« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

We Should Be Thankful, and So Should Obama

What Obama's Deepwater Horizon Response Tells Us

We have been studying petroleum, intensely, for over 100 years.  We know what it is, how it behaves, and what it can do.  We have many years of experience with it.  There are thousands of people with BS, MS, and PhD degrees in Petroleum Engineering.

Therefore, when a deep-sea well failed in a way that left a gaping hole in a pressurized oil deposit, it shouldn’t have surprised anybody that the oil came out fast, in great quantities, and that it could rather quickly flow through the Gulf of Mexico, perhaps towards our coastline.  We knew that it wouldn’t shut itself off, yet President Obama seemed satisfied to sit back and wait for BP Oil to “handle” the situation.

True, BP did have the most expertise regarding this particular well, but there are thousands of other human resources available to the President who could have helped him set up the task force necessary to keep a tragic accident from developing into the disaster it has now become.  It’s known now that this event isn’t unique–other oil companies in other parts of the world have had even worse accidents.  Yet day after day, week after week, for more than a month, the President did little more than threaten BP while at the same time he allowed BP to set the priorities for whatever mitigating actions were being taken.  Today, near the 50-day mark, he still hasn’t announced anything about any extensive use of government resources to remove the oil from the Gulf water or haul it away.  And BP is doing all the work of capping the well to stop the flow at its source.

Early in the morning of June 10, the June 4 press release was still featured on the White House website.  It mostly covered legal issues, and how there were

federal folks [assigned] to look over BP’s shoulder and to work with state and local officials to make sure that claims are being processed quickly, fairly, and that BP is not lawyering up, essentially, when it comes to these claims.

That’s nice, but it doesn’t prevent any beaches or birds from becoming oil-covered.  Obama mentioned there was lots of boom deployed in Louisiana, but not necessarily in the right places.  He was concerned because “we’ve got limited resources.”  (Sounds like an excuse to me.)  The June 9 White House blog starts its substantive report with

Today, National Incident Commander Admiral Allen meet[sic] with BP claims officials to assert claims oversight and ensure BP meets commitments to restore Gulf Coast communities….

And

At the President’s direction, Admiral Thad Allen today met with top BP claims officials to assert the administration’s oversight of BP’s claims process in order to ensure that every legitimate claim is honored and paid in an efficient manner. He expressed the American people’s urgent need for additional transparency into BP’s claims process, including how the process works, and how quickly claims are being processed for both individuals and businesses impacted by the oil spill. Additional meetings will be held in each of the four impacted states from June 11-13.

The emphasis still seems to be on legalisms and clean-up and recovery after the fact, political grandstanding, paper-pushing and meetings, not mitigating the oil damage before more occurs.

So why do I say we and Obama should be thankful?

Oil is an inanimate object.  It can’t think.  It can’t plan.  It can’t observe, learn and adjust its behavior.  It must follow the laws of physics and chemistry in all respects.  That means it floats, it dissolves, it forms solutions and compounds, it dissipates, it clumps, and it coats, but mainly it just “is,” and whatever it “does” is the predictable result of whatever comes in contact with it.  It really can’t surprise us very much.  Yet this President has found it beyond his ability to get a working plan set up in less than 50 days to stop it.  Nobody would expect him to do it personally, but he couldn’t even get it in gear to delegate to the Coast Guard immediately the task of assembling the right “panel of experts” to attack the entire problem before the disaster could develop.  If he wants an “ass to kick,” perhaps he should look behind him.

We should be thankful because this wasn’t an attack by our sentient enemies. In many respects it’s a static incident.  Only one source is spewing oil into the Gulf, and it’s flowing in a fairly predictable stream from there.  Yet its systematic containment is still baffling to this President.  That the oil slick has attained the size of South Carolina just makes matters worse.

If it were of human origin, we’d have new “leaks” springing up in other places.  Instead of one, there’d be many.  Whatever we would do to defend our shore, the enemy would know it and take countermeasures.  While an enemy would of course not use oil wells to attack us, we know they could use many other weapons, and the response so far to this much simpler challenge indicates they would do a lot of damage before the administration knew what hit us.  The response so far seems to be, “I hope, I hope, I hope BP can fix things before they get really, really bad.”  That wouldn’t work against a human enemy any better than it works against an oil slick.

I am thankful this wasn’t an enemy attack, and if the administration and President learn something from it, maybe that will be its silver lining (I don’t have any real expectation that learning will take place).

