« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

GOP Consultants Palin on Paul Ryan

Palin (verb w obj.) pay • lîn

To pile on a Vice Presidential nominee and blame him/her for defeat so political consultants do not have to accept any responsibility.

There have been a number of stories out over the past few days from Republican political consultants on background claiming the GOP is now screwed because Paul Ryan is the Vice Presidential nominee.

There is an underlying kernel of truth in their concerns. For seventy-two hours now, the GOP has talked about Medicare, not the failing economy. Several of the consultants I have talked to express a deep concern, based on past performance, that the Romney campaign does not have what it takes to fight on this front and make it about the economy. Their concerns are based on legitimate issues.

The reality, however, is that we win on this playing field if the Romney team does engage. Fixing entitlements is directly correlated to fixing the economy and Paul Ryan is an articulate spokesman on that correlation.

Bill Kristol gets at the ridiculousness of a lot of the bed wetting. In 1980, 1994, and 2010, Republican consultants soiled their britches that the GOP would lose for daring to make the campaign about ideas and ideology. Each time they fought on ideas, they won.

Let me make a simple point without wasting all our time — Republican consultants have gotten lazy. Many of the new kids on the block came up through the 2000 race with Karl Rove and are absolutely convinced that instead of running on ideas, you run on tactics directed toward building piecemeal coalitions. That’s how a supposed conservative like George Bush went from steel tariffs in Pennsylvania to Medicare Part D for seniors.

Republican consultants hate running campaigns based on ideas and ideology because they (A) don’t have one (B) think conservatives who do are knuckle draggers and (C) don’t understand how to message ideological campaigns as a result. And by God we can’t have consultants out actually working and thinking.

There are some great Republican consultants out there who share the concerns reflected in the Politico and elsewhere. Their concerns are based on the Romney team not being able to execute an ideological race. I don’t think we should lump them in with the others.

The ones the media is talking to are the consultants, like Mark McKinnon, who really don’t believe we should be having these fights. They’d rather fight around the edges. Those are the fights that will not win at this time. Those are the fights fought by people who hated the Tea Party in 2010 and were convinced the “Party of No” was a nonstarter with the American people. Those are the people we all really need to put out business on our side.

If the Romney campaign will wage an ideological fight for the heart and soul of the American Dream, they will win. Ultimately, the vast majority of voters do not want Barack Obama being the arbiter of what is fair in America.

—–

After posting, a political consultant friend of mine writing to agree with me noted this in an email:

The only thing I’d add: Democrats have demagogued on Social Security and Medicare since the beginning of time. Anyone who isn’t preparing for Dem attacks on Medicare, especially House members who voted for the Ryan Budget twice, is crazy.

Tags:

COMMENTS

  • http://www.justintribble.com Justin Tribble

    You are exactly right:

    “Many of the new kids on the block came up through the 2000 race with Karl Rove and are absolutely convinced that instead of running on ideas, you run on tactics directed toward building piecemeal coalitions.”

    It’s disheartening. We do not want to be a party of tactics. I hope Romney’s intent is to elevate the discourse. Of course, the Democrats don’t believe this in a million years. They think this is all maneuvering.

  • fpete13527

    ..NOW…or we lose.

    As you said, in order to engage in the economy you HAVE TO engage in the entitlements and other issues that are killing the economy and killing the country !!

    Every time we engage in Conservative principles…we win….EVERY TIME.

    We also win over the disgraceful OBAMA/DNC Progressives generating class warfare and race warfare (because they have no positive message.) Obama and the DNC are the ones who want to see poverty and race divisiveness….no one else does.

    Just make sure to not use the wimp/slosh/RINO/Rove/Boner cop outs …..and make sure to not support the McCain/Crist mindsets in the Federal and State legislatures.

    All that the GOP legislators, and everyone else for that matter, must do is to stand up to the disgrace MSM (mud-slinging-media..IE HUFF HAG, CNN..etc) and disregard whatever they will write or say……just forget it!!! Let them rant!!

    The Conservative media, and all others who speak the truth, are now disintegrating the Progressive MSM stories at Warp speed.

    Dont listen to the squish group, GOP/Crist campaign advisors who say you have to go with the Progressive squish flow.

    Speak and demonstrate Conservatism…LOUD….and you will WIN EVERY TIME!!

  • JSobieski

    2012 has to be the line in the sand.

