« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

Is It Enough to Elect Republicans?

What if I told you there was a free-market based jobs package that wound its way through the legislature backed by small business groups, free market groups, conservative groups, tax reform advocates and others?

What if I told you that one Republican sided with the most liberal members of the legislature to oppose the legislation?

What if I told you part of the reason that Republican opposed the legislation is because it cut taxes?

What if I told you that the greater reason this Republican opposed the legislation was because he did not want another Republican to get credit for it because that other Republican wrote the legislation?

Pretty crummy, right?

Well let me ask you one more question: what if I told you the other Republican — the one who wrote the legislation — is running for Congress along with the guy who sided with the left?

So is it enough to elect Republicans? Lee Hawkins, the Republican who sided with the left to oppose the free market jobs bill would be a perfectly fine and typical Republican. He’d vote the way leadership tells him to vote, whether on TARP or bailouts or health care. He’d bring on the bacon with gusto, perfectly happy to spend your money on his district never considering it is your money and you might like it more.

Then there is Tom Graves. He’s the guy who wrote the legislation. Tom Graves, like Pam Gorman in Arizona, actually bled for the conservative cause metaphorically at least. He, unlike Lee Hawkins, opposed Republicans in the Georgia General Assembly. Tom Graves spoke out against the GOP’s free spending, tax increasing ways. He was punished. In fact, seven different times Tom Graves spoke out and was punished — stripped of his position, stripped of his office, exiled out of the Capitol Building.

But he kept fighting for the conservative cause. He set up a caucus of conservatives to strategize and fight for free enterprise, small businesses, and you.

I would say it is not enough to vote for Republicans. We need to vote for conservative Republicans. Between Tom Graves and Lee Hawkins, we need Tom Graves.

It is not enough for us to just go into swing districts and try to beat the Democrats. We need also to beat Republicans who are the type that caused the GOP to lose its way. We cannot redeem the party in the eyes of the public without putting in office good men and women of character.

Please, please, please don’t sit this out. We can dramatically improve this safely Republican seat. We can do it by electing Tom Graves.

His supporters have organized a money bomb for him. Let’s give what we can and get him to higher office.

COMMENTS

  • Hugh

    We must support the right candidate in elections. Those with a moral compass and conservative values. There can be no compromise.
    Let the people say “Amen”.

  • EagleWatcher

    And this post is one of the reasons why. I think you’re right. It’s not just about the D’s and the R’s it’s about their voting records. We are tired of “born again conservatives” (John McCain) who suddenly shift to the right a few months before the election and then put on their Che Guevara tee shirts as soon as they get elected.

  • texasgalt
  • ardvarkmaster

    Progressive Republicans are like wolves in sheep’s clothing, they lead the rest of us to the slaughter that socialism is. An (R) by a name means nothing if it is not a Conservative (R).

  • zollistar

    …if we don’t insist on Republicans who truly “get it” about limited government with powers firmly checked and the free market instead of a tax-and-spend, overreaching government.

    Because I’m not sanguine about our Republican leadership “getting” any of this, I think it’s a smart strategy to by-pass it and cherry-pick reliable candidates to support. Thanks for pointing them out to us Eric and all of you at RedState.

  • The_Rebel

    as to why we need real conservative Republicans and not pandering and vindictive Republicans.

  • zollistar

    …but I read this (click below):

    http://dailycaller.com/2010/04/20/supporting-steele-pays-off-for-head-of-oregon-gop/

    TIME TO BY-PASS THE REPUBLICAN S0-CALLED LEADERSHIP!!!

    At the minimum, we can starve them.

    It’s been a long, long time since I’ve contributed to the Republican Party . By contrast, I have contributed to individual candidates e.g., Rubio, Doug Hoffman (who lost but showed us what the Scozzafava and the Republican leadership that selected her was all about), and others.

  • gunforbrains

    Maybe you should find some Republicans that aren’t hypocrites and stop being so rigid in finding a path out of the mess created by GWB.

    Just saying…

  • danasdaddy

    I actually live in the district where Hawkins and Graves are running. I’ve seen and heard so much conflicting info about these guys that I was really confused as to which is actually the guy to support.

    Knowing that you have the time, ability, and connections (that I don’t) to find out the truth about these guys helps immensely.

    Even if I didn’t live in the district, I’m always interested in what you find out about candidates. I know that I can trust the info I get from you and the other RedState contributors.

  • the_invisible_hand

    I mean we can all support any candidate in the primary process and we should fight for the conservatives we wish to see in Washington, but we have to support the nominee in the general because any Republican is better than any Democrat.

    Real liberals are in the Democratic Party. They don’t join the Republican Party. So all members moving up are at least orthodox on the general issues. They have varied interests and concentrations. Some are just about fiscal issues. Some are just about social issues. But even the most moderate Republican beats any Democrat as far as I can tell.

  • diamonddave

    bill parson here in nevada needs the same support to be the candidate to run against harry reid. he is the only true conservative, the only constitutional candidate endorsed and vetted by icaucus and the onlyb non-washington, non-establishment, non-politician in the gop primary race. so how about putting your money and support where your mouths are?

  • incumbentrant

    Thanks for a great article, Erick. You are so right with this. I’ve noticed how the Republican leadership backs the candidate they think will follow their lead…not the candidate we the people prefer…not the candidate who will follow the Constitution…not the candidate who will cut taxes…not the candidate who will call a terrorist a terrorist…I will vote for any candidate who shows me he’s a conservative Constitutionalist…anyone who’s for America and what our Founding Fathers stood for…

  • ihateliberals

    yet. Unless they are Reagan Style Republicans then they should hit the road. A liberal siding republican is as useless as a liberal. They should not be elected and the ones there should be pushed out. the reagan model is the one that works and that is what we are going to have to have if we have any hope of surviving this Socialist government take over.

  • http://www.zapakramp.byregion.net Carlton Newman

    What a brilliant idea. You put your finger on the pulse and crux of the matter. When need to designate candidates with a “CR” if they are a Conservative Republican and an “RR” if they are a Rino Republican.

  • awunsch

    to vote repulbican, although it is a good start for 2010. We also need to rid the party of moderates like Crist, not because they are bad people but because we need people that will stand up and cut the Obama budget. So after we get rid of democrats, (they are all, in the final analysis, tax and spend people) we need to bring in more conservative candidates into the republican party. It will be a tought ride through the 2010 and 2012 elections and following congressional sessions because we need to make serious cuts. Some depts need to be eliminated, others cut, some like defense need to be supported and maintained. The losers will not like the cuts, that’s human nature, so the congress will need to tough it out and do the right thing.

  • awunsch

    to vote repulbican, although it is a good start for 2010. We also need to rid the party of moderates like Crist, not because they are bad people but because we need people that will stand up and cut the Obama budget. So after we get rid of democrats, (they are all, in the final analysis, tax and spend people) we need to bring in more conservative candidates into the republican party. It will be a tought ride through the 2010 and 2012 elections and following congressional sessions because we need to make serious cuts. Some depts need to be eliminated, others cut, some like defense need to be supported and maintained. The losers will not like the cuts, that’s human nature, so the congress will need to tough it out and do the right thing.

  • jbjones

    politicians who share and govern according to the American Ethos, not socialists masquerading in masks of American values. The press won’t look a layer lower – especially if the politician is far left – so we must. Your article should excite and energize Americans in Georgia. Elect conservatives . . . Republican or not . . . and we’ll get the government we deserve.

  • GenEarly

    US Congressional District 10 (Pinellas County) Florida Bill Young 79 yrs old Pork Barrel King voted for Bush Big Government and pork for everyone! A fine example of a republican who runs “conservative” then votes pork.
    Eric Forcade has a written pledge for Constitutional Conservative government,but the republican establishment supports the “Party” incumbent over Conservative Principles.
    Check out and support www.forcadeforcongress.com

  • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior

    I took the time to read through all the comments to Erick’s post.

    Lot’s of “we need this” type sentiments:

    “We must support the right candidate in elections.”

    “We are tired of ‘born again conservatives’ . . . .”

