« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Associated with see no evil monkeys AP gives Obama “symbolic” NC win

Symbols matter

Originally published by Mike “gamecock” DeVine as Charlotte Law and Civil Rights Examiner for Examiner.com

What is the big hurry in “declaring” the winner of North Carolina’s electoral votes in the presidential election? Especially since the outcome will not slow down the transition of President-Elect Barack Obama?


The day after the election, AP reported:

“In the unofficial returns, Obama led Republican John McCain by 13,746 votes. Gary Bartlett, the state elections director, said Obama should be considered the unofficial victor. Bartlett said an estimated 40,000 provisional ballots still must be counted, but based on experience, the outcome is not likely to change when the State Board of Elections certifies the results on Nov. 25.”

Electors don’t meet until December 15th, the Joint Session of Congress to count the votes isn’t until January 6th and Inauguration Day isn’t until January 20th.


The Tar Heel state’s election official responsible for carrying out the law gives the AP license to report what “should” be, based on “experience”? After Florida 2000? And just what is the “experience” Bartlett relies upon: that “history suggests that “about 65%” of provisional ballots will be eligible.

The math: Sixty-Five percent of 40,000 equals 26,000, which just happens to be about twice as many votes John McCain needs to win North Carolina.

On Wednesday, the AP and Charlotte Observer (in none of these stories would any actual reporter attack their name to such incompetence) declared “Obama’s bid to win North Carolina – now only symbolic” with provisional ballots “holding up” a decision.

What happened to McCain’s “bid”? And how dare those voters hold up a rush to coronate Obama by voting provisionally?

And the outcome is “only” symbolic? If symbolism didn’t matter to Bartlett and his agent, the Associated Press, there would have been no rush to judgment on Friday:

“The Associated Press declared Obama the winner after canvassing counties in North Carolina to determine the number of outstanding provisional ballots. That survey found there aren’t enough remaining ballots for Republican John McCain to close a 13,693-vote deficit.”

Clearly AP should replace Johnny, as in “Johnny can’t count.”

Symbols matter, and the AP, aided and abetted by a North Carolina government official, has prematurely foisted a symbol they prefer upon the history books.

That is, until their “history” was examined by DeVine Law.

And this does not even account for all the millions of absentee ballots. For that story check fellow Charlotte political examiner, Caleb Howe.

It seems the process is being carried out and reported by monkeys that don’t want to see or hear anything they don’t want to say about the only bid they care about, i.e. Obama’s bid.

Mike DeVine’s Charlotte Observer, Examiner.com and Minority Report columns

“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

[For links to AP stories cited in this article see original story at Examiner.com]

Tags: , , ,
Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • Susannah

    Thanks for reporting on this. :-)

  • Illinicon

    why not declare McCain the winner in Missouri? He is up 5,800 votes with something like 7,100 provisional ballots to be counted.

  • GregInFla

    ?The Associated Press declared Obama the winner after canvassing counties in North Carolina to determine the number of outstanding provisional ballots. That survey found there aren’t enough remaining ballots for Republican John McCain to close a 13,693-vote deficit.?

    I did not know that the AP was the official elections authority. The way that the networks proclaimed the election over at 10 pm. Tuesday night also ticked me off.

    North Carolina was also a victim of third-party politics Missouri is another victim.

  • DavidS1787

    Tom Brokaw on Charlie Rose’s PBS Show…

    Interesting comments!

    Where were these guys for the last 21 months and their research staffs?

    Appalling Journalism…

  • gamecock

    comment

    Clearly NBC should have dispatched some reporters to cover Obama!

  • 2006_personoftheyear

    Just because there are enough provisional ballots remaining to overturn the result, doesn’t mean it is likely* to happen. I mean, they called Vermont for Obama immediately, not because the votes already counted (0) pointed toward an Obama victory but because it was obvious from pre-election polling, exit polling, past results, etc. Same with various states for McCain. They always make these judgment calls, I don’t see what makes North Carolina different from any of the other states (for example, calling a state wtih 75% of the vote in and one guy up 55-45, even though technically the guy who’s up has only secured ~41% of the vote at that point…) Also if they were in a rush to call NC for Obama why did they wait until like 99% of the vote was in for him? I think it’s way more likely they just looked at the numbers, where the remaining ballots were from, and the fact that (I believe) provisional ballots tend to favor Dems, and decided it was mad unlikely McCain’d make a comeback there.

    The odds against all, or even a huge portion (like the 75% he’d have needed) of those ballots being Republican, are pretty astronomical.

    *when I say “likely” I don’t mean > 50% chance, I mean perhaps >1% chance.

  • gamecock

    was not called and given the AP’s excuse that same was “only” symbolic the day after the election and given the quotes from the government official, the blog is about the inthe tank media.

    Not about the liklihood of victory for McCain, although looking at THEIR OWN NUMBERS, it is not out of the question.

    What’s the darn hurry?