<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>RedState</title><link>https://redstate.com/erick/2010/12/09/an-earmark-solution-to-nowhere/feed/</link><description>Conservative News &amp; Politics</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 13:55:29 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>An Earmark Solution to Nowhere</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[It’s time to nip something right in the bud.  Michelle Bachmann and others have been complaining about how the House earmark is too restrictive because it will not allow for Members to get federal funding for their roads and bridges.  She wants them exempted from the moratorium.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 12:43:50 -0500</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Erick Erickson]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://redstate.com/erick/2010/12/09/an-earmark-solution-to-nowhere-n37263</link></item></channel></rss>