Rick Perry can’t be President, he might upset the fringe Left!
By: Frederick (Diary) | August 8th at 06:00 PM |
Seems the Lamestream Media is scared stiff that Texas Governor Rick Perry may run for President. Jennifer Rubin (the “conservative” blogger at the Washington Post) initially writes a piece rightfully decrying the New York Times Op-Ed about Perry speaking at the Prayer Response Event last week, then had an unfortunate piece criticizing Perry for not being inclusive: In his comments at the event, Perry specifically | Read More »
An Open Letter: Gun control and the belligerent New York Times
By: Frederick (Diary) | November 26th at 05:35 PM |
Dear New York Times Editors, After reading your editorial about the NRA’s push to overturn handgun age restrictions for citizens 18-20 years old, I can only surmize that no one in your editorial staff has ever read, nor would ever care to read, the Constitution of the United States. Nowhere in that foundational document does it state that one’s rights activate on one’s 21st birthday. | Read More »
No MRIs, but there were doctors
By: Frederick (Diary) | March 25th at 12:00 AM |
Hullabaloo, a Liberal blog, posted a little gem: ”There were no MRIs in 1780.” Ignoring the fact that the United States had not yet forced Cornwallis’ surrender at Yorktown in 1780 (and hence, no Articles of Confederation, let alone a Constitution, had been ratified), the line of reasoning by the author is sophomoric at best and intellectually dishonest at worst. Nowhere in the constitution does | Read More »
Tags:
1780,
citizen,
constitution,
federal power,
government,
health care,
hullabaloo,
MRI,
personal health,
power,
specious,
straw man,
stupidity
The Non Sequiturs Continue
By: Frederick (Diary) | June 5th at 07:49 PM |
I have been waiting and wating for this one. When I wrote my diary, The Constitutional Non Sequitur, I purposely left one out. That was because the US Court of Appeals in Chicago was hearing arguments on that non sequitur. Immediately following the landmark District of Columbia v. Heller case, in which the Second Amendment was recognized as a right retained by individuals, the NRA | Read More »
The Constitutional Non Sequitur
By: Frederick (Diary) | May 3rd at 06:30 PM |
Author’s note: When using the term “liberal” or any derivative thereof, it is a reference to modern colloquialism, not to the traditional definition of “liberal,” which is in fact what we now call “conservative.” – – – In law, they use Latin quite a bit. We recognize some of them easily: pro bono, en loco parentis, per se, and non sequitur among them. It is | Read More »
28th Amendment (proposed)
By: Frederick (Diary) | January 9th at 05:56 PM |
“No person or entity shall be relieved of property or possessions to favor the property or possessions of another person, entity or government without just compensation provided, except for those activities which are specifically listed as responsibilities of government in the Constitution of the United States, or of the State in which that property is possessed.”