« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Institutional racism cases should now end

Election data refutes statistic based civil rights claims

Originally published by our, Mike “gamecock” DeVine as Charlotte Law and Civil Rights Examiner for Examiner.com

Barack Obama’s election to lead America’s largest institution, its government, by a 75% Caucasian electorate, should eliminate further civil rights claims not based on actual racist acts by identifiable flesh and blood racists.

When a self-identified African-American receives more votes for president (both actual and as a percentage of the majority group) than a blue blood white guy from Massachusetts, it is time to “no-bill” racism indictments against its institutions.


State, and especially federal laws, have long allowed for civil lawsuits, especially since passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, seeking monetary damages as well as injunctive relief for racial discrimination in employment, college admissions, and many other areas.

Originally these laws only allowed for cases that proved intentional acts of discrimination against government or private employer defendants. Over the past five decades, however, federal courts (and some revisions by Democrat majorities in Congress) created a new cause of action for supposed institutional racism based primarily upon statistics in hiring, firing, and promotions within government or companies and admissions to colleges and universities.

The underlying assumption of such claims was that most white Americans were racist, even if they didn’t realize it, and so, were incapable of not discriminating against racial minorities. In 2003, then Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor penned a majority opinion upholding the use of race as a factor in law school admissions in an affirmative action case that suggested such policies would be necessary for another 25 years.

She must have meant “dog years.”

In North Carolina generally, but especially in Charlotte-Mecklenburg County, Obama bested Kerry’s 2004 vote totals among whites by 35-27 percent:

“The uptick in white support helped Obama win Mecklenburg County with 62 percent of the vote — a margin that stunned even Democratic Party activists. The inroads among white voters also helped Obama outperform Kerry across the state, even in rural areas in the east and in conservative counties ringing Charlotte. Kerry also won Mecklenburg County in 2004. And while McCain got about the same number of votes in Mecklenburg as President Bush in 2004, Obama got 50 percent more votes in the county than Kerry. The turnout percentage was about the same in both elections.”

Any objective observer of cultural and political America for at least the last 4-30 years must admit the diminishment of race as a significant factor in the choices white Americans make, and that what doomed Kerry and most past democrat losers were their liberal political views without regard to race. (See Oprah, Michael, Tiger, Powell, Thomas and Rice, et. al.)

Many prominent blacks on the left and center left are heralding Obama’s election as proof of the above. The best example from an early African-America Obama supporter:

“Now, if this racism of the scattered and subliminal varieties were the obstacle to achievement that Jim Crow and open bigotry were, then we would have a problem. But yesterday, we saw that this “out there” brand of racism cannot keep a black man out of the White House.

Might it not be time to allow that our obsession with how unschooled and usually aging folk feel in their hearts about black people has become a fetish? Sure, there are racists. There are also rust and mosquitoes, and there always will be. Life goes on.

I know–what about “societal” racism? Well, if we can now relax about the backward folk “out there,” then maybe Obama in the White House can help open up an honest discussion about the role racism does not play in black communities’ problems.”

Sandra Day O-Connor was obviously wrong about White America, and now we have the statistical data and the ultimate symbolic evidence (President-Elect Obama) to prove it.
The only questions that remain are will Democrats and the courts insist upon continuing to discriminate against whites.

Hopefully they will follow the advice of the Chief Justice of United States, John Roberts (pictured above), who declared, in the minority opinion opposing now retired O’Connor’s:

“The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.”

Mike DeVine’s Charlotte Observer, Examiner.com and Minority Report columns

“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • Jaded

    doubt it but there is alway HOPE for CHANGE :-)

  • Tbone

    stomach McCain.

  • Tbone

    stomach McCain.

  • aaronbg

    I would say self hate…but I don’t think that gives McCain enough credit for losing.

  • redalert

    Blacks in this country were elated by the election of Barack Obama,but I hope they realize the time for excuses has now ended. Blacks have fallen so far behind the rest of America in academic achievement that they are now behind the children of Latino immigrants. The violence in ghettoes is endemic. Drive by shootings are a daily occurrence. All of these were explained away by citing racism as the cause. Now a black man has been elected President because whites voted,not by race,but because of perceived excellence by Obama. This now puts the onus squarely on the black community. No more blaming schools because black kids keep dropping out of school. No more blaming “the man” because young black men keep going to prison or to the morgue in ever increasing numbers. If a black man can be elected President,don’t tell me a black man can’t become an accountant. How is Oprah Winfrey going to blame the rest of America for the plights of blacks now?

  • aaronbg

    n/t

  • redalert

    Yes,I’m still on. I have to counterbalance people like you. I was informed that you were a losing contestant on “Can you beat a 5th Grader?”

  • aaronbg

    n/t

  • Neil_Stevens

    Blam.

    Petition the Directors for reinstatement if you wish.

  • Achance

    many comments you knock off the comment column with paragraph long titles?

    It’s hard enough to keep up with comments with the way the site works these days without people writing ten line titles.

  • Airion

    If you’re saying that problems in the black community are not because of racism, but rather blacks being black, that’s racism.

    52% of Americans can elect a black president, but that doesn’t solve racism in America.

    The problems you mentioned have nothing to do with racism- it’s about things like economic inequalities, and essentially a self-feeding cycle.

  • bk

    They’ve been arguing for a generation or more that we need programs that allow blacks to “catch up” to make up for past discrimination. Since there were 350 or so years of slavery and another 100 years or so of discrimination afterward, they’ll NEVER admit that the playing field is equal. It doesn’t matter that Hispanic or Vietnamese or whatever immigrants came here in the last generation not speaking a word of English seemed to do just fine – we’ve got countless billions of dollars of the federal budget that are dependent on race/class and they will not go down – ever. Our mentality is so screwed up – “equal opportunity” means you treat everyone equally and “affirmative action” means you don’t.

