<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So Wait A Second!  DeVore Polls Better Against Boxer Than Fiorina, But We&#8217;re Supposed to go With Carly?!?!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/05/14/so-wait-a-second-devore-polls-better-against-boxer-than-fiorina-but-were-supposed-to-go-with-carly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/05/14/so-wait-a-second-devore-polls-better-against-boxer-than-fiorina-but-were-supposed-to-go-with-carly/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 09:38:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: clarencedebarrows</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/05/14/so-wait-a-second-devore-polls-better-against-boxer-than-fiorina-but-were-supposed-to-go-with-carly/#comment-69464</link>
		<dc:creator>clarencedebarrows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 18:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=7436#comment-69464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;San Francisco&quot; in 1964!  Not questioning your &quot;conservative credentials&quot;, but definitely questioning your couth.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;San Francisco&#8221; in 1964!  Not questioning your &#8220;conservative credentials&#8221;, but definitely questioning your couth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MF</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/05/14/so-wait-a-second-devore-polls-better-against-boxer-than-fiorina-but-were-supposed-to-go-with-carly/#comment-69412</link>
		<dc:creator>MF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 16:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=7436#comment-69412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[H&#039;e sort of a young Arlen Specter.  Yeah, he had an (R) next to his name, but he&#039;s going to provide cover for the other liberal Rs to move further left.  I wouldn&#039;t even be surprised to see him switch to (D) if he were elected and the more conservative R leaders tried to pressure him.

&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Campbell is not a RINO, he&#039;s a DWAD (Democrat without a D).&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>H&#8217;e sort of a young Arlen Specter.  Yeah, he had an (R) next to his name, but he&#8217;s going to provide cover for the other liberal Rs to move further left.  I wouldn&#8217;t even be surprised to see him switch to (D) if he were elected and the more conservative R leaders tried to pressure him.</p>
<p><i><b>Campbell is not a RINO, he&#8217;s a DWAD (Democrat without a D).</b></i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trilogy</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/05/14/so-wait-a-second-devore-polls-better-against-boxer-than-fiorina-but-were-supposed-to-go-with-carly/#comment-69397</link>
		<dc:creator>trilogy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 15:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=7436#comment-69397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When are people going to wake up and notice a RINO, is a RINO, even with lipstick on it. We need to take back our country by electing the right people to do this and not put into office those who are of the same cloth that is currently in Washington.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When are people going to wake up and notice a RINO, is a RINO, even with lipstick on it. We need to take back our country by electing the right people to do this and not put into office those who are of the same cloth that is currently in Washington.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vinick</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/05/14/so-wait-a-second-devore-polls-better-against-boxer-than-fiorina-but-were-supposed-to-go-with-carly/#comment-69238</link>
		<dc:creator>vinick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 18:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=7436#comment-69238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[you guys are nuts...you all talk about the most important thing being defeating Boxer and electing a Republican and yet you are taking all these pains to pick Fiorina or DeVore so that they can beat Campbell. Campbell is a Republican too and guess what? He can actually win! Campbell has appeal beyond the Republican base, which you need to win because, in California, the enthusiasm gap is not enough to overcome Democrats&#039; registration advantage. Republicans in  CA need moderates and independents and DeVore and Fiorina are not going to pull those in to the same extent that Campbell will. I&#039;m for him because of his views, but the rest of you guys please, he is the best choice if for no other reason than because he can win in November.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you guys are nuts&#8230;you all talk about the most important thing being defeating Boxer and electing a Republican and yet you are taking all these pains to pick Fiorina or DeVore so that they can beat Campbell. Campbell is a Republican too and guess what? He can actually win! Campbell has appeal beyond the Republican base, which you need to win because, in California, the enthusiasm gap is not enough to overcome Democrats&#8217; registration advantage. Republicans in  CA need moderates and independents and DeVore and Fiorina are not going to pull those in to the same extent that Campbell will. I&#8217;m for him because of his views, but the rest of you guys please, he is the best choice if for no other reason than because he can win in November.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charm2</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/05/14/so-wait-a-second-devore-polls-better-against-boxer-than-fiorina-but-were-supposed-to-go-with-carly/#comment-69227</link>
		<dc:creator>charm2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 12:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=7436#comment-69227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When she became the head honcho at Hp there was lots of noise about how wonderful to have a woman at the head of a big corportation. She then proceeded to run the company into the ground. When they fired her with a 20 million +/_ severance pay she hit the tv circuit complaining about the low severance pay and declared the reason she did not get much money from them was because she is a woman.  She was at Lucent before coming to Hp. After being at Hp I vaguely remember  some suggestions that things were not all what they seemed when she was at Lucent. Is politics her choice because there are no options for her in the business communityr?  She worked on McCains campaign and he lost. She has the Republican party&#039;s  old boy&#039;s endorsement.   I don&#039;t  know for sure what she is nor why anyone believes California would benefit from her being their senator, but there are some red flags here that have loser written all over them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When she became the head honcho at Hp there was lots of noise about how wonderful to have a woman at the head of a big corportation. She then proceeded to run the company into the ground. When they fired her with a 20 million +/_ severance pay she hit the tv circuit complaining about the low severance pay and declared the reason she did not get much money from them was because she is a woman.  She was at Lucent before coming to Hp. After being at Hp I vaguely remember  some suggestions that things were not all what they seemed when she was at Lucent. Is politics her choice because there are no options for her in the business communityr?  She worked on McCains campaign and he lost. She has the Republican party&#8217;s  old boy&#8217;s endorsement.   I don&#8217;t  know for sure what she is nor why anyone believes California would benefit from her being their senator, but there are some red flags here that have loser written all over them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adjoran</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/05/14/so-wait-a-second-devore-polls-better-against-boxer-than-fiorina-but-were-supposed-to-go-with-carly/#comment-69221</link>
		<dc:creator>Adjoran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 09:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=7436#comment-69221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If DeVore had a chance, I&#039;d be for him.

