<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on the NRA&#8217;s Harry Reid Endorsement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/07/01/more-on-the-nras-harry-reid-endorsement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/07/01/more-on-the-nras-harry-reid-endorsement/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 03:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: josephmn</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/07/01/more-on-the-nras-harry-reid-endorsement/#comment-191764</link>
		<dc:creator>josephmn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 01:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=8072#comment-191764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Harry Reid has spent his political life destroying Americans freedom.  He walks carefully around the NRA because they give him cover from Americas gun owners.  Fill the congress with harry reids and see how long they will support our gun rights.  I cancelled my NRA membership because they would not abdicate their support of the hateful little anti-American from Nevada.  

It is exactly how Protestants (and Catholics?) refused to deal with the Nazi&#039;s. 

We either strive together for freedom from tyranny or offer the door to those who want to placate the monster.  harry reid is worthy of no mans endorsement who loves America and what we stand for.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harry Reid has spent his political life destroying Americans freedom.  He walks carefully around the NRA because they give him cover from Americas gun owners.  Fill the congress with harry reids and see how long they will support our gun rights.  I cancelled my NRA membership because they would not abdicate their support of the hateful little anti-American from Nevada.  </p>
<p>It is exactly how Protestants (and Catholics?) refused to deal with the Nazi&#8217;s. </p>
<p>We either strive together for freedom from tyranny or offer the door to those who want to placate the monster.  harry reid is worthy of no mans endorsement who loves America and what we stand for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmdalton</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/07/01/more-on-the-nras-harry-reid-endorsement/#comment-76597</link>
		<dc:creator>dmdalton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 02:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=8072#comment-76597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/07/13/nra-openly-floats-a-harry-reid-endorsement/

The NRA?s lobbyist, Chris Cox, claims that Chuck Schumer would be Majority Leader were Harry Reid gone (note the NRA?s implicit expectation of a Democratic Senate majority). But here?s the thing ? Chuck Schumer could not get anti-gun legislation through the Senate and what?s more, Schumer, when head of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, recognized the damage to the Democrats being anti-gun was having. Many of the Democrats in the Senate the NRA loves were people supported by Chuck Schumer.

So they have gone from denying they would endorse Harry Reid to ?not tamping down speculation.?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/07/13/nra-openly-floats-a-harry-reid-endorsement/</p>
<p>The NRA?s lobbyist, Chris Cox, claims that Chuck Schumer would be Majority Leader were Harry Reid gone (note the NRA?s implicit expectation of a Democratic Senate majority). But here?s the thing ? Chuck Schumer could not get anti-gun legislation through the Senate and what?s more, Schumer, when head of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, recognized the damage to the Democrats being anti-gun was having. Many of the Democrats in the Senate the NRA loves were people supported by Chuck Schumer.</p>
<p>So they have gone from denying they would endorse Harry Reid to ?not tamping down speculation.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tbone</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/07/01/more-on-the-nras-harry-reid-endorsement/#comment-75708</link>
		<dc:creator>Tbone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 00:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=8072#comment-75708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#039;s see, 6 day wonder, this is your first post and you say this:

&quot;Received from a colleague who has friends that work for the NRA (we both live in the Washington DC area).&quot;

Let me help you flesh it out a bit. ....&quot;who once knew a guy that heard from his sister-in-law who shot ducks in an arcade game that she was pretty sure that was what the kid said while bagging the groceries  to the person ahead  of her mother in line on Wednesday, or maybe it was this morning.&quot; LOL]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see, 6 day wonder, this is your first post and you say this:</p>
<p>&#8220;Received from a colleague who has friends that work for the NRA (we both live in the Washington DC area).&#8221;</p>
<p>Let me help you flesh it out a bit. &#8230;.&#8221;who once knew a guy that heard from his sister-in-law who shot ducks in an arcade game that she was pretty sure that was what the kid said while bagging the groceries  to the person ahead  of her mother in line on Wednesday, or maybe it was this morning.&#8221; LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmdalton</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/07/01/more-on-the-nras-harry-reid-endorsement/#comment-75707</link>
		<dc:creator>dmdalton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 00:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=8072#comment-75707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following explains why NRA says it plans on supporting Reid.  Received from a colleague who has friends that work for the NRA (we both live in the Washington DC area).  YMMV, BIDI 

