« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

The Huntsman Team Responds With Obamaton Precision

It is stunning that Jon Huntsman is going to run against Barack Obama when, in responding to me, his campaign behaves exactly as someone close to Obama, or at least close to the left, would. They cite Media Matters and, in the process, defend Obamacare.

Not kidding.

Someone close to Huntsman tells Ben Smith

Ironic that someone who suggested sending President Obama to the death panel is calling someone else disloyal to the President. And based on Erickson’s track record of Republican primary endorsements, he will most likely get another bite at the apple, and when he does, we hope he closely examines Huntsman record of creating jobs, cutting taxes, and signing prolife legislation.

Note first that the suggestion of “sending President Obama to the death panel is calling someone else disloyal to the President” is actually a reference to Obamacare, but was a hit job by Media Matters. What does it say that Huntsman’s team would go after a Republican by going first to Media Matters.

Second, I did not work for the President of the United States nor serve as this President’s Ambassador to China while plotting to run against the President. I’m very clearly in the opposition and proudly so.

As for the bit about primary endorsements, perhaps Huntsman needs to talk to Sue Lowden, Jane Norton, Charlie Crist, Trey Grayson, Gresham Barrett, or . . . hey, I know! . . . Bob Bennett.

Lastly, my point, which I will reiterate here, is that Jon Huntsman’s record as Governor is irrelevant compared to his judgment that it is perfectly okay to plot a campaign for the Presidency against the incumbent President of the United States while serving as that President’s Ambassador to the People’s Republic of China.

The disloyalty is not just to the President; it’s to the country he swore an oath to serve. One cannot serve both God and money, nor can one serve both the President of the United State of America and one’s own ambition to depose the President.

By the way, over at Slate, Dave Weigel notes

Team Huntsman doesn’t take this charge terribly seriously, given that its proponents are unable to point to actual, provable examples of how this short political grey period — roughly January 2011 to early May — affected anything in China.

First, it seems pretty clear the plotting began back in October. Second, examples do not matter in my mind. That he would do so is a matter of disloyalty as an Ambassador of the United States. Third, you think there are no examples? Just wait until Barack Obama’s team gets finished with him should he get the nomination. This man was ambassador prior to, during, and after a summit with China. There’ll be examples.

COMMENTS

  • Goldwater_Conservative

    a three person race (not that only 3 people have a chance but that these are the 3 people that have a shot at being both a good candidate and a winning candidate) and those 3 are Pawlenty, Daniels and the X factor of Cain. Thats not to say that those three will all turn out great, but out of our candidates those are the only three that are still not fatally flawed.

  • leftylurker

    Looks like you all have found your man to beat.

    And I think it’s a good point. I think my boss would be pretty upset if I was planning to open my own shop to compete with him on his time, and he would be right to do it.

    But Obama is too clever to push this…he knows that if the choice is Obama vs. Squish Republican Obama then people will buy the real thing.

  • Dan McLaughlin

    As far as I know, there are no public examples of Huntsman doing anything as Ambassador to China.

  • Dan McLaughlin

    …although it depends who else runs – e.g., Palin. Or for that matter whether Daniels runs, which remains an open question.

    (I’m not a Cain backer, as I think rookie candidates are a bad gamble at this level. But at least his loyalties to the conservative movement are solid).

  • Flagstaff

    I hesitated to say the same thing.

    Just exactly WHAT do those folks do, anyway? In Luxembourg, it’s easier. Standard requirement is to be rich and donate money to the administration.

    http://www.aolnews.com/2011/02/04/cynthia-stroum-5-facts-on-the-former-ambassador-to-luxembourg-n/

    Huntsman was at least fluent in Chinese. Could Stroum speak Luxembourg?

  • http://seekingliberty.wordpress.com fmaidment

    …we lost in 2008, at least partially. As John McCain raced to the Center, Obama was able to stay comfortably on the Left and describe McCain as Bush Redux. When McCain picked Palin as his running mate, he turned off many in the Center and didn’t energize enough of the GOP base to counter it.

    The same thing would happen with Huntsman, and the Obama camp is salivating at the concept.

  • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

    and take Lindsey Graham with you.

  • forrest

    is an Obama doppleganger.
    His candidacy is a creation of the media.

  • drfredc

    What a sucky troll of a post…

    It’s long past time for conservatives of any sort to stop positioning themselves against another fellow GOPer. STAY FOCUSED! The object isn’t to beat up fellow GOPers for this or that reason but to beat the Obamacrats.

    If Huntsman wants to run against Obama, fine, he can start to do so while working in the government — happens all the time.

    The critical issue is looking forward, not backwards, can this or that guy beat Obama… How well does he handle the issues? Etc. Who is the best? Why are they good — Not who is the worse, why are they bad… Don’t give the opposition stuff to work with…

    It’s not necessary to tear someone down because you have a stick up your ho ho about this or that. No one can build a winning team by cutting team members down…

  • Menlo

    Apparently, there was not much else for him to do in Malta.

  • kestrel

    The money quote from your first piece today on this man came straight from his own mouth, and it contradicts Weigel’s attempt to spin your charge away by saying, ?Team Huntsman doesn?t take this (Erick’s) charge terribly seriously?.

    Oh, they don’t?

    Harking back to your earlier piece, when ABC’s John Garcia asked Huntsman on Jan 20, 2011 about a possible presidential run, Huntsman’s chosen statement with which to dismiss reporters was, ?We are loyal to the President and loyal to the country .? (My emphasis.) Now why would he say that if there were not a potentially very serious conflict here? The video of him saying it is here, and the relevant paragraph from your earlier piece is this:

    On January 20, 2011, President Barack Obama, preparing for a summit with the Chinese, had to deal with press reports that his Ambassador to China just might be setting up to challenge him. From Good Morning America, Jake Tapper noted that President Obama, during a press conference with the Chinese premier joked about a possible Huntsman run with Ambassador Huntsman in the room. Jon Garcia of ABC News caught up with Huntsman and, Tapper reported, ?Garcia asked him about a run and Huntsman didn?t specifically answer the question. He said, we are loyal to the President and loyal to the country.?

    The man sounds like a snake to me.

  • izoneguy

    by taking this stance with Erickson & Redstate.

  • lukematthews

    Didn’t like Huntsman before and certainly don’t now. He appears more and more to be the darling of the American Left anyway. They are absolutely committed to pushing Daniels or this joker on us as a ‘serious’ nominee. Certainly the Washington ComPost’s Dan Balz is rooting for this weasel. “[D]issatisfaction with the choices evident among party activists, the little-known Huntsman and the team of advisers he has assembled think there is opportunity for a fresh face to shake up the GOP race.” Anyone who characterizes the GOP presidential field as sparse and activists as ‘dissatisfied’ is simply inventing rancor when there is calm questions about who would be best for this country. They’re just trying to create the conditions of “Operation Chaos” among the GOPers.
    That’s all.

  • bs61

    Unbelievable!

    I saw other comments on other message boards from UT people, and they said he started off conservative then moved left once in office.

  • EcH90

    Though I rule out Cain for being too much of a long shot (and really too much of a political newbie for president, though I’d love to see him go for congress or governor), your list is spot on. If Daniels does get in, there’s a real choice between him and Pawlenty. Otherwise, T-Paw is our best pick.