« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Un-Hatch a new strategy for challenging liberal judicial nominees

Given the Democratic Party’s huge majority in the U.S. Senate, conservatives and Republicans cannot prevent President Barack Obama from appointing a replacement for the retiring Justice David Souter that will echo the Left’s unconstitutional judicial philosophy that regularly re-writes our founding documents.

All the more reason to focus on setting the stage for future nomination fights and establishing and maintaining credibility on the issue of the proper judicial philosophy expressed by Chief Justice Roberts of a justice as an “umpire”.

We must eschew the old Orrin Hatch (R-UT) mantra that since a President was elected, he gets his nominee so long as they can read and write; never smoked pot and were never discovered with a live girl or a dead boy or vice versa. That philosophy is fine when considering cabinet nominations but not for members of the third branch of government that serve for life.

The main thing the GOP needs to do is finally come up with a strategy for the confirmation hearing that can educate the public on the insidiousness of the judicial philosophy of the so-called “living constitution”. We must not confirm a nominee that gives indications that they will not uphold their oath to uphold the actual dead constitution under which the capital “L” Liberty of We the People to self govern is guaranteed.

Republican senators are elected too, and also take an oath to uphold that Constitution that grants them the right of advice and consent, and they mustn’t repeat their mistakes in affirming Clinton’s Ginsburg and Breyer.

For more than 45 years, liberal judges have been re-writing the Constitution so that during times when Democrats didn’t have super filibuster-proof majorities in Congress, the liberal agenda could be imposed oligarchically via five lawyers.

So, the Hatch strategy was inappropriate even before the Democrats smeared Robert Bork and Clarence Thomas to try and keep justices off the U.S. Supreme Court that would leave the matter of self government to a center right people in their states and localities.

Even more so post-Borking, the GOP must not give up their “co-equal” status.

No, we should never stoop to defamatory smear tactics, but we must use the hearings to try and make headway is educating the public on this critical, yet difficult to explain matter of judicial abuse.

Mike DeVine’s Charlotte Observer, Examiner.com and Minority Report columns

“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

Originally published @ Examiner.com, where all for verification links may be accessed.

COMMENTS

  • djemi

    http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_050109/content/01125109.guest.html

  • Kyle-MI

    The people who understand what judicial activism means with respect to abortion and gay marriage are already in our court. We can expand the opposition by expanding the scope. If judicial activists can do this for abortion or gay marriage then there is no stopping them from applying it to the 2nd amendment or confiscating your property. If you don’t think so, just look at the Kelo decision.

  • Mike gamecock DeVine
  • http://beaglescout.wordpress.com LJ “Beaglescout” Miller

    Kelo is potentially one of the most explosive abominations to have ever come out of the SCOTUS. Property rights *are* human rights. It’s time to stop letting the left define this issue.

  • Mike gamecock DeVine

    later

  • Mike gamecock DeVine

    PREVENT ANY COOPERATION ON AGREEING ON A LIVING CONSTITUTION NOMINEE JUST BECAUSE THEY WENT TO HARVARD AND HAVEN’T COMMITTED MURDER. WE MUST ALL VOTE AGAINST THE NOMINEE ON CONSTITUTIONAL NTERPRETATION GROUNDS UNLESS THEY ARE TRULY AN ORIGINALIST.

  • mbecker908

    We should hold a meeting of sitting Republican Senators and House Members on an ice floe. And leave the bastards there.

  • http://web.mac.com/mayo99/iWeb/Site/VladBlog/VladBlog.html Vladimir

    ….since 1994 it has been the way the party’s representatives in the Senate Judiciary Committee (read: Hatch & Specter in particular) have gotten outfoxed by their Dem colleagues at every turn.

    Not just SCOTUS nominees, all federal judgeships.

    After a while, it’s like watching Charlie Brown trying to kick Lucy’s football: the ultimate exercise in futility.

    Hooray for Jeff Sessions!

  • Mike gamecock DeVine