« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The Regulators

Central Planners as capricious, do-gooder, abusive spouses

Originally published By Mike DeVine, Legal Editor for The Minority and HinzSight Reports

[Friday, October 10 - UPDATE: Wachovia and Charlotte dodge Regulators' bullett as Wells Fargo wins Wachovia: Combined bank to rival giants BofA and Chase
Gamecock argues below that the Fed should not have been twisting arms behind closed doors, so we were especially interested in this quote:

In a statement Thursday evening, FDIC Chairwoman Sheila Bair said she supported the efforts of the Federal Reserve to resolve the situation and praised Citi for letting the deal go forward. "While some outstanding issues remain, this announcement brings much needed certainty to the process," she said.

Notice Bair's praise to Citibank for supposedly "letting" the deal go forward. The free sales and legal markets would have most certainly dictated that the WF-Wachovia deal go forward and that Citi's only remedy for breach of contract be a civil action for damages. The unspoken message is that the Fed, i.e. Big Brother (or, under Bair, Big Sister) "let", i.e. centrally planned, the deal go forward.

Thankfully, the blind squirrel stumbled upon the right nut this time.]

[Thursday, October 9 - : McCain mortgage plan UPDATE

The details of McCain's mortgage re-fi plan is significantly more limited in scope than was suggested by the vague language he used in the debate. Only borrowers who made down payments would qualify and other details of the requirements listed on his website also greatly limit the number of borrowers that would qualify.

The statement on the McCain Web site fills in some other details: It says the plan would buy mortgages directly from homeowners and mortgage servicers and replace them with "manageable, fixed-rate mortgages." That help would be available to mortgage holders who live in the home as a primary residence, who can prove they didn't fake their qualifications for the loan, and who provided a down payment. The statement also indicates McCain believes the purchases can be made quickly as a result of the authority given the Treasury Secretary in various pieces of legislation.

]

Panic abounds post-passage of the $700 Billion Paulson Panic Prevention Plan.

The hundreds of billions of Bear Stearns, Lehman, and AIG dollars allocated behind closed doors by the President’s Treasury Secretary on Sabbaths and Sundays pre-PPPP will soon be exceeded by the billions more for AIG and from Paulson prognosticated bank failures. The arteries of credit markets Henry sought to un-clog remain cluttered with bad cholesterol as “regulators” dared not allow Wells Fargoans and CitiBankians unclog their own arteries in a free market and legal markets for Wachovia.

The “regulators” said they feared how the market would “react” to such a free market spectacle. No, they prefer the bear-they made roar louder-market-chaos they have “regulated” everyday since President Bush signed the “see, we did something and so can go home and campaign and say so” “Rescue” f/k/a Bailout, Bill.

The view of the new world the regulators have created must look better in the smoke-free backrooms they decide the fate of the world within, than it does from the less congested high-gas price semi-deserted roads and streets in Charlotte, where Wachovians ponder why the new Gods couldn’t let Wells Fargo pay a higher price to their shareholders and let a judge decide Citi’s damages.

In the meantime, as many acolytes of Milton Adam Smith Freidmanites took solace that Big Brother would, at least, as specified in the final version of the PPPP, only seek to “minimize” foreclosures like any other mortgagee (lender), along comes a, now masked, John, Maverick Loan Arranger (kudos to WSJ’s James, Best of the Web, Taranto), McCain with a dusted off housing floor market seeking proposal from last April, that would have Central Planner Paulson allocate $300B of the $700B “in” the “peel the green off the Greenback” bill, to Housing Gamblers Anonymous (HGA). The latest science indicates recovery by HGAers can only be had in mortgaged homes.

Meanwhile, this Forgotten Man issues a reverse Marie Antoinette refrain:

LET THEM RENT!


They rented before they placed the bet on the two-story brick house on Wager Street. They can rent again, like many of us non-gamblers.

We were told that the purpose of the PPPP was to free up capital for NEW GOOD LOANS. That can happen for the new buyers of these homes after the gamblers move out and the price falls. There is no special remedial effect in new loans for particular bodies that can be made warm in a rented homes, much like the non-gamblers, that saved up a down payment over the past several years, who would buy up the semi-vacation from reality shells of the over-wagered.

