« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

A Litmus Test for Obamacare

If Barack Obama were truly interested in improving “Health Care” for Americans, he has a very simple way to prove it to all of us non-believers.  I mentioned it to Mrs. Flagstaff (who is already registered to be in Atlanta next year) the other day, and since then I’ve heard the same general idea mentioned by such estimable people as Rep. Michelle Bachmann, among others.  The simple procedure?

He simply has to lead the way in solving the problems of Medicare.  We all know what they are–not enough money, too many obligations, no way to rein it in.  It even goes broke before Social Security does.

Since he is proposing to put everyone within the boundaries of America on the equivalent of Medicare, he should first prove that he can make his plan work for the smaller subset of the population who are already (often against their will) dependent upon government health insurance, if not government health care.  While he’s at it, he should bring the VA system up to snuff, because it truly is government health care, and it treats the most important of our citizens.

Don’t say that it isn’t fair to make those demands because the elderly are much more expensive to cover than are the younger citizenry.  That may be true, but everybody who is working, young and old alike, are already paying Medicare taxes.  He is presently essentially proposing to add many millions more people into that same system, or one just like it.  It is eminently fair to suggest that he solve the VA’s and Medicare’s problems first, before he compounds them by adding the rest of us into the coverage pool.

If he can do that without resorting to borrowing to cover expenses, without eliminating the Medicare Advantage plans which provide many of us with catastrophic care coverage, without resorting to other taxes to cover the new expenses, without resorting to accounting sleight-of-hand which postpones benefits while it moves revenues forward, then, and only then, will I believe that he can create a national, government-run health plan that will work and be self-sufficient.

COMMENTS

  • Cheryl

    is saying the Dem’s new strategy will be to split the health care legislation so they can get something passed in short order on a party line vote. I’m not sure how to share the link.

  • izoneguy

    he would have never been talking about “HealthCare Reform” in the context of a government takeover.

    Obama could care less about the HealthCare system.

    That is something you have to understand when talking about this issue. For Obama it’s about gaining a permanent majority for the socialists. Creating a sub-class that will only be beholden to the socialists. That is what the GM & Chrysler take-overs were.
    A permanent union monopoly.

    On paper the socialists have breathtaking plans. But they did not factor in a few things. The free people of America. They have finally woken up to the day before the takeover and they are saying hell no we won’t go.

    If the socialists do ram this down our throat it will be an epic fail with several unintended consequences they just did not plan for.

    When that happens – as it has around the world for centuries, it won’t be pretty and it might go on for quite awhile.

  • Flagstaff

    My essay was not intended for those who understand Obama’s intentions, it was for those who have bought into his story, at least to the extent that it sounds like a good idea to them. They need to be asking the same questions that I did by inference.

    1. “Mr. President, if you think you can provide us all with health care, why don’t you prove it by fixing Medicare first?”

    2. “Mr. President, if you think you can provide us all with health care, why don’t you prove it by fixing the VA system first?”

    3. “Don’t just drop an atomic bomb on our existing health care system, give us a sample of a successful smaller program first. Medicare for the insurance side, the VA for the health care side. Even Jon Stewart says we should have dropped the first bomb offshore, just to prove to the Japanese we could do it.”

    If we can get enough independents to start asking those reasonable questions (numbers one and two), we will win this argument going away, because you know he has no clue as to how to solve those problems. Even the slowest among us can see that if he can’t solve the smaller problem, he can’t solve the larger one, either.

    In other words, those are talking points, my friend, and effective ones because they contain truth.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine