« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Ten for the Road, Part 2: Which Republican Leaders Are Making an Impact?

I continue to enjoy Chris Cillizza’s interesting top 10 list of most influential in the Republican Party. While the world, needless to say, is not waiting for my utterances on the same topic, I can’t resist taking a crack at it.

My list has slightly different criteria than my previous list and focuses on the near term for the top five and then the longer term for the next five. The reason is this: President Obama is pressing two legislative initiatives that are the most dangerous, costly, and ineffective as anything seen in recent history – an overhaul of the health care system and a cap-and-trade bill. Despite President Obama’s eloquence, the public seems to get it, and public opinion is turning against these policies. If they can be defeated in their present form in Congress, it will represent a victory for mainstream America, mark the end of the Obama honeymoon, and launch the resurgence of the Republican Party.

Here is my list of the top 10 players making an impact for our party:

  1. Mitch McConnell - He has the task of holding together the forty Republican Senators, no small task. If he remains successful with this charge, it is extremely unlikely the health care or cap-and-trade bills will be enacted.
  2. John Boehner – He has a simple task in the House and so far has been enormously effective in binding the GOP together, not by partisan political force, but by sensible articulations and unity around a set of policy beliefs, and just enough comedic timing to keep things light. He is serious, but not self-serious.
  3. Doug Elmendorf – True, he’s not a Republican but the head of a Congressional Budget Office, appointed by Democrat leadership. Thank goodness he is a man of character and courage, for it is he who put a dagger in the health care plan with an accurate assessment of its true costs and deficit impact. This confirmed what Republican leaders have been saying and gave encouragement to the Blue Dog Democrats who have been highly skeptical.
  4. Bob McDonnell
  5. and Chris Christie – We have two statewide elections in a little more than three months. McDonnell is the best candidate Virginia has had in a generation and leads his opponent by 3-5 points. He is on the right side of the issues on health care, energy, and deficit spending. He will win. Christie is an outstanding candidate and leads Corzine by some twelve points currently. The same fears about taxing and spending that dominate the national scene have run Corzines’s approval in the ground, based on New Jersey’s spending and huge deficits. Both McDonnell and Christie are on the path to victory, aided in part by increasing public skepticism of President Obama’s programs and the enormous deficits and mounting debt that results. Now, one could ask: Are defeats of the health care and cap-and-trade bills combined with victories on both Virginia and New Jersey the equivalent of a straight flush for Republicans? I believe the two are related and have a fairly good probability. If so, the Republican resurgence will not only have begun but be in full swing, just as was experienced in 1993 with the victories of George Allen in Virginia and Christie Todd Whitman in New Jersey.
  6. Mitt Romney – Now I turn to the future. Romney continues to do all the right things campaigning for Republican candidates and raising large amounts for candidates and his own well run PAC. If the current recession continues, President Obama will have to assume responsibility – he may start by looking at his poorly-designed “stimulus” plan – then perhaps nobody will be better positioned than Mitt. His leadership experience and ability were not quite enough to overcome doubts in 2008, but now that he has shown he can run as confident a campaign as the current president’s, he will definitely get a strong second look as the 2012 race takes shape.
  7. Tim Pawlenty – Pawlenty is positioned to take on a leadership role among Republican Governors, is receiving top marks on his appearances around the country, and will soon be regarded as a top contender for 2012. He is showing bold leadership, even after announcing he will not run for re-election, with his promise to close Minnesota’s $2.7 billion deficit without resorting to tax increases. This means he is taking an axe to the state’s budget himself above the predictable objections of the Minnesota DFL. Too few Republicans these days are pro-active about fiscal conservatism, and those in Congress especially should pay attention.
  8. Haley Barbour – He is undoubtly the best political strategist in the Republican Party and is just as strong on policy. He will be a dynamic force as Chair of the Republican Governor’s Association and will be enormously helpful to both McDonnell and Christie. Will he or won’t he in 2012 is a guessing game we’ll be playing well into the cycle.
  9. Charlie CristMark Kirk, and hopefully Mike Castle – And other moderate candidates. My fellow conservatives may not like this one, but hear me out: Unless our party can embrace a big tent policy that welcomes moderates like my friend Colin Powell, we will not win elections. In liberal-dominated Illinois, Delaware and increasingly purple Florida, we need to be open to supporting officials who can win and will support our issues most of the time, instead of electing more Democrats who will oppose us nearly all of the time. These three plus our great conservative candidates in states like New Hampshire, Ohio, and Missouri give me great hope that we can remain a party in which conservatives and moderates can not only coexist, but flourish.
  10. Paul Ryan – As ranking minority on the House Budget Committee, his voice will continue to be heard and become more influential. And it is a clear and compelling voice. I believe Ryan could become Governor of Wisconsin if he chose to run, but he is that unusual politician who is not consumed by ambition but devoted to his constituents and his pivotal role to Congress. Stay tuned- this is a man to watch.