  • Darin_H

    d) The consultants are elitists who think that voters are too stupid to understand an intelligent economic argument.

    Correct me if I’m wrong (I don’t remember) McKinnon was part of the “No Labels” crapola?

  • ctredstater

    of wee-weed up RINO consultants – and let them know that their services are no longer desired.

    these beltway geniuses are, to quote the World’s Greatest Orator, a part of what “got us into this mess”.

    I find this whole story – quietly leaking to their buddies in the media to get the “concerns” out there – is gutless, spineless, and brainless.

    sure, Erick, of course. concerns. there are always concerns. but if these brilliant strategist/tacticians cannot see the organic and growing energy that is taking place in the campaign right now, what iin the world are they doing claiming to be political gurus? \
    \

  • streiff

    A substantial number of our “consultants” really don’t believe in anything bigger than their next paycheck. Fighting a large scale ideological fight is beyond their comprehension as it actually requires values.

  • citizenjerry

    You wrote that Republican consultants have gotten lazy, and the picture that immediately popped into my head was the cueball-headed Steve Schmidt. After his abysmal handling of McCain-Palin, he and his fellow toad Nichole Wallace should be permanently banned from ever running a Republican campaign again.

  • renny

    but the last thing Romney and Ryan need is any advice from the people that ran the Bush I reelection, the Bob Dole, or John McCain elections as they were unfocused, unresponsive, not ideological, and lacking in tactics to the extent the McCain people did not want experienced Bush II workers in his fight against the most amorphous and difficult to oppose “hope and change and I’m black” obama campaign.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    in November. We have to endure the MSM spin on how critical is each day of a campaign every year and its all bunkum.

  • gbenton

    Tactics is ALL Team Obama has… Romney scores by dwarfing Obama’s content-free campaign with ‘restore America’ theme AND highlight that the cause of our malaise is the ideology that motivates Obama.

    Obama’s core strategy is to turn this into a base election by diminishing turnout by disgusting indies with the whole process – which Romney would play into by getting in mud with tit-for-tat tactics. Reaganize to remind indies of Morning in America… Obama will be revealed as the unAmerican empty suit that he is.

    Romney/Ryan is in position to inspire America with real hope and motivate indies and Reagan Democrats to CHANGE the Presidency and have the audacity to vote out the first black President.

    Obama won on ‘ideas’, they were big, bold, and vapid. Romney can do the same, only with content behind the big and bold ideas.

  • ctredstater

    Honors President Reagan

    Recalls his simple wisdom – ideas that worked!

    Very easy to understand

    Another bumper sticker item.

    Let’s keep this alive!!!!

  • gbenton

    With all do respect to the exceptions, those RINO Steve Schmidt types who no doubt have their fingerprints on everything that’s happened since HW Bush are the clowns who put the party in a rut that begat Obama.

    Reagan left us with a legacy and these hacks coasted on that and leached off the GOP brand until it was on life support. McCain was the quintessential last gasp of that thinking – and Palin and the Tea Party are the GOP’s only long term hope.

    Return to Reagan, shun the spinless dweeb consultants who stand for nothing but their own perpetual parasite gig.

  • gbenton

    Running on ideology IS a tactic, too. But to run ONLY on tactics is what allows for Presidential terms to become rudderless opportunistic crony-fests where anything goes… or, the Bush years for the GOP.

    I agree with what you said… and hope that Romney/Ryan combines savvy tactics with an ideology that inspires the way Reagan did and bring a tidal wave election that allows America to vent all the frustration at the utter disgrace the Obama regime has been.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    Obama

  • gbenton

    on pickpocket theme… highlighting that money from our paychecks is going to Obamacare, a program ‘not for you’. Pickpocket indeed!

    Obama’s Medicare Shell Game… Don’t Get Ripped Off!

  • evilbloggerlady
  • bgintn

    Saw this!

    http://my.brainshark.com/The-President-s-8-Billion-Coincidence-356086344

  • jimmaloney

    …what a breathtaking undertaking it would be if one of the editors appearing here would make an effort to place many of the talking heads that, generally, support our point of view along a trust-curve consistent with the outcome we hope to achieve in November and beyond…

    I say this because I no longer quite trust the likes of Karl Rove as I did before for exactly the arguments raised in the column above and I put Bill O’Reilly in the “let’s keep giving the President the benefit of the doubt” column when he should know better and quit playing to his “so-called independent” listeners.