Your ad hom attack shows the lack of coherent argument for pursuing the windmill tilting.  Just over three weeks remain.  The only one showing any measurable movement is Campbell, and he doesn&#039;t have much.  

How much money would it take to come from third place in three weeks in a state with all the media markets California has?  Has DeVore shown any ability to raise it?

I thought YOU were the one who actually looked at the numbers.  Can you in good conscience say you are in agreement with the &quot;Big MO&quot; proclamations made by Erick and Aaron (Josh is with the campaign, he&#039;s expected to spin everything their way)?  Is that the way you interpret these subgroups?

If so, please explain it in a way that makes sense, not that conforms with wishful thinking.  But you don&#039;t, you just attack the messenger who points out there is nothing there.  You could see the truth if you wanted to, but you don&#039;t want to.  You can&#039;t handle the truth! (always wanted to say that ...).

Sorry to be the skunk at the garden party, but my conservative credentials can&#039;t be questioned.  At the age of 11, I stayed up until 4 am EDT listening to Barry Goldwater&#039;s acceptance speech from the Cow Palace in Frisco in 1964.  I rang doorbells for Nixon in 1968, and backed Reagan in 1976.  I was one of the early evangelists of Kemp-Roth, which eventually became &quot;the Reagan tax cut.&quot;  I was burning up local talk radio with conservative views when Limbaugh was still a DJ.  So, I don&#039;t give a brass farthing what some kid says about me.  

This California stuff is all clear to anyone with average faculties and paying attention.  Those who care about the facts will get it, those who don&#039;t never would anyway.  Some years back one of the most popular conservative sites was Polipundit, but the guy went off the deep end into the fringe waters.  Started when he decided Bush was a RINO enemy.  It&#039;s still around, but pulling a fraction of the traffic it once did.