Obama argues, and Paulson tacitly affirms, that, despite the negotiated “minimize” language, Daddy Treasury “has the power” already, to re-do all the mortgages they wish to re-do under current legal authority. Conservatives have long decried the, law unto themselves, five lawyers in robes that re-write Constitutions ratified by We The People. So, we thought, that, Gods and Oligarchs had to be appointed for life for such brazen raw power, but, after all, the Regulators are “only” re-writing mere statutes, enacted by representatives of We The People.

Seeing a trend, “We the People”?

Stephanie of Hang Right Politics sees echos of a former Coercive and Abusive Spouse in Big Government clothing:

I’m not a victim anymore and that’s why I want to say something. The last few years of that marriage were a nightmare because I fought hard for the right to think my own thoughts and make my own decisions and I sit here and watch as the government wants to now take those rights away from me and confer them on someone else who knows nothing about me while expecting me to fit some image they have determined is what I should fit. On top of that, no matter how hard you try to fit that image, the rules are always changing. I see these same things going on with government and I just don’t want to live like that anymore.

Other portions of StephC’s Plea and a Promise (above link) ring true in how we pay for the whims of CEO do-gooder liberals, that are insulated from the consequences of their own caprice. The mask is coming off of Goldman Saks’ former CEO Paulson, like his stuttering, drunk driving Democrat predecessor governing New Jersey, and like another of our so-called best and brightest elites that qualify as head regulators in this Brave New World who has recently shed his:

In 49 years of living in Charlotte, I’ve seldom offered my opinion in writing and never submitted a piece such as this. The condition of our country compels me…Only one of them demonstrates the needed intellect, fortitude and temperament. That is why I have decided to publicly support Barack Obama…What is needed in Washington is sound judgment and exceptional leadership…I see them in Obama: a sharp intellect, stiff spine and steady hand.

Obama’s economic plans will restore market confidence and provide a blueprint for a better future. His pragmatic, intelligent economic plan will stop our financial slide and restore the expansion and confidence we knew in the 1990s. Obama’s tax relief plans for small businesses and the middle class should provide much-needed economic stimulus.

Obama also has an energy plan that makes sense. He will shift energy use from foreign oil toward alternative, domestic sources. This will create millions of “green collar” jobs and enable us to capitalize on alternative energy. These cleaner energy solutions will protect the planet for our children and grandchildren and free us from depending on hostile nations…

I greatly respect all that John McCain has done for our nation. But it is Barack Obama whom we need now.

That was, incredibly, Hugh McColl Jr., former chairman and CEO of Bank of America in last Monday’s Charlotte Observer. The caprice of green collar jobs!

You see above, Exhibit A for the two main truths of Robert Bork’s Slouching Towards Gomorrah that are leading us to destruction: radical egalitarianism and radical individualism.

The defining characteristics of modern liberalism are radical egalitarianism (the equality of outcomes rather than opportunities) and radical individualism (the drastic reduction of limits to personal gratification). These may seem an odd pair, for individualism means liberty and liberty produces inequality, while equality of outcomes means coercion and coercion destroys liberty. If they are to operate simultaneously, radical egalitarianism and radical individualism, where they compete, must be kept apart, must operate in different areas of life. That is precisely what we see in today’s culture.

Radical egalitarianism reigns in areas of life and society where superior achievement is possible and would be rewarded but for coercion towards a state of equality. Quotas, affirmative action, and the more extreme versions of feminism are the most obvious examples but, as will be seen, radical egalitarianism is damaging much else in our culture. Radical individualism is demanded when there is no danger that achievement will produce inequality and people wish to be unhindered in the pursuit of pleasure. This finds expression especially in the areas of sexuality and the popular arts.

