« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Ensuring Representation

I’m sorry this may sound terrible, but I don’t mean it in that way at all.

Congresswoman Giffords cannot represent her constituents in her current state, and something needs to be done. It needs to be known how long before she can return to congress, if she even can return. If it isn’t able to within a few months she needs to resign, or be forced to. There needs to be a law protecting constituents, representation in congress. Forcing special elections after so long with out representation. I found it awful what Gov Patterson did in New York after Congressman Massa Resigned. The constituents were with out representation for almost 8 months, he was play political games and wasn’t looking out for 1/29 of his constituents. I think that 100 days is plenty of time for a special election.  In a case such as Congresswoman Giffords maybe we should have laws allowing a temporary seat filler, if she can return, if she cannot she needs to go because it is the right thing for voters. For any major tragedy (serve car accident, as in they are in a hospital for 6 months) or even major unexpected medical events (Cancer treatment), or anything that can hinder and elected official from doing their job. we need to have provision in place, to make sure we are represented. I would not have a problem if someone came out and said I can’t do my job for six months, fill my seat temporarily, then have rules regarding procedure for this.  Plus rules that would force a resignation of an elected official, without them resigning, after missing so many consecutive votes, or days not at there congressional office doing their job. To put it simply maybe we as constituents need a bill of rights.

COMMENTS

  • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

    I don’t have time to look it up, but generally it says that if a Rep is incapacitated for “X” (I think 90 but not sure) days there is either/both an appointment/special election.

    Jan Brewer talked about the law last week and said that she would support passing a new law removing the provisions for Giffords.

    I apologize for all the fuzzy stuff, I just don’t have time to look up specifics. If nobody’s dealt with it by later tonight, I’ll get to it.

  • Finrod

    What if a terrorist got lucky with a bomb and managed to kill 100 or more Representatives? How would Congress maintain continuity of government?

    There were some ideas kicked around for how to deal with this post-9/11 but IIRC nothing ever really got passed to handle cases like this. I think that was an opportunity missed that we may someday regret.

  • freemanja1991

    is an Arizona law? I’m talking about it be a rule for congress. So it will ensure that NY-29 doesn’t happen again. And the Provision for Giffords shouldn’t be lifted, it is unfortunate what happened but if she is unable to do her job here constituents will suffer. And without looking it up that X is up for debate and can and will be litigated.

  • freemanja1991

    I believe it took him a couple months to die, and it is said that life went on as normal. Simply shut down congress for a 100 days and let new members be seated.