Of course, it couldn&#039;t happen here.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If DeVore had a chance, I&#8217;d be for him.</p>
<p>Your ad hom attack shows the lack of coherent argument for pursuing the windmill tilting.  Just over three weeks remain.  The only one showing any measurable movement is Campbell, and he doesn&#8217;t have much.  </p>
<p>How much money would it take to come from third place in three weeks in a state with all the media markets California has?  Has DeVore shown any ability to raise it?</p>
<p>I thought YOU were the one who actually looked at the numbers.  Can you in good conscience say you are in agreement with the &#8220;Big MO&#8221; proclamations made by Erick and Aaron (Josh is with the campaign, he&#8217;s expected to spin everything their way)?  Is that the way you interpret these subgroups?</p>
<p>If so, please explain it in a way that makes sense, not that conforms with wishful thinking.  But you don&#8217;t, you just attack the messenger who points out there is nothing there.  You could see the truth if you wanted to, but you don&#8217;t want to.  You can&#8217;t handle the truth! (always wanted to say that &#8230;).</p>
<p>Sorry to be the skunk at the garden party, but my conservative credentials can&#8217;t be questioned.  At the age of 11, I stayed up until 4 am EDT listening to Barry Goldwater&#8217;s acceptance speech from the Cow Palace in Frisco in 1964.  I rang doorbells for Nixon in 1968, and backed Reagan in 1976.  I was one of the early evangelists of Kemp-Roth, which eventually became &#8220;the Reagan tax cut.&#8221;  I was burning up local talk radio with conservative views when Limbaugh was still a DJ.  So, I don&#8217;t give a brass farthing what some kid says about me.  </p>
<p>This California stuff is all clear to anyone with average faculties and paying attention.  Those who care about the facts will get it, those who don&#8217;t never would anyway.  Some years back one of the most popular conservative sites was Polipundit, but the guy went off the deep end into the fringe waters.  Started when he decided Bush was a RINO enemy.  It&#8217;s still around, but pulling a fraction of the traffic it once did.</p>
<p>Of course, it couldn&#8217;t happen here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: svconservative</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/05/14/so-wait-a-second-devore-polls-better-against-boxer-than-fiorina-but-were-supposed-to-go-with-carly/#comment-69211</link>
		<dc:creator>svconservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 04:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=7436#comment-69211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We should not get obsessed over polls. Primary voters&#039; preferences can change substantially close to the election, and more importantly no votes have been counted for any of these candidates yet.

If Fiorina were a strong conservative candidate she would be able to unify the conservative vote by convincing voters on the strengths of her ideas and her leadership abilities. When the party machine has tried to anoint a candidate who has not been able to build a strong coalition and solidify support on their own merits, we have often ended up with surprisingly weak candidates.

I used to like Campbell though he has shifted further to the left than I would prefer. Campbell is a RINO. He has been on our side of some issues and quite far to the left on others. Fiorina is a big question mark. We really have very little idea about what she really believes, or about what she will do if elected. I think it is quite likely that she is a RINO just like Campbell and just like Arnold.

