« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

No questions left for Obama

Newly attentive voters getting the answers now that Obama can't refute

We have the answers (UPDATE – see link for more answers after this column)

Originally published By Mike DeVine, as Legal Editor for The Minority and HinzSight Reports

“This new information about Barack Obama’s relationships with ACORN and William Ayers raises a lot of questions.” – (insert TV political talking head’s name here)

Wrong.

The information coming out now, during the “attentive voter season” before Election Day, answers all the questions voters have before they vote every four years.


Does this candidate share the Judeo-Christian values that have defined our Nation and have served us so well for so long? Does he have the character worthy of occupying the most powerful position on Earth? And would enemies of the United States fear that he would aggressively defend us?

To listen to TV talking heads, even those named Hannity and Gingrich, from whose Thursday night discussion I culled the above paraphrase, no questions are ever answered. Rather, what are, indeed, revelations, only reveal to a brain dead media another line of questioning that Obama could theoretically trump with some glib retort on their television shows. For you see, if questions are ever definitively answered, there would no reason to tune in and listen to them any more!

Moreover, even our conservative pundits, like ourselves, if we aren’t careful, can be just as guilty of elitist tunnel vision as liberals. Add to that, the all too common, “the world was just invented this election cycle”, of so many of the poll-obsessed yutes in the blogosphere, egged on by a media that sells the idea that past election losses by leading-in-the-polls-until-the-end-Democrats were decided by debate moments or clever ads late in the campaign, and you witness the rampant defeatism of so many conservatives for whom McCain can never attack aggressively enough.

I heard all this from 1980-1988 and 2000-2008. Absent a known leftist and a Perot, we win.

The only slightly credible argument advanced by the defeatists is that Obama is not a “known” leftist. But even on this, a certain kind of elitism blinds the defeatist.

The defeatist knows Obama is a far left appeasing, Marxist that is unfit for the office of President of the United States. He sees it oh so clearly and, due to historical ignorance, allows his emotions to be manipulated by polls. Moreover, and more importantly, he thinks that the average, mostly inattentive for the past four years, mostly non-political potential voter, does not see Obama for what he is, and that he won’t see Obama for the extremist he is unless John McCain and Charlie Gibson say exactly what the defeatist thinks ought be said in just the way our defeatist hero wants.

I say, get over yourselves.

One mistake the defeatists make is that they watch the news in a different way than the average voter. We political junkies watch news reports about the Obama revelations to see how the media spins the revelations. The average voter, on the other hand, sees and hears the revelations. They are new to the average voter. And they are about the business, NOW, of getting attentive to make their choice on Election Day. They know that they get to vote on that day. They have lived through other election days and remember that they made the right choice then. They will this time.

The now attentive voters were already jolted into noticing Obama by the God-damned America sermons Obama sat thru for 20 years. Their common sense prevents any glib excuses to drown out the din of his pew-parked butt on that matter, nor on the fact of the new video of Farrakhan dubbing him the Messiah. They understand that it would not be appropriate for any candidate to hang with a less competent Timothy McVeigh that got off on a legal technicality and serve on boards to craft an “education reform” on radicalism short of bombing government buildings in Oklahoma, just because they were wetting diapers in the 90s. Same with Ayers.

The public sees and hears, just like us. Yes, we saw and heard months ago. It’s our life. These “swing” voters have real lives. They had real lives in the past as well, and looked up just in time to see what we knew and elect Reagan twice, Bush 41, and Bush 43 twice.

Why? Because they saw that Mondale would raise taxes; abandon the conservative economic policies that were working; and not be feared by the USSR. They saw that Dukakis would do the same and that he didn’t share our values with respect to crime, criminals and the appropriateness of the recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance by school children. That Gore lacked character as revealed by his three characters and would abandon Bill Clinton’s Reaganite economic policies and that Kerry would turn over US sovereignty to Kofi Annan.

They saw the liberal and rejected the liberal, just in time.

This past week these people, wracked by economic crisis, saw a slick lawyer that claimed he never represented the far left ACORN vote fraud community organizers as a lawyer.

Gamecock asked the question months ago if it were too much to ask Obama to name one client and one member of a community he organized. We already knew that he tried to hide the hopelessly audacious racist pastor/mentor praying in a church basement as he announced his candidacy. We, and even the usually inattentive American, have seen the wife he can’t hide preach her un-proud of America cynicisms.

