Comments on: Morning Briefing for June 5, 2012

By: tnfriendofcoal101368

tnfriendofcoal101368 — Wed, 06 Jun 2012 01:27:51 +0000

I normally just add 5 points to the Republican candidate with PPP. Their quoting of Nate Silver was rich, quoting a Democratic biased pollster to try and establish their own cred.

By: commonsenseobserver

commonsenseobserver — Wed, 06 Jun 2012 01:09:22 +0000

Obama still wins among independents, the geography can’t really change the figures that much, right?

By: Bill S

Bill S — Wed, 06 Jun 2012 01:04:40 +0000

By: commonsenseobserver

commonsenseobserver — Wed, 06 Jun 2012 00:58:50 +0000

But I do acknowledge they could be unreliable, though Republicans have done well in urban Florida before.

By: APA Guy

APA Guy — Wed, 06 Jun 2012 00:26:19 +0000

PPP notoriously over-samples urban areas because they favor Dems more than Republicans. Even the kos kids know and acknowledge this.

Plus, in the past their results have been…less than reliable, to say the least.

By: commonsenseobserver

commonsenseobserver — Tue, 05 Jun 2012 23:54:13 +0000

And I’m worried about the independents and women.

By: APA Guy

APA Guy — Tue, 05 Jun 2012 23:49:20 +0000

I wouldn’t be quoting their results as gospel.

By: acat

acat — Tue, 05 Jun 2012 23:41:07 +0000

for a few years peace from his yammering.

Mew

By: commonsenseobserver

commonsenseobserver — Tue, 05 Jun 2012 23:40:41 +0000

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_Release_FL_605.pdf

Romney’s down dramatically with women and independents.

By: westcoastpatriette

westcoastpatriette — Tue, 05 Jun 2012 23:33:13 +0000

loudmouth

By: acat

acat — Tue, 05 Jun 2012 23:24:49 +0000

and just walks away.

Mew

By: westcoastpatriette

westcoastpatriette — Tue, 05 Jun 2012 21:46:43 +0000

because if they don’t, that means the last ruling — which struck down the voter’s proposition banning SSM in CA — will stand.

If that should happen, there will be an uproar over this.

By: westcoastpatriette

westcoastpatriette — Tue, 05 Jun 2012 21:41:12 +0000

to hear the case.

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/marriage-ban-supreme-court/2012/06/05/id/441278?s=al&promo_code=F1B8-1

By: lineholder

lineholder — Tue, 05 Jun 2012 21:29:55 +0000

It’s Jesse Jackson, folks. We can’t expect much more than this from Jesse Jackson

He says that Gov. Walker is “segregating” WI by refusing to accept the funds from Obama’s “jobs programs” that would put public transportation in the form of rail through Milwaukee.

http://freebeacon.com/hateful-rhetoric/

By: lineholder

lineholder — Tue, 05 Jun 2012 18:48:41 +0000

http://www.nationaljournal.com/daily/poll-mixed-views-on-health-care-farm-bill-20120604

By: commonsenseobserver

commonsenseobserver — Tue, 05 Jun 2012 14:50:54 +0000

http://news.investors.com/article/613655/201206041914/obama-economic-recovery-worst-since-great-depression.htm

Lethal.

By: commonsenseobserver

commonsenseobserver — Tue, 05 Jun 2012 12:02:41 +0000

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJdL8hG7q7g&feature=context-gfa

By: commonsenseobserver

commonsenseobserver — Tue, 05 Jun 2012 11:56:35 +0000

“On the other hand, if Walker wins today, it will be a sign, as the pollster Scott Rasmussen has been arguing, that the voters are ahead of the politicians. It will be a sign that voters do value deficit reduction and will vote for people who accomplish it, even in a state that has voted Democratic in every presidential election since 1984.

A vote to keep Walker won?t be an antiunion vote. It will be a vote against any special interest that seeks to preserve exorbitant middle-class benefits at the expense of the public good. It will tell the presidential candidates that it is safe to get specific about what they will do this December, when hard deficit choices will have to be made.”