we need to focus on the Senate. I’ve provided a list of good candidates. I’d add Ovide LaMontagne in New Hampshire and Christine O’Donnell in Delaware to that list, but I’m more focused on the list as prepared. We need to move the Senate right both because of the GOP and because we need to hold the line on Obama’s appointees. The Senate GOP continues to fold on these issues.

So how do we do it?

First, we take this of House Democrats and “adopt” them. Set up a Google Alert or whatever you need to so you can track everything they do. And then you blog about it. Build a record of their misdeeds. Blog about them here or elsewhere. Let’s exchange notes.

Then we get in and find good challengers for them. We have challengers for some of them already. I’ll make a commitment to start writing about those challengers. But we need to build up a narrative on these guys and monitor their movements. If you live in their districts, show up at events with a flip video camera. Capture their words and screw ups.

In November, we vote them out and replace them with our guys.

I’ll begin working on a list of the solid House candidates. We have a few already. On the Senate side though, I cannot emphasize enough that we must rally around candidates right now, even though their primaries may be a ways off.

We cannot split between Lowden and Tarkanian — we need Tarkanian. We cannot split between Coats, Hoffstetler, and Stutzman in Indiana — we need Stutzman. We cannot split between Norton and Buck in Colorado — we need Buck.

I know there is some disagreement, but we need to rally. And we need to rally in favor of the guy who is going to be a conservative before being a Republican. That is the only way to have a real impact.

Already Senate Republicans are wavering on repealing Obamacare verses nibbling at the edges to fix it. We need candidates who will repeal it.

This is not rocket science. But we have to stick together and fight. At the end of the day we have to be willing to make some tough choices. We can do it. That’s how we win.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • conservos
  • swamphermit

    MoveOn.org offered plenty of support to Rep. Allen Boyd in the recent push for Obamacare, so I have him on my ‘Throw OUT’ list! Here’s a quote from yesterday’s MoveOn.org email:

    “But Republicans are already unleashing their spin machine to target Democrats who voted for reform, so we’ve got to show that we’ve got their backs. We’ve set a goal of making 3 thank-you calls from Old Town to Rep. Boyd’s office today?can you join in?”

    I hope this so-called “Blue Dog” Boyd enjoyed his MoveOn.org support!

  • conservos

    and I’m embarrased it was the first comment for this fine, very purposeful post.

    My apologies!

    I will “bing” the google alert!

    That being said, thanks for the direction. I, for one, certainly needed it.

    At this moment, I will begin looking for money-bomb stickers for Tarkanian, Stutzman and Buck for my blog.

    Next will be to work your advice on buildling the narrative.

    My favorite is to get the dirt on the opposition, nasty politicians!

    Thanks, Erick.

  • conservos

    if you’re frightened away b/c of MoveOn.Orgie’s endorsement, that’s exactly what they want.

    Have you emailed Boyd to personally thank him?

    A thank you from an enemy is more powerful than slick propaganda from a leftist organization you would expect an endorsement from, any day.

    Email, assess, find a Consevative Repub replacement as necessary.

  • earlgrey

    Fri/Sat he had indicated he would support the legislation.

    I think that makes the points in Moe Lane’s post about the PPP polling particularly relevant.

  • oneoff

    I respect your right to stand firmly and transparently on one side of the political aisle but CNN should also not have hired you for this very reason. People desperately need the established media to take a more neutral, non-biased stance and just disseminate facts without a political filter.
    I have given up watching most main stream media outlets because they have all chosen a definite bias. I’m a big girl now and don’t need hand-holding on how to “think.” I have the necessary critical thinking skills to decide for myself what something means to me or the larger community.
    I’m trained as a journalist by education and background but abandoned the field when it became clear you had to side with your taskmasters (corporate owners of the network) or not work. Please can’t we just have the old Cronkite style of news back? Just the facts, Ma’am.

  • renny

    If CNN can’t produce pro-o numbers, he’s in really bad shape.

  • Kyle-MI

    Give examples of corporate owners playing taskmaster over the media that they own.

  • renny

    and chairman positions.

    Ergo, I want cons. Reps., but if a contest comes down to a moderate Rep.and any kind of Dem., we should back the Rep. Getting the power of leadershp out of the hands of Reid, Pelosi, Waxman, Boxer, Frank, yadda is REALLY important, no matter what kind of Reps. it takes to do it.

    Even the RINOS of the Sen. have stood fast against Obamanationcare and are now planning to rip into the so-called reconciliation if it ever appears.

  • animatorgirl

    and that’s something we’ve ceded to the liberal Democrats over the decades. This is something we need to win, or our victory in November will be momentary and fleeting, and will not have the sustained support to reverse the leftward march of our government.

    While most of us need to be working to support specific candidates (or revealing yes-voting Dems for the dangers they are), at least a few need to work on refining, improving, and expanding conservative media and entertainment. The conservative message must be represented both as the less-glamorous reality and as the hip, modern, forward-thinking philosophy that it really is. Don’t deride the strength of the justification that something is popular or that “everyone knows [insert inane liberal lie here].” Conventional wisdom must be rewritten with a genuine conservative and historically-based understanding.