  • mom2oneson

    My son’s school assignment is answering the question how did Alexander Tureaud use his education and talents to help others help themselves.

    What changed, how did it go from people like Tureaud to the movement we have today with leaders who do nothing to actually help people achieve.

  • mom2oneson

    nt

  • bk

    It seems like the goal of people like Tureaud was to get government out of people’s way. Now the Democratic establishment seems to have a goal of having poor people permanently dependent on government largesse – “vote for us so we can increase your aid rather than the GOP who will cut it”. The GOP’s goal should be to get government out of people’s way again so these people have a chance to make it on their own. But they are immediately branded as racists by the people who truly are more racist IMHO.

  • aaronbg

    n/t

  • gamecock

    that suggests that Obama’s election will lead to many blacks and hispanics will leave the left sooner rather than later and how VITAL it is for America and the GOP that we win them over

    more later

  • gamecock
  • bs

    Now I’m sure that “bk” would love to be just like me, but he’s not me. :-) But he and I do think quite a bit alike, so we’re interchangeable in some ways…

  • bk
  • gamecock
  • Common_Cents

    It is now we’ll hear more and more stories and now the left will have the power to accelerate affirmative action in ways that will strengthen the Democratic party, not necessarily helping people. It’s “payback time” in many minds, but as long as it helps the DEMS.

    If the DEMS think they have a lock on power I could also see them throw minorities under the bus as they may feel they do not need them any longer. Well at least for 4 years.

  • ender79

    explained it in 1911:

    “There is a class of colored people who make a business of keeping the troubles, the wrongs, and the hardships of the Negro race before the public. Having learned that they are able to make a living out of their troubles, they have grown into the settled habit of advertising their wrongs-partly because they want sympathy and partly because it pays. Some of these people do not want the Negro to lose his grievances, because they do not want to lose their jobs.”

    Nowadays this describes the left in general.

    I expect that the “leaders” of the African American community to start with the “Obama isn’t black enough” meme at some point in order to keep people angry about race.

  • Airion

    A little wishy-washy. Unless we’re fine with crime and prisons overflowing with prisoners, it’s worth asking why the majority of those prisoners are black. It’s not that we’re all just human and it’s a coincidence. It’s that we’re all just human but something has the black community in particular standing on different ground.

  • gamecock

    hopefully they can survive 4 years

  • communitarian

    Communitarian, the leftist, Volvo-driving, over-educated, artisanal tea-drinking, People’s Republic of Massachusetts resident, must chime in. I myself am Black. My husband and many of my good friends (all over-educated) are white. By virtue of being married to Blacks or having adopted Black children, they can tell you from personal experience that Blacks are not treated with the same respect as whites. We endure a hundred little insults a day which can probably be attributed to discrimination. It’s possible that whites are unaware of their own behavior, since they are not reminded of their “whiteness” while Blacks are constantly reminded of their “Blackness.”

    My husband is a Philosophy Professor. He teaches a course called Moral and Social Problems. When the class discusses race, many white students agree with the indisputable evidence that blacks are victims of discrimination yet can’t bring themselves to say that, in fact, racism is woven into US history and that they themselves may, perhaps unknowingly, participate in racist behavior.

    And while we’re on the subject of discrimination, it is difficult for Muslims and Jews to live in a country where people proclaim it as “Christian.”

    “It is you who has made us, and not we ourselves.” 2nd Samuel

  • bk

    Is it wondering to themselves some black classmates got in because of quotas? Or is it taking some sort of overt racist action?

    There always have been and no doubt always will be racists among us of various skin colors. What in my mind certainly does not help are when people like John Lewis are so bitter that they are ready to call John McCain and every other white person a racist at the drop of a hat.

    I personally don’t care how racist a person is, as long as they don’t act on it. If I hate some other race but keep it to myself and am not in a position to affect hiring, etc., who cares? And as far as I’m concerned, if companies don’t hire the best people regardless of race, they are doomed to be overtaken by companies that are color blind and will have better employees. It’s not a matter of forcing “diversity” down people’s throats – it’s a matter of common sense to me. This endless “we need to make up for past discrimination” is what rubs many people the wrong way. Either we’re going to treat people differently or we’re not. What’s that John Roberts line from some decision? He put it perfectly in my mind.

  • itrytobenice

    Kennedy has only 1/2 the brains of Roberts/Alito/Scalia/Thomas, half the character, and half the gravitas. But he does like that swing vote status, so he’ll probably go our way at least part of the time.

  • Rottimer

    What happens when you have a position where you have a black candidate and a white candidate who are equal in every way, including economically, except for the color of their skin. Who do you choose then?

    Is it fair to your employees to hire the black man if they feel more comfortable working with someone from their neighborhood or with their life experiences as white people?

    Is it fair to that black candidate if you don’t have any minorities working in your office and choose the white guy because he “fits in?”

    It’s not racism if a business owner hires people he knows and people from his neighborhood and old friends and people they recommend. But what ends up happening on a national level is that you get a lot of qualified minorities not getting jobs because they weren’t born in a certain place or of a certain color. It doesn’t mean that any particular person is discriminating against them, but it does mean the system has let them fall through the cracks.

    This is not an excuse for committing crimes, or dropping out of school, or not being a father to your kids. Neither does it ever justify putting someone that’s less qualified in a job over another based on color. But I would be fine with a system that acknowledges that given EQUAL candidates, you might go with the one that is least represented.

    And I think it should work both ways. If a white guy wants a job at BET and he’s qualified and 90% of your workforce is black, he should be a shoe in.