<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So This is Why Lisa Murkowski Failed The Bar Exam 4 Times</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/10/27/so-this-is-why-lisa-murkowski-failed-the-bar-exam-5-times/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/10/27/so-this-is-why-lisa-murkowski-failed-the-bar-exam-5-times/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 16:32:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: corbert</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/10/27/so-this-is-why-lisa-murkowski-failed-the-bar-exam-5-times/#comment-89339</link>
		<dc:creator>corbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 18:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=9275#comment-89339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And NOT the will of the Republican party with the probable win of write-in candidate Lisa Murkowski. HAIL TO THE PEOPLE!

I love it how it was the &quot;will of the people&quot; when the Republicans won on Tuesday and a &quot;notice to the President&quot; that his agenda was being rejected, but when Lisa Murkowski&#039;s probable win, by write-in even, becomes more and more apparent,  all of the sudden she&#039;s a horrible person. A whiner. A RINO. 

Whatever the outcome, it&#039;s the will of the people. It&#039;s what those who voted ultimately wanted.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And NOT the will of the Republican party with the probable win of write-in candidate Lisa Murkowski. HAIL TO THE PEOPLE!</p>
<p>I love it how it was the &#8220;will of the people&#8221; when the Republicans won on Tuesday and a &#8220;notice to the President&#8221; that his agenda was being rejected, but when Lisa Murkowski&#8217;s probable win, by write-in even, becomes more and more apparent,  all of the sudden she&#8217;s a horrible person. A whiner. A RINO. </p>
<p>Whatever the outcome, it&#8217;s the will of the people. It&#8217;s what those who voted ultimately wanted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aesthete</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/10/27/so-this-is-why-lisa-murkowski-failed-the-bar-exam-5-times/#comment-87909</link>
		<dc:creator>aesthete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 16:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=9275#comment-87909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ll be glad to see her go down, and to see Miller go up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be glad to see her go down, and to see Miller go up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chihank</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/10/27/so-this-is-why-lisa-murkowski-failed-the-bar-exam-5-times/#comment-87901</link>
		<dc:creator>chihank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=9275#comment-87901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Murky steals the election, then Murky will be beholden to labor unions and liberal Native Americans which backed her write-in bid.

Since losing the primary, she has bashed the tea parties and campaigned on more pork for AK.

Murky&#039;s votes on the issues will be for sale.  Don&#039;t be surprised if Murky votes with the Dems just to undermine DeMint.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Murky steals the election, then Murky will be beholden to labor unions and liberal Native Americans which backed her write-in bid.</p>
<p>Since losing the primary, she has bashed the tea parties and campaigned on more pork for AK.</p>
<p>Murky&#8217;s votes on the issues will be for sale.  Don&#8217;t be surprised if Murky votes with the Dems just to undermine DeMint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Allen Leeper</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/10/27/so-this-is-why-lisa-murkowski-failed-the-bar-exam-5-times/#comment-87900</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Allen Leeper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=9275#comment-87900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gdpitzer</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/10/27/so-this-is-why-lisa-murkowski-failed-the-bar-exam-5-times/#comment-87896</link>
		<dc:creator>gdpitzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=9275#comment-87896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[She will not even be a footnote in History. She is DONE politically.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She will not even be a footnote in History. She is DONE politically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gdpitzer</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/10/27/so-this-is-why-lisa-murkowski-failed-the-bar-exam-5-times/#comment-87895</link>
		<dc:creator>gdpitzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=9275#comment-87895</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#039;s more extreme than helping the Demon Crats overthrow the country?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s more extreme than helping the Demon Crats overthrow the country?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ashland_avenue</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/10/27/so-this-is-why-lisa-murkowski-failed-the-bar-exam-5-times/#comment-87894</link>
		<dc:creator>ashland_avenue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=9275#comment-87894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[nt]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gdpitzer</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/10/27/so-this-is-why-lisa-murkowski-failed-the-bar-exam-5-times/#comment-87890</link>
		<dc:creator>gdpitzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=9275#comment-87890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amen to That! In addition to being a Wolf in Sheep&#039;s Clothing, she is a blot on Republicans. We need to have HIGHER standards of conduct. 

And with what is going on with the Demon Crats is basically setting the bar so LOW that no one should have a problem breezing past. However, SHE MANAGED TO SINK LOW ENOUGH TO SQUEEZE UNDER THE BAR WHICH IS LAID ON THE GROUND. 