    We can cede no more ground in education. Home-school your kids or take over the local school board (I prefer the latter). This is as important as winning in November, and the truth is it will take longer and have a more lasting effect.

    PLEASE don’t ignore the need to own the narrative.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    Cronkite pushed an agenda too.

    You’re just crying because somebody has an agenda other than yours.

    You’re just jealous. Ha ha. Loser.

  • muffin

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/03/22/house-roll-health-care-overhaul/

    Excerpt:

    FLORIDA

    Democrats — Boyd, Y; Brown, Corrine, Y; Castor, Y; Grayson, Y; Hastings, Y; Klein, Y; Kosmas, Y; Meek, Y; Wasserman Schultz, Y.

  • chriser

    Not only does Mo Brooks have more cash, he is also a proven candidate in that he has been elected numerous times by large majorities to county-wide offices (AL state house delegate, DA, county commissioner). I have nothing against Les Phillips – he is a solid conservative – but he has little political experience and at this time is not the best candidate for North Alabama.

  • chriser

    Not only does Mo Brooks have more cash, he is also a proven candidate in that he has been elected numerous times by large majorities to county-wide offices (AL state house delegate, DA, county commissioner). I have nothing against Les Phillips – he is a solid conservative – but he has little political experience and at this time is not the best candidate for North Alabama.

  • conservos

    the guy is caca.

    let’s go get him.

  • http://www.spartanburgteaparty.org karenmartin

    Here in SC04 we are running to get rid of Bob Inglis, the RINO-est of the RINOs. there are 4 challengers, 2 are attorneys/public office holders, one an academic, and one a businessman. I am supporting the businessman www.JimLeeForCongress.com. But we run the risk of splitting the votes with the academic, who formed a tea party herself to serve as her mouthpiece. Jim Lee has won the endorsement of Independence Caucus, a very fine vetting organization, but as a completely grassroots campaign we all know the challenges, mostly financial and name recognition. Redstate attention/endorsing/support is quite valuable to our conservative SC district, yet I”m sure you are inundated with requests. Is there a path to Redstate endorsement some of us in the smaller, yet CRITICAL races can take?

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    Write diaries.

    Write diaries introducing us to your candidate, and keeping up with events in that race.

    Don’t just copy press releases though.

  • weatherford

    than the House, certainly in the long term, because of the six-year term.

    We have only a thin reed on which to rely under the Senate’s present Republican membership and “leadership.”

    Even in the Health Care matter, their performance was sub-par. Now I know that we owe enormous gratitute that they held firm on cloture, but they did nothing to slow the process and actually facilitated HCR by rubberstamping too much else of the Obama Agenda.

    Their greatest flaw, however, is their (or their “leadership’s”) pathological fear of negativism. The People understand the word “No,” and it is the word they want to hear.

    The big question, and it will very soon be answered, is whether it is truly “negatavism” they fear or is it conservatism or moribund fear of success.
    (One could add, and I do, an aversion to serious work.)

    It boils down to this: the People are going to take care of the House. But our resources are finite and need focus. That, I think, is the deeper meaning of Erick’s writing.

    I may not be tracking him exactly, but, for me, we need to go for the jugular and that is the United States Senate.

  • tritonspolartiger

    …interestingly enough…

    Your point is well-taken, and I say that from the perspective of someone who hasn’t much use for RINOs.

    I recall back when this nightmare was rolling through the Senate that I worried that one or both of the Maine Gals would vote with the Dems, but it didn’t happen…. good on’em.

    I’m still seething over Stupak’s double cross… what a Judas. Using this EO as a fig leaf is the equivalent of giving Americans the finger. It practically screams “you people are STOOPID!”

    For cryin’ out loud, there’s no way that the man could think for a second that an EO could prevent the implementation of a selected bit congressional legislation. This EO is nothing more than a line-item veto by another name, and SCOTUS already shot that down, IIRC.

    These people think we’re a herd to be managed… and with this monstrosity now the law of the land, we’re also a herd to be culled at their pleasure.

    Stupak’s opponent’s about to get some of my hard-earned (and limited) $$$.

    Triton

  • hickorystick

    is the most important element of a campaign. You can spend millions in advertising, but if it doesn’t ‘grip’ the watcher, it’s wasted money. McCain didn’t get his narrative right, and he lost. He never left the voter a solid reason to vote for him. other than to ‘eliminate a negative’.
    Andrew Jackson understood the power of story, and every one, even the backwoodsman knew his story. Clint Didier, who is running for US Senator from Washington, has his story right on the front page of his website.

    http://www.clintdidier.org/home.html

    This is a skill every Republican must learn.

  • weatherford

    I got it right in the text but wrong in the intro.

    “Nothing sounds sweeter to a man, than his own name.”

