« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Yes, Democrats, please make this election about jobs

Democrats are planning to push “Job Creation” this election season.

Yeah, we’ve heard that one before. Right before the massive, do-nothing stimulus package was passed. The same stimulus package that now has to be paid for–with job-killing tax hikes.

Yet Democrats are poised to make this election about jobs:

A retooled jobs initiative, which Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer (Md.) on Tuesday dubbed the “Make It in America” agenda, will be front and center for Democrats hoping to have something positive to take home during the August break.

With the unemployment rate hovering near 10 percent and the bulk of the House Democratic agenda stalled in the Senate, rank-and-file Members have been clamoring for leadership to refocus their attention on jobs. Lawmakers want to be able to demonstrate that they are working to aid the manufacturing sector and keep American jobs from being shipped overseas.

Here’s a news flash for the Democrats: It doesn’t matter how many incentives you provide. As long as you keep raising taxes, companies are going to ship jobs overseas.

The inescapable fact is that companies are in the business to make money. They make money by selling products for more money than it costs to make them. Taxes are a cost. Increasing taxes increases costs. So corporations that can afford to do so will invest in places where taxes (and hence, costs) are lower.

The Democrats seem to believe in a fantasy world where the cost of labor, taxes and regulatory compliance continue to increase, but companies make more money.

Sure, there are 305 million people in the United States. As the nations go, we’re educated, productive and affluent. Somebody will have to provide the goods and services Americans need. Raise taxes and increase costs like mandating health insurance and creating excessive regulatory paperwork and more and more of those goods will be coming from overseas instead of the United States.

The Democrats are offering a pittance of incentives to encourage businesses to keep jobs in America, but those incentives pale in comparisson to the increased cost of taxes to pay for all those incentives, and those taxes will invariably affect small businesses, large corporations and yes, individual wage earners.

So the political class in Washington has a choice: They can continue to spend greater and greater sums of money from the Treasury, requiring more borrowing and tax increases that stifle economic growth and job creation, or they can end the self-destructive slide into fiscal oblivion by reducing spending, slashing deficits and cutting taxes.

Democrats can try to sell themselves as job creators, but the past 18 months have educated America to the truth: Centralized government direction is not an effective tool at stimulating economic growth and creating jobs. Only the power of the free market, unleashed and unfettered by punishing taxes and regulation, can do that.

COMMENTS

  • http://www.laborunionreport.combrand/brhttp://www.laborunionreport.blogspot.com LaborUnionReport

    A: The amount of money companies are sitting on, according to the Fed. Why? Because they are RISK AVERSE

    But don’t get me started.

    • nessa

      They inject gov’t into business by collecting ever increasing taxes, business tightens their belts, the gov’t tries to stimulate business with the only tool they know, throwing money at it. Then they threaten still more taxes to pay for the money they threw at business, and the businesses are sitting on the money they need to grow the entire time. Sounds to me like the whole problem would be solved if the gov’t got out of the business business. But what do I know, I’m just an unemployed racist. Not that racist is my career, I’m not in the Obama Administration, NAACP or the NBPP, it’s just a brush I’m painted with.

  • redneck_hippie

    The Ds do have a problem, though.

    In reality the Dems can not talk about jobs because the public is wise to the scam. Their real problem is that their one and only issue has been race for the last 18 months, and now that both the Holder / New Black Panther fiasco and the Sharrod fiasco have happened, they don’t even have that to talk about.

    I predict they will revert to their tried and true strategy of giveaways, right along with the Big Lie (that it is deficit neutral).

  • jcincy

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704684604575381534154934568.html?mod=WSJ_business_whatsNews

    It is a sad era when China is consistently more favorable to business growth and expansion than USA.

  • David123
    • http://seekingliberty.wordpress.com fmaidment

      I’m talking about real job creation, not government work programs.

      Granted, I’m not against the fence, just against calling it a “jobs program”.

  • vettepilot

    I think that the regulation is every bit as important as the taxes are. The taxes absolutely cut into earnings and reduce the operating capital that businesses have available, but the regulations can prevent business from ever even forming. Think of it this way; who is better equipped to handle assessing how a 2000 page bill is going to impact their business, a sole proprietorship or small business with 10 employees (none of them attorneys), or a large corporation with on-staff and retained counsel in addition to access to major consulting firms? If I’m interested in opening up my own business, where in the world do I even start? Am I going to get fined, or Heaven forbid hauled off to jail, because I didn’t fill out some form?

    Don’t get me wrong, I believe that the taxes are absolutely the primary driver behind US corporations sending jobs off-shore. But I think it’s the regulatory environment that’s turning the US into a corporatocracy run by the elite and politically connected…