And this week we found out why Obama has never volunteered a satisfied client because his clients are vile. But more than that, this is not a case of a lawyer defending a criminal as part of his duty to the bar in our justice system. No. This is a case of his representation of his ideological brethren.

He was caught in a flat out lie could not possibly have NOT been NOT un-covered because of the “whole truth” compilations of appellate case reporting going back to US Reporter Volume One from 1790!

Obama is listed in federal reports as a lawyer for ACORN. For the non-legal, do you recall seeing those endless rows of identically bound thick volumes in courtrooms and law libraries? Those are books of ALL of the opinions of appellate cases in all courts of the United States and the states. They cannot be refuted.

Obama is caught in a brazen lie. And the beauty of it is that the lie ties him to not only ACORN, but also to Ayers “education” minutes on Annenberg, Obama’s book review of Ayers book, and all the lies about their supposedly neighbor waving a neighbor thru a stop sign in the morning relationship. An ad of Obama and the nervous crowd laughter when he said teaching sex ed in grammar school and kindergarten is “the right thing to do” is on the air.

Palin has been attacking Obama for all this and for what it says about Obama in explicit terms. McCain has ads up doing the same, one of which has Bill Clinton blaming the dems in congress for the Fannie Mae caused economic crisis. Palin is all over the Obama votes against saving babies that survive abortions.

And, for all you ostriches, Rush, Levin and others played numerous clips this week of McCain himself calling out dems by name, including Obama for the crisis.

In short, the questions are being answered before our eyes and yet so many politically correct TV talking heads continue with the refrain that Obama needs to answer questions. One wonders if these people asked that question after the confession in To Kill a Mockingbird as the credits rolled after The End!

Obama’s actions of the past 20 years are the answers, not any non sequiturs he might belch out during a “debate.’

No amount of psychoanalysis will change what he DID. No words from his mouth will make it all ok for him to hold the nukes for four seconds, much less four years.

Defeatist poll obsessors, lend me your ears!

The American people can connect the dots, and are, in fact doing so now. They can see through the voice-overs by a liberal in the tank media they viscerally distrust.

There is nothing new under the sun. The conversations on conservative websites I frequent are the same as I had with nervous nellies in quadrennial Leap Year Octobers past while a Republican, and the flip-side of too confident libs when I was democrat and knew that the gray-haired old lady in the second row of the Baptist choir was a better predictor of the aftermath of Election Day than the latest hurling from Gallup.

And hey, Newt and Hannity, don’t let answers to questions pass you by. And hey, fellow members of the conservative chattering class: Lower your snobbish noses a bit and you will see the knowing looks in the eyes of the non-chatterers, as Obama’s 20-year mask is removed just in time for Halloween.

[Update - Links with answers to questions about what Obama is and is not:

Go here and scroll to bottom of companion article at my personal website (This source will be periodically updated until Election Day)]

Mike DeVine’s Charlotte Observer columns

Race 4 2008

“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

COMMENTS

  • izoneguy

    great article! Please write an article entitled – “And if that was not enough!” And expose Obama for his ties with Odinga.
    Just look through my diary.
    Thanks

  • JSobieski

    In all of the Presidential elections that I have followed (1980 on), the Republican always ended up doing better than the prevailing conventional “wisdom” would suggest

    Even Bob Dole in 1996 was rapidly closing the gap and could have won if the campaign were extended by a couple of days.

    There are things to get down about, but McCain’s electoral prospects are NOT one of them

  • David_Hinz

    the American electorate is just now coming out of its 4 year hibernation. Information that is so old to us that we are sick and tired of talking about it (I am just as guilty as the next person) is brand new and illuminating to an electorate that has been engrossed in Survivor (is that program still on?) but has no idea who Rev Wright or Bill Ayers is.

    Time to connect all of the dots — all the information thus far brought forth needs to be once again talked about and thrust in front of a newly awakened public.

  • janis

    so very informed that we assume others who don’t spend their time reading about this stuff have no clue how to get where we are.

    Because we know what we know and have for so long, we want to see that reflected in the polls and in the MSM. Both lie for their own reasons. And because we don’t see it reflected there, we assume that the average voter is going to continue to get snookered. But, as you have pointed out, they get it–they have in the past, they will this time, too.

    Now, if we can figure out a way to overcome the massive voter fraud efforts, we should be in good shape.

  • jsteele

    … I have great admiration for your arguments. I have but one question: how does the “gray-haired old lady in the second row of the Baptist choir” find out about Obama’s answers?