    My own name is frequently misspelled, which should mean nothing — but tends to mean everything.

  • Darin_H

    Really? The guy who called our absolute military win during the Tet Offensive as a loss? He’s the one you’re looking for? I wish we had blogs and the new media back then.

  • JX12

    May I suggest that the only reason Democrats who voted against this monstrosity did so was because Pelosi didn’t need their votes to pass it. Had she actually needed their votes, they would have fallen in line. As it is, they have the luxury of political cover. At some other time down the road, they may not.

    Just commit to getting rid of every last one of them and replacing them with conservative Republicans. We need veto-proof majorities to repeal this thing anyway. We may as well shoot for that and see what happens.

  • obladioblada

    Too funny!

    Since when is it the job of a prominent conservative political commentator to “to take a more neutral, non-biased stance and just disseminate facts without a political filter?”

    Besides, CNN didn’t hire him as a journalist– Anderson Cooper and his reports on “teabaggers” and Susan Roesgen and her debates with protesters fill the roles of CNN’s objective reporters.

  • animatorgirl

    I’ll agree heartily that his story is direct and appealing. It sounds less like a vapid political campaign statement and more like an honest, personal letter from a concerned citizen. I like it. There’s a kernel to start with there.

    I work for a web design company that’s created 4 Republican websites to date, and is currently working on our fifth. My 23-year-old boss always says we’re “raising the web standards of Republicans, one site at a time.” Perhaps I should give Mr. Didier a call…..

  • obladioblada

    on list of House Dems. Returns “service not available” message.

  • swamphermit

    I did email or call him each time MoveOn sent out one of their emails about Boyd (there was at least half-dozen alerts), but I made sure to let him know I was against it. When he voted to allow the Slaughter Rule (?), I immediately let him know I was going to vote against him when he runs again.

    I’m going to write him today, let him know that MoveOn wants me to ‘Thank Him’ and ask him about his links with such a lefty group.

  • wgsampson

    We also need to make sure that our state legislatures include more conservative republicans, and more Governors too.

  • usranger

    From what I am seeing Erik, you’re basically saying, get behind one candidate and do not split the Conservative vote.

    I don’t think you understand what it is like here in AL05 though. Have you seen any polls on the 3-way race in AL05?

    Parker Griffith has a snowball’s chance in hell in winning the primary. As a local its painfully clear that he is going out in a flaming heap.

    Les Phillip has raised the most money and come April I got $20 that says he will out raise what he did last quarter.

    not only that,

    He will out raise Griffith and Brooks combined. (obviously, Griffith will still have more cash)

    AND

    Mo will not match what he raised last quarter.

    cowboy up, Erik. Les Phillip has this race in the bag.

  • dmartin

    Wisconsin 8th, Out withSteve Kagen, in with Reid Ribble http://www.ribbleforcongress.com/

    Out with Russ Feingold, in with Terrence Wall,
    http://www.terrencewall.com/

    Both issued immediate press releases condemnning Obamacare and calling for its repeal.

  • wgsampson

    so can we also just start calling ALL democrats – democrat socialists.

  • patman2108

    I agree. The Senate is the problem and it will be IMPOSSIBLE to gain 25 Senate Seats in the 2010 election. That’s right. 25 Seats would be needed to overcome an Obama veto.

    Look at our history. If we used the 18th and 21st Amendments (first to prohibit alcohol and then to repeal it)., then we can certainly use it to make Obamacare illegal. With the public uproar, now is the time. Don’t place our hope on the 7 sitting on the Supreme Court. Let the people fix it. Lets get a Constititional Amendment making healthcare off-limits for the federal government!

  • avgjo

    That would protect us from this probably forever.

    In it should be a statement that no new non-defense spending can be done without money already in the treasury. No spending based on assumptions or projections or other ‘-ions’, just on money already on hand.

  • conservos
  • conservos
  • conservos

    put up a centralized location on the front page for us to find your whitepapers and RS’s endorsements?

    Maybe up there, to the right of “War”or to the immediate right of “Hot Topics,” list “Whitepapers.”

    Maybe on your personal site?

    Too urgent to not have this immediately accessible and

    A LOT of us have friends who don’t ‘net.

    It would be beautiful to print out your backgrounder papers like this one here:

    http://www.redstate.com/erick/files/2010/03/bennett-backgrounder.pdf

    to show to our friends and family.

    Especially our elders who “don’t get” tweet or email and are not computer saavy.

  • momma

    Thanks for the tip! Let’s add some FB fans to his story:
    http://bit.ly/aADvTO
    Patty Murray has been called the dumbest woman in the Senate. But she has been able to raise a big war chest. It would be nice to see a credible challenge from Mr. Didier.

  • http://www.sheetanchor.org Sheet Anchor

    it is greatly appreciated. This man needs to be elected in my view, especially in view of the current state of the New Mexico budget. His first campaign TV ad can be seen here:

    http://allenweh2010.com/

  • momma

    Give us the LINKS! I for one would love to see your company’s designs for Republican candidates.

