« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Obama’s “pre-packaged” bankruptcy an early Christmas gift to GOP

GOP should ride shotgun in President-Elect's new car

And Republicans they should do it quickly before the Democrats get in the frontseat.

Originally published by Mike DeVine as legal editor for The Minority Report on its Live Wire:

This is a brilliant idea, even if The One did think of it. It is what used to be called political victory for a more savvy GOP. Republican office holders, radio talk show hosts and columnists have been all over TV, radio and the Web advocating bankruptcy for bankrupt companies and rightly decrying any bailout that keeps union contracts in tact and that lets Reid, Pelosi, Franks and Dodd (The Three Horsemen and National Velvet of the American economic Apocalypse) run the auto industry like they run Amtrak and Fannie Mae.


The Loyal Opposition should show their loyalty to America and back up the President-Elect on his concept:

President-elect Barack Obama’s transition team is looking into a “prepackaged” bankruptcy for Detroit’s automakers as a possible solution to the industry’s financial crisis, Bloomberg News reported today, citing an unnamed source familiar with the matter.

A representative of Obama’s team has already contacted at least one bankruptcy law firm about the idea, according to the source.

In a prepackaged bankruptcy, a company would go into court with financing ready after reaching agreements with lenders, workers and suppliers on what each would give up and on a business plan, Bloomberg reports. Such a process would take substantially less time than a typical Chapter 11 bankruptcy.

Getting out front on this would also address the serious political concerns of Pat Buchanan for the GOP’s future:

Are Republicans aware of what they are about to do?

When workers, execs, engineers, dealers, salesmen and suppliers are all factored in, the Big Three employ 3 million people who contribute $21 billion a year to Social Security and Medicare, and $25 billion in federal income taxes. Add in all the businesses that depend on the auto industry, and we are talking about one-tenth of the U.S. labor force.

As columnist Tom Piatak of Chronicles and Takimag.com writes, 850,000 retirees, and their families, depend for pensions and health care on the Big Three. If they go under, the burden falls on us.

And to let the auto industry die is to write America out of much of the economic future of the planet.

Gamecock doesn’t buy all of Pat’s trade ideas, but he does agree that government policy has greatly burdened the auto industry and that both politically and economically, the GOP needs to be part of the solution.

Obama has given us a great opportunity to highlight a more conservative solution that the Democrats.

Read all of As GM Goes, So Goes the GOP
Mike DeVine’s Charlotte Observer, Examiner.com and Minority Report columns

“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

COMMENTS

  • Wubbies_World

    This is a win win situation I would go along with as a solution. There is no down side that I am aware of in this.

    I am definitely and seriously opposed to just giving them a “bridging loan” until their cash flow improves. They bad need a dramatic restructure to solve their problems!

  • izoneguy

    And many other industries as well.

    The GOP should demand as part of any BIg 3 BailOut.

    Unfettered energy exploration. If the Big 3 or any auto
    maker wants to keep selling the cars they make today then an energy policy of drill here and yesterday should be rammed down the dems throat. Yes we should continue to explore alternative sources of energy and develop the cars that will lessen our dependence on oil. That won’t happen unless we develop our own energy resources.

    Stop the insane talk of global warming and cap & trade.
    This one issue alone will put the auto makers out of business.
    Why bail them out only to kill them during the Obama administration?

    Relax the fuel standards for now. Keep them where their are at for at least the next 2 years. This will give everyone a breather.

    Stop talking about windfall profits tax. This only encourages the oil companies to pull in.

    So, democrats want a bailout for their UAW buddies??
    Well it cost you more than just a swipe of the pen.

  • aaronbg

    Think of this as a trust but verify situation.

    The “plan” is bare bones right now from what I read. And we all know that the details are wherein the devil lies.

    So the question to me now is:

    • Where is the financing going to come from

    • What concessions will we force the UAW to accept

    • Will this resolve root causes

    With those three question in mind, and still needing to be answered, I would give only a tentative support for this “plan”.

  • gamecock

    later

  • gamecock

    To get ahead of the Dems against the bail out with congress as CEO.

    great points and more later

  • gamecock

    commenters here at RS!

  • izoneguy

    …you are not to shabby yourself!

  • SteveLA

    The Obama pre-packaged bankruptcy only works for me IF and a big IF, part of the plan is a roll back of the UAW contract provisions that are killing the auto industry:

    Make the “Job Bank” mirror Federal unemployment rules, no more 2 years at 95 percent pay.

    No paying off of the existing contract commitments to retirees with funds from this bail out.

    Reduction of retiree commitments to no more generous than offered to Federal Civil servants.

    Total labor rates (pay+benefits+retiree promises) approximately equal to Non Unionized US domestic producers.

    US tax code changes to make interest paid on auto loans from US produced cars tax deductible once again, with sun set provisions for a fixed period of time.

    While the Obama plan looks good, devil is in the details, and R’s can push for some key points outlined above that Democrats may not embrace.

  • gamecock

    of a prepackaged b/r, not any details that have yet to be provided.

    It appears that Obama is rejecting the Congress as CEO model. That is what I think is significant and that the GOp should join Obama in opposition to what Pelosi-Reid want.

  • SteveLA

    game,

    No worries then, but I am suggesting that Republicans in Congress adopt a robust series of practical conservative enhancements to the Obama plan instead of the generalized case. The path back to victory is being specific about conservative principles, not hand waving or sitting on the sidelines because of generic philosophical differences.

  • Achance

    that looks like a concession to UAW, it will be a “Nixon to China” event, and I just might begin to reform my opinion of him. One thing I think is for sure; it is in the genes of union and community organizers to not allow employers or Republicans any credit for anything good. They’ll abandon even good things to avoid the employer or a Republican getting any credit.

  • mbecker908

    So, how do you treat Toyotas, Nissans and BMWs that are manufactured in the US by non-union labor?

    Or are we jigging the tax code only in favor of the UAW?

    And, FWIW, messing with the tax code is a really bad idea.

  • SteveLA

    Key phrase here, US produced, including Honda, Toyota or others that are produced in US plants using US workers.

    Yes it would help manufactures who don’t need help, but it would help US workers, which is who my thought was aimed at. Sell more cars made in the US, UAW and non UAW, more people working.

    By the way, if the packaged bankruptcy cleans up the abuses of the UAW and the Big Three, why not throw a bone in terms of taxes to all US producers of automobiles?

  • redneck_hippie

    are hoping the big 3 rescue plan includes more goodies to union workers?

    I’m looking for concessions “from” the UAW.

  • gamecock

    http://www.redstate.com/diaries/gamecock/2008/nov/22/v-i-day-and-the-loyal-opposition/

  • mbecker908

    and not be supported by the Dems – see Card Check – to organize the other manufacturers they’re living in an alternate universe. The UAW won’t even show up at the table without a hostile BK filing. They don’t have to. And, depending upon the new Labor Department, they might not end up giving up anything in that case either.

  • gamecock
  • Achance

    a concession. Sorry, I live in a world of shoptalk about this stuff.

    I don’t see how any Democrat can back any plan that the UAW would see as requiring them to make ANY concession. They think they own the Democrat Party, and they’re probably right.

  • GregInFla

    Tie the new oil exploration lease income at home to the funding of the loans to Big 3. Call it the Transportation Energy Omnibus Act of 2008 of some such thing.

  • gamecock
  • E_Pluribus_Unum

    He’s got a good point here. Repubs should do everything possible in this lame duck session to not do any further actions that would allow Dems to hang the Dem-caused global recession around the necks of Repubs.

  • CFPeterson

    I don’t think you could get unfettered energy exploration as a part of the deal.

    What I’d like to see is a mandatory re-organization of the UAW pension and health plans to be more inline with the rest of America. My bet is if most people saw what retired autoworkers get for benefits they’d puke. Its that extra $2000 per car just for benefits that make the Big 3 so uncompetitive.

  • WOSG

    Why arent we hanging the incompetence of Reid around the necks of the Democrats?
    There was a bipartisan consensus to use money already allocated to help the big 3.

    Yes, pre-pack ch-11 with massive UAW concessions and a serious revamping of the GM business model is the way to go to save the company long-term.

    Do that, and have Govt chip in the $25 billion ALREADY allocated. Anything beyond that is a waste of money.

  • aaronbg

    Christmas is named CHRISTmas for a reason…you know that. X-mas is a denial of the main import of the day.

  • gamecock

    in Michigan in the process.

  • gamecock

    They made major concessions down to $15/hr and no pension for entry level.

    Lack of money concentrates the mind.

  • E_Pluribus_Unum

    At some point, their voters will see where their bread truly is buttered. Free markets, free choice.

  • gamecock

    The One will soon be self evident.

  • gamecock
  • redneck_hippie

    who are in charge of the house and senate which the Obama voters believe are controlled by Republicans?

  • JSobieski

    nt

  • charliehall

    at $50/barrel. All the “drill, baby, drill” chants will not convince oil companies to sink a single well if they don’t think the price will stay high enough.

    Of course, if the oil companies go belly up from the lower oil prices, the federal government can bail them out, assume equity stakes, and force them to drill even uneconomical wells.

  • gamecock
  • youngling

    Since X is the Greek letter Chi (pronounced Kai I believe) which is the first letter of Christ (a Greek word), it is a lot like saying MLK Day instead of Martin Luther King, Jr. Day…

    Just saying…

  • gamecock

    and to reduce the starting wage to $15/hr is huge. Maybe not a cave?

    But hey, I am no apologist for that union. They have conspired with management to wreck the northern auto industry.

  • aaronbg

    yeah uh that isn’t what the X in X mas is representative of…and I find MLK day to far less important that Christmas…and I assume MLK would as well.

    Just sayin..

  • JSobieski

    The two tiered approach first manifested itself during the Delphi bankruptcy. Given that 99% of employees fall under the old rules, its window dressing for all practical purposes.

  • gamecock
  • redneck_hippie

    Gotta play this at least once a week. It gets funnier with repetition.

    How Obama Got Elected

    Er, make it over 1.5 million.

  • gamecock

    given demand and supply worldwide, after the recession. The key to getting them to drill is removing legal impediments (moratoriums) and deterrants (ESA and other lawsuits).

  • Pingback: Christmas Party Online » Blog Archive » gamecock?s blog ? Obama?s ?pre-packaged? bankruptcy an early …

  • Pingback: Tags » GOP must support public works to discredit green kooks ::

  • Pingback: Recommeded Diaries » GOP must support public works to discredit green kooks ::

  • Pingback: Christmas gift ideas, need your input! | raidz.net - a perspective

  • Pingback: gamecock’s blog » Second chance for GOP to split Dems with ?orderly, pre-packaged? bankruptcy ::

  • Pingback: ChooseTheHero.com » Blog Archive » Second chance for GOP to split Dems with ?orderly, pre-packaged? bankruptcy

  • Pingback: ChooseTheHero.com » Blog Archive » Second chance for GOP to split Dems with ?orderly, pre-packaged? bankruptcy

  • Pingback: Krista Nervis

  • Pingback: Emery Sulton

  • Pingback: Ruthanne Rosse

  • Pingback: Aja Delargy

  • Pingback: Jeremiah Roa

  • Pingback: Benito Loegering

  • Pingback: Basil Neiman

  • Pingback: Nannette Reho

  • Pingback: Elmo Mercuri

  • Pingback: Azucena Moya

  • Pingback: cheap edu backlinks

  • Pingback: Josephine Rzeszutko

  • Pingback: http://lms.ilam.ac.ir/wiki2/index.php?title=DayHecht373

  • Pingback: Stuart Iacovelli

  • Pingback: Emory Stasny

  • Pingback: Nathan Eitzen

  • Pingback: Carlena Wasik

  • Pingback: Karen Arrambide

  • Pingback: Chance Frausto

  • Pingback: Lou Skeans

  • Pingback: Birdie Alvidrez

  • Pingback: Danille Shover

  • Pingback: Raymond Hein

  • Pingback: Mikel Benes

  • Pingback: Dolly Mizwicki

  • Pingback: Marty Nobis

  • Pingback: Cruz Mestanza

  • Pingback: Cristy Scarff

  • Pingback: Jc Rutledge

  • Pingback: Regenia Bilodeau

  • Pingback: Lovella Perone

  • Pingback: Gaston Arciola

  • Pingback: Francisco Silveria

  • Pingback: Inger Rodell

  • Pingback: Eleonore Rhodd

  • Pingback: Lamar Robes

  • Pingback: Hassan Minock

  • Pingback: Carri String