« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Climate change is a natural constant

It was about 13º Fahrenheit in Atlanta this morning at 8:00am, making it one of the coldest days in recent history.  The cold snap has lasted over a week already seems unlikely to stop until Tuesday or Wednesday.

While many conservative pundits have commented that this weather is “proof” that the Global Warming™ alarmists’ claims are false, the vast majority do it tongue-in-cheek.  As the “Warmers” are so keen to remind us, local weather patterns are not indicators of Climate Change™–or lack thereof.

This mocking behavior, of course, counters the statements made by Global Warming™ alarmists after disasters like the Indian Ocean Tsunami and Hurricane Katrina that Global Warming™ was a contributing factor to the scale of these and future events.  Give it time, and someone will claim that Climate Change™ is, in fact, the cause of this cold weather.

The reality, of course, is that the Earth’s temperature has in general been gradually rising for the last 12,000 years, since the end of the last ice age.  The planet’s temperature has fluctuated drastically throughout its 4.5 billion year history, most of that without the influence of human beings.  In fact, the earth has both baked to nearly complete dessication and frozen over entirely at least once each.

It is somewhat notable that conservatives, who are generally conflated with bible-literalists (those who believe the Earth is just 6,000 years old, called Creationists™) by the Left are the people who are taking the long-term view of Earth’s climate; while liberals, who are always associated with the Scientific Community™ in the media, take the short-term, human-scale view.  That short-term view being that 150 years of climate trend indicate human beings are the evil behind Global Warming™, not natural processes; and that even though the planet was warmer 2,000 years ago than it is today, any more warming today poses dire consequences for the whole planet.

Earth’s climate has changed drastically during its existence.  Just 12,000 years ago, the polar ice caps extended as far south as New York City in the north and as far north as Sydney, Australia in the south.  During the Roman Climate Optimum, roughly 200 BCE to 400 CE, the planet’s temperature was warmer than today followed by the somewhat colder Dark Ages, and moderate fluctuations have persisted through all of recorded history.

So while this cold snap is by no means “proof” that Global Warming™ or Climate Change™ is not happening, neither are the localized and temporary events indicated by the alarmists proof that it is.  The real issue of climate is that we as human beings really don’t have enough information to make any conclusions about the future of climate.  Even though the climate has been cooling for the past eight years and the Climate Research Unit’s IPCC data has been called into serious doubt, liberals want us to send billions of dollars to Poor Nations™ to help them “deal” with famine, rising sea levels and other effects of Global Warming™.  That the billions of dollars in aid already spent on Poor Nations™ has done nothing to help them develop is not an issue.  We’re talking about evil Imperialist Western Nations™ paying their Fair Share™ here!

Whether claiming an imminent ice age in the 1970s or planetary dessication in the 1990s, and numerous iterations in the decades before, climate science has always been tainted by individual and group agendas.  The difference now is that world governments appear keen to try to Do Something™ about it.  Until and unless double-blind scientific study can be done, no one can claim to have any idea in what shape is our planet’s climate.  To simply Do Something™ that could have drastic effects on the world’s economy and eliminate many individual freedoms without real, unbiased proof is anathema to reason.  Before spending hundreds of billions of dollars to help Poor Nations™ and forcing businesses to add billions of dollars in costs to be Green™, perhaps it is time to ask our scientists what really is going on with our climate.

Author’s Note: I have used the trademark sign (“™”) to indicate traditional liberal or alarmist talking points, ideas or terminology.

COMMENTS

  • vrwcnut

    the ability for a disinterested party to examine the data used, repeat the experiment or study under controlled conditions and arrive at the same or a similar conclusion.

    Climate Change theorists know full-well there are too many variables in the equation for this to be done with regards to the global average temperature. This is not about science; it’s about control and $.

    We can ask our scientists (who btw seem to be as corrupt as our politicians) to try to further study the global ecosystem but to what effect?

    We weren’t here when this whole thing started, can’t reproduce those conditions and can’t know what events have intervened since.

    From a human perspective, the science will never be “settled”.

  • Vladimir

    Geology is the one science that has an appreciation for historical time scales and cataclysmic change of global scope.

    I have 15 hours of so of college geology & have spent my 31 year professional career in the practical application of that science. I currently work with 5 geoscientists (minimum Master’s degree in terms of education background) and they all think global warming is a hoax.

    It’s interesting that you speak of Creationists — I would call the 6,000 year-old earth variety “Young Earth Creationists”. As an oil and gas company exploring the Gulf of Mexico, we (and dozens of other companies) bet millions of dollars a year betting that the “Single Global Flood Event” model is wrong.

    That’s because the observable geology in the Gulf of Mexico demonstrates dozens of sea level cycles just over the past several million years. Each of these cycles has a name and particular microfauna (fossil foraminifera) that are associated with each one.

    These cycles were what made the generation and accumulation of oil and gas possible, and distributed various “trends” geographically in relation to the paleo-environment that existed at the time of deposition.

    It is known, for example, that in the last Ice Age, sea level was something like 100 ft lower than present. Water bottom surveys have indicated signs of inhabited barrier islands (like present day Padre Island), that are now in 85-100 feet of water. Uncle Sam requires anthropological studies in certain areas to make sure that these things aren’t disturbed by oil & gas development.

    Sorry to go on & on. This never-ending quest for ManBearPig needs to end. It just burns me up.

    • penguin2

      My belief, not much one can do about it either way-cooling or warming. Nature is the controlling factor, not man. I do believe we can be good stewards of the earth and its’ resources. What burns me up; the Left being able to trash and taint us with the label that we “want to” destroy the environment. That is absurd, but they have gotten away with pushing the idea that Republicans are anti-environment.
      I don’t understand the extremists that are so intent on “saving” the earth at the expense of improving the life of man and saving people.

      Loved geology in college. Took that first in college, before biology.

      • http://hillbillypolitics.com Steph C

        That is the problem, isn’t it? Who decides what is or isn’t good stewardship?

        For example, wasn’t it the global warming crowd aka liberals attending Obama’s swearing in that trashed the mall? Yet, weren’t they the first to pick on the tea party protesters who didn’t?

  • dbitz

    As I understand it, climate scientists are/have been predicting that global warming may cause hurricanes to be more intense…

    http://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/global-warming-and-hurricanes

    This would be because the temperature of the oceans is rising, and hurricanes need warm ocean water to exist. That is a global warming/climate change issue…rising ocean temperatures make stronger hurricanes.

    • http://seekingliberty.wordpress.com Fred Maidment

      …is that the scientists have yet to scientifically link human activity to Global Warming. Sure, they’ve got computer models that work for {this thirty year period}, but when the models are tested against other known time periods or are tracked beyond their original programming date, they fail, miserably.

      Yes, warmer ocean temperatures are linked to stronger hurricanes. But human CO2 emissions are not.

  • Flagstaff

    Sorry I was late, but it reads just as well today.

    To simply Do Something