    “[We] need to designate candidates with a ‘CR’ if they are a Conservative Republican and an ‘RR’ if they are a Rino Republican.”

    “[We must] insist on Republicans who truly ‘get it’ about limited government with powers firmly checked and the free market instead of a tax-and-spend, overreaching government.”

    “[W]e need real conservative Republicans and not pandering and vindictive Republicans.”

    “A liberal siding republican is as useless as a liberal. They should not be elected and the ones there should be pushed out.”

    “We also need to rid the party of moderates like Crist, not because they are bad people but because we need people that will stand up and cut the Obama budget.”

    “The American people deserve politicians who share and govern according to the American Ethos, not socialists masquerading in masks of American values.”

    All good sentiments. Worthy goals. Those sentiments, and two dollars, will get you a cup of coffee.

    The real question is, HOW do we get what we “need” or “deserve” from “the Republican Party?” If we conservatives want better, more conservative candidates, we have to create a conservative Republican Party so those candidates have a conservative Party backing them. “The Republican Party” is defined by its precinct committeemen, who actually elect the leaders of the Party, write the platform, pass the resolutions, etc.

    If you want to change the Republican Party, without actually being inside it, good luck. It ain’t gonna happen. If you want to change the Republican Party, you MUST get INSIDE IT.

    We conservatives can find sufficient numbers of conservatives in all the grass roots “tea party” type organizations that have sprung up. Go get them and bring them into the Party. Create a conservative Republican Party at the grass roots level. THEN you’ll have a tool — a conservative Republican Party — that can actually fill all the “needs.”

    If you aren’t already a PC, I hope you’ll become one ASAP. And, it’s fun!

    Thank you.
    ColdWarrior, PC
    Conservatives, UNITE! CHANGE the Republican Party and the world by UNITING INSIDE the Party as precinct committeemen. NOW!

  • dave624

    I would really like to see this concept take traction. Maybe the TEA Party can run with it. The republican leadership would hate it of course but it might finally get their attention!

    It would definitely not allow RINO’s to continue their deception with the public.

  • jcooper511

    Changing the the people is NOT the answer. The SYSTEM is BROKE. It’s the SYSTEM that need to be changed back to Constitutional Law. The Progressives have taken 60 years to subvert the SYSTEM. It will not be changed by the the addition or subtraction of a few Congress people no matter how attractive that may seem.

  • greatbasinconservative

    … with Bill Parson is the same problem with Danny Tarkanian. They have no record for us to judge them by. So they can say anything they want now, and then do whatever they want once in office. The job of U.S. Senator is too important to take a risk like that.

    The candidate to replace Reid that conservatives in Nevada (AND nationally!) should be getting behind is Sharron Angle. She actually DOES have a record, which includes suing the Republican governor (and winning!) when she was in the Assembly (using her own money!) for violating the state Constitution’s 2/3 majority requirement to raise taxes. She has been endorsed by Gun Owners of America, National Tea Party Express, and Mark Levin. Read more about her at http://www.sharronangle.com.

  • jb123

    Good article!!
    We don?t read the fine print ? the Republican Party try?s to pick the winners and the voters just follow their 30 second ads. We need to vote some conservative Republicans into office ? check Oregon?s primary the ?R? party mouths ?Conservatives? but stand behind the ?Moderates?
    Scott Bruun the party pick (both by the RNCC and State Rep. Party) claims himself as a ?Moderate? Republican and votes 70% of the time with Dems. running against Fred Thompson www.fredthompsonforcongress.com a ?Conservative Republican?

    If we let the parties pick the winners and losers again ? we will end up in the boat we are in now. My favorite quote from the other day by the Republicans on the campaign trail ? ?party backed candidates is like have a leash on a dog we can tell them when to sit and when to roll over?

    check out moocountynews.com

  • animatorgirl

    Again, I met Graves and Hawkins in person, got the chance to ask both of them specific questions. If Graves is so willing to stand up to the GOP, then why was he unable to answer my question: “What mistakes do you believe Congressional Republicans have made over the last decade, and what would you do differently?” If what you say above was true, the easy answer would have been to point to the Repubs’ reckless spending and then describe how he opposed the same excess in the Georgia legislature. Instead, I got a weird non-answer about how we need to elect candidates who will defend the Constitution.

