« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Infanticide, the Good Samaritan, Obama and MSM strategy

Conservatives must not let "not infanticide" be the standard

Infanticide is defined as “the killing of an infant.” The law punishes same.

A Good Samaritan sees a human in distress and helps them. Not rising to the moral heights of same is not punished. Those that do rise to such heights are glorified.

Hence, America is glorified. We help the least of these when we don’t have to. But you can’t see it from Chicago’s South Side.

So let’s get down in the weeds of Presidential politics, and Obama’s opposition to the Born Alive Infants Protection Act, but first:


For Democrats, “its all about sex” and “not being a convicted felon” is the test for qualification for leadership.

Which brings me to one of my favorite subjects: How Republicans let the MSM steal issues from them by overreaching and letting the libs move the goalposts and defining the issue. William Bennett called this the Death of Moral Outrage and defining deviancy down.

Obama opposed a law that would have made it mandatory that a physician give life saving aid to a baby outside the womb that survived an attempted abortion.

Obama says that prior law required same.

For the sake of argument, let’s assume that.

So, we are content to rely upon a law that would require an abortionist to save the life of a life that is living because he failed in his attempt to kill for pay.

We are supposed to rely upon the weight of the Hippocratic Oath upon a person who can be sued for malpractice in their failure to kill a baby, to risk further liability for negligence in saving the baby’s life he, seconds ago, tried to snuff out?

Obama is a dead presidential nominee man walking, much as McGovern, Carter ’80, Mondale, Dukakis, Gore and Kerry were, but we heard the din of the 20-year pew-parked butt months earlier than Come Home America, there he goes again, I’ll raise your taxes, I’ll let out convicted murderers, The world will end in 10 years, and International tests.

The least of these Obama.

Get ready to join them.

Fellow Redstaters, let’s not let the MSM define this issue as whether Obama favors Infanticide.

Let’s define the issue as the Good Samaritan.

Tags:
Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • Maggie_in_Indiana

    Suppose the baby is born alive,the abortionist tries to save the baby,but it dies.

    Does the mother have a case for malpractise for the live birth?
    Does the mother have a case to sue for wrongful death of the baby?
    What responsibility or how much ,if any, does the abortionist have to save a born alive baby he thinks is going to die within minutes after birth?

    See we know all life is sacred and abortion is murder,legal,but murder.What is the abortionist guilty of if the baby dies?

    I think these questions are some that Obama may have asked in the discussions before taking the floor for a vote,using the protection of Roe v wade as an excuse.

    What say you,Redstate?

  • gamecock

    a

  • Susannah

    Great job Gamecock!! Recommended. :-)

  • Rightmindedmom

    National Right to Life — Obama quoting Matthew “Whatever you do to the LEAST OF THESE, you do to me.” (Jesus)

    Then show a newborn baby. And say, “Isn’t this the ‘least of these’, Senator?”

    Disclaimer: Paid for by NRLC

  • bk

    Does the mother have a case for malpractise for the live birth?

    Does the mother have a case to sue for wrongful life of the baby?

  • Mary_Contrary

    Since many areas allow a newborn baby to be dropped off at the front door of a hospital…no questions asked…suppose these nurses had taken these live, aborted babies and run them around to the front door of the hospital? Then they would have been able to receive care.

    Some abortion centers welcome mothers to the front door…only to shoosh them out the back after they’ve collected the fee. What’s to be ashamed of?

    We know in our hearts that killing babies is dead wrong. Some still try to hide it deep down inside, but the shame gives it away.

    Abortion is a dark, shameful deed.

  • gamecock

    5

  • Mary_Contrary

    American Right To Life Unfurled World’s Largest Protest Sign: DNC Sheets Of Shame

    This huge sign was unfurled today — four miles of seams on over 2400 sheets– just outside the DNC Convention area.

    http://www.americanrighttolife.org/news/american-right-life-unfurled-worlds-largest-protest-sign-dnc-sheets-shame

  • chuckie

    …and that’s a lot….aside from his “God forbid we should infringe upon a mother’s right to kill her kid” argument, his main problem seemed to be…(paraphrasing-did not memorize)

    ….AND WHO’S GONNA BE PAYING FOR THIS LIFE-SAVING TREATMENT, ANYWAY??? AND IF IT SURVIVES, WHO’S GONNA TAKE CARE OF IT THEN???

    …another unnecessary burden on the poor taxpayers of illinois….

    the fact that he has lied about this vote for years, and has finally been forced to …sort of….admit that fact, should be headline news everywhere…

    maybe they’re saving it for the October Surprise, ya think?

    nahh……….

  • ewyatt

    However, I don’t think this sign has much life left in it — the DNC will surely find a way to “legally” dismantle it. They always do…