But consider events of the past year.

The uproar over Arizona’s new immigration law leaves the impression that all immigrants illegally entering the state are Mexicans. But according to a 2006 report from the House Committee on Homeland Security, an increasing number of illegal immigrants from nations known to produce, train and harbor Islamic terrorists are using the Southwest border as a gateway to the United States.

Hundreds, more likely thousands of illegal migrants from Middle Eastern countries, Europe, and even China have been captured crossing into the US over the Texas-Mexico border since 2001.  We don’t know how many have escaped detection.

Major Doctor Nidal Hasan killed 13 people at Ft. Hood before he was stopped by city police.  The Christmas airline bombing was thwarted by civilians.  A May 1 bombing disaster in Times Square was averted only by incompetence on the part of the bomber and sheer luck.  In all three cases, the first thing the administration announced was “It isn’t al Qaeda, it’s not part of a coordinated attack, the perpetrator was acting alone and on his own, it might not even be connected to radical Islam, maybe it was a right-wing wacko.”  In the first two cases, there were warning signs that officials both missed and ignored, yet seemingly nothing has been done to improve the system.  They were all connected to radical Islam.  None of them were prevented by federal procedures or personnel.  And the debate about border security almost never mentions the high number of OTM’s (Other Than Mexicans) captured by the Border Patrol.

How do we know that they weren’t separate but coordinated attacks designed to test our defenses and our preparedness?  How do we know the “flying Imams” weren’t the first test?  How do we know that al Qaeda operatives are not crossing into Arizona still?  We don’t.  All we know is that our legislative, executive, and judicial responses have all been inadequate and misdirected.  I’d bet that al Qaeda is watching us bumble around in the Gulf and using what it sees to plan its next attack.  And for that I’m not thankful.

COMMENTS

  • http://thesandsinstitute.org Vassar Bushmills

    EE mentioned a couple of days ago the “kicking ass” comment of OB-1, by saying all he wanted to do was find someone to blame. But it was also a tacit admission that he didn’t know what to do. None of them. It’s almost as if he was angry because he didn’t really sign on for this part of the job.

    We (at RedState) noticed on day 12 a huge jurisdictional gap between Bush/Katrina and Obama/Oil Spill, to wit; from the beginning there were things that ONLY the federal government had the jurisdiction to attend to…oil 50 miles out can only be managed by them, not the individual states. And they could have done a lot.

    I’m hoping someone does a time line of the explosion and spill, day by day, hour by hour, side by side…agency by agencyt and state by state.
    There won’t be a Pulitzer in it unless it lays all blame at the feet of BP, but no matter, there’s a matter of justice here, and as you state, a matter of national security in a real crisis.

    • Flagstaff

      FEMA stands for “Federal Emergency Management Agency.” Here are a few tidbits from the FEMA website (my emphasis added):

      FEMA?s mission is to support our citizens and first responders to ensure that as a nation we work together to build, sustain, and improve our capability to prepare for, protect against, respond to, recover from, and mitigate all hazards.

      Under “What we do” they write

      The disaster life cycle describes the process through which emergency managers prepare for emergencies and disasters, respond to them when they occur, help people and institutions recover from them, mitigate their effects, reduce the risk of loss, and prevent disasters such as fires from occurring.

      There is a link from the word “mitigate,” but the page is missing. However, under “respond” they say

      Response begins as soon as a disaster is detected or threatens. It involves mobilizing and positioning emergency equipment; getting people out of danger; providing needed food, water, shelter and medical services; and bringing damaged services and systems back on line. Local responders, government agencies and private organizations take action. Sometimes the destruction goes beyond local and state capabilities. That’s when federal help is needed as well.

      So there is a federal agency already in place that is supposed to address just this kind of situation. For probably a dozen reasons, Obama didn’t task FEMA with the assignment to lead the response. Instead, he dithered. If there was nobody at FEMA capable of gathering a task force of appropriate experts within a couple of days to analyze the situation and collect equipment and people to address it, then FEMA might as well be disbanded, or at least its mission should be amended.

      At the risk of redundancy, I say that he not only didn’t know what to do about the oil spill, he didn’t even know how to find somebody who did know. And the only substantive action he’s taken is the counterproductive one of shutting down other, safe, drilling in the Gulf, resulting in even more economic damage to the US while aiding Middle Eastern oil producers and Venezuela. Imagine that.