  • momma

    We need to share these views with our elderly parents and others who may have voted for Obama because their only view to the news is through the MSM on TV, and who are only now realizing what might happen to their Medicare benefits.

  • http://www.sheetanchor.org Sheet Anchor

    takeover of 1/5 of the US economy for so many people to realize that the Democrats were all socialists at heart? Remember when they tossed out Joe Lieberman? They hated GW Bush with a passion unseen in politics. They were never interested in “Bipartisonship” except when the wanted some Republican political cover for unpopular legislative acts.

    This nation has been visibly divided since President GW Bush was elected in 2000. Did people simply want to believe that Democrats were not statists and socialists?

    At least now the true character of Democrats and liberals is in plain view for all to see. But the costs was tremendous. We must act now and be as aggressive as possibe to save the United States from European socialism, and the complete dismantling of America and loss of freedom. As Thomas Jefferson said, “The difference between our government and those of Europe is the difference between heaven and hell.”

    I have one other question: where are the great Veterans organizations in this fight? Perhaps I have just not seen their recent actions. In any event, we need them to engage in this fight for our country. Erick I am with you, and thank you for your unwavering leadership in this fight for our nation’s soul and future.

  • weatherford

    very long-term goal. (There is, by the way no veto problem because there is no submission to the President, at least best I recall.)

    There is however an enormous practical hurdle that we are in absolutely no position to overcome, either now or foreseeably.

    BOTH houses of Congress must concur on an exact text by a two-thirds vote just to get an Amendment submitted to the States where three-quarters, at present, 38 States must concur.

    Of greater significance, a Constitional amendment proposition is itself amendable on the Floor of the Senate or in Senate Committee, and I believe the same is true in the House.

    The fact of freedom, in the Senate, to propose none germane amendments is exactly why we have been protected from making D.C. a State in times worse than these. I have seen school prayer, busing, and all manner of other proposals used to kill D.C. Statehood, and although ignored by the MSM that is exactly why D.C. is not a State.

    These tactics would doom a constitutional amendment even with a two-thirds majority in the Senate.

    Finally, virtually every proposed amendment I have seen, self-destructs if not ratified by the states in seven years. And if that language is not there initially, it will be added by germane amendment.

    Conversely, ONE SENATOR weariing a cup can bring the entire government to a halt. Let us win now — not a decade from now.

  • jaydickb

    I see what you mean about the web site, but his narrative is very impressive.

    I have been a Washington Redskins fan for 40 years or so and remember when he was a tight end there. Whodathunkit.

  • http://www.rightklik.net rightklik

    I think we should be willing to take our chances with candidates like Les Philips. I’m concerned about the long term health of this country, not just the outcome of November’s elections.

    How can we trust someone who has recently caucused with the Democrat party? Why should we be backing an Arlen Specter in a GOP primary? Do I have my history wrong, or did Arlen start out Dem, go GOP, and then go back to the Dem party at the worst possible time?

    Griffith?? If Griffith wins, with the help of the GOP establishment, I don’t hold out much hope for the future of this country.

  • tennreps

    monstrosity. Not the only way, but certainly one.

    We must pursue every angle. The senate is a top priority and I will be supporting that goal.

    Also, we must all work for conservative state legislatures. We are now becoming more aware of local races and are starting to track races where we will have a chance to have a conservative in our state house. This is vital .
    There are too many items that are going to be coming before all of them.

  • Redbirdfan

    If you think the GOP leadership will really try to repeal let alone actually succeed in repealing it, you obviously didn’t see them in action from 1995-2007. What was the average increase in federal spending in those years? 3% over inflation 4? 5? Stop deluding yourselves and look for real change.

  • patman2108

    I never said it would not be easy for a constitutional amendment.
    However, if you view the website: http://www.usconstitution.net/constam.html, you will note there are 2 ways to call for a constitutional amendment. One was the way you described AND the second method prescribed is for a Constitutional Convention to be called by two-thirds of the legislatures of the States.

    With the States fired up and filing suits, hopefully there would be two-thirds of the States ready to call for a convention…we can forget about California, New York, etc., we don’t need them.

    I’m not an advocate of wait-and-see how the Supremes will rule. And congressional voting is, in my opinion, a long shot. However, with the States fired up, there is no better time than now to open the debate.

  • weatherford

    I doubt that anyone here disagrees with your approach as a great long-term goal.

    The point is this: in combat you try to kill the enemy nearest to you. That is how it works. And if you ignore that tactic, you die.

    Right now, the Senate is smelling the Jet Fumes and will pass the House Reconciliation Bill intact to get their worthless butts out of D.C. on, get this, Easter Recess.

    That is the problem many of us are working right NOW. And with respect, I have no further time for diversions.