I have omitted my friend, Sarah Palin, as there is no clarity on her future plans. Also absent are strong and influential leaders like Eric Cantor, John McCain, and John Cornyn. We should continue to watch them, and also let’s be alert for the next step of others not now in the spotlight like Bobby Jindal and Norm Coleman. All are fine Republicans with much to bring to the table, even if not in a national campaign (or not yet). I am always keeping my ear to the ground, so please suggest others in the comments.

COMMENTS

  • redtillimdead

    Charlie Crist, Mark Kirk, and hopefully Mike Castle – And other moderate candidates. My fellow conservatives may not like this one, but hear me out: Unless our party can embrace a big tent policy that welcomes moderates like my friend Colin Powell, we will not win elections. In liberal-dominated Illinois, Delaware and increasingly purple Florida, we need to be open to supporting officials who can win and will support our issues most of the time, instead of electing more Democrats who will oppose us nearly all of the time. These three plus our great conservative candidates in states like New Hampshire, Ohio, and Missouri give me great hope that we can remain a party in which conservatives and moderates can not only coexist, but flourish.
    Finally, someone else on this site understands! Would you rather have 61 people who agree with you 80% of the time, or 39 people who agree with you 100% of the time?!?!?

    • http://andrightlyso.com/ civil_truth

      Whatever the merits regarding other Republican “moderate” there’s no way that a party an accept someone like Colin Powell who 1) supported Obama against the most “moderate” of the Republicans who ran for President; and 2) wants to expel most of the party base to accomodate him; 3) takes a “my way or the highway” approach to defining the Republican Party; and 4) is clearly more comfortable with Democrat policies over Republican policies

      At some point, there’s something called party loyalty that comes to play rather than taking your ball and going home when things don’t go completely your way (and complaining about how you don’t want half the folks there to play on your team because you’re embarrassed to be seen with them).

      As to the rest of your argument, I’m fine with moderates running in primaries, and we’ll let the voters decide who will represent the party in the general election. However,

      1) I do not like the national organizations like NRSC taking sides and throwing money at one of the candidates. They need to keep out of active participation; and more importantly

      2) I expect that all the Republicans will unite behind the primary winners, and especially that moderates will do so rather than complain the press about extremist Republicans hijacking the party, etc. – which is disrespectful to the voters.

      If you’re going to call yourself a Republican, you need to stay in if the primary votes don’t go your way, support the ticket, and try again next time around.

      Instead, the track record is that the moderate are more interested in proving that a conservative can’t win a general election as a lever to try to push more “moderate” than in actually supporting the candidate.

      This gives rise to the suspicion that moderates view conservative as a greater enemies than Democrats. This is not exactly a “big tent” attitude but rather a not-so-hidden agenda to effectively disenfranchise a substantial portion of the American people.

      • JadedByPolitics
      • eburke

        It strikes me as beyond ironic (perhaps ‘disingenuous) to listen to a large swath of the ‘moderate’ and ‘liberal’ wings of the GOP bray unceasingly about wanting to be a ‘big tent’ party, who then proceed to take their ball and go home when a conservative wins a primary over a liberal.

        Time and time again they have not only refused to support the nominee but then undercut the GOP by running a 3rd party candidate (think Ollie North in VA) or, more often, by wailing about it to the MSM. Your statement that the track record is that moderates view conservatives as greater enemies than the Democrats is dead on.

        The hypocrisy kills me.

      • janis

        And then when they have managed to thoroughly denigrate and chastise the conservatives, they go on to yell at us about how a third party won’t cut it and we’re crazy to even think about it.

        I don’t want a third party either, but at some point you are inclined to quit working for your own defeat at the hands of those who say they are with you and need your vote.

      • David123

        chose a member of the American Communist party as his mentor.

        developed a friendship with a convicted terrorist and her husband, who was not convicted of terrorism due to a technicality, but who bragged about his terrorist activities. This terrorist friend also stood on an American flag and displayed symbols from Communist Cuba in an adoring manner

        chose a man for a pastor and spiritual mentor who cursed the United States. This pastor also said highly insulting things about Presidents Roosevelt, Clinton, and Bush [and possibly other presidents as well].

        General Powell, if you knew of such a soldier, would you be worried about his loyalty to the United States? Would you be concerned if this soldier had a security clearance? Would you want a more thorough investigation done on this soldier before you let him see any secret information?