      • Scope

        and as you said in your diary Flagstaff, if they were non-existent in the Deepwater accident, what good would they be with other, more dangerous or widespread crises, or attacks on our soil. The EPA is another questionable agency, as it seems that all they have done is say that the dispersants could not be used, but, they were ignored, and the dispersants are still being used. These agencies are only as useful and/or effective as the people employed within them, and, the O has surrounded himself with as many incompetents as he is himself.

      • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine
        • izoneguy

          Oil spills can be eaten up

          http://www.ocregister.com/articles/genetic-247025-oil-techniques.html

          At the time of the catastrophic 1989 Exxon Valdez spill in Alaska, there were great expectations for modern biotechnology applied to “bioremediation,” the biological cleanup of toxic wastes, including oil. William Reilly, then head of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, later recalled, “When I saw the full scale of the disaster in Prince William Sound in Alaska … my first thought was: Where are the exotic new technologies, the products of genetic engineering, that can help us clean this up?”

          Innovation had been stymied by EPA’s hostile policies toward the most sophisticated new genetic engineering techniques. In 1997 the EPA issued the regulation in final form, ensuring that biotech researchers in several industrial sectors, including biocleanup, would continue to be intimidated and inhibited by regulatory barriers.

          Government policymakers seem oblivious to the power of regulatory roadblocks to impair resilience. Experiments using genetically engineered organisms confront massive red tape and politics and require vast expense. The costs and uncertainty of performing this R&D have virtually eliminated them as a tool to clean up oil spills and other pollution.

          EPA chief Lisa Jackson said at a press conference in Louisiana that her agency is just part of a team effort. It looks as though her players are trying to throw the game.

          • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

            http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2010/06/11/the-need-for-a/

  • http://vladenblog.tumblr.com Vladimir

    We must avoid the temptation to think that the government is all-powerful, and that just the focusing of the President’s attention on the problem will be enough to solve it.

    The gov’t is necessarily dependent on BP to plug the well. That job is beyond the capabilities of gov’t.

    But in considering mitigation strategies like the berms and novel oil recovery technologies, the default position of the gov’t is the bureaucratic permit review process, which Obama could sweep aside with the stroke of a pen.

    And your observation about fighting an essentially passive enemy, vis a vis our preparedness and commitment to fighting an active, relentless, intelligent foe ought to cause us more than a few sleepless nights.

    • Flagstaff

      Thanks for emphasizing the danger we face if Obama has to face and active enemy attack. I didn’t do that well enough–it was actually my primary concern as I sat down to write the piece.

      As for “That job is beyond the capabilities of gov?t,” I couldn’t agree more. In fact, this administration is proving that while there is no job out of the government’s covetousness, there is almost no job that isn’t beyond its capabilities. If we didn’t have such a top-heavy bureaucracy, we might have had more of those “limited resources” (booms). And booms don’t demand health care benefits and weekly salaries.

      George Will’s column today includes this passage:

      Obama is the first president whose presidential campaign was his qualification for the office he sought. He almost said so on Sept. 1, 2008, as a large hurricane made landfall on the Gulf Coast. Megan McArdle of the Atlantic has resurrected Obama’s answer when he was asked if could handle such a crisis.

      Using perhaps the royal plural – a harbinger of grandiosity to come – Obama cited the size, cost and complexity of his campaign: “Our ability to manage large systems and to execute, I think, has been made clear over the last couple of years.”

      Deepwater Horizon has made it clear that he can’t manage anything that doesn’t respond to words.

    • http://thesandsinstitute.org Vassar Bushmills

      My sense now is the tough talk is part shake-down, and part theater, considering the media is writing a history (narrative) like Katrina which will be years in being undone, once the shorter memories and passions and political value has faded.

      I’m an old coal lawyer, and know something about strict liability in certain kinds of accidents, and a lease holder (the deep pockets) does not automatically take legal liability for the negligence of the subs. In civil cases there are always all sorts of cross-filings. I can see where all three parties to this are not going to be the default fall guys. And all three will be able to make very public known and unknown federal omissions that have exacerbated the damages they’ll be asked to pay.

      As for criminal cases, other than of an administrative nature, failure to follow regs, guidelines, I don’t see very much coming out of this. Maybe you can enlighten us more. I still say there’s a Pulitzer prize in there for the first person who tells this story well, and right.