    It is true that the press has long supported liberals but over the past few cycles the support has gone more to active campaigning. When you have a press that is so far in the tank for Obama that they have grown gills how does the lady find out at this late date those things we have known for so long?

    Like you I have grown up with great confidence in the innate good sense of the American electorate. But good sense depends on some modicum of information even if it is simply exposure to the words and actions of the candidate. Today we are faced with a press that not only does not report those things but goes to great lengths to conceal any vestige of them. We are left with mere posed photos of The One gazing into space with a Photoshop-created halo around his head.

    How does the lady know?

  • gamecock

    send me your link

    My days of links are about spent

    I am the LINK!

  • gamecock

    5

  • janis

    people who listen to the MSM. Even without my sending them stuff on the ‘net to read, they knew something about Obama was hinky from the get-go. Everybody saw him lose the primary vote in so many states at the end, but be selected as the nominee anyway.

    The MSM’s defense of Obama over every single thing that should have damned him as the candidate–starting with Wright–just makes people look at Obama and the MSM with doubt. Look at the numbers for the vice-presidential debate. Millions wanted to know if Sarah was the dunce the MSM tried to portray her as–and millions saw an intelligent, gifted woman who more than held her own.

    Think that made any of them wonder if the MSM was biased against her and in favor of Obama? Obama’s arrogance and the MSM’s bias are plain to see for even those who are not junkies on this stuff.

  • gamecock

    I see the formerly inattentive everyday that are repulsed by Obama after having given him the benefit of the doubt.

    I even see the equaivlent of the defeatists on redstate and r408 in the real world that basically hold “average” voters in utter contempt for being stupid and ignorant starting to see what I have seen for 30 years.

    Yes, many are ignorant. many more WERE ignorant, but just as Reagan said, they are not stupid.

    The fact is that many of our fellow chatterers are historically ignorant in ways that these average rubes they look down their noses at are not.

  • jimmuy8

    Seems kinda hard when there is so much bad news lately.

  • gamecock

    But they are always ineffective ultimately when they try and mask a leftist. Bill Clinton was not a leftist and had Perot.

    The choir member sees the msm “news.” They don’t trust them either, and what they se and hear is WHAT THE UNDERLYING STORY IS. They can see and hear past the voice over lib telling them what they must think about it. They see and hear the essential facts via word of mouth with talk radio savy people like me and you.

    BUT, they also saw thru it in 80, 84 and 88 BEFORE RUSH AND FNC.

    more later

    I am allowing myself only so much negativity on this religious day:

    college football services begin at 11am cst

  • izoneguy
  • David_Hinz

    An article, Barack Obama’s Foreign Policy Experience that includes a great video that demonstrates that Sen Obama supports a Communist cousin in Kenya…

  • janis

    this year that it’s astounding. Their biggest mistake was how they treated Hillary and Bill, which took them out of the category of “only biased against Republicans” and into “biased against ANYONE who threatens our guy”. This silly season woke up a lot of Democrats, too.

    Enjoy your religious observances–having whiskey sours in place of communion wine? :-)

  • StephC

    there are a lot of things that are just now hitting the media although we learned of them months and even over a year ago. There’s a pattern to this, too. Had they spoke of these issues and deterrents to Obama’s candidacy sooner, most would have forgotten about them in the lofty rhetoric Obama utters.

    However, this time, I think they left it a little late given the mediocre candidate we ourselves have to back. The fact that media is even having to mention them says something… not much but something… which is better than nothing.

    It’s not over until the election process declares a winner.

  • gamecock

    opened their eyes. Gamecock didn’t think of that.

    god bless

  • jimmuy8

    “I am allowing myself only so much negativity on this religious day:

    college football services begin at 11am cst”

    Always an uplifting message in those pews.

  • pilgrim

    The title of this comment is a corollary to your excellent post on all of the hype. At the beginning of this year Dana Milbank trying to be funny reveals how the folks who wheel and deal inside the beltway operate, and what they think of outsiders. When John McCain chose Sarah Palin as his running mate a lot of inside the beltway elitists have circled the wagons to try and destroy her since she is not one of them. I even catch a whiff of this kind of attack on pages here at RedState occasionally.

    So while all that you have written is absolutely correct, I think an additional phenomena that distinguishes it from Nixon v. McGovern, Reagan v. Carter, Reagan v. Mondale, Bush v Dukakis, Bush v. Gore and Bush v. Kerry is that this time there is a more heightened sense of outrage by folks for the bias the inside the beltway reporters have against Sarah Palin.