&quot;As we discussed by phone a few minutes ago, it appears the NRA
does indeed plan to support Harry Reid&#039;s re-election, its rationale
according to JK being that Shummer of NY would replace Reid, and Shummer is the greater 2nd Amendment threat. Of course there&#039;s more behind the scenes, but, like you, if NRA supports Reid directly or indirectly, that would end my NRA membership once and for all. And you and I would be just the tip of the iceberg.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following explains why NRA says it plans on supporting Reid.  Received from a colleague who has friends that work for the NRA (we both live in the Washington DC area).  YMMV, BIDI </p>
<p>&#8220;As we discussed by phone a few minutes ago, it appears the NRA<br />
does indeed plan to support Harry Reid&#8217;s re-election, its rationale<br />
according to JK being that Shummer of NY would replace Reid, and Shummer is the greater 2nd Amendment threat. Of course there&#8217;s more behind the scenes, but, like you, if NRA supports Reid directly or indirectly, that would end my NRA membership once and for all. And you and I would be just the tip of the iceberg.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hproesemann</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/07/01/more-on-the-nras-harry-reid-endorsement/#comment-75482</link>
		<dc:creator>hproesemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 18:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=8072#comment-75482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eric, 
           you were wrong about NRA confirming Kagan and you were wrong about NRA`s stance on the  &quot;Disclose Act&quot; .

You were too quick to judge the NRA. If you are wrong about the NRA endorsing Harry Reid, I am discontinuing my subscription to your MB newsletter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric,<br />
           you were wrong about NRA confirming Kagan and you were wrong about NRA`s stance on the  &#8220;Disclose Act&#8221; .</p>
<p>You were too quick to judge the NRA. If you are wrong about the NRA endorsing Harry Reid, I am discontinuing my subscription to your MB newsletter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billcaris</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/07/01/more-on-the-nras-harry-reid-endorsement/#comment-75381</link>
		<dc:creator>billcaris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 19:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=8072#comment-75381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They say they are not endorsing Reid and that Angle has an &quot;A&quot; on 2nd Amendment issues and that Reid &quot;hasn&#039;t helped&quot; them. I pointed out that he sure helped the NRA on the DISCLOSE Act...NRA rep said they oppose the version in the Senate. I told him I&#039;d never renew my membership if they cave.

Folks, you gotta call and be heard. Reid has almost 20 MILLION in the bank to pound Angle...You CAN&#039;T ASSUME a Republican sweep in November...An NRA endorsement would hurt Angle badly...

Call NRA and be heard!!

You may also contact us by phone at (800) 392-VOTE (8683), Monday-Friday, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., EST.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They say they are not endorsing Reid and that Angle has an &#8220;A&#8221; on 2nd Amendment issues and that Reid &#8220;hasn&#8217;t helped&#8221; them. I pointed out that he sure helped the NRA on the DISCLOSE Act&#8230;NRA rep said they oppose the version in the Senate. I told him I&#8217;d never renew my membership if they cave.</p>
<p>Folks, you gotta call and be heard. Reid has almost 20 MILLION in the bank to pound Angle&#8230;You CAN&#8217;T ASSUME a Republican sweep in November&#8230;An NRA endorsement would hurt Angle badly&#8230;</p>
<p>Call NRA and be heard!!</p>
<p>You may also contact us by phone at (800) 392-VOTE (8683), Monday-Friday, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. &#8211; 5:00 p.m., EST.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pburton</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/07/01/more-on-the-nras-harry-reid-endorsement/#comment-75361</link>
		<dc:creator>pburton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 18:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=8072#comment-75361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;... the key point ? both people at the NRA and people in the Senate are telling me the NRA will be endorsing Harry Reid later this year ...&quot;

Eric, as you may have guessed from readership and the CNN job,  you&#039;re a player now  -- someone who is to be used, when possible.