  • Timothy Morella

    Although this alternative has never been used, according to the Constitution, 2/3 of the legislatures of the States (34) must apply to Congress for a Convention (which, according to the Congress, “shall” be called). This may seem an easier route than the first alternative. However, although this does not require a 2/3 conservative majority in Congress, it nevertheless appears that this alternative still has Congress drafting the language. Thus, we would have to work to ensure that we have both 3/4 of the State Legislatures (for ratification), and enough conservatives in Congress to propose satisfactory wording. In any event, 2010, 2012 and 2014 should be used to ensure a conservative plurality (if not majority) in Congress and the White House.

  • Massachusetts_Transplant

    Sorry Erick. But Lamontagne is not a “good candidate”. I think we run the risk here of simply equating the non-establishment-backed candidate with being the best candidate.

    In the case of Marco Rubio – this is true. He is the conservative, he is electable, and he wasn’t backed by the establishment (although Crist’s support is waning).

    However, every state isn’t the same. Growing up in NH, I saw the horrible race that Ovide Lamontagne run in 1996. Clinton won the state finishing with just under 50% of the vote with Dole and Perot’s vote adding up to 50%. Bob Smith was narrowly reelected – after the networks proclaimed he lost, John Sununu won the 1st Congressional district and Charlie Bass was reelected in the 2nd district. Yet Ovide Lamontage got destroyed by Jeanne Shaheen who ran 7% ahead of Clinton.

    After that crushing loss, Lamontagne basically disapeared from Republican Party politics only to resurface this year to run for the Senate. Currently, he is the only GOP candidate running behind the detestable Paul Hodes.

    I am not saying Binnie or Ayotte are perfect, but I think we do a disservice to the cause, when we think that because Ayotte is backed by the establishment that she is therefore a Crist, and a Lamontagne isn’t so he is therefore a Rubio.

  • patman2108

    There is no reason why a multi-prong strategy can not be employed.
    Certainly rattle the cages of elected representatives…They deserve it.

    But again, unless Repubs pick up 25 seats in the Senate in 2010, this is going nowhere until 2012 and then only if we can defeat Obama in 2012.
    Besides beating Obama; there are the Supremes, which these days trusting that they will do the right thing is really a toss-up.

    If a convention is not thought about now, we’ll lose potentially years and the motivation which we certainly now have may be diminished in two or three years.

  • oneoff

    You obviously never heard about the legal case involving two FOX reporters and Monsanto (a major FOX sponsor) years back…

  • oneoff

    That’s a perfect example of what I mean; I have no agenda and it’s getting harder and harder to find any mainstream innformation source that DOESN’T….ditto finding people to have intelligent discourse with who usually respnd with comments such as yours.

  • oneoff

    yes, he was hired as just another talking head with an agenda…and there are already far too many of those. I don’t want their opinion. I just want facts and I’ll form my own opinion, thanks.

  • Swamp_Yankee

    Conservatives like de-centralization. We believe that which governs closest to the people governs best. I too had not been impressed the Ovide’s campaign and subsequent actions. He’s a nice guy and a decent conservative, but he’s an odds on favorite to lose. We needs soldiers right now. We cant talk about repeal and then push a host of underdogs.

    Its different up close. I believe in picking the best candidate. That entails a numerb of things, but just because someone positions themselves as the most conservative candidate doesnt mean they are the best candidate, it doesnt even mean they are the most conservative. They are opportunits in the conservative movement too.

    Ovide practically destroyed the party in 1996. Ovide pushed th electorate towards Shaheen and Lynch and the Dems have since consolidated their power.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    And that’ll wrap it up.

  • Massachusetts_Transplant

    . . . clearly Chris Christie was the “establishment” candidate and on paper not as conservative as Steve Lonegan.

    However, you have to be happy that we have Christie now. He has been walking the walk and from what I have read iis slashing government left and right in New Jersey. Lonegan very well might have lost.

    Swamp Yankee – thanks for mentioning Shaheen – as we know she was able to acquire a statewide profile which enabled her to eventually beat John Sununu, a good young, smart conservative. Bad candidates can have bad ripple effects.

  • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

    …tried to kill the organic food movement for last year.

  • http://beaglescout.wordpress.com Beaglescout

    Look up “bespoke” if you don’t know what it means. Erick is at CNN to keep them honest, to keep the leftist newsreaders from spinning their leftist assumptions into the news as if their assumptions were the news. For proof as to who the newsreaders, view this wonderful video of Walter Cronkite being “neutral” in his advocacy of world-wide socialism and Satan. No, I’m not kidding.

    Jump to 2:40 into the video if you want to skip over the stuff about how the International Criminal Court (which overrides the USA’s own laws and Constitution) is so awesome the US should sign on post-haste.

    Why did I write about socialism? Because that is what International “peace and justice” always means when friends of Hillary Clinton are talking. Norman Cousins, for whom the award Cronkite received is named, was a long-time socialist and advocate of the “peace” movement, by which he meant the movement to disarm America and let the USSR take over the rest of the world.