  • David_Hinz

    Potomac Land is a very tribal place, complete with its tribal ways.

    “When you step back and look at people who live in Washington, they steal from other tribes, like Jack Abramoff,” Milbank says. “They hide their treasures in ice boxes like Congressman [William] Jefferson. And, if you follow the Scooter Libby case, they even engage in human sacrifice.”

    sadly….

  • gamecock

    yes, the outrage is greater now because of their brazeness and because Rush trated calling it out in public from 1988-today.

    The secret to his succes is that he started saying in public what we knew in our hearts was true about libs and about the press that treats us like vermin.

  • gamecock

    every eight years. Start in Montgomery, Alabama; then to Jackson, MS and so on thru the state capitols for the next 200 years and we will get real journalism again and we will get real legislators who can’t make a second home in one city on the Potomac.

  • gamecock

    that average voters get attentive. They wouldn’t hear the stuff before now no matter how loud its shouted

    except for video and audio clips like Rev Wright

    and they do know that and did before now and it did permanent, irreparable damage to Obama.

    The only reason for your fears are polls.

    We had those in the past when dem libs lost too.

  • redneck_hippie

    What you said. And as long as McCain/Palin stay on the taxes kill jobs mantra, we will do okay.

    The object lesson of Pelosi/Reid can’t fail to persuade disgruntled Ds, Rs, and Is that more of the same is not an option.

    The Wright/Ayers/etc. etc. etc. “revelations” are the figurative slap in the face to non-junkies that Obama is not what he appears. The mask is starting to slip. Great, great post!

  • gamecock

    5

  • JSobieski

    24/7 news has caused just about everyone to lose a sense of perspective.

    Conservatives lose when we accept the premises of the MSM. We win when we articulate a narrative that is contrary to liberalism.

    The rest is details.

  • gamecock

    Kentucky!

    thanks again for the links

    me lazy

  • gamecock

    hehe

  • Han_Pritcher

    Something we can agree on, right?

  • gamecock

    The comb of the Gamecock 14-14 vs Wildcats just now.

  • gamecock

    cough!

    thanks man

  • IndependentfrMI

    The MSM and liberals can try to persuade us that Obama is the next best thing since sliced bread. But thank God for the new tech era.

    Now that times are tougher and more people are spending time at home. Now is the time for the real Obama to stand up. If not on the NYT then on YouTube and the net.

    We have heard all we need to hear about the economic crisis and fixes or patches. We’ve stepped in it, scraped it from our shoes but it will still stink for a while.

    Mr. Obama, you can run but you can’t hide.

  • David_Hinz

    when college football isn’t on the TV

  • gamecock

    good man han

  • gamecock

    Its not time for Obama to do anything.

    re-read the blog

  • cwilson

    elected Clinton because “it’s the economy, stupid” during the “worst economy in 50 years”.

    It wasn’t.

    Average voters held — and still hold — the Gingrich Republicans responsible for the government shutdown, when it was known at the time, and extensively documented later, that unions and Dem activists gave Clinton the go-ahead and cover to pull that trigger

    Average voters blamed Republicans and Ken Starr for “the impeachment mess” when the entire affair was the direct result of Clinton’s Violence Against Women Act — and his own appetites.

    Average voters tossed the Republicans for “corruption” in 2006 — believing Nancy & Harry’s promises of “the most ethical Congress in history”. Besides being laughable on its face, the corruptocrats are invariably protected by the Media’s “name that party” game of selective omission when in comes to Dem scandals. But average voters bought it.

    Average voters to this day hold W responsible for Blanco and Nagin’s failures in New Orleans during Katrina. And today, average voters are blaming Bush, Republicans in general, and John McCain (c.f. tracking polls’ correlation with DOW index) for every last piece of bad news in the financial markets, when its so obvious that the Dems are most responsible that even SNL is making skits about it (pre-censorship).

    No, I do not share your faith in “average voters” — not until I see some evidence reflected in the polls. We can wave off 3-4% as typical polling bias for the Dems; maybe even another 1-2% this cycle given the Bradley effect. But since Tues 10/7, the RCP average has been daily bad news for McCain — going in the wrong direction (see again, DOW correlation) and stands now at +7.6 Obama.

    The higher the correlation between the slide in the DOW and Obama’s positive fortunes, the less faith I have in the ability of “average voters” to accurately process the available information and reach the correct conclusion: Obama, his Dem allies, and his radical friends created the circumstances of this meltdown, and John McCain/W fought unsuccessfully to head it off. And therefore Obama & friends should be punished for it at the polls, and McCain rewarded.