We see, in the current crisis, a strange merging of the “two radicals”, that indicates to gamecock that we must be moving within the gravitational pull of Gomorrah proper. The consequences of the former vice of gambling will now be visited upon non-gamblers for the crime of not joining the conspiracy with the do-gooder CEOs outside the government. These same CEOs that for decades have posed as free-marketers while all the time surrendering to their politically correct regulators of office flirting (see harassment); charity (see affirmative action of the quota avoiding lawsuit variety); and religion (surrender to Pope Gore of the Global Warming Church and the expected arrival of the Second Coming of green jobs.)

Weeks ago we learned that government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs), Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were “too big to fail,” even if We the People are not. Today, Hank announced that the government may exercise its new power to be a shareholder in what banks remain. That will make banks out and out GSEs as well.

In fact, let me quote our own Jack Savage from his recent column:

Through this bailout bill, and Social Security, and Medicare, and Medicaid, and unemployment insurance, and welfare, and housing assistance, and mortgage interest deductibility, and a host of other federal, state and local programs, every individual in America is a government sponsored enterprise. Every last one of us. The dream of the socialists and communists that run the Democrat party has been fully realized, and they are now aided and abetted by the votes in Congress of the last defenders of freedom – the Republican Party.

What will remain of our freedom if The Regulators take over the industry that builds our homes? Will we have enough left within those homes to rise up a Paul Revere to warn of whose coming by land or sea if they are already inside the house?

Houses? The examples of family homes in other nations that turned housing over to Central Planners ended up with several families living in the same room.

When we avoid the consequences of irresposibility, we also give up the reaping of the rewards of responible conduct and soon the incentive to acheive fades away.

Mike DeVine’s Charlotte Observer columns

“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

COMMENTS

  • StephC

    I honestly don’t know what to say anymore. It’s like everyone everywhere has given up, except for a very few people. We have become dependent on looking to a broken government to lead us when there are no leaders there. We need leaders to lead us away from Gomorrah much like Moses leading the Israelites out of bondage in Egypt.

    Is this what the nation has come to? Bowing down to the forces that would enslave us to a central body who has no aim more apparent than garnering more and more power to itself?

  • birdmojo

    Good for you.

  • c17wife

    I just don’t know what to do or say. I just sit here in complete and utter horror.
    God help us, please.

  • terilyn

    adopt a defeatist attitude. We must continue to fight for what we believe in. Never give up!

    I, for one, will never bow to the idea that I am destined to live in a nation where gov’t controls all.

    We must continue talking to everyone we can about the choice they will make on Nov. 4!

    Don’t stop believing!

  • speciallist
  • StephC

    I can find no more words to debate anybody but I can still stand my ground and refuse to submit. They want us to do nothing and I won’t have it. Came too far to give up now.

  • gamecock

    elaborate. It appears, as I have vaguely suspected, that in hard times, you and I would be on the same page?

  • gamecock

    5

  • gamecock

    taking up arms for a new revolution.

    not kidding

  • MrSandman

    S&P 500 = $909

    Gold = $930

    It begs the question.

    Will Gold eventually cross the DOW?

    Tomorrow could be bloody indeed.

    First the equities….than the Treasuries….than the dollar.

    If you haven’t been short nearly everything for awhile now….you haven’t been paying attention.

  • birdmojo

    There are three legs to the stool.

    In this current crisis, I find myself wishing that I could vote for someone reasonably conservative on the whole economy thing. Heck, I’d settle for someone reasonably full of envy/resentment/populism.

    As it stands, I see two guys who supported the bailout (whoops, Rescue) bill. I might be convinced to vote for a “real” party again if I could be convinced that we wouldn’t go all “centralized control”… but, as it stands, my choice is between a guy who merely supported the rescue and a guy who suspended his campaign to support the rescue.

    All that to say, if McCain talked more like you, you’d find me growing squishier and squishier in my support for one of those nutty non-”real” parties out there… maybe even to the point where I’d vote McCain in the privacy of the booth but just tell the pollster that I voted Boston Tea.

    You know, to keep my street cred.

  • pilgrim

    I know that you are excellent at organizing your notes to put great columns together. I also like how you have included Bork’s slouching and Taranto’s lone arranger and Shlaes’ forgotten man.