She will not even be a footnote in History.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen to That! In addition to being a Wolf in Sheep&#8217;s Clothing, she is a blot on Republicans. We need to have HIGHER standards of conduct. </p>
<p>And with what is going on with the Demon Crats is basically setting the bar so LOW that no one should have a problem breezing past. However, SHE MANAGED TO SINK LOW ENOUGH TO SQUEEZE UNDER THE BAR WHICH IS LAID ON THE GROUND. </p>
<p>She will not even be a footnote in History.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gdpitzer</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/10/27/so-this-is-why-lisa-murkowski-failed-the-bar-exam-5-times/#comment-87889</link>
		<dc:creator>gdpitzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=9275#comment-87889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glen Beck had an interesting show (as if he ever had a boring show) in which he explained the &quot;sheep in wolf&#039;s clothing&quot; tactic and Lisa fits this to a T (sans the Tea Party Shirt).

They get someone who appears to be supporting the original Republican values but who in reality support Socialism. She is not a Republican in any way shape or form. 

What she is, is the Wolf.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glen Beck had an interesting show (as if he ever had a boring show) in which he explained the &#8220;sheep in wolf&#8217;s clothing&#8221; tactic and Lisa fits this to a T (sans the Tea Party Shirt).</p>
<p>They get someone who appears to be supporting the original Republican values but who in reality support Socialism. She is not a Republican in any way shape or form. </p>
<p>What she is, is the Wolf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nepanyrush</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/10/27/so-this-is-why-lisa-murkowski-failed-the-bar-exam-5-times/#comment-87872</link>
		<dc:creator>nepanyrush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=9275#comment-87872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In order to collect votes from moderates and liberals, Murkowski has gone all out in trying to demonize the conservative candidate and Republican nominee as an extremist.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In order to collect votes from moderates and liberals, Murkowski has gone all out in trying to demonize the conservative candidate and Republican nominee as an extremist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/10/27/so-this-is-why-lisa-murkowski-failed-the-bar-exam-5-times/#comment-87868</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=9275#comment-87868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...that Murky&#039;s write-in campaign has received a ton of Union money?  Several hundred thousand dollars I believe.

That right there is a massive red flag.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;that Murky&#8217;s write-in campaign has received a ton of Union money?  Several hundred thousand dollars I believe.</p>
<p>That right there is a massive red flag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kyle8</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/10/27/so-this-is-why-lisa-murkowski-failed-the-bar-exam-5-times/#comment-87866</link>
		<dc:creator>kyle8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=9275#comment-87866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[she might end up screwing Republicans this time by throwing the election to the democrat, but she is DONE in politics. People will remember her asinine and petty write in candidacy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>she might end up screwing Republicans this time by throwing the election to the democrat, but she is DONE in politics. People will remember her asinine and petty write in candidacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trapperjohn</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/10/27/so-this-is-why-lisa-murkowski-failed-the-bar-exam-5-times/#comment-87864</link>
		<dc:creator>trapperjohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=9275#comment-87864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You can read it on her official website. Here is a direct quote from her official senate website,  &quot;Murkowski believes that we must look at all possible options for regulating climate change, from a carbon tax to cap and trade...&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can read it on her official website. Here is a direct quote from her official senate website,  &#8220;Murkowski believes that we must look at all possible options for regulating climate change, from a carbon tax to cap and trade&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Stevens</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/10/27/so-this-is-why-lisa-murkowski-failed-the-bar-exam-5-times/#comment-87863</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 07:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=9275#comment-87863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is not the site for you to advocate the election of Lisa Murkowski.

Understand?

Mgmt.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not the site for you to advocate the election of Lisa Murkowski.</p>
<p>Understand?</p>
<p>Mgmt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: powertothepeople</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/10/27/so-this-is-why-lisa-murkowski-failed-the-bar-exam-5-times/#comment-87862</link>
		<dc:creator>powertothepeople</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 07:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=9275#comment-87862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[but you can see a record her comments concerning not over turning the Obama HC bill and her support for tax dollars going to pay for abortions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but you can see a record her comments concerning not over turning the Obama HC bill and her support for tax dollars going to pay for abortions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: powertothepeople</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/10/27/so-this-is-why-lisa-murkowski-failed-the-bar-exam-5-times/#comment-87861</link>
		<dc:creator>powertothepeople</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 07:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=9275#comment-87861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[but lets both look at a few items just for kicks and giggles shall we:

First republican to ever receive an A rating from the anti reform group NEA. By God this puts her in the class with Pelosi, Frank, Reid, etc. The main reason she got the liberal rating was her staunch opposition to Opportunity Scholarship Program.

