« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Ken Lewis’ good deeds don’t go unpunished [updated]

Bank of America CEO resignation example of “No good deed goes unpunished” axiom

Just over a week ago, The Wall Street Journal crystalized all of my numerous defenses of Ken Lewis and Bank of America during my stint as Charlotte Law & Politics Examiner:

 ”When Bank of America bought Merrill Lynch last winter, the political class applauded and called CEO Ken Lewis a solid citizen. Now, from the safety of noncrisis hindsight, our politicians claim the bank’s shareholders may have been mistreated. Few of those shareholders are complaining, given the profits Merrill has been generating for the bank in recent months, but the pols apparently want a scapegoat for bailouts and bonuses. Mr. Lewis fits the bill.”

It is a testament that it took All The Powers That Be so long to run this good man off. He has been under siege for most of 2009 from the the whole of the Democratic Party Congress; many spineless Republicans in Congress; Democrat Governors and Attorney Generals in New York; and the whole of the Drive-By media, including the hometown paper of BOA in The Charlotte Observer.

Banks  and greedy CEOs did not cause The Great Recession. Many factors led to the financial crisis that socked America and the World last Fall and the only scapegoats worthy of the appellation occupied elective office as Democrats and bureacratic positions that regulated Banks in the late 90s. They threatened CEOs like Ken Lewis with stiff fines if they refused to make home loans to low income applicants that couldn’t afford homes while also assuring them that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac would buy those bad loans and remove the risk.

If anyone should resign it is Barney Frank (D-MA), Chris Dodd (D-CT) and The President of the United States (D-Chicago).

Ken Lewis is not a greedy CEO. Ken Lewis is an honorable man that kept his bank solvent throughout the crisis and took the toxic Merrill Lynch and turned it into a profit generator; all while under extreme pressure from Treasury Secretary Paulson and Fed Chairman Bernanke to keep Merrill to save the nation.

Ken Lewis’ leadership of BOA is nothing short of a miracle and he is one of the true heroes in preventing a much worse, 1929 like crisis.

[Update]

God bless you Mr. Lewis and Godspeed, and with respect to the NY Attorney General’s and others’ obcession with the puny Merrill bonuses, the WSJ says it best:

If Mr. Cuomo wants to do a public service, he could focus on the government’s own role in this episode. In late December then-Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson threatened that Mr. Lewis and the board would be fired if they didn’t complete the Merrill deal. Mr. Lewis was considering invoking his rights under a material adverse condition (MAC) clause to kill the merger.

Mr. Paulson has argued that his intervention helped everyone, including BofA shareholders, because in fact the MAC clause would not have allowed Mr. Lewis to get out of the deal. A more likely scenario is that Mr. Lewis would have used Merrill’s exploding losses and the threat underlying the MAC to get Merrill CEO John Thain to lower his price.

Under oath, Mr. Lewis told the