Do you ever worry about being made a dupe, Mr. Erickson?  Do you suppose there may be people out there who are every bit as clever?

If you&#039;re right on this, I&#039;ll not renew my NRA membership (14903XXX)  for whatever term Senator Reid corrupts principle, nor  praise the NRA by name.  And I&#039;ll apologize. 

And if you&#039;re wrong ...?

BTW:  The primary problem, as pointed out, is not endorsement or single advocacy.  The problem is putting politics before principle; the problem is regarding law as means.

Although the form (strength through unity and number) can be corrupted by men, the enduring part will live on, supported by other of the true principles.

In this case, it is particularly sad.  The gun-guys only have to work with 27 words.  You&#039;d think such brevity would lend itself to understanding; that the single hot spark would ignite a greater enlightenment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230; the key point ? both people at the NRA and people in the Senate are telling me the NRA will be endorsing Harry Reid later this year &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Eric, as you may have guessed from readership and the CNN job,  you&#8217;re a player now  &#8212; someone who is to be used, when possible.</p>
<p>Do you ever worry about being made a dupe, Mr. Erickson?  Do you suppose there may be people out there who are every bit as clever?</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re right on this, I&#8217;ll not renew my NRA membership (14903XXX)  for whatever term Senator Reid corrupts principle, nor  praise the NRA by name.  And I&#8217;ll apologize. </p>
<p>And if you&#8217;re wrong &#8230;?</p>
<p>BTW:  The primary problem, as pointed out, is not endorsement or single advocacy.  The problem is putting politics before principle; the problem is regarding law as means.</p>
<p>Although the form (strength through unity and number) can be corrupted by men, the enduring part will live on, supported by other of the true principles.</p>
<p>In this case, it is particularly sad.  The gun-guys only have to work with 27 words.  You&#8217;d think such brevity would lend itself to understanding; that the single hot spark would ignite a greater enlightenment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: profchuck</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/07/01/more-on-the-nras-harry-reid-endorsement/#comment-75347</link>
		<dc:creator>profchuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 17:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=8072#comment-75347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reid is a progressive and as such he is willing to cut any deal that furthers the progressive agenda.  The progressives want a populace that is dependant upon the government and they want the government to be feared. As Jefferson observed, &quot;when the people fear the government there is tyrany&quot;   My word to the NRA is don&#039;t be like the AARP.  Sicophants are regognized for what they are.  Stand up for the second ammendment but stand for liberty as well.
If the NRA supports Reid the impact on membership will be catastrophic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reid is a progressive and as such he is willing to cut any deal that furthers the progressive agenda.  The progressives want a populace that is dependant upon the government and they want the government to be feared. As Jefferson observed, &#8220;when the people fear the government there is tyrany&#8221;   My word to the NRA is don&#8217;t be like the AARP.  Sicophants are regognized for what they are.  Stand up for the second ammendment but stand for liberty as well.<br />
If the NRA supports Reid the impact on membership will be catastrophic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jplfly</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/07/01/more-on-the-nras-harry-reid-endorsement/#comment-75342</link>
		<dc:creator>jplfly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 16:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=8072#comment-75342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, after leaving a voice mail on their recorded comment line I called back to speak with a live person.  I held for 45 minutes and finally gave up.  Sounds like we are keeping them busy.  I do plan to call again later.

But let&#039;s face it folks, the NRA and the AARP are both nothing more than huge fundraisers and mouthpieces for anyone who promises to cut them a deal.  They are no longer principled organizations who give the small guy a voice.  