    But I get it. This is all cold war stuff and you wonder why we should care. Go ask Barack Obama why it matters. He’s the one trying to force the US into socialism or communism or fascism once again, when we already had it up to our neck during the Great Depression (which they caused and sustained). He’s the one trying to revive discredited ideologies. He’s the one who hires communists to work in the White House. He is the one living in the past. We are just trying to be free to live our own lives, to keep the fruits of our own labor, and to not be enslaved or imprisoned by a tyrannical government.

  • weatherford

    Back long enough for a quick comment.

    I thought it would be pointless to cover the Second Method for Amending the Constitution. I was wrong.

    The Second Method has never been used for a number pratical and principal reasons: a) it is effectively impossible to follow the State initiative route and became so after the dawn of the 19th Century, and no one, no one has given it truly serious consideration because it is only a call for a convention and DOES NOT in itself cause a convention to be convened, b) with the Union growing from Nine States to 50, it is absurd on its face, c) a convention cannot be limited by definition (except as covered hereafter), d) all states would participate, not just those calling for the covention, e) the dangers of a rewrite of effectively the entire Constitution are inherent in any convention, and f) no state, not insane, is going to subject its rights guaranteed by the present Constitution, inter alia. the federal guarantee to them of a republican form of goverment — to a delegation from California.

    To put this question, I hope, to rest, how would any of us feel if we wound up with a President for Life, a King, or a Nobility. Far fetched? Maybe, but it should make the point and close this thread except to monarchists.

    And Yes, I do know the parts of Section 9 of Article I that cant be amended and value the irony, for purposes of this discussion, that also protected from amendment is that “no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the SENATE.” (Emphasis supplied.)

    The intellectual exercise has been enjoyable, but I cant help but believe that we need to focus on action today.

  • weatherford

    For what little it may be worth, I agree with you.

    The question is where to lean hardest.

    For me, the Senate is right now the easiest target to exploit. But the fight extends through the State Legislatures, the County Commissions, and the City Halls. The administrative governments at every level tend to be arrayed against us. The political bodies at every level are weak and unresponsive.
    Every opportunity to cashier the lame and supine needs to be seized.

    My only main thesis today is that we have an immediate problem with Senate Republican Leadership and most Senate Republican Staff plus the Easter Recess. They cannot be permitted to cut and run.

    In short, your point is mine.

  • Right Reason

    As to part a): if 2/3 of the states call for it, the Congress SHALL call a convention. Not may, SHALL. As to part b), please back up this statement. With 38 states passing or considering legislation against the health care monstrosity, I’d say the discontent has been sown and the work started for us. As to parts c), d) e) and f), at a convention, each state has one vote. I think that the states that would call for the convention in the first place would be doing so to reign in the federal government. I think the risk of a convention producing a President for life, or a King is absurd on its face.

    Working to change state legislatures is, I think, a much easier thing than changing the makeup of the federal government. Both are big undertalkings, but the state problem is broken down into many smaller pieces. State politicians have much closer contact with their constituents and can be held to closer account. Also, state elections generate much lower turnout than national elections, making a concerted effort much more powerful.

    I agree, that this is a long term prospect. Buit we have huge, long term, structural problems to solve. And I don’t know about you, but I’m perfectly capable of walking and chewing gum at the same time.

  • weatherford

    I thought only monarchist would rise to the bait. Wrong again.

    Look, trying a constitutional amendment the proven way is not stupid. But it is hard enough already without wandering into the morass of working two-thirds of the state for an initiative. With respect, that approach is just plain crazy, and I suspect you know it.

    We are not talking about walking and chewing gum. We are talking about walking, chewing gum, and dribbling a basketball.

    Is it possible for us to get real.

    I hope this narrows down further comment to the Harlem Globetrotters.

  • Right Reason

    . . .along with the sarcastic digs. Coupled with the lack of substantive argument, it’s just like talking with a liberal.

    It took us at least 70 years, since the new deal, to get us into this mess. We can probably get out electorally, IF we get power back – in ALL the branches, soon enough, and IF all those we put there stay true to their principles (has that happened ever?!), and IF we can keep power long enough to give us the time to roll back what’s happened. Gee, that almost sounds – crazy?!

    Nobody is saying that the Constitutional Convention process will be easy. It will be extremely hard. But I think not much moreso than the previous paragraph.

    Now, you can work – on all fronts possible, to change things, or you can type out sarcastic blog posts in your oh-so-superior tone. I’m going for the first option.

  • weatherford

    FOX News has clearly pivoted Left. There are substantial grounds for believing that the second largest stockholder at News Corp. may have given FNS a hard shove in that direction.

    Hardly conclusive, but the MSM Talking Heads know who pays the piper. And whoever is calling the tune, they are ready to dance.

  • gekster

    snark

  • gekster

    my bad

  • hickorystick

    game. I was 7 years old at my cousins house. When they scored their first touchdown I started hollering, we scored, we scored. My older cousin asked who’s We? I said Washington of course, thinking they were from our state. He explained, but I stuck with them anyway, till Seattle got a team..