It is not clear to me that Campbell has the killer instinct that is needed to win a tough fight in the general election. Carly is a wild card. What she has going for her is name recognition and the fact that Boxer has never had to run against a woman before. Nominating Carly is a gamble - she could turn out to be a tough challenger for Boxer or she could be a much weaker campaigner than expected. My vote will be for the best candidate in this primary, Chuck Devore, regardless of what the polls say.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We should not get obsessed over polls. Primary voters&#8217; preferences can change substantially close to the election, and more importantly no votes have been counted for any of these candidates yet.</p>
<p>If Fiorina were a strong conservative candidate she would be able to unify the conservative vote by convincing voters on the strengths of her ideas and her leadership abilities. When the party machine has tried to anoint a candidate who has not been able to build a strong coalition and solidify support on their own merits, we have often ended up with surprisingly weak candidates.</p>
<p>I used to like Campbell though he has shifted further to the left than I would prefer. Campbell is a RINO. He has been on our side of some issues and quite far to the left on others. Fiorina is a big question mark. We really have very little idea about what she really believes, or about what she will do if elected. I think it is quite likely that she is a RINO just like Campbell and just like Arnold.</p>
<p>It is not clear to me that Campbell has the killer instinct that is needed to win a tough fight in the general election. Carly is a wild card. What she has going for her is name recognition and the fact that Boxer has never had to run against a woman before. Nominating Carly is a gamble &#8211; she could turn out to be a tough challenger for Boxer or she could be a much weaker campaigner than expected. My vote will be for the best candidate in this primary, Chuck Devore, regardless of what the polls say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tracycolorado</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/05/14/so-wait-a-second-devore-polls-better-against-boxer-than-fiorina-but-were-supposed-to-go-with-carly/#comment-69187</link>
		<dc:creator>tracycolorado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 23:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=7436#comment-69187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chuck Devore has my vote !  Fiorina endorced john mccain and his CAP AND TAX in last presidential ellections  .  NOW fiorina has flopped like a fish ,  and says she is against CAP AND TAX .  Campbell has no backbone ,  and doesnt know ,  what he wants  .  CHUCK DEVORE has never swayed on his values and beliefs ,  unlike the rocking chairs campbell and fiorina]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chuck Devore has my vote !  Fiorina endorced john mccain and his CAP AND TAX in last presidential ellections  .  NOW fiorina has flopped like a fish ,  and says she is against CAP AND TAX .  Campbell has no backbone ,  and doesnt know ,  what he wants  .  CHUCK DEVORE has never swayed on his values and beliefs ,  unlike the rocking chairs campbell and fiorina</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conservativecrusade</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/05/14/so-wait-a-second-devore-polls-better-against-boxer-than-fiorina-but-were-supposed-to-go-with-carly/#comment-69156</link>
		<dc:creator>conservativecrusade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 20:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=7436#comment-69156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[there has to be a point we make a choice and choose the candidate that can not only beat Boxer, but also beat Campbell. Chuck should stay in and fight like hell until either he is CLEARLY beating Carly or the other way around. At that point we need to demand the other drops out, gets behind the other, so that Campbell is not the elected republican, and then go beat Boxer. Like it or not, the line has to be drawn and drawn soon or  it will be Campbell versus Boxer, and that is a crappy choice. One of the two has to be willing to let their pride go, drop out, so that a conservative in Chuck or a moderate in Carly can move on and keep a Boxer look a like in Campbell out of the main election.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there has to be a point we make a choice and choose the candidate that can not only beat Boxer, but also beat Campbell. Chuck should stay in and fight like hell until either he is CLEARLY beating Carly or the other way around. At that point we need to demand the other drops out, gets behind the other, so that Campbell is not the elected republican, and then go beat Boxer. Like it or not, the line has to be drawn and drawn soon or  it will be Campbell versus Boxer, and that is a crappy choice. One of the two has to be willing to let their pride go, drop out, so that a conservative in Chuck or a moderate in Carly can move on and keep a Boxer look a like in Campbell out of the main election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conservativecrusade</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/05/14/so-wait-a-second-devore-polls-better-against-boxer-than-fiorina-but-were-supposed-to-go-with-carly/#comment-69155</link>
		<dc:creator>conservativecrusade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 20:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=7436#comment-69155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[with Campbell. But since we should keep these replies somewhat short, in a nutshell, there is no difference in the beliefs between Boxer and Campbell. That is the main thing wrong with him. If he wins we are simply changing from an old stale poo pile to a newer and fresher poo pile. And since there is little difference if any, he will vote the same way Bozo did, so we will still be in the same shape we were in before.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>with Campbell. But since we should keep these replies somewhat short, in a nutshell, there is no difference in the beliefs between Boxer and Campbell. That is the main thing wrong with him. If he wins we are simply changing from an old stale poo pile to a newer and fresher poo pile. And since there is little difference if any, he will vote the same way Bozo did, so we will still be in the same shape we were in before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AceInTX</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/05/14/so-wait-a-second-devore-polls-better-against-boxer-than-fiorina-but-were-supposed-to-go-with-carly/#comment-69154</link>
		<dc:creator>AceInTX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 20:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=7436#comment-69154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AceInTX</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/05/14/so-wait-a-second-devore-polls-better-against-boxer-than-fiorina-but-were-supposed-to-go-with-carly/#comment-69153</link>
		<dc:creator>AceInTX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 20:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=7436#comment-69153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[but how do explain this...we have a candidate that polls better in the general than their moderate pick...yet they still insist we back the moderate who is the weak horse...

Who are the ideological, (or non ideological if you will), purists in the RPCA and the NRSC?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but how do explain this&#8230;we have a candidate that polls better in the general than their moderate pick&#8230;yet they still insist we back the moderate who is the weak horse&#8230;</p>
<p>Who are the ideological, (or non ideological if you will), purists in the RPCA and the NRSC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Stevens</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/05/14/so-wait-a-second-devore-polls-better-against-boxer-than-fiorina-but-were-supposed-to-go-with-carly/#comment-69152</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 20:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=7436#comment-69152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You could not possibly be a worse proponent of Carly Fiorina.

Do you realize that you come across so badly that you&#039;re probably making people vote DeVore right now just to shove it in your face?

She should pay somebody to cut the power to your house just to stop the bleeding.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could not possibly be a worse proponent of Carly Fiorina.</p>
<p>Do you realize that you come across so badly that you&#8217;re probably making people vote DeVore right now just to shove it in your face?</p>
<p>She should pay somebody to cut the power to your house just to stop the bleeding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adjoran</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/05/14/so-wait-a-second-devore-polls-better-against-boxer-than-fiorina-but-were-supposed-to-go-with-carly/#comment-69150</link>
		<dc:creator>Adjoran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 19:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=7436#comment-69150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One single point in one single poll with a MOE of 4.5% and you make this ridiculous claim?