The NRA is NOT representing their members if they endorse Reid and they should suffer the same loss of financial support and membership that the AARP did by supporting Obamacare.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, after leaving a voice mail on their recorded comment line I called back to speak with a live person.  I held for 45 minutes and finally gave up.  Sounds like we are keeping them busy.  I do plan to call again later.</p>
<p>But let&#8217;s face it folks, the NRA and the AARP are both nothing more than huge fundraisers and mouthpieces for anyone who promises to cut them a deal.  They are no longer principled organizations who give the small guy a voice.  </p>
<p>The NRA is NOT representing their members if they endorse Reid and they should suffer the same loss of financial support and membership that the AARP did by supporting Obamacare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gowallygo</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/07/01/more-on-the-nras-harry-reid-endorsement/#comment-75341</link>
		<dc:creator>gowallygo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 16:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=8072#comment-75341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the NRA endorses Harry Reid, I along with many of my friends will drop our membership with the NRA.  Harry is a back stabber, a lair and will tell you anything to get your support .  I hope the NRA thinks twice before they make a decision and endorse the correct person and that being SHARRON ANGLE.

THANKS, WALLY]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the NRA endorses Harry Reid, I along with many of my friends will drop our membership with the NRA.  Harry is a back stabber, a lair and will tell you anything to get your support .  I hope the NRA thinks twice before they make a decision and endorse the correct person and that being SHARRON ANGLE.</p>
<p>THANKS, WALLY</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: warrior06</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/07/01/more-on-the-nras-harry-reid-endorsement/#comment-75339</link>
		<dc:creator>warrior06</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 15:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=8072#comment-75339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I also, after waiting for approximately 30 minutes, had a pleasant conversation with a rep also named Miranda (same one?).  She also defended Sen Reid.  She stated their decision will not come out until Sept/Oct. I explained he is a democrat, and she responded they are not a political organization,  I informed her (forcefully) that the Democrat Party as POLICY is hostile at best and determined to emasculate/eliminate at worst the 2nd Amendment. That as a matter of policy, the GOP is the party of the 2nd Amendment.  I brought up Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi that Democrats are only allowed to vote for 2nd Amendment issues when their votes will not affect the course of the bill.  Otherwise they WILL vote the Democrat line. I said I was disappointed with the NRA&#039;s position on the DISCLOSE act, but while not agreeing, understood their position.  I made it forcefully clear (I made sure she got my life time NRA membership number) that IF, IF the NRA endorsed Sen Reid I WOULD cancel my life time membership via signature receipt requested letter, and transfer all my monetary support to the GOA.  She was quite subdued.  Please continue the pressure.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also, after waiting for approximately 30 minutes, had a pleasant conversation with a rep also named Miranda (same one?).  She also defended Sen Reid.  She stated their decision will not come out until Sept/Oct. I explained he is a democrat, and she responded they are not a political organization,  I informed her (forcefully) that the Democrat Party as POLICY is hostile at best and determined to emasculate/eliminate at worst the 2nd Amendment. That as a matter of policy, the GOP is the party of the 2nd Amendment.  I brought up Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi that Democrats are only allowed to vote for 2nd Amendment issues when their votes will not affect the course of the bill.  Otherwise they WILL vote the Democrat line. I said I was disappointed with the NRA&#8217;s position on the DISCLOSE act, but while not agreeing, understood their position.  I made it forcefully clear (I made sure she got my life time NRA membership number) that IF, IF the NRA endorsed Sen Reid I WOULD cancel my life time membership via signature receipt requested letter, and transfer all my monetary support to the GOA.  She was quite subdued.  Please continue the pressure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joliphant</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/07/01/more-on-the-nras-harry-reid-endorsement/#comment-75337</link>
		<dc:creator>Joliphant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 15:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=8072#comment-75337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NRA gets the message.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NRA gets the message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: profchuck</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/07/01/more-on-the-nras-harry-reid-endorsement/#comment-75336</link>
		<dc:creator>profchuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 15:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=8072#comment-75336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have contacted the NRA.  As a long time member I informed them that if they did support Reid I would cancel my membership.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have contacted the NRA.  As a long time member I informed them that if they did support Reid I would cancel my membership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josephmn</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/07/01/more-on-the-nras-harry-reid-endorsement/#comment-75334</link>
		<dc:creator>josephmn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 15:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=8072#comment-75334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am a member of the NRA as is my wife.  We have been proud to be part of this patriotic ogranization for many years.  When the NRA supports harry reid and backhands freedom loving people  by doing the stupak two-step and making a deal with the devil on free speach  they have lost claim to my loyalty and continued membership.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a member of the NRA as is my wife.  We have been proud to be part of this patriotic ogranization for many years.  When the NRA supports harry reid and backhands freedom loving people  by doing the stupak two-step and making a deal with the devil on free speach  they have lost claim to my loyalty and continued membership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TexasTami</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/07/01/more-on-the-nras-harry-reid-endorsement/#comment-75332</link>
		<dc:creator>TexasTami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 15:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=8072#comment-75332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...then they&#039;ll lose me as a paying member.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;then they&#8217;ll lose me as a paying member.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: indylawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/07/01/more-on-the-nras-harry-reid-endorsement/#comment-75331</link>
		<dc:creator>indylawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 15:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=8072#comment-75331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a voter, I agree with you. I&#039;d absolutely vote for Angle if I lived in Nevada, and in fact will vote for Dan Coats even though he voted for an assault weapons ban and Ellsworth is supposed to be pretty solid on guns.