  • hickorystick

    is going to be more important than how many times a candidate can afford to pay for it to be said. Didier has been working very hard, going to many events. He is a very passionate speaker. He is new to politics, but if he handles himself well, and hones a message that is well received in enough parts of Seattle, he could win. Outside of Seattle he will do well. He is a native Washingtonian.

    Are you from Washington too?

  • weatherford

    Okay, you win. I cant “walk and chew gum” at the same time.

    But I can go to bed, which is where I’m heading.

  • trumpetplayer

    Obama has committed an impeachable offense. This is a clear case of “abuse of power.” His back room deals and bribes has force this down our throats. The man is a compulsive liar. You can’t believe anything he says. Thanks to him, poor people will be FORCED to buy insurance or else. To make matters worse, now Planned Parenthood’s fetalcide mills can put on a 3rd shift at MY expense. Impeach Obama and ALL the Democrats + any Republicans who voted for this. We need to have laws that control the insurance, pharmaceutical, hospitals(from charging $5.00 for an aspirin) and put a cap on exactly how much one can get in medical malpractice suits. $800,000 for a dog bite? Come on now. Where does that dog live so I can get it to bite me and RETIRE!
    I have connected Geoffry Fieger to initiate a law suit to stop this bill.

  • kosmetar

    One thing we can do is if your rep’s have done the right thing and do not face a strong challenge support others in or out of your state. I live in Georgia but have sent money (small amounts as I’m on a fixed income) to Brown, Rubio and others.

  • dudette

    Just the facts—yes, like he gave in the Tet offensive. That rat has American soldiers’ blood all over him – may he suffer in Hades. Sorry i am not in a forgiving mood these days

  • mbecker908

    The issue isn’t whether reporters or news organizations “have an agenda”, of course they do. They always have and always will I doubt anybody here has a problem with that.

    The problem comes when they push their agenda with one hand (usually their left hand) while pushing the meme that they’re “objective” with the other.

    And as far as “intelligent discourse”, you’re incapable of it if you’re so dumb as to believe that Cronkite was a “newsman”. Good riddance.

  • davesinsanantonio

    Two-thirds of the states can also call for a Constitutional Convention, or if the Congress does not fulfill its constitutional duty to call such a convention, can meet in convention and propose any amendment they want, or even a new constitution if they so desire. Thus, historically, when enough states get close to the two-thirds number, Congress has stepped forward and made its own amendment proposal. That, so far, has safely limited the ability of the states to push through something Congress does not want. So, the way to get movement is to work at the state level and get each legislature to call for a convention. One of the best amendments to propose is a spending limit amendment. A balanced budget amendment will not work, because the Demrats will only use it as justification to raise taxes when they are in power to “balance” their runaway spending. Hence, we need a spending limit. Same with amending a healthcare ban, look ahead to how the Demrats could misuse it in the future.

  • davesinsanantonio

    Calling for a constitutional convention may have the added virtue of putting subtle pressure on the Supremes. They pretend to be apolitical, but they read the papers and can understand the sense of the country. Most of the less rabid members of the Court do not want to upset the citizens too much.

  • TFS

    Can you please post a list of Senate and Congressional conservative candidates across the country that you have vetted and believe we should all support?

    We all need to put our money where our mouth is. If you put up a list, we can then start letting people know who the real conservatives are that we should be financially supporting.

    Thank you.

  • TFS

    I am sending donations to conservative candidates in other states, too. All of us need to do this, no matter how small the amount.

  • TFS

    I agree. Erick please do this.

  • edintexas

    You passed right over the need for delegates to the Constitutional Convention. Do you have some scheme to ensure that a strong majority of Conservatives will be elected, either by the people or the state legislatures, to be delegates? Otherwise, you might be advocating a Convention without knowing who will populate the delegate ranks. Consider the probability that delegates will need to be free of job requirements for an extended period, or periods, of time, how many Conservatives can afford to leave family and income for an extended period?

    While several states have recently revoked their legislature’s vote to call a Constitutional Convention (votes occurred over a couple of decades), there are some Constitutional “scholars” who believe once the vote is taken, it can’t be revoked. I disagree, but definitely believe we need to understand ALL the ramifications of any course we are considering, and understand the ramifications before we start down that road. After all, Mr. Ponzi’s scheme looked really good to lots of people – and more than once in history. The biggest Ponzi scheme of all, Social Security, is one we can’t seem to get rid of (I, for one, would give up my SSA monthly check in a heartbeat for a lower national debt and lower taxes).

    As an aside, I’m somewhat depressed that “older Americans” are asking “How”. Did they learn nothing in school? Maybe they just weren’t paying attention in Civics class? As an “older American” myself, I know we had the lessons in school. Surely Alzheimer’s isn’t that widespread.

  • jetman

    first a “John Dennis” asking for money to run against Pelosi. I would donate if he’s for real.

