<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>RedState</title><link>https://redstate.com/erick/2011/09/08/confusion/feed/</link><description>Conservative News &amp; Politics</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 03:17:55 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Confusion</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[I realize we&amp;#8217;re all supposed to be in the tank for Mitt Romney, but when the heck did we suddenly love social security?  It&amp;#8217;s nuts.We&amp;#8217;ve got Karl Rove out denying it is a ponzi scheme solely because he hates Rick Perry.  It&amp;#8217;s all politics, not principle.Mitt Romney says that millions of Americans being dependent on government for their retirement is the definition of a successful program.And we&amp;#8217;ve got a solid segment of the conservative movement falling in line behind them.  It&amp;#8217;s all so confusing.Are we all so damn scared of Rick Perry that suddenly we&amp;#8217;re going to abandon the fight for real reform of social security and try to make Perry look like a fringe candidate when, in fact, his position has been the mainstream of the GOP for decades?Social Security is, for all intents and purposes, a ponzi scheme.  Don&amp;#8217;t believe me?  Try out the Securities and Exchange Commission definition:]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 05:00:00 -0400</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Erick Erickson]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://redstate.com/erick/2011/09/08/confusion-n40323</link></item></channel></rss>