    Now the omission IMO is the Esonian Economic Miracle and especially what Mart Laars has to say about the Rule of Law. Here is an excerpt, and tell me how this does not pertain exactly to the economic mess we are in:

    The Rule of Law

    Radical economic reforms cannot be imple mented without laws regulating the economic space. Although the rule of law has been and still is one of the pillars of modern Western civilization, its importance was not readily understood in several transition economies. Some believed that decisive reforms could be implemented without supporting laws by using only government decrees or simply letting the old structures collapse without creating new legislation and institutions.

    In some transition countries, politicians regretta bly believed that a free-market economy could mag ically create wealth without clear laws or government to enforce those laws. Often, they paid insufficient attention to renewing and strengthen ing–not enlarging–the government.

    However, good laws by themselves are not enough. All developing economies need to build effective institutions that move their new laws from paper to practice. Formal legal systems place judges, prosecutors, arbitrators, court functionar ies, and the private legal profession in the role of primary interpreters and enforcers of laws. Devel oping and securing all of these systems is vitally important for the reforms’ success, as is creating an effective civil service.

    The rule of law is especially important in fighting corruption, one of the worst diseases of transition economies. Corruption thrives when public officials and private agents have much to gain and little to lose from taking a bribe, which is precisely the situ ation that exists in most transition countries. Uncer tain or non-transparent rules, heavy regulation, and pervasive controls give officials exceptional power, many opportunities to seek bribes, and a wide scope for appropriating public wealth.

  • DonPMitchell

    Um, OK, I’m pretty skeptical about the bailout too. But let’s not pull a Timothy McVeigh please.

  • StephC

    I hope it doesn’t come to that but if it does…

  • gamecock

    Thomas Jefferson

  • gamecock

    5

  • MrSandman

    What??

    You’ll take up arms against your government?
    You’ll shoot at a cop or a National Guard soldier?
    You’ll shoot at a politician?

    What will you do??

    I’m calling your bluff my friend.

    Your candidate is down in some polls and you are threatening to take up arms?

    If you’re that convinced surely you know what you would do right? Who would you go after first?

    Am I missing something?

  • dbecraft

    Seems like Socialism is the NEW way regardless of party – just who can get there the fastest.

    Yep, given up and hope for the best. Have even given up on the future of my children, can’t get any worse than that…

  • speciallist

    n/p

  • dbecraft

    Bring on the NEW Revolution! It seems to be about time… I’m ready to go buy my ASSAULT rifle…heh. You know, the ones that the Democrats (Socialist/Marxists) banned…

  • speciallist

    that All we would have to do is Boycott paying taxes for about 2-3 years…everybody….

    That would give us a little leverage he says…maybe they would listen to us

    I’m not sure

  • dbecraft

    revolt…? You?

  • gamecock

    by Big Government (see King George for example) run by any party’s candidate, then, as TJ said, we the people may have to water the ground of liberty with our own shed blood

    see Dec of Ind

  • terilyn

    are prepared to stand up for what is right. No doubt in my mind.

  • dbecraft
  • speciallist

    n/p

  • MrSandman

    However I think you all need to take a deep breath and think about the 70′s.

    Did they suck from an economic/GDP/employment point of view?

    Yes. Oh Yes they did. In fact I’d certainly include the early 80′s in that too.

    But the music was the bomb. Great movies and comedy too. Richard Pryor, early SNL, Network, Godfather…recessions seem to inspire good for music and film.

    My point is that we survived. Things got better.
    We will need to lead the free world in figuring out how to get off the ME oil teat.

    We will need to rebuild our energy infrastructure….using all tech available.
    Blahbittyblahblahblah….

    we all know what we should be doing I hope….what happens….who knows….

    But until they come to my home to harm my family, seize my property ….No way…It’s inconceivable to me.

  • dbecraft

    Well, I DID live through the 70′s and think that this is worse…heh… So what do you say now?