    Second, a “Patrick Murray” mentioned this morning on WMAL who’s going to run against VA 8th’s “rep-for-life” James Moran (aka the moron). That’s close to home for me and I intend to get involved.

  • pirate55

    I must say I am a strong supporter of Marco Rubio in Florida and I plan to put my money where my mouth is. Let us all do our due diligence and research and strongly support electable (I stress this as a keyword) conservative candidates.

    When 2010 is over we will not have it all right as RINO’s will remain. Heck, ultra liberal (I believe tht’s all that’s left) Democrats will remain. In fact we will never get it all right but we should have never let it get to this point in the first place. Now we had better rely on our collective memories that this era in our history is NEVER repeated.

  • wardjh

    The attempt to convene a constitutional convention would be one more way to pressure everyone. Yes there are risks. Remember the ERA amendment. Multiple extensions and still not ratified. But the pressure from that caused changes.

    There are enough states that could call for a convention. With all the hoorah that would raise, it would make other things easier to accomplish. Publish the outlandish. Someone’s ox will be gored on all sides. This could cause pre-emptive changes to current law to forestall a convention.

    Worse case, lots of publicity. Get the populace stirred up. Remove the feeling that the status quo is forever. Revolt does not mean arms, but does mean threats.

  • conservos

    http://www.propublica.org/about/

    “ProPublica is an independent, non-profit newsroom that produces investigative journalism in the public interest. Our work focuses exclusively on truly important stories, stories with ?moral force.?

    “…We have created an independent newsroom, located in Manhattan and led by some of the nation?s most distinguished editors, and staffed at levels unprecedented for a non-profit organization. Indeed, we believe, this is the largest, best-led and best-funded investigative journalism operation in the United States. ”

    Advisory Board:

    Jill Abramson,- managing ed of The New York Times
    Martin D. Baron – ed of The Boston Globe
    David Boardman – exec ed of the Seattle Times
    Robert A. Caro, historian and biographer of Robert Moses and Lyndon Johnson
    John S. Carroll – former ed of the Los Angeles Times and the Baltimore Sun
    L. Gordon Crovitz – former pub of The Wall Street Journal
    David Gergen – prof of pub serv at Harvard?s John F. Kennedy School of Government and director of its Center for Public Leadership
    Shawn McIntosh – dir of culture and change at The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
    Ellen Miller – ex dir of The Sunlight Foundation
    Gregory L. Moore – ed of The Denver Post
    Priscilla Painton – ed-in-chief of Simon & Schuster
    Allan Sloan – sr ed at large for Fortune magazine
    Kerry Smith – sr vp for editorial quality of ABC News
    Cynthia A. Tucker – ed of the editorial page of The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

    Me:

    This organization?s ?major, multi-year commitment? funding source — The Sandler Foundation — adores ACORN, Project Vote, and John Podesta, co-chairman of the Obama-Biden Transition Project.

    George Soros too..

    They contribute pieces to HuffPo and other liberal blogs and sites as “investigative journalism” while they tout this overly-familiar rheotirc back at Pro-Publica:

    “In the best traditions of American journalism in the public service, we seek to stimulate positive CHANGE. We uncover unsavory practices in order to stimulate REFORM. .. We look hard at the critical functions of BUSINESS and of government, the two biggest centers of POWER, in areas ranging from PRODUCT SAFETY to SECURITIES FRAUD, from flaws in our system of criminal justice to practices that undermine FAIR ELECTIONS.”

    An Obama acolyte with an agenda, passing itself off as a reputablle investigative news organization. A wolf in sheeps clothing.

    Poo on your Cronkite and half-baked whining. You know what’s up.

    You’re either a diehard lib and lie about your desire for un-biased reporting, or your career ended b/c you were a bad journalist who blatantly disregarded the good- journalist creedo:

    Check your sources.

  • vols4life

    It’s amazing, with all of the uproar against the entrenched, career politicians, that people constantly defend Mo for running for some higher political office whenever it is an off year for his county commission seat. Mo Brooks, no offense to his character, is a moderate. He consistently defends the necessity of the most extravagant of government bureaucratic agencies, including the EPA, IRS, Department of Energy, Department of Education (Reagan advocated eliminating this one), etc. Mo lacks understanding of basic ideas like the congressional authority to declare war. Much of Mo’s cash comes from a personal loan, and from donors that maxed out for both the primary and runoff. Mo has a very small donor base that writes big checks…

    Les Phillip’s been able to run effective and hard-hitting ads throughout the district on his budget, while Mo talks about his grandparents light-bulbs in his radio spots. Les has also outraised both other candidates for 2 quarters in a row, had the most individual donors from within the district, and won straw polls at the 2 debates that included them. Les has international business experience, and firm handle on the defense and aerospace issues that drive this district, and a solid grasp on the advantages of Austrian economics over the Keynesian system. Mo Brooks is an avid Keynesian…