<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>RedState</title><link>https://redstate.com/erick/2011/08/31/is-ryan-lizza-an-idiot-or-willfully-distorting-christian-theology/feed/</link><description>Conservative News &amp; Politics</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 00:39:02 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Is Ryan Lizza An Idiot or Willfully Distorting Christian Theology?</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[From Ben Domenech&amp;#8217;s excellent Transom, I found out some news I did not have when I wrote yesterday about Ryan Lizza&amp;#8217;s The New Yorker article where he got major, substantive facts wrong.One of the things Lizza did was tie Michele Bachmann to Francis Schaeffer and Nancy Pearcey, who Lizza opined are &amp;#8220;dominionists.&amp;#8221;  Well, Schaeffer may be dead, but Nancy Pearcey is very much alive and has her own website.  She has responded to Lizza&amp;#8217;s piece.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 09:32:24 -0400</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Erick Erickson]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://redstate.com/erick/2011/08/31/is-ryan-lizza-an-idiot-or-willfully-distorting-christian-theology-n40242</link></item></channel></rss>