But the NRA exists to promote one issue - gun rights. Their position is a conservative one, and most of the time that&#039;s going to mean supporting the candidate who is more conservative overall. But they aren&#039;t a conservative organization per se. And their strategy of supporting pro-gun incumbents of either party has worked very well for that purpose. I&#039;d note this isn&#039;t anything new - Bernie Sanders first got elected to Congress because the NRA went after the Republican incumbent for an anti-gun vote.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a voter, I agree with you. I&#8217;d absolutely vote for Angle if I lived in Nevada, and in fact will vote for Dan Coats even though he voted for an assault weapons ban and Ellsworth is supposed to be pretty solid on guns.</p>
<p>But the NRA exists to promote one issue &#8211; gun rights. Their position is a conservative one, and most of the time that&#8217;s going to mean supporting the candidate who is more conservative overall. But they aren&#8217;t a conservative organization per se. And their strategy of supporting pro-gun incumbents of either party has worked very well for that purpose. I&#8217;d note this isn&#8217;t anything new &#8211; Bernie Sanders first got elected to Congress because the NRA went after the Republican incumbent for an anti-gun vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mjdzfun</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/07/01/more-on-the-nras-harry-reid-endorsement/#comment-75329</link>
		<dc:creator>mjdzfun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 15:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=8072#comment-75329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I contacted the gun range I belong to as well as my local gun club to express my concerns about the NRA endorsing Harry Reid. (Here, to get a range badge for the firing range, you must belong to a local gun club. To join the gun club, you must belong to the NRA.) I&#039;ve heard from both organizations who said like me, they were concerned and frustrated about NRA&#039;s pending endorsement of Reid. The gun range added they were sending out an email to all their affiliated gun clubs to discuss the matter of having to join the NRA as a requirement to belonging to the gun club. 

So contact the NRA for sure, but don&#039;t stop there. Contact every 2nd Amendment organization you know.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I contacted the gun range I belong to as well as my local gun club to express my concerns about the NRA endorsing Harry Reid. (Here, to get a range badge for the firing range, you must belong to a local gun club. To join the gun club, you must belong to the NRA.) I&#8217;ve heard from both organizations who said like me, they were concerned and frustrated about NRA&#8217;s pending endorsement of Reid. The gun range added they were sending out an email to all their affiliated gun clubs to discuss the matter of having to join the NRA as a requirement to belonging to the gun club. </p>
<p>So contact the NRA for sure, but don&#8217;t stop there. Contact every 2nd Amendment organization you know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kowalski</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/07/01/more-on-the-nras-harry-reid-endorsement/#comment-75325</link>
		<dc:creator>kowalski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 14:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=8072#comment-75325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If GOA had been the organization filing the &lt;em&gt;amicus&lt;/em&gt; briefs in DC vs. Heller and in the most recent case, do you think it would have gone very far?  Do you think Heller would have even filed the suit without the legal support from people at the NRA?  

It strains credulity, at the very least, to imagine that GOA is anything other than the Johnny-Come-Lately 2nd Amendment organization right now.  And it&#039;s making everyone on this blog who supports the last two SC decisions sound like a bunch of ingrates.

