« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Recipe for Indian and American peace: Flight 93, 2nd Amendment and Bush 43

In the aftermath India’s “911”, the world’s largest democracy could learn a few things from the world’s oldest.

Originally published by Mike gamecock DeVine as Legal Editor for The Minority Report

A combination of roundups of visa overstays from Muslim countries in the weeks immediately following 911; elimination of nation-state sponsored safe havens; foreign and domestic surveillance; and war against Taliban, Wahhabist, Baathist, Iranian Shia, and other Islamist enemies of civilization over seas, including the killing of tens of thousands and aggressive interrogation of such enemies by the armed forces led by their President George W. Bush as Commander-in-Chief has kept the American homeland safe for seven anniversaries of The 911.

Like President Bush in the immediate aftermath of the attacks on New York and Washington, India’s leader has confronted Pakistan with ultimatums. General Pervez Musharref, a former ally of Afghanistan’s al Qaeda harboring government, accepted a U.S. offer he couldn’t refuse.

Current President Asif Ali Zardari, widower of Benazir Bhutto (herself killed by terrorists) has been equivocal while also promised India its full cooperation to take on the Lashkar-e-Taib a terrorists in his country.

But India must do more within its own borders to deter small bands of well-armed terrorists that don’t want to meet 73 virgins just yet. The woeful state of the equipment employed by India’s security forces is one problem, but I sense another larger problem.

At critical times during the attacks targeting westerners, Jews and the economic symbols of a successful free state that killed more than 200 innocents, security forces refused to kill enemies in their sights.

Even more significant, the terrorists had no reason to fear being interrupted in their rampage by armed citizens.

Ever wonder why our enemies haven’t sent non-suicidal terrorists to our hotels, malls and community centers?

They know that Americans are armed with a Bill of Rights to take them out on sight (so long as it isn’t a “gun-free” school zone controlled by the left ala Columbine or Virginia Tech) and that even unarmed Americans ala Flight 93 (National Memorial pictured above) will take planes down in Pennsylvania fields to protect their Nation.

They must have the will to use force. The will shown on Flight 93 and shown by President Bush and our armed forces.

Some in India are crying out for the right to bear arms to protect themselves, their families and their nation.

For India to equal America’s perfect record of peace at home they will also have to endure the ire of the leftist world press that long ago surrendered to barbarism “tolerance”.

It seems prudence has even concentrated the mind of our own former War Critic-in-Chief, President-Elect Barack Obama, on the perfect record of his soon to be predecessor, as judged by his national security team.

The Drive-By media has even shifted post-Election Day (and post-Mumbai) to laud Obama for his own new found toughness given the reality of terrorist enemies, even if they suspended their intelligence for seven years of Bushlied; still refuse to acknowledge Bush’s perfect record post-911; and still use the gratuitous, bash-Bush throwaway line template in every story on the war. A recent dead-tree example:

But the lesson of Mumbai cannot be understated. Yes, the Obama administration must break new diplomatic ground and repair the international damage of the Bush years. America must return to its image as a nation that does not use its military might as a global bully that pursues pre-emptive wars.

That said, Obama’s national-security team has to remember that Americans, both civilian and in service, face fundamentalist threats on a daily basis.

Yes, we have faced the threat on a daily basis, yet, despite that fact, they have not succeeded since one day in 2001, no thanks to Obama’s Democratic Party and the Drive-By media.
India will need a leader like President Bush that cares more about saving the lives of his countrymen than the approval of chattering classes. The willingness of India to blow suspected Islamist Pirate mother ships out of the water absent proof beyond a reasonable doubt indicates they just may have what it takes.

I sure hope our President-Elect has what it takes, beyond mere campaign threats to invade allies seeking an Osama bin laden reduced to video releases of material nearly three years old.

Take notes Mumbai and the “office” of the President-Elect, on a plan me know that works for at least seven years.

Mike DeVine’s Charlotte Observer, Examiner.com and Minority Report columns

“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • RottDawg

    Thank you Mr. Gamecock!

  • Mike gamecock DeVine

    1

  • DONTREADONME

    Let me add one thing, I hope Obama will continue our weapons development programs that are specifically tagged for use in the GWOT. Trust me I will be watching closely, as I have a vested interest, for any cut in funding to these programs. If he cuts these programs, I will be inclined to think that his willingness to conduct and win the GWOT is absent and he will conduct policy in accord with his statements made during the campaign for defense spending.

    I will also be watching the Congress closely since the first signs of program cuts will come out of there.

  • SteveLA

    Future Combat System will be cut…no tears shed.

    JTRS will be even more scaled back…no tear shed.

    DCX will probably get the ax….not doing all that well anyway.

    JSF will be left alone, too many jobs riding on that one, and International sales.

    It will be an interesting time in DoD land.

  • JLenardDetroit

    another D regime of $URRENDER doctrine and Military cuts w/o regard to any/all threats we face.

  • DONTREADONME

    I will let everyone know when I am looking for a job.

    Anyway, FCS great idea, but not exactly executed properly. Cuts necessary but complete abandonment will be disasterous. My understanding is that FCS is for the next wars – super-soldiers and UAV, USV and UNV etc. A reorientation is necessary, but a cut will show a complete lack of coordination with the brass and may be due to O’s political appointments to the DoD.

    I am not too familiar with the Joint Tactical Radio Systems

    DDX, if it is the stealth destroyer, I think a few of these is not a bad idea to have now even with the price tag of >>3B. With the re-emergence of the Russian (Soviet) KGB run government stealth on the seas may be necessary. We will wait and see. The DCX is the same arguement.

    JSF – thank God the JSF is to big to fail

    Once again, I have a front line seat for all of this coming down and will let all here know when I see the cuts affect my employment. Let me iterate for all Government people reading this, I love my job, please save my job Mr. Obama.

  • DONTREADONME

    and say I hope Mr. O shows some willingness to listen to the Military Brass. The Brass will not give up pressing for the systems that they believe will be continue U.S. military might for as long they can before retirement.

  • http://hillbillypolitics.com Steph C

    I was witness to the Clinton cuts. I’m really not sure how much more can be cut without seriously damaging this country’s ability to protect itself from those who would do it harm. I watched as many were pressured into taking early retirements with greatly reduced benefits to bring about the reduction in troop levels in the 90s and look for more of the same to happen in the years ahead, not to mention all the things already mentioned. I suppose half a bird is better than none if they were forced out woth nothing, right?

    On the other hand, if we can survive this, we’ll be better for it. There’s only so much stupidity We The People will take before we take matters into our own hands… even when it’s some of We The People who voted it in.