      • http://vladenblog.tumblr.com Vladimir

        The new “Notice to Lessees”, which came out Wednesday, IIRC, requires a Sarbanes-Oxley style statement from each company’s CEO wrt compliance with 30 CFR 250, the part of the federal code that covers oil, gas and sulphur operations.

        These clowns have a legalistic and lawyerly approach to problems. If anything goes wrong, it must be somebody’s fault, and we must start assigning blame before the root problem is solved.

        • http://thesandsinstitute.org Vassar Bushmills

          …without due process (a trial…a rule from the 80s I’ve always hated, with SCOTUS would revisit it)…I don’t see much of a threat of criminal action. Again some of the “Take-over” (Maxine Waters) and boot on the neck threats are actually unthinkable, and it bothers me most the MSM lets them get away with it. Even Fox is on the fix inasmuch as it makes for good red journalism.

          In a trial the Govt would get hammered…from contributory negligence to shared liability for damages.

    • Achance

      When, well, actually, if, the truth comes out, I’m willing to bet we’ll find some grizzled old tool pushers and other such operational people who were scared to death by this well but who couldn’t articulate their fears in such a way as to overcome the “we have a plan for that” point of view of their chain of command.

      Don’t get me wrong, I’m not accusing anyone of malfeasance or negligence, but these guys had to know that they were working at the extreme limit of capabilities and, I think, were too confident of their planning, of their ability to “handle it.”

      No matter what the lawyers try to tell us, accidents are not a crime. There are reams of regulations controlling drilling and responses to marine oil polution. Even small boats are required to have a MARPOL placard in their machinery spaces with the USCG’s oil spill hot line number on it. There was a plan, but the plan was overwhelmed. I won’t say that it was predictable that the plan would be overwhelmed on this well, but it was predictable that the plan would be overwhelmed on some well. The real failures here are that nobody has been able to come up with a successful alternative plan to cap the blow out and the federal government, whose job it is, has not been able to take effective steps to keep the oil offshore.

      Whether as the result of the appeal of a state government or from the conclusion of the CG that available resources were not sufficient, it was the federal government’s job to marshall the Nation’s and the World’s, if necessary, resources to protect the shoreline and marine life. It is unconscionable that there is not sufficeient boom on the Gulf Coast. It is unconscionable that envirowhacko politics is interfering with constructing berms and using skimmers. It is unconscionable that the shipping industries and maritime unions’ politics is interfering with bring all the World’s resources to bear.

      Here is the epic fail: unlike Katrina, this isn’t first a local and state problem, from the moment that well blew out, it was the federal government’s responsibility to protect the coastline and marine life. Yes, it is BP’s liability, within the legal limits, and it is BP’s responsibility WITHIN BP’S LIMITS, but it is the federal government’s ulitmate responsibility both as a matter of US law and International Treaty. Just wait until some of that oil starts washing up on Cuban and Mexican beaches and the complaints of treaty violations begin.

      • http://thesandsinstitute.org Vassar Bushmills

        Just like the Challenger…an engineer overruled by a bureaucrat

  • http://www.veronicaestrada.com/ Veronica Estrada

    jihad is legitimate and we’re working to “win” the hearts and minds of our enemies — including the Taliban, Hezbollah, Hamas, Iran..

    building up their nations ($400 million to Palestine is just the latest example) — believing that money is “ammunition,” as Patraeus quipped in May’s Vanity Fair.

    Nationbuilding for what? To build more inroads to this RELIGIOUS war, Mr. Obama, against a CHRISTIAN Nation.

    It won’t be long before the Maiming, Murdering Jidahist has loudly proclaimed human rights.

    Flag — that OTM report just blew my mind. Through McAllen, TX, too!

    It’s easy for them to blend in with the illegal alien/Mexican population b/c they look just like them.

    Same swarthy, tan skin, same dark hair. I know.

    One summer, after vacationing and letting the beard grow, my seriously tanned and ragga-muffin-looking Hispanic husband was twiced-over at the airport.

    Poor baby, I can’t stand him growing a beard now..

    I SERIOUSLY dislike these people in power. These people who STILL want to kill us — even moreso.

    Thanks flagstaff. Great analogy.

    • Flagstaff
  • Flagstaff

    had red hair and freckles. (^;^)

    Obama is either clueless or incompetent or doing all this intentionally, or all three. The jury is still out.

    In the meantime, Peace, Love, and Hare Krishna.