  • stanleybix

    I have been paying into the fund for 40+ years! This is my own money!Conservative estimates show that my cotributions are worth about $850,000! For my thousands of dollars of payments, the goverment sends me a small monthly stipend and provides healthcare in my senior years. Can this be said about any of the government “freeloader ” entitlements?

  • Craigpennsylvania

    This may offend you even further, but you have not “paid into the system” anymore than I have. Social Security (as with Obamacare) was declared constitutional because it was a “TAX”, not a forced payment into a retirement fund.

    Yes, you have been paying FICA Taxes. I have been paying them as well – in fact – I have paid the maximum on SS every year since I was 29. None of us has an agreement from any govt. institution which shows in any way that we are the owners of this money.

    As soon as the money was taken from us, it was no longer “OUR” money.

  • Repair_Man_Jack

    FICA revenues go into the general fund.

  • commonsenseobserver

    Your own money has been spent by Washington politicians on other fancy things like Cowboy Poetry Festivals. You paid for it, yes, but the money does not exist now. Which is why we need to make tough choices to protect current seniors and strengthen the programs for future generations. One area where Romney actually goes further than the Path to Prosperity is Social Security reform.

    But, yeah, they’re still considered entitlements. Everything in government is funded by taxpayers’ money or debt as well, so it hardly makes a difference.

  • soljerblue

    I would far rather it be for ideology and PRINCIPLE, than banging heads over edge issues. We’re up to our backsides in alligators, true — but draining the swamp absolutely must be done. Otherwise, the alligators win no matter how many we get rid of.

  • roadrage

    I always enjoy coming to RS and reading the articles and the comments.
    I’ve learned many things and appreciate the civility demonstrated….it’s quite refreshing…sticking to the facts and sometimes with a little humor thrown in.

    I’m for taking the gloves off ocassionally and just telling it like it is….not sugar coating everything. Romney/Ryan just need to stay on message and not get side tracked. It’s the economy , creating jobs and cutting govt spending across the board….everybody takes a hit !!!

    I do have a question….what does N/T nt mean ? I’m not that computer lingo or texting savvy :)

    Thanks Patti B

  • roadrage

    I always enjoy coming to RS and reading the articles and the comments.
    I’ve learned many things and appreciate the civility demonstrated….it’s quite refreshing…sticking to the facts and sometimes with a little humor thrown in.

    I’m for taking the gloves off ocassionally and just telling it like it is….not sugar coating everything. Romney/Ryan just need to stay on message and not get side tracked. It’s the economy , creating jobs and cutting govt spending across the board….everybody takes a hit !!!

    I do have a question….what does N/T nt mean ? I’m not that computer lingo or texting savvy :)

    Thanks Patti B

  • liberty17

    N/T, nt or n/t means No Text.

  • checkmate2012

    n/t means no text. You have to enter a comment in the comment section before you can press “post comment”

    A quick remark can be said the comment title but then you have to put n/t in the comments section.

    And just so you know, The Morning Brief, is what’s called an open thread. So if you have something to say that doesn’t fit into a diary, you can place it there, anytime. They don’t like threadjack- an off comment in a diary.

    Welcome!

  • gekster

    It means no text in the comment box, that the title box is the comment.

  • emptybucket

    I’m somewhat new to the comment area but like you have read RS quite a while. Have fun but the best part is all the incredible commentary you will read. I am learning so much plus getting a chance to speak my own Conservative opinion. I like that I can say God with a bunch of bloggers coming down on me about it.

  • emptybucket

    question about just what they were talking about Wall Street commits crime after crime?

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    Error: please type a comment.

    n/t, no, no text lets you post a comment when you intend for the title box to stand alone as gekster says above…and Welcome to RedState!

  • demsaresatanic

    That nails it.

  • gekster

    He’s still spouting off about the crimes, but hasn’t/can’t name any.
    He looks to be an OWS type, but he denies that also.

  • funwithknives

    Watch out for The Evil Double Click.
    Sometimes the acceptance and transference of your post takes a bit.

    Say….OOOPS!

    Oh and …..Howdy, NeighBah…… Got any gum?

  • YnotNOW

    as you may have noticed….

  • stanleybix

    SSI, Medicaid, Food stamps, etc are given away to those who never contributed a nickel in taxes!! We who have paid in thousands of dollars a year, every year for 40+ years should not be lumped in with the freeloader crowd!!