« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

A Hard Time vs. Hard Times redux

The Great Recession tests the Charlotte and American Character

We are going to have a hard time no matter what plan wins this weekend. The issue re times is, will the plan ensure long hard times.

I wrote those words amidst the credit crunch last September when Charlotte’s unemployment rate was under 6%. It now stands at over 10%. Friends and business associates lose their jobs every week and nearly all live in constant worry about their future.

No matter which TARP plan had been adopted by Bush’s Paulson (pictured above with Bernanke), Obama’s Geithner (pictured below), or whomever McCain would have imposed, America was going to have a hard time given the mistakes in policy I document below in a re-print of my column foreshadowing the likely generational test of American character we were about to endure.

The enduring has begun and I am now convinced that the recession is, indeed, accurately titled by Examiner.com in our network-wide accounting of same taking place today, as The Great Recession.

Any chance that the hard times could be limited was lost with the election of Barack Obama and his massively irresponsible policies that have will keep investors on strike for years to come and that promises to destroy America’s currency.

The new president and Democrat majorities (Speaker pictured with President above) had a chance to limit the recession to post-WWII averages but forfeited that chance with a stimulus bill that only stimulates government growth. The only reason the economy hasn’t plummeted faster and that the stock market has had a mini-rebound is due to Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke’s printing press stimulus.

From September:

Many Americans are now in the midst of a year-long hard time born of skyrocketing energy prices and/or the housing/credit crunch. It has been nearly impossible to get small business loans for many months and home loans for all but the top ten percent of credit risks for many more months.

This column has long chronicled the Democratic Party’s explicit policy of energy self suicide since 1978 in restricting access to expanded oil drilling and their regulations (especially including the Endangered Species Act and environmental lawsuits) making the building of oil refineries and nuclear power plants nearly impossible.

Below, I discuss the artery-hardening diet the Democrats have force-fed the credit markets since 1998 that is the cause of the present crisis. But before we look at what got us to this precipice, let us look at where we are.

Bush Debt vs Obama Debt (see chart and recounting of September crisis in original article at Examiner.com)

April 2009
We now know that they were not held accountable in 2008. They must be held accountable in 2010 and if we want to limit the damage that will cause more real hard times and that will have to be repaired after 2010, Tea Party-inspired Americans must let their representatives in Congress hear their voices NOW so that they will stop:

Cap and Trade or EPA regulations that will devastate the poor, lower and middle income families, large and small businesses, and the over all American economy with the higher energy prices Obama said we needed to be taught a lesson and to bankrupt the coal industry;

The $3.6T budget that will devastate the US Dollar, bankrupt the nation and mortgage the future of America’s next generation to foreign bondholders; and

Socialized medicine.

They must be held accountable politically. Their policies must be rejected economically.

Mike DeVine’s Charlotte Observer and Examiner.com columns
Legal Editor for The Minority Report
“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

COMMENTS

  • Flagstaff

    The original bank/Wall Street bailout may have been the wrong thing to do, or maybe the best thing at the time. Maybe something was necessary, maybe not. I don’t doubt that Paulson and then Bush and Bernanke believed that they were doing not only the right thing, but the necessary thing. Yet that’s water under the bridge.

    We could have recovered from the original bailout alone. It hasn’t even all been spent yet. What will kill us is the piling on of trillions of dollars of ADDITIONAL spending and debt, dollars that are cosmically out of the realm of reason. The chart you included should be carried by every conservative who might discuss the problem with an Obamapologist, to counter the “But Bush created huge deficits for 8 years” argument. Bush’s deficits are dwarfed by Obama’s plans, and HE was fighting a major war. Obama will bankrupt us while saying he’s making things better. In fact, he claims that he’s saving us money because he won’t send eight more surges into Iraq. What a guy!

    Tax cuts are permanent. They aren’t covered by a single $400 check. I don’t know what McCain would have done differently, but think it would have at least been better. You can’t do what Obama is claiming to be able to do. As Charles Krauthammer wrote in yesterday’s column (free signup required), “Obama has the magic to make words mean almost anything. Numbers are more resistant to his charms.”

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/16/AR2009041603379.html

    And now Congress is getting ready to set up a requirement for sales tax on online purchases.

  • Mike gamecock DeVine

    eyes again and still not removing the toxic assets. No, its all about power. Bank of America makes a profit and Obama is more determined to own it anyway.

  • Flagstaff

    Alan Abelson’s column in “Barron’s” weekly (published Saturday) quoted the blog Zero Hedge. It reported that AIG, in an attempt to C[I]A and qualify for more money from the Treasury, started unwinding default-credit instruments; AIG “gifted the major bank counterparties with trades which were egregiously profitable to the banks.” The result was that those banks were profitable during the first quarter, but the profits were “of the one-shot variety, and, ultimately, they entailed a transfer of money from taxpayers to banks….” Still, those profits were at least partly responsible for a pretty good bump in bank stock prices in the last 30 days.

    Although it would expose an awful lot of people as being lousy investors who didn’t do their homework, it could be that enough of those people read that article and decided that the banks’ profitability wouldn’t continue, resulting in today’s big sell-off of bank stocks.

    So maybe it’s another case of Obama’s investment timing being terrible.

  • Mike gamecock DeVine

    and I don’t think the drop in stock price was ever justified and it appears that Obama wants to drive down the prices to claim “insolvency” so he can seize them.

    great comment Vlad’, as usual and no, I am not considering civil disobedience in this instance!

    smile

  • Mike gamecock DeVine

    and I don’t think the drop in stock price was ever justified and it appears that Obama wants to drive down the prices to claim “insolvency” so he can seize them.

    great comment Vlad’, as usual and no, I am not considering civil disobedience in this instance!

    smile