    • http://www.veronicaestrada.com/ Veronica

      we have to decide now and pursue w/ conviction!

      otherwise, we’ll end up w/ an 80-year-old Obama in Congress, screwing up w/ some schpiel like Thomas ..saying something like

      “Reds should have invaded 40 years ago, when I told them, harder, meaner .. and I’m not talking about those Redstate groupies”

      he ain’t clueless.

      If we can trace back Helen Thomas’s bullsh*t 10 years ago when she first started w/ Hearst, we can cement what Obama’s said within the past decade as well .. and hold it as absolute truth.

      As for me, he’s an actor on the world stage — dissipating Americanism, trying to get us to gel with the idea of being “global citizens” where there are no borders.

      Excuse me, Mr. President, while I take an axe to my fridge while you want to force me to break bread and share my beer with my neighbor, the Jihadi.

      Legitimate tenet, my butt.

      the only archie I liked was the archie engine that was around before godless google.

      • http://www.veronicaestrada.com/ Veronica
      • Flagstaff

        Obama shows tremendous discipline in continuing to do the exact wrong things in such an obvious manner. It moves him toward his goal and keeps many of us unsure of his motives. His strategy seems to be to do whatever it takes to bring the country down before he leaves office, and re-election is unimportant to him.

        • http://www.veronicaestrada.com/ Veronica

          Let’s take the BP oil spill.

          I can name a couple of things that have been in the environmental-global warming pipeline for which letting BP go to hell would serve as an excellent backdrop.

          There’s World Oceans Day, UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, InterAcademy Council Review of the IPCC.

          These global jerks are relentless and the sad mess in the gulf is the perfect photo op.

          I think Barack’s waiting for the spill to make it out into international waters to get the international community involved.

          It works like this:

          The New York Times reported that there are “large gaps” in international conventions to address oil spills of this type and of this magnitude. We can expect this to change.

          Anyone who argues against this is either stupid or isn’t following what the international community is forcing down our throats w/ global warming.

          We can also expect Barack to try to “institutionalize” international law through policy even if we don’t ratify whatever conventions the UN/international community dreams up.

          Case in point.

          Do you remember back in March about the concern over Obama outlawing fishing?

          He established the Interagency Ocean Policy Task Force via executive memorandum for “marine spatial planning” with the intent of obtaining recommendations that “should prioritize upholding our stewardship responsibilities and ensuring accountability for all of our actions affecting ocean, coastal, and Great Lakes resources, and be consistent with international law, including customary international law as reflected in the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.”

          The US has not even ratified the Convention of the Law of the Sea,
          though Obama supports it.

          And here he is, instituting international law into domestic policy.

          The same will probably be done because of the BP oil spill, which I think is just one giant photo op that has nothing to do with his ineptitude and inexperience as a President.

          We already have the bureacracy in place to enforce oceanic international law.

          The Bureau of Ocean, Environment and Scientific Affairs is now the Bureau of Ocean is now the Bureau of Ocean, *International* Environmental and Scientific Affairs with sub-agencies devoted to international ocean law and policy.

          And instead of boatloads of fishermen in the coastal waters in and around the continential United States, we’ll have newly-minted state employees as part of the massive clean-up crews.

          New jobs created through “creative destruction” that fits right in with Obama’s greenie policies and greenie stimulus.

          Obama knows what the hell he’s doing.

          Don’t you, Mr. President?

          We need to go along to get along, even if it means wrecking the United States.

          • Scope

            exactly what he is doing.

            Lying in bed thinking this morning, the thought kept going through my mind that the O’s obvious detachment from the people in this country is alarming. He gives no clue that he is capable of even empathy. You have to be one evil person to know that you are destroying people’s lives, yet carry on with your destructive agenda. He seems to be very flat in his personality, yet comes alive with words like ass kicking when he plays his thug games. Look at his happy smiling shout-out to some Indian chief, before he even touched on the killing spree by the radical sicko in Texas.

            As to the Deepwater accident, I don’t believe that he even came out with any immediate statements on the deaths of the 11 that were killed in the explosion. Look at the hurricanes and tornados that have ripped through areas in the country, with not a word from the Evil Won.

            I just heard on my local(VA) radio that our Governor is now holding meetings to prepare for the possibility of oil contaminating our Atlantic shores.

            Oh yes, he is a man with a plan.

          • http://www.veronicaestrada.com/ Veronica

            those are great observations.

            last night, hubby and I were thinking along similar lines.

            I think that disconnect comes from his constant scheming and from”working” the crisis.