The kindest word to use for this interpretation is &quot;spin.&quot;

Of course, using the RCP average of the last four statewide polls yields a different result - so let&#039;s ignore that!  And as others have pointed out, using this &quot;logic&quot; would mean supporting Campbell over both the others, so let&#039;s ignore that, too!

Your grip on reality is beginning to resemble Kos&#039;.

When you have to fantasize to make your case, perhaps it&#039;s time to recognize you don&#039;t have a sound argument.  

Don&#039;t worry - I&#039;m sure Tom Campbell will send along a nice note thanking you for your help getting him the nomination.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One single point in one single poll with a MOE of 4.5% and you make this ridiculous claim?</p>
<p>The kindest word to use for this interpretation is &#8220;spin.&#8221;</p>
<p>Of course, using the RCP average of the last four statewide polls yields a different result &#8211; so let&#8217;s ignore that!  And as others have pointed out, using this &#8220;logic&#8221; would mean supporting Campbell over both the others, so let&#8217;s ignore that, too!</p>
<p>Your grip on reality is beginning to resemble Kos&#8217;.</p>
<p>When you have to fantasize to make your case, perhaps it&#8217;s time to recognize you don&#8217;t have a sound argument.  </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t worry &#8211; I&#8217;m sure Tom Campbell will send along a nice note thanking you for your help getting him the nomination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drothgery</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/05/14/so-wait-a-second-devore-polls-better-against-boxer-than-fiorina-but-were-supposed-to-go-with-carly/#comment-69147</link>
		<dc:creator>drothgery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 18:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=7436#comment-69147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s May. And DeVore is a complete unknown outside of conservative activists. His numbers right now are pretty much the &#039;not Barbara Boxer&#039; numbers. Don&#039;t mistake them for resembling in any way what they&#039;d be if he were actually nominated. 

I&#039;d like to live in a state where someone like Chuck could win a statewide election of any consequence, but that&#039;s not going to happen unless San Diego secedes from California (and if you&#039;ve been to San Diego, you understand why I ain&#039;t moving as long as I can pay the bills and live here).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s May. And DeVore is a complete unknown outside of conservative activists. His numbers right now are pretty much the &#8216;not Barbara Boxer&#8217; numbers. Don&#8217;t mistake them for resembling in any way what they&#8217;d be if he were actually nominated. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to live in a state where someone like Chuck could win a statewide election of any consequence, but that&#8217;s not going to happen unless San Diego secedes from California (and if you&#8217;ve been to San Diego, you understand why I ain&#8217;t moving as long as I can pay the bills and live here).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tankertodd</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/05/14/so-wait-a-second-devore-polls-better-against-boxer-than-fiorina-but-were-supposed-to-go-with-carly/#comment-69146</link>
		<dc:creator>tankertodd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 17:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=7436#comment-69146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Using Erick&#039;s logic, then let&#039;s get behind Campbell.  He&#039;s one point away, while DeVore and Fiorina are 6-7 points away.  What&#039;s so bad about Campbell?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using Erick&#8217;s logic, then let&#8217;s get behind Campbell.  He&#8217;s one point away, while DeVore and Fiorina are 6-7 points away.  What&#8217;s so bad about Campbell?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Gardner</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/05/14/so-wait-a-second-devore-polls-better-against-boxer-than-fiorina-but-were-supposed-to-go-with-carly/#comment-69145</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 17:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=7436#comment-69145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erick Brockway</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/05/14/so-wait-a-second-devore-polls-better-against-boxer-than-fiorina-but-were-supposed-to-go-with-carly/#comment-69144</link>
		<dc:creator>Erick Brockway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 17:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=7436#comment-69144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Mullins</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/05/14/so-wait-a-second-devore-polls-better-against-boxer-than-fiorina-but-were-supposed-to-go-with-carly/#comment-69143</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Mullins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 17:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=7436#comment-69143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More of the same stuff and a Water Person for the party ,even if it&#039;s all stupid. If you don&#039;t vote the other party, the problems will still be there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More of the same stuff and a Water Person for the party ,even if it&#8217;s all stupid. If you don&#8217;t vote the other party, the problems will still be there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Persons</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/05/14/so-wait-a-second-devore-polls-better-against-boxer-than-fiorina-but-were-supposed-to-go-with-carly/#comment-69142</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Persons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 16:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=7436#comment-69142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