    Average voters seem to be reaching the opposite conclusion.

  • IndependentfrMI

    Some of us have known the real Obama for years yet the powers that be want to put lipstick on a pig. It’s still a pig.

  • IndependentfrMI

    You’re right, time is of the essence. Now is the time as in every election cycle to hit the home run.

    Remember the populace is on Ritalin!

    Voter ADD or is it ADHD?

  • StephC

    I misread a section of the article and got a slightly different impression. I’m tired. Been fighting with liberals since last night. I keep trying to reason with them and they keep calling me moron.

    I think I need a nap.

  • gamecock

    we cool

  • gamecock

    5

  • kowalski

    Barack Obama and Tony Rezko bought property together (through his wife Rita), they dined together, Obama bought an easement from the guy for over $100,000, and Rezko is now singing like a bird to prosecutors about all the dirty dealings he knew about in Illinois.

    And what a collection of dirty dealings the Donks are trying to scramble away from.

    Even Bill Clinton was smart enough to know that Rezko was trouble with a capital T.

  • RichChatfield

    One of things that constantly nagged me was everyone saying over and over, this stuff was already talked about and it means nothing.

    I thought it comical since I had no answers to the questions. I was simply told that Hillary and the DMC vetted Obama in the primaries and its old news, so quit asking these types of questions and let’s talk about issues like the economy. I thought oh boy.

    I am glad that we are still putting this out there because so many are just tuning in. But I would like to see more of what I should for rather than just what I should vote against.

  • ocleverone

    and I am hoping your team does well.

  • streetwise

    The right-eous brethren have grown cold in their faith, probably because they watch too much g-d TV :>)

  • gamecock

    Links with answers to questions about what Obama is and is not:

    Make your skin crawl update

    Go here and scroll to bottom of companion article at my presonal website

    pigskin GC Update

    USC Gameocks 24 Kentucky Wildcats 17 FINAL

  • Martin_A_Knight

    I read the many diaries you wrote in 2006 that sounded exactly like this. i.e. you’ve never been wrong, average voters are going to wake up just in time, law of electoral physics: liberals always lose, the only poll that counts is on election day, the GOP will launch their offensive at just the right time, you’ve never ever been wrong, etc.

    But, of course, we lost in 2006.

    I wish I could write something different but I have no faith in your precognition skills – I think it’s just wishful thinking. See cwilson’s comment above. The American people are not stupid – underestimating the intelligence of Americans is always a mistake. Unfortunately, the same admonition applies to the American people’s ignorance.

    The latter is what we have to address – and you’ve given me no evidence other than your words that that is being done – that previously asleep voters are waking up.

    That said, I’ll be patient. The last ten to twenty days of a campaign can see a lot of changes happen. I’ll do my part but I’ll not hold my breath … or my tongue.

  • gamecock

    in which the GOP actually did perform very well historically. I hate to have to keep correcting your false analogy but have to protect my reputation and make sure you don’t mis-educate the public.

    A known leftist has never won the presidency and I have never been wrong about one since 1980. The GOP has won 7 of the last 10 and the three we lost were against Dems that ran as non-leftists. And Bill had Perot.

    Try and use more precise language while you are not holding your tongue if you don’t mind.

    BTW, your third paragraph is self-contradictory. Make up your mind.

    Hey, smile.

  • gamecock

    don’t get and won’t accept, but which has been the fact since election days began. You want to “feel” better before Election Day with anecdotes, you call evidence (see poll obsession).

    Well, the ONLY real evidence is actual VOTES!

    I have seen lots of liberal smiles turn upside down on election days despite all the what you call evidence months, weeks, days and hours before.

    see kerry

  • gamecock

    that Americans are getting less ignorant and are likely to reject another dem lib?

    list what you require, other than polls

    any damn fool can read a poll

    I am evidence partner.

  • gamecock

    aren’t good evidence?

    that would be a good thing to say

    so say it

  • SteveLA

    Game,

    The Democrats in ’06 made the election about GW Bush, guess what they are making this election about him again and they are succeeding.

    Sad to say, until McCain throws Bush under the bus “big time” so the American people get the point that John McCain is not George Bush, he will loose.

    Same outcome as the election of ’06.

  • mbecker908

    In 1980, 1984, 1988, 2000 and 2004, at this point in the cycle, the Republican was even or ahead in the polls. In 2004 GWB was polling ahead of Kerry, within the MoE but ahead, thanks to the SwiftVets.