    I have seem most of the “worst of society” but today is looking worse than I’ve have ever experienced…but what they hey… it may be just a faze…

    A bit of fun there, but who are you (youngster) to say what is important to today’s society? You actually know so little that it scares me…

    If you have no history ingrained in you from the fore-fathers, you have no knowledge of what is to come… At least they knew that democracy would be lost with inaction. You are just a cog in the works…(with your attitude)…

  • speciallist

    n/p

  • MrSandman

    When it’s all said and done I think we’ll be back to housing values of early 90′s.

    I guess you could think of it has the biggest “do over” in history.

    100 new “clean” banks set up by the feds…??

    Who’s calling Roubini a sap now??

    This from Nouriel Roubini – I believe needs to be shared now:

    “At this point severe damage is done and one cannot rule out a systemic collapse and a global depression. It will take a significant change in leadership of economic policy and very radical, coordinated policy actions among all advanced and emerging market economies to avoid this economic and financial disaster. Urgent and immediate necessary actions that need to be done globally (with some variants across countries depending on the severity of the problem and the overall resources available to the sovereigns) include:

    another rapid round of policy rate cuts of the order of at least 150 basis points on average globally;

    a temporary blanket guarantee of all deposits while a triage between insolvent financial institutions that need to be shut down and distressed but solvent institutions that need to be partially nationalized with injections of public capital is made;

    a rapid reduction of the debt burden of insolvent households preceded by a temporary freeze on all foreclosures;

    massive and unlimited provision of liquidity to solvent financial institutions;

    public provision of credit to the solvent parts of the corporate sector to avoid a short-term debt refinancing crisis for solvent but illiquid corporations and small businesses;

    a massive direct government fiscal stimulus packages that includes public works, infrastructure spending, unemployment benefits, tax rebates to lower income households and provision of grants to strapped and crunched state and local government;

    a rapid resolution of the banking problems via triage, public recapitalization of financial institutions and reduction of the debt burden of distressed households and borrowers;

    an agreement between lender and creditor countries running current account surpluses and borrowing, and debtor countries running current account deficits to maintain an orderly financing of deficits and a recycling of the surpluses of creditors to avoid a disorderly adjustment of such imbalances.

    At this point anything short of these radical and coordinated actions may lead to a market crash, a global systemic financial meltdown and to a global depression. The time to act is now as all the policy officials of the world are meeting this weekend in Washington at the IMF and World Bank annual meetings.”

  • MrSandman

    ;)

  • MrSandman

    :)

  • speciallist

    n/p

  • dbecraft

    My son will have to pay for your ignorance…

  • speciallist

    got a light?

  • speciallist

    n/p

  • dbecraft

    I have a really hard time staying calm when it involves the future… Trying to calm down though…

  • speciallist

    n/p

  • izoneguy

    Like I said – The gun range was packed. The gun store was going nuts. We will see in 24 days.

  • speciallist

    Tell your friends!!!

  • Mike_Dugas

    But that because correct decisions were made. Robbing the communal tax wallet
    to pay off ceo’s and other political buddies is not the right decisions. Turning us more and more into a socialist nanny state is NOT the right decision.
    Things CAN get worse very easily, they are getting MUCH more expensive that’s for sure. No personal responsibility, no repercussions or punishment for those responsible for creating this mess. Hell the people who caused/planned this disaster have put themselves in charge of fixing it and covering up their duplicity.
    In the mean time the left and far left have gotten just about everything they want. More power and more, much much more government in our lives. They are in the process of nationalizing our lives.
    As each day goes on and I read more and more about how this started and who the players are am becoming a sort of truther
    in that I am starting to believe that
    alot of this financial disaster was planned and carried out to push us towards a type of government the left wingers have been dreaming and drooling about. All of that, plus the HUGE amount of voter fraud the dhimmis and their brownshirts are carrying out, to ensure THEY are in charge at this time
    so their CHANGE can be implemented. It is sort of like the perfect storm tearing apart what our country was and forcing it to become what they want.

  • MrSandman

    I’m responsible for your son? I’ve got a teen daughter….wanna trade sometime?

    If you think I’m happy about the train wreck we are witnessing I haven’t been clear.

    The house is on fire my friend….and the buckets got holes in them.

