« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

Another Bit of Data Into 2012

I don’t think next year is going to be easy for the GOP. But I am increasingly convinced next year’s electoral struggle for the GOP will not be fraught with the dire and awful predictions of so many, no matter who the Republican Party nominates.

It remains as it ever was — the economy, stupid!

President Obama off to destroy the Israeli State in the name of a two state solution does nothing but show he is yet again not focused on jobs or the economy. The Democrats fear mongering on medicare while refusing to offer up a budget of their own shows the same.

And now there is new data from Resurgent Repubilc that adds more data and more ability to tie the economic message to a range of Democrat actions and sustain the idea that it is the economy, stupid.

According to a new poll of registered voters,

By a margin of 55 to 36 percent, voters are more concerned that the federal government has too many regulations that will hurt the economy, rather than too few regulations to hold private businesses accountable. Republicans are more concerned about too many regulations by 77 to 16 percent, as are Independents by 55 to 35 percent. Only Democrats are concerned about too few regulations by 56 to 36 percent.

The most striking bit of the data is that 47% of hispanic voters are concerned about out of control regulations and 57% of private sector union members are concerned about government regulation.

The concern about regulations is shared by all age groups, by all income levels.

Now, the regulatory state alone is not enough to pull voters to the GOP. But, it is one more data point that Republicans have a message to sell to the voters and it is tied directly into the economic malaise of the Obama Administration. People understand the oppressive regulatory environment of the Obama Administration contributes to high unemployment, escalating costs, and slow growth.

COMMENTS

  • earlgrey

    to the direct impact on voters’ lives. They talk too much about philosophy and not enough about how their ideas will benefit everday people. This could be why so many think it is only the party of the rich and of business, which isn’t really true, but that is the perception.

    I was instantly reminded of Rand Paul’s “question” to a regulator about the cost and low efficiency of the new standards for home appliances. Low flow toilets in particular.

    Do you see any evidence or any hope for the GOP to get out of talking philosophically to speaking directly to the people?

  • lineholder

    and start paying more attention to these kinds of trends, Erick. It could make all the difference in the world in 2012 if they do.

    I saw this quote this morning and thought it would be appreciated here at RS:

    We all want progress, but if you’re on the wrong road, progress means doing an about-turn and walking back to the right road; in that case, the man who turns back soonest is the most progressive. ? C.S. Lewis

    There are more people than we realize who are recognizing we are on the wrong road.

    Young adults are waking up.
    http://dailycaller.com/2011/05/20/recent-college-grads-sour-on-obama-surveys-say/

    Black communities are looking at wider ranges of factor influencing their current socioeconomic position.
    http://dailycaller.com/2011/05/16/black-unemployment-racism-or-personal-responsibilty/
    http://www.bookerrising.net/2011/05/black-unemployment-in-america.html

    Black citizens are becoming more proactive in politics on the Republican side
    http://www.toledoblade.com/Politics/2011/05/19/Poll-puts-unannounced-Blackwell-in-GOP-lead-for-Senate-race.html

    As to Hispanic concerns about Unions, this story explains part of it
    http://thelasttradition.blogspot.com/2011/05/union-whistleblowers-in-new-york-we.html

    Hispanic conservative viewpoint on immigration
    http://thelasttradition.blogspot.com/2011/05/my-fellow-latinos-obama-is-playing-you.html

    There is so much potential out there for Repubs right now. It’s almost breathtaking to see it.

  • http://www.scragged.com petrarch

    It is absolutely essential that our nominee have an attitude of fighting for conservatism with both fists, 100% of the time, in all circumstances and situations. No mealy-mouthedness or excuses, but full-on confrontation of statism and left-liberalism.

    I know a lot of folks here have criticisms of Sarah Palin, some of them even substantive, but she seems to be the only potential candidate with that full-on all-fight attitude. All the rest have their merits, but also their areas of wishy-washiness and go-along-to-get-alongness.

    Michelle Bachmann would be the closest runner-up but doesn’t seem to quite have Palin’s sound-bite creation skill, which is necessary to bring the fight to the attention of the American people. Christie is fantastic in some areas, but he appears to pretty firmly not be running. Cain, OK, looks good so far, but only time will tell.

    The rest: maybe good in their hearts, but not enough for this moment.

    Now is not the time for a technocrat or good-government type (sorry, Romney). Now is the time for a verbal warrior who is fearless and utterly unapologetic.