<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>RedState</title><link>https://redstate.com/erick/2011/05/16/natural-constituiences/feed/</link><description>Conservative News &amp; Politics</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 14:35:38 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Natural Constituiences</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[I have thought a lot more about Mike Huckabee&amp;#8217;s departure from the race on Saturday and then Newt Gingrich&amp;#8217;s Meet the Press appearance Sunday.  They raise a few questions in my mind that I want to explore here.  Admittedly, a post like this pulls from my own biases in how I see the candidates, but I&amp;#8217;m going to do my best to be as objective as possible, even when dealing with a guy like Huntsman.I just think it is helpful to explore natural constituencies to see who is fighting over what.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 09:32:25 -0400</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Erick Erickson]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://redstate.com/erick/2011/05/16/natural-constituiences-n39029</link></item></channel></rss>