            When you’re BSing around, you have a hard time facing the people you’re trying to screw over.

            And I say BS as in .. he’s duplicitous.

            He plots for himself AND plans a nice presentation for the public.

            We get the BS.

            You can fool some of the people some of the time …

          • Flagstaff

            O?s obvious detachment from the people in this country is alarming. He gives no clue that he is capable of even empathy. You have to be one evil person to know that you are destroying people?s lives, yet carry on with your destructive agenda. He seems to be very flat in his personality, yet comes alive with words like ass kicking when he plays his thug games. Look at his happy smiling shout-out to some Indian chief, before he even touched on the killing spree by the radical sicko in Texas.

            In a political thriller, that would be a description of a later-to-be-revealed psychopath. It’s an uncannily accurate description, at least to my mind, and one that not many people are comfortable with saying out loud–yet.

            Maybe Obama is a message from God that it’s unhealthy for the country to allow the President to have power unrestricted by public skepticism or the Constitution.

          • Flagstaff

            I meant “sociopath,” not “psychopath.”

          • Flagstaff

            are on the same wavelength.

            She, too, is convinced that Obama is intentionally allowing the spill to grow far longer than necessary for the same reasons you give.

    • blooch

      has asked Obama to hold off mitigating the disaster so they can get their quota of pictures and plaintiffs. They’ve run the numbers,and they’re still not where they need to be to assure them of sufficient profit.

      “Meanwhile, the trial lawyers’ lobby is on the hunt for tales of fishermen and families left destitute by the spill. ‘Unfortunately, whenever you have a disaster of this magnitude, it refocuses attention to the problem with the underlying law,’ said Susan Steinman, policy director for the American Association for Justice, the trial lawyers’ lobby. She said her group has ‘had a host of meetings with a lot of different offices’ on Capitol Hill.”

      http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202459020950&Companies_in_Gulf_Spill_Tap_Washington_Help

      Nah, that’s just crazy talk. Barry has no doubt told them that, “At some point you’re making too much money, fellas. Go with the clients you’ve got now, because I’m turning off the spigot real soon.”

  • aesthete

    Sequential problem solving, i.e., I’ll try Plan A first, then if that doesn’t work, I’ll try Plan B, and so on, is usually a sign of bad management, and is the one most on display in the BP oil debacle. Why? Because if Plan A doesn’t work/gets held up, it means that a whole lot of resources and time have just gone down the tubes. I can’t tell you the number of times that opportunity

    Living in a world with imperfect information means that problem solving for imminent problems and threats should be redundant, i.e., while you are trying Plan A, you should go forward with Plans B, C, and maybe D to make sure that the problem is resolved in a satisfactory and timely manner. That way, you can stop Plans A and B when they’re 20% done and Plan C has proved to be the functional plan, instead of spending resources on enacting and waiting for Plans A and B to be 100% done, and then going ahead with Plan C (the successful plan). As Ben Franklin put it, “Diligence is the mother of good luck.”

    • Flagstaff

      It’s interesting to me that Obama refuses to apply simultaneous problem solving to this disaster, where it is eminently applicable, yet he insists on a simultaneous (comprehensive) approach to the illegal immigration problem, where it’s entirely inappropriate.

      In the oil case, he is acting out of ignorance; in the immigration case, he’s acting out of ideology. In both cases, he’s wrong.

  • aesthete

    Sequential problem solving, i.e., I’ll try Plan A first, then if that doesn’t work, I’ll try Plan B, and so on, is usually a sign of bad management, and is the one most on display in the BP oil debacle. Why? Because if Plan A doesn’t work/gets held up, it means that a whole lot of resources and time have just gone down the tubes.

    Living in a world with imperfect information means that problem solving for imminent problems and threats should be redundant, i.e., while you are trying Plan A, you should go forward with Plans B, C, and maybe D to make sure that the problem is resolved in a satisfactory and timely manner. That way, you can stop Plans A and B when they’re 20% done and Plan C has proved to be the functional plan, instead of spending resources on enacting and waiting for Plans A and B to be 100% done, and then going ahead with Plan C (the successful plan). As Ben Franklin put it, “Diligence is the mother of good luck.”

  • Pingback: Google

  • Pingback: Click Here

  • Pingback: uk casino sites

  • Pingback: free casino bets

  • Pingback: seattle auto service

  • Pingback: click here

  • Pingback: Seattle garage door repair