<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>RedState</title><link>https://redstate.com/erick/2011/03/29/on-intervention-and-opposition-to-to-the-libyan-engagement/feed/</link><description>Conservative News &amp; Politics</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 03:09:43 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>On Intervention and Opposition to the Libyan Engagement</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[&amp;#8220;Right now, the best case is simply to sit back and root for injuries between the warring parties in Libya — not intervening for either side.&amp;#8221;]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:19:45 -0400</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Erick Erickson]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://redstate.com/erick/2011/03/29/on-intervention-and-opposition-to-to-the-libyan-engagement-n38464</link></item></channel></rss>