I&#039;d like to ask, for example:  Is Erick himself a gun owner?  Has he ever been an NRA member?  I mean, I received the issue of the &lt;em&gt;American Rifleman&lt;/em&gt; in the mail -- but Erick apparently had to be informed of it by other people.  He&#039;s in Macon, not Nevada.  Is GOA active in Macon?  I know the Friends of the NRA are active there.  Has Erick ever been to one of their meetings?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If GOA had been the organization filing the <em>amicus</em> briefs in DC vs. Heller and in the most recent case, do you think it would have gone very far?  Do you think Heller would have even filed the suit without the legal support from people at the NRA?  </p>
<p>It strains credulity, at the very least, to imagine that GOA is anything other than the Johnny-Come-Lately 2nd Amendment organization right now.  And it&#8217;s making everyone on this blog who supports the last two SC decisions sound like a bunch of ingrates.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to ask, for example:  Is Erick himself a gun owner?  Has he ever been an NRA member?  I mean, I received the issue of the <em>American Rifleman</em> in the mail &#8212; but Erick apparently had to be informed of it by other people.  He&#8217;s in Macon, not Nevada.  Is GOA active in Macon?  I know the Friends of the NRA are active there.  Has Erick ever been to one of their meetings?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: etlib</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/07/01/more-on-the-nras-harry-reid-endorsement/#comment-75324</link>
		<dc:creator>etlib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 14:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=8072#comment-75324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservatives must stand together. Single issue organizations cannot stand alone and individual politicians must support ALL the conservative view points if they are to win.

Look at the left. The racial groups all support abortion. the anti-life groups all support gun controls, gun control groups all support the ACLU, the anti religion groups all support the peace groups and everyone supports the greenies.

Since I see a logical and moral connection between all the conservative positions I have no problem supporting them all but if gun control groups start focusing on gun control to the extent they ignore the importance of pro-life, lower spending, lower taxes, religious freedom, ...  the second amendment rights will be lost. In fact the second amendment is almost certainly the first to go (it&#039;s almost gone now).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conservatives must stand together. Single issue organizations cannot stand alone and individual politicians must support ALL the conservative view points if they are to win.</p>
<p>Look at the left. The racial groups all support abortion. the anti-life groups all support gun controls, gun control groups all support the ACLU, the anti religion groups all support the peace groups and everyone supports the greenies.</p>
<p>Since I see a logical and moral connection between all the conservative positions I have no problem supporting them all but if gun control groups start focusing on gun control to the extent they ignore the importance of pro-life, lower spending, lower taxes, religious freedom, &#8230;  the second amendment rights will be lost. In fact the second amendment is almost certainly the first to go (it&#8217;s almost gone now).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IronDioPriest</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/07/01/more-on-the-nras-harry-reid-endorsement/#comment-75323</link>
		<dc:creator>IronDioPriest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 14:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=8072#comment-75323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://gunowners.org/

Gun Owners of America (GOA) is a non-profit lobbying organization formed in 1975 to preserve and defend the Second Amendment rights of gun owners. GOA sees firearms ownership as a freedom issue.

GOA was founded in 1975 by Sen. H.L. (Bill) Richardson (now retired). Richardson continues to serve as the Chairman of Gun Owners of America, bringing his many years of political experience to the leadership of GOA. Richardson is also an avid hunter and outdoorsman.

The GOA Board of Directors brings over 100 years of combined knowledge and experience on guns, legislation and politics. GOA&#039;s Board is not satisfied with the &quot;status quo.&quot; Americans have lost some of our precious gun rights and WE WANT THEM BACK! This is why GOA is considered the &quot;no compromise&quot; gun lobby.

From state legislatures and city councils to the United States Congress and the White House, GOA represents the views of gun owners whenever their rights are threatened.

GOA has never wavered from its mission to defend the Second Amendment -- liberty&#039;s freedom teeth, as George Washington called it.

