« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Zelaya to return to power

The United States delegation to the ongoing crisis in Honduras has negotiated an agreement between Manuel Zelaya’s supporters and the de facto administration in that country. All that remains is for the nation’s Congress to approve the deal.

Never mind the fact that the United States is on the wrong side of the issue; that we have essentially forced the legal government of that nation to accept its Constitutionally ousted former leader.

[Interim President Roberto] Micheletti later joked with his aides that [United States Secretary of State Hillary Clinton] stuck so close to her message it appeared she had a limited vocabulary. “I kept trying to explain our position to her,” he said, according to officials close to the talks, “but all she kept saying was, ‘Restitution, restitution, restitution.’”

Speaking on Friday in Pakistan, Mrs. Clinton called the deal a “historic agreement.”

“I cannot think of another example of a country in Latin America that, having suffered a rupture of its democratic and constitutional order, overcame such a crisis through negotiation and dialogue,” she said.

I cannot think of another example in history where a nation was so blatantly forced to violate its own Constitution and surrender its sovereignty by a nation that holds up its own Constitution so highly as ours as an example for others to follow.

Yes, we’ve supported tin-horn dictators. We gave aid to the Shah and Saddam. We supported the Bay of Pigs invasion. All true and depending on your viewpoint of history, some or all were bad decisions; never have we looked at a friendly nation–an ally–and said, “We don’t like the fact that you have held true to your Constitution, so we’re going to join with your enemies and force you to violate it.”

The principle fact in evidence is that Zelaya violated his nation’s Constitution. He did so above the lawful objections of Honduras’ Congress, Supreme Court, military leadership and his own Attorney General. He violated every rule for holding referendums and elections his nation has, and yet the government of the United States stands with a would-be dictator.

Perhaps this is a look inside the mind of President Obama. After all, the Constitution of the United States clearly gives him no authority to take-over General Motors or Chrysler; nor does he have the legal authority appoint a “Pay Czar” who can “claw-back” the contractual salaries of private companies. Yet he has done so. Could it be he stands with Zelaya, not because he believes that Honduras violated its own laws and Constitution, but rather because he cares for neither? Could it be that he cannot oppose Zelaya because he sees himself as entitled to the same kind of power to thwart the Supreme Law of the Land? That opposing Zelaya would call into question his own quest to grab more power for himself?

I cannot see into the man’s heart, so I am only posing these questions for critical evaluation. Perhaps I’m overreacting and there are other reasons why our President would so openly support a power-seeking would-be dictator. Ignorance and stupidity are all that come to mind, but there may be something more legitimate. Whatever the Administration’s reasons, I believe them to be wrong. How would the people of this nation have reacted if Nixon had decided to hold on to power after being impeached instead of resigning in disgrace before the vote? What would have been our response if the Soviet Union or United Nations had refused to recognize our government after such an impeachment?

The salient question now is what is Zelaya’s future? Will Honduras’ Congress approve the agreement? If not, what will happen to the newly and Constitutionally elected government without international recognition? Will there be a peaceful transition to the newly elected government if Zelaya is returned? Will there be assassination attempts either way?

All these questions are posed for one simple and unassailable reason: The United States government stood for the violation of a nation’s Constitution and against the rule of law.

Originally posted at The Minority Report.

COMMENTS

  • scarlos

    I mean, doesn’t this sort of make the whole point moot now that the election for president is about to happen?

    Even so, the fact that we’ve strong-armed a Leftist dictator back into power is going to be a black mark on our nation for years to come.

  • kowalski

    What a disaster for Honduras if this happens. This Administration hasn’t lifted a finger (and neither have any of its people feeding the U.S. media) to keep Zelaya out of power, which is where he should be.

    It’s sickening to watch this, but you knew it was going to happen. Barack likes those Lefties. He gets along with them real well.

    • http://impudent.blognation.us/blog kyle8

      Go ahead and agree to anything the rest of the world wants, Then when Zelaya steps off the plane spray him and his whole party with machine gun fire.

      Then claim it was an accident “Well It went off in me hand didn’t it?” Sure, no one will believe you, sure you will face the opprobrium and ire and maybe sanctions form the rest of the world, (for a while).

      But that is a small price to pay to keep your liberty.

      • E Pluribus Unum

        “Oops. Did I do that?”

  • kowalski

    Let’s remember that waaaaay back on the 27th of this October the nephew of the de facto leader of Honduras was found murdered. Chinese news has a good photo of the body.

    The nephew of de facto Honduran President Roberto Micheletti had been shot and killed in the north of the country, police reported Monday.

    Enzo Micheletti was the son of Ivan Micheletti, the brother of the de facto leader.

    Evidently Zelaya’s telephone calls from the Brazilian embassy finally found their mark. And today we see this:

    Roberto Micheletti, the leader of Honduras

  • http://andrightlyso.com/ civil_truth

    What is clear is that the U.S. has pushed to restore Zelaya, moving even to the left of some of the Latin American states.

    The agreement is ambiguous regarding the Congressional vote, but a normal reading would indicate that Congress has a choice. Zelaya, however, threatens to repudiate the agreement if Congress doesn’t vote to restore him, which would move the crisis to a new plane because Latin American countries, even those with leftist sympathies, don’t like the U.S. strong-arming the situation.

    Unclear whether the nephew’s death was politically connected or not, though the timing is suspicious. Other reports indicate that the U.S. twised Zelaya’s arm to sign the agreement too.

    The elections are scheduled for Nov 29 – lots of time for sabotage regardless of whether Zelaya is or is not restored to power. The agreement accepts the results of that election by all outside nations, but if Zelaya repudiates, who
    knows what will happen then.

    Lots of sub rosa activities and agendas to complement the ambiguities of the agreement.

    Bottom line question in terms of the U.S. – is Hillary and crew looking for a graceful way out a this point, leaving matters in the hands of the OAS and Honduras, or is our government determined to install a left-wing dictatorship in Honduras, given their political sympathies dating from the 70s.

    • kowalski

      The Obama Administration had many, many chances to say something supportive for Honduras in the past few months and say anything — anything! — negative about Zelaya that might have signaled the U.S. was going to defend the Honduran government.

      As far as I can tell they did nothing substantive until two days ago, tipping the balance in favor of Zelaya returning.

      I don’t think they’re determined to install anything, I think they’re letting Honduras’ friends in the form of Lula and Chavez do the (re)installing.

      • kowalski

        On behalf of the American People, tonight I think we should all apologize to the people of Honduras, who are witnessing the reinstallation of a leftist dictator by the hands of his leftist friends because the United States of America simply refised to give even the most modest support to the lawful government that ousted him.

        I hope they realize that not every American supported the election of this President and not every American supports the current Secretary of State in her official duties calling for “restitution, restitution, restitution.”

        What can be said to people whose hopes for freedom have been so thoroughly dispatched by an American administration who refused to lift a finger to help them?

        This entire country should hang its collective head in shame. The President of the United States is about to sit on his hands while a Communist is reinstalled as a dictator in Honduras.

      • Common_Cents

        was I am the only thing between you and pitchforks. He likes that line.

  • redneck_hippie

    What I do not see: a more humble foreign policy.

  • E Pluribus Unum

    Impeachment papers ought to start being drawn up, oh, say, January 3, 2011.

    It won’t pass the Senate, but the House can force a trial. And we’ll have about a 250-195 majority.