<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>RedState</title><link>https://redstate.com/erick/2010/06/04/can-jane-norton-think-for-herself/feed/</link><description>Conservative News &amp; Politics</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 07:36:56 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Can Jane Norton Think For Herself?</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[Jane Norton is a nice lady.  Don&amp;#8217;t believe me?  Ask Ken Buck.  He has not been going around the campaign trail personally attacking Jane Norton, just pointing out policy differences.  Despite the establishment talking points that those differences are minimal, if at all, they are actually quite big on a few big issues.  On the paramount issue — who will be conservative before being a tool of the party — Norton fails.And now she is out to change that.  Along the way though, she must overcome the perception that she can&amp;#8217;t think for herself.  And given this profile, that might be difficult.Throughout the profile, Norton keeps attacking Ken Buck based on his connections, his closet liberalism (nevermind he is a Jim DeMint style conservative), etc.  But everytime she finishes, she has to ask her staff about it.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 07:00:00 -0400</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Erick Erickson]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://redstate.com/erick/2010/06/04/can-jane-norton-think-for-herself-n34976</link></item></channel></rss>