Over the last 30 years, GOA has built a nationwide network of attorneys to help fight court battles in almost every state in the nation to protect gun owner rights. GOA staff and attorneys have also worked with members of Congress, state legislators and local citizens to protect gun ranges and local gun clubs from closure by overzealous government anti-gun bureaucrats.

As an example, GOA fought for and won, the right of gun owners to sue and recover damages from the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (BATF) for harassment and unlawful seizure of firearms.

Associated with GOA are: Gun Owners of America Political Victory Fund, Gun Owners of California and Gun Owners Foundation.

Gun Owners of America Political Victory Fund is the political action arm of GOA. It raises funds to support the election of pro-gun candidates at all levels of government. GOA has a record of helping pro-gun candidates defeat anti-gunners in hundreds of races across the country over the past 30 years, and will continue to do so as long as our supporters provide the necessary financial resources.

Gun Owners of California operates solely within California, where it was also founded by Senator Richardson to address the pivotal gun issues arising in that state.

Gun Owners Foundation is a non-profit, tax-deductible education foundation. It is the research arm of GOA. Among the activities sponsored by GOF are seminars which inform the public, the media and government officials about key issues affecting the Second Amendment. GOF also publishes books and articles concerning gun issues as they affect people throughout the world.

Strength comes with numbers, and the more concerned Americans join Gun Owners of America, the more we can do to protect the Second Amendment and our freedom. We need you! Shouldn&#039;t you become a member of Gun Owners of America?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>http://gunowners.org/</p>
<p>Gun Owners of America (GOA) is a non-profit lobbying organization formed in 1975 to preserve and defend the Second Amendment rights of gun owners. GOA sees firearms ownership as a freedom issue.</p>
<p>GOA was founded in 1975 by Sen. H.L. (Bill) Richardson (now retired). Richardson continues to serve as the Chairman of Gun Owners of America, bringing his many years of political experience to the leadership of GOA. Richardson is also an avid hunter and outdoorsman.</p>
<p>The GOA Board of Directors brings over 100 years of combined knowledge and experience on guns, legislation and politics. GOA&#8217;s Board is not satisfied with the &#8220;status quo.&#8221; Americans have lost some of our precious gun rights and WE WANT THEM BACK! This is why GOA is considered the &#8220;no compromise&#8221; gun lobby.</p>
<p>From state legislatures and city councils to the United States Congress and the White House, GOA represents the views of gun owners whenever their rights are threatened.</p>
<p>GOA has never wavered from its mission to defend the Second Amendment &#8212; liberty&#8217;s freedom teeth, as George Washington called it.</p>
<p>Over the last 30 years, GOA has built a nationwide network of attorneys to help fight court battles in almost every state in the nation to protect gun owner rights. GOA staff and attorneys have also worked with members of Congress, state legislators and local citizens to protect gun ranges and local gun clubs from closure by overzealous government anti-gun bureaucrats.</p>
<p>As an example, GOA fought for and won, the right of gun owners to sue and recover damages from the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (BATF) for harassment and unlawful seizure of firearms.</p>
<p>Associated with GOA are: Gun Owners of America Political Victory Fund, Gun Owners of California and Gun Owners Foundation.</p>
<p>Gun Owners of America Political Victory Fund is the political action arm of GOA. It raises funds to support the election of pro-gun candidates at all levels of government. GOA has a record of helping pro-gun candidates defeat anti-gunners in hundreds of races across the country over the past 30 years, and will continue to do so as long as our supporters provide the necessary financial resources.</p>
<p>Gun Owners of California operates solely within California, where it was also founded by Senator Richardson to address the pivotal gun issues arising in that state.</p>
<p>Gun Owners Foundation is a non-profit, tax-deductible education foundation. It is the research arm of GOA. Among the activities sponsored by GOF are seminars which inform the public, the media and government officials about key issues affecting the Second Amendment. GOF also publishes books and articles concerning gun issues as they affect people throughout the world.</p>
<p>Strength comes with numbers, and the more concerned Americans join Gun Owners of America, the more we can do to protect the Second Amendment and our freedom. We need you! Shouldn&#8217;t you become a member of Gun Owners of America?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