    I’m preparing for it to get very bad.
    My family will be okay but we certainly feel the effects of this downdraft.

    I think everyone will. It’s very sad. Lots of suffering.

    I’m still not sure what the son thing is all about. Debt??

    Dude….don’t get me started about debt.

    I’ll get banned. I promised myself when I started posting that I would not voice my opinion of the current administration and so far its worked out for me.

    My initial response was flippant. I’m sorry. I meant no disrespect.

  • dbecraft
  • MrSandman

    That’s what got us to where we are today.

    It’s too late for me to make a reasonable argument…but I think it’s fair to say that both parties deserve to banished from ever legislating finance law again.

    That won’t ever happen of course. But the answers certainly aren’t found with the politicians.

    Those are the incompetent greedy bastards who drove us off the cliff.

    The $700B giveaway was formulated without outside expert opinion of any kind…only Paulson, Bernanke, WH, and Congress. And what a turd they created. The markets really loved it. It makes one wonder what they are not saying. What didn’t they want the experts to testify on record about?

    Gah.

    It pisses me off beyond reason.

    The politics got us here.

    We need economists now.

    Good night.

  • speciallist

    n/p

  • MrSandman

    Did I tell that I think golf sucks too??

    LOL

  • dbecraft
  • dbecraft

    Just what do you think brought us to this precipice…?

  • dbecraft

    I would not uphold my rantings either… even if they were true…heh.

  • StephC

    For me, it’s not just about the economy. I can survive that.

  • gamecock

    the 1770s

  • gamecock

    why not re-make it in the Milton Freidman image that is the Estonian miracle.

  • janis

    but three stores in a row were out of them. The last salesman I talked to said they are bought almost as soon as they come in.

    It’s good to know that we are still an armed citizenry. My assumption is that those who would inflict violence on their fellow citizens if Obama loses are not concerned with gun safety at home.

  • gamecock

    UPDATE: Wachovia and Charlotte dodge Regulators’ bullett as Wells Fargo wins Wachovia: Combined bank to rival giants BofA and Chase
    Gamecock argues below that the Fed should not have been twisting arms behind closed doors, so we were especially interested in this quote:

    In a statement Thursday evening, FDIC Chairwoman Sheila Bair said she supported the efforts of the Federal Reserve to resolve the situation and praised Citi for letting the deal go forward. “While some outstanding issues remain, this announcement brings much needed certainty to the process,” she said.

    Notice Bair’s praise to Citibank for supposedly “letting” the deal go forward. The free sales and legal markets would have most certainly dictated that the WF-Wachovia deal go forward and that Citi’s only remedy for breach of contract be a civil action for damages. The unspoken message is that the Fed, i.e. Big Brother (or, under Bair, Big Sister) “let”, i.e. centrally planned, the deal go forward.

    Thankfully, the blind squirrel stumbled upon the right nut this time.]

  • gamecock

    McCain mortgage plan UPDATE

    The details of McCain’s mortgage re-fi plan is significantly more limited in scope than was suggested by the vague language he used in the debate. Only borrowers who made down payments would qualify and other details of the requirements listed on his website also greatly limit the number of borrowers that would qualify.

    The statement on the McCain Web site fills in some other details: It says the plan would buy mortgages directly from homeowners and mortgage servicers and replace them with “manageable, fixed-rate mortgages.” That help would be available to mortgage holders who live in the home as a primary residence, who can prove they didn’t fake their qualifications for the loan, and who provided a down payment. The statement also indicates McCain believes the purchases can be made quickly as a result of the authority given the Treasury Secretary in various pieces of legislation.

    ]

  • itrytobenice

    He’s been a porker for so long, his nose looks like a snout.

    When the rain comes, he doesn’t cover his head, just his nose.

  • itrytobenice

    No.

    Polician? Um…which one?

  • janis

    “Term Limits”. It was his first book and I have been a fan ever since. Involved the assassination of at least three major American politicians who had been screwing over the American citizens and the troops for years until the tipping point was finally reached and they did something so wretched that they had to be stopped.