Has made it clear she does not support the ending of abortion.

She supports a government take over of health care. In her own words:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thealaskastandard.com/sites/default/files/media/Senator%20Lisa%20Murkowski%27s%20%20would%20you%20support%20pub%20%20option%20%20%282%29.mp3&quot;&gt;

On 10/18/07 voted with every dem against an amendment that would prohibit tax money from being given to  companies that perform abortions other than life of mother and hospitals. 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.votesmart.org/issue_keyvote_detail.php?cs_id=16080&amp;can_id=15841&quot;&gt;

She voted with the Democrats against adopting an admendment to S Amdt 1373 to HR 2892 (110th Session of Congress) that requires the 700 miles of reinforced fencing along the Mexico border, authorized under existing law, be completed by no later than December 31, 2010. (Roll Call Vote Number 220, 111th Session of Congress)

She voted for the wall street bailouts

She voted for stimulus funding in the Omnibus Bill, contributing to the deficit spending that is drowning our country

She is one of the greatest abusers of the earmark system, sponsoring close to $1 billion in earmarks. 

She and Snowe cosponsored bills to reduce global warming pollution which would cost us and business a ton


The list could go on and on so quit trying to play me and everyone else in here. Voting &quot;conservative&quot; part of the time and Voting liberal other times does not make her a conservative. It makes her a wishy washy moderate who can not be trusted. She is one of the worst RINOs in congress and for you to argue otherwise really makes me question your conservatism and your honesty.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but lets both look at a few items just for kicks and giggles shall we:</p>
<p>First republican to ever receive an A rating from the anti reform group NEA. By God this puts her in the class with Pelosi, Frank, Reid, etc. The main reason she got the liberal rating was her staunch opposition to Opportunity Scholarship Program.</p>
<p>Has made it clear she does not support the ending of abortion.</p>
<p>She supports a government take over of health care. In her own words:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thealaskastandard.com/sites/default/files/media/Senator%20Lisa%20Murkowski%27s%20%20would%20you%20support%20pub%20%20option%20%20%282%29.mp3"></p>
<p>On 10/18/07 voted with every dem against an amendment that would prohibit tax money from being given to  companies that perform abortions other than life of mother and hospitals. </p>
<p></a><a href="http://www.votesmart.org/issue_keyvote_detail.php?cs_id=16080&amp;can_id=15841"></p>
<p>She voted with the Democrats against adopting an admendment to S Amdt 1373 to HR 2892 (110th Session of Congress) that requires the 700 miles of reinforced fencing along the Mexico border, authorized under existing law, be completed by no later than December 31, 2010. (Roll Call Vote Number 220, 111th Session of Congress)</p>
<p>She voted for the wall street bailouts</p>
<p>She voted for stimulus funding in the Omnibus Bill, contributing to the deficit spending that is drowning our country</p>
<p>She is one of the greatest abusers of the earmark system, sponsoring close to $1 billion in earmarks. </p>
<p>She and Snowe cosponsored bills to reduce global warming pollution which would cost us and business a ton</p>
<p>The list could go on and on so quit trying to play me and everyone else in here. Voting &#8220;conservative&#8221; part of the time and Voting liberal other times does not make her a conservative. It makes her a wishy washy moderate who can not be trusted. She is one of the worst RINOs in congress and for you to argue otherwise really makes me question your conservatism and your honesty.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finrod</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/10/27/so-this-is-why-lisa-murkowski-failed-the-bar-exam-5-times/#comment-87860</link>
		<dc:creator>Finrod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 06:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=9275#comment-87860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Compare with Doug Hoffman in NY-23, who lost a viciously-contested primary (a year ago for the special election, there was no primary), sucked it up like a big boy, and endorsed the Republican that beat him in said primary.

If you can&#039;t respect the results of a Republican primary, whether you&#039;re the candidate or a fan, you&#039;re a poor excuse for a Republican.  She could have quietly bowed out and been the front-runner to unseat Alaska&#039;s Dem Senator when he comes around again, but no, she had to burn the Republican Party to the ground in Alaska just because she couldn&#039;t respect Republican voters.  Her all-about-me campaign is actually putting Alaska in danger of having 2 Democratic Senators, which is unforgivable.

You&#039;ve been here less than a week, so I strongly recommend you go back and read the archives from the time of the Alaska primary, and perhaps you&#039;ll understand then.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Compare with Doug Hoffman in NY-23, who lost a viciously-contested primary (a year ago for the special election, there was no primary), sucked it up like a big boy, and endorsed the Republican that beat him in said primary.</p>
<p>If you can&#8217;t respect the results of a Republican primary, whether you&#8217;re the candidate or a fan, you&#8217;re a poor excuse for a Republican.  She could have quietly bowed out and been the front-runner to unseat Alaska&#8217;s Dem Senator when he comes around again, but no, she had to burn the Republican Party to the ground in Alaska just because she couldn&#8217;t respect Republican voters.  Her all-about-me campaign is actually putting Alaska in danger of having 2 Democratic Senators, which is unforgivable.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve been here less than a week, so I strongly recommend you go back and read the archives from the time of the Alaska primary, and perhaps you&#8217;ll understand then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katesmith</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/10/27/so-this-is-why-lisa-murkowski-failed-the-bar-exam-5-times/#comment-87859</link>
		<dc:creator>katesmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 06:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=9275#comment-87859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Holder vote I believe 2/2/09, TARP 10/1/08. Holder vote reportedly just because she thought the president should have whom he wanted. If there were a debate, which there isn&#039;t because she lost fair and square, these two votes alone have inflicted enormous harm on America.

8/25/10, CNN, (mid page): &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/08/25/alaska.primary/index.html&quot;&gt;To be sure, Murkowski &lt;/a&gt;-- who was first appointed to her post by her father in 2002 -- was also hampered by her own record, having voted for the Troubled Asset Relief Program, which many conservatives view as the ultimate example of a government handout.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/08/25/alaska.primary/index.html&quot;&gt;A Congressional Quarterly analysis&lt;/a&gt; suggests Murkowski is the most moderate senator facing re-elections this year, having voted against her party 30 percent of the time on key votes. Another Congressional Quarterly analysis, from 2003 to 2008, suggests Murkowski has

    * increasingly voted with Democrats over the years.&quot;...

Aside from the above, many people were well embedded in the Beltway while our country was being lost, lifetimes of work and sacrifice transferred to George Soros&#039; bank account. Ms. Murkowski has lived a graced life, which is nice for her. She is not the new blood we desperately need.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Holder vote I believe 2/2/09, TARP 10/1/08. Holder vote reportedly just because she thought the president should have whom he wanted. If there were a debate, which there isn&#8217;t because she lost fair and square, these two votes alone have inflicted enormous harm on America.</p>
<p>8/25/10, CNN, (mid page): &#8220;<a href="http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/08/25/alaska.primary/index.html">To be sure, Murkowski </a>&#8211; who was first appointed to her post by her father in 2002 &#8212; was also hampered by her own record, having voted for the Troubled Asset Relief Program, which many conservatives view as the ultimate example of a government handout.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/08/25/alaska.primary/index.html">A Congressional Quarterly analysis</a> suggests Murkowski is the most moderate senator facing re-elections this year, having voted against her party 30 percent of the time on key votes. Another Congressional Quarterly analysis, from 2003 to 2008, suggests Murkowski has</p>
<p>    * increasingly voted with Democrats over the years.&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>Aside from the above, many people were well embedded in the Beltway while our country was being lost, lifetimes of work and sacrifice transferred to George Soros&#8217; bank account. Ms. Murkowski has lived a graced life, which is nice for her. She is not the new blood we desperately need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike gamecock DeVine</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/10/27/so-this-is-why-lisa-murkowski-failed-the-bar-exam-5-times/#comment-87858</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike gamecock DeVine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 05:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=9275#comment-87858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[herself entitled to the office.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>herself entitled to the office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/10/27/so-this-is-why-lisa-murkowski-failed-the-bar-exam-5-times/#comment-87857</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 05:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/erick/?p=9275#comment-87857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...painting him as an extremist...because she feels she&#039;s owed that seat or something.

If I knew nothing else about her, that would tell me she&#039;s not a Conservative Republican.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;painting him as an extremist&#8230;because she feels she&#8217;s owed that seat or something.</p>
<p>If I knew nothing else about her, that would tell me she&#8217;s not a Conservative Republican.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