    UM, no sh*t, Sherlock. How is that an answer that inspires confidence?

    Furthermore, Graves is AWFULLY young to have already spent 8 years in politics already….. this tells me he’s a career politician in the making, of whom we need NO MORE in the US House. Hawkins, on the other hand, has a long career as a dentist behind him, giving him an excellent basis not only in the private sector, but also in insurance law, which will be handy when we try to repeal Obamacare.

    So to everybody out there who takes RedState’s endorsement as the gold standard, please find out the facts for yourselves, or you’ll be letting Erick handpick your representatives. And in the end, they have to represent you, not him.

  • animatorgirl

    and read my last comment below. Trust your own judgment and don’t let blogs make decisions for you, not even excellent ones like RedState.

  • Aaron Gardner

    You do realize that you are asking others to trust your judgement while simultaneously criticizing those who trust Erick’s judgement, right?

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    how you doing brother?

  • Aaron Gardner

    Check your e-mail.

  • animatorgirl

    I didn’t say BELIEVE ME AND NOT ERICK, I said trust YOUR judgment.

    My point was simply that, when I trusted my own judgment, I disagreed with Erick. Others may look at the facts and find they agree with Erick, and that’s fine. I just think it’s not going to serve the Conservative cause well if people start abdicating their responsibility to research candidates and make decisions to bloggers. I have a lot of respect for Erick, but I’m careful not to assume that he’s always right.

    Other endorsements I think he’s right on-track with, like Karen Handel. But again, I determined that for myself, and not because Erick said it.

  • Aaron Gardner

    And just for the record, you are asking others to trust your judgement … not on the candidate, but on whether or not Erick is right.

    I sincerely doubt that our readership relies solely on what Erick writes to make their electoral decisions.

    Frankly, it is insulting that you did.

  • animatorgirl

    “I actually live in the district where Hawkins and Graves are running. I?ve seen and heard so much conflicting info about these guys that I was really confused as to which is actually the guy to support.

    Knowing that you have the time, ability, and connections (that I don?t) to find out the truth about these guys helps immensely.

    Even if I didn?t live in the district, I?m always interested in what you find out about candidates. I know that I can trust the info I get from you and the other RedState contributors.”

    I appreciate that not everyone has the time and opportunity to check details on candidates and that Erick’s knowledge is therefore helpful. However, it sounded very much to me as though in this case, his opinion had made up this person’s mind.

    “And just for the record, you are asking others to trust your judgement ? not on the candidate, but on whether or not Erick is right.”

    No, I’m not. I just said that if they think Erick is right, after investigating the facts themselves, then fine. Not sure why you’re insisting there’s arrogance at play here: I’m recommending taking a blogger’s opinion with a grain of salt, which I think most people would agree is a good policy.

    I’m sorry if you’re insulted, but I said nothing about people being mindless followers, nor did I even suggest that Erick “commanded” anything. He gave an opinion. I assume others know that just as I do.

  • Aaron Gardner

    Especially on a thread that was over two weeks old.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    state and local level. I think the limited power (esp. the inability to print money) plus the limited impact and laboratories of democracy function.

    The KISS method got its name for a reason. I think one of the main big lies that too many of our side mouths is that “there isn’t a dime’s worth of difference between the parties.”

    That is a lie. Obama’s deficits and liberty-reductions are HUGE systemic leaps from the past.

    The electorate has been re-educated in the evil failure of liberal policies. They will deliver.

    Most all of the candidates in GA GOP primaries would vote right, imho, in Congress in DC.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    his jobs/tax cut bill was puny and had some bad aspects that mirrored some of Obama’s and esp Carter’s old “new jobs” tax credit that actually causes the premature firings of good workers.

  • animatorgirl

    I’d say it’s more relevant now than it was two weeks ago.

    And as demonstrated, I responded to a single statement. How dare I voice an opinion in response? But whatever; you’re determined to be offended by me, and to somehow justify that offense. Too bad, Aaron: we’re on the same side. Best of luck and toodles.