        What if this person wasn’t just a regular soldier, but was Commander in Chief of the whole armed forces?

        Don’t you think that maybe, just maybe, a career military man who proved his heroism and loyalty to America and his fellow warriors in combat and in years of brutal captivity just might make a better Commander in Chief than someone with all those questionable associations?

    • eburke

      yet again.

      This meme is getting as old and tiresome as the ‘racist Republican’ garbage the Dems throw around.

      So…not that it’ll matter ’cause obviously you would rather spout the canard than deal in facts and reality, but for the couple of thousandths time, the number of conservatives who are looking for that elusive 100% are few and far between. You guys always trot out the 80% line of RR. FTR, those of like-mind would be *thrilled* is some of these turkeys were *with* us 80% of the time.

      So..name the last time Arlen Specter, Linc Chafee, Snowe, Collins, Kirk, Castle, et al came anywhere close to a 80% ACU rating (or any other conservative benchmark). So can the ‘purity’ garbage. To not stand with the Party after gladly accepting their money and support on pieces of legislation which strike at the very *soul* of the Republican Party such as Crap and Tax and Porkulus is beyond the pale. When you kiss Obama’s butt on something like the Porkulus Package (that would be Charlie Crist) don’t wonder why you catch grief from the footsoldiers of the Party you want to represent.

      So in a word (or nine): can the ‘with us 80% of the time’ garbage. It’s old and it’s tiresome.

      • reddog53

        I agree that the 80% thing is abused beyond recognition, and just as ebuike says, would welcome the likes of Snowe, Specter (not any more!) and Crist to be with us at least 80% of the time…but they lag well below that.

        The idea is to pull people toward our ideas and convince them we’re at least 90% right–not let them water down the basic core principles down as too hard or ‘not inclusive enough.’

        We are being offered opportunities every day as this administration’s over-reach and deafness to the ideas of others plods along.
        Everyone knows basic truths– you can’t spend your way out of bankruptcy, and it’s not reasonable to expect everyone else to pay your way.

        Our job is to cut through the verbal fog the Democrats produce and show everyone a more effective way. We can do this, and we must.

  • JadedByPolitics

    The guy all but litterally kissed Obama’s butt down in Florida for the 787 billion dollar debacle and this makes him a Republican Party leader?

    Romney? really? why?

    His statewide “universal healthcare” is the what Conservatives use to MOCK Obama’s…it will take a BILLION dollars this year to cover it and the state DOESN’T have the money so they are going to RAISE Taxes.

    I think perhaps you should divide your people into Conservative’s and GOP…WE Conservatives, you know the base are SICK of people like Crist and Romney as they are the epitome of Vichy Republicans or Rockefeller Republicans. I think the “party” is not recognizing the ANGER in America the ANGER that is building into a political movement you know the TEA party movement. If the GOP cannot grasp ahold of that ANGER they will forever be in the wilderness. The only way they can grasp it and move it forward is to recognize that AMERICANS ARE CONSERVATIVE.

    There will be no winning for elite GOP’er’s in Conservative states. Crist may have the NRSC but Rubio has the GRASSROOTS and in the voting booth the GRASSROOTS win every time! you see the NRSC has the money but they don’t have the VOTE’s and if Republican’s choose not to recognize the tide turning in 2010 then they shall stupidily be crying in their wine spritzers the day after!

  • eburke

    for Obama and went out of his way to diss the GOP (especially when one of Powell’s prized “moderates” won the GOP nod) is not, and can never again claim to be a moderate.

    Sorry!

  • pilgrim

    I hope that you will be able to edit number nine on your list so that it will include Marco Rubio and Don Lowery. while they are not like Mike Castle, if they win Senate seats for the Rs in FL and IL then this will be a good thing.

    • IJB

      Crist, Kirk & Castle will get my support in a *primary* when Hell freezes over!

      I am quite comfortable with a party that *doesn’t* embrace these guys, thanks.

  • red_oakster

    Maybe Jon Kyl and John Bolton. If you need a moderate, I’ll take Rudy Giuliani over the Gergenesque Powell any day. But I’m with you on Paul Ryan.

    And finally Mr. Malek, who showed the most guts in the past year in taking on Obama’s radicalism? Vice President Cheney. Give some credit where it’s due

  • JadedByPolitics
  • http://andrightlyso.com/ civil_truth

    …perhaps you might want to look for some people with different ideas rather than just holding steady with the same crew than got you into your predicament.

    The rules have completely changed: the Democrat’s no longer follow the Constitution but rather follow Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals.

    The days of comity are gone the way of the horse and buggy; it’s a new era, called seeking the brass ring of permanent one-party rule.