    This year it appears that McCain has squandered his post-convention lead that for a moment was outside of the MoE.

    I agree that the country has never elected a hard left President, I also agree that it’s election day that counts. However, this year my gut tells me we’re about to blown out across the board. My only hope right now, since I have no confidence in McCain actually “Manning-up”, is the Bradley Effect.

    In my lifetime we’ve only had one Republican on the national stage with both brains and balls. And Reagan is dead.

  • mbecker908

    If McCain doesn’t borrow Sarah’s balls we’re looking at a blow out of Goldwateresque proportions. He was from AZ too.

  • ocleverone

    the polls had Kerry up by 5 or 6 points and on election day, the “exit” polling was showing a 10 point lead early in the process.

    And you do bring a good memory and recitation of election history.

  • redbob

  • Martin_A_Knight

    i.e. my 3rd paragraph is not contradictory.

    Other than that, I’ve said all I’m going to say on this thread. If you’re right, I’ll be very glad to eat crow. I’ll put it in my signature line that I was wrong and you were right for as long as you want.

    But if not …

  • gamecock

    thanks friend

    me feel better

    just wish I could make MAK, ACE and others feel as good as I do

  • RedChevy64

    Take a look at my diary, I have a link to a great odinga/obama video

    Redchevy64

  • Rod_Patrick

    Here:

    Defeatist poll obsessors, lend me your ears

    I dedicate this GC line to all RS guys, republicans, conservatives, PUMAs, and other NOBAMA people out there who seem disheartened and lost by the current poll numbers.

    There is still HOPE. Hope only dies when we lose our faith and stop fighting.

    Courage! Courage! Fight! Fight!

    Remember our goal… that Shining City on the Hill!

    Here’s a possible October surprise that can leap our hearts:

  • gamecock

    and I have no idea what you said in the third paragraph or your response.

    This isn’t about eating crow, I thought. Isn’t it about winning the damn election! Or is it about some pink glow of pleasure from being the earliest bearer of bad news.

    Can’t never could do nothing and naysayers risk self-fulfilling prophecies.

    I hope you learn from history, including the history before you were an adult and the history you are living thru now, so that in the future when the less experienced seek advice or share views, you aren’t still attached at the hip to

    daily pollsters. As that appears to be the ONLY evidence that moves you.

    Thanks God Reagan didn’t look at polls and give up like so many hear at Redstate.

    The task is to move that ONE poll that counts.

    on Election Day.

    I never knew that the main goal of so many here would rather substitute symbols in subject lines in response to serious questions; refuse to answer said questions and obsess over crow eating.

    God bless

  • gamecock

    That is the issue. No comparison to a congressional year election.

  • hunter

    It is about time we snapped out of the funk.
    Now, back to kicking lefty butt.

  • seattle_ite

    Might make the talking heads more attentive, if they can’t just post a story from their living room in D.C.

  • seattle_ite

    The more successfully our message gets across to Joe Six-pack, the harder the MSM and vote-fraud activists feel they have to fight. A sane person would realize the futility of fighting an unjust cause (liberalism) in the face of so many conservative victories.

    Sadly, they can’t see the forest for the trees.

  • gamecock

    5

  • itrytobenice

    But if there were similar allegations regarding Sarah Palin, there would be no end to the msm investigation.

  • gamecock

    hold back due to having to live among the enemy. They have friends who can throw cocktail parties in Montgomery, Atlanta and Columbia. (not Raleigh)

  • IndependentfrMI

    When the polls close on election night the media will once again profess the Liberal agenda has succeeded……But…..what will the voters say?

    Don’t believe everything you read. But I will take him at his word. From Obama; you will benefit if you follow the govt behavior expectations…..say what? Did I wake up and Chavez is president?

  • izoneguy

    …. I guess they are counting on all the chumps that sit around with rabbit ear TV’s to consume the glop they call news. At this point anyone that would vote for Obama must be a marxist and subscribe to that philosophy. They should understand that getting an extra $3 a day is what they will get in turn for their freedom. I have many friends in law enforcement – don’t believe what the police unions say – many of my friends will leave law enforcement if Obama gets elected. This will be a real tragedy and cause unforseen calamities that we cannot even imagine.

  • IndependentfrMI

    Your police friends won’t be the only Public Servants to leave.

    I have numerous friends in health and safety and defense and they are planning on voting against their leaders of uniions. The Defense workers will be out of jobs if Obama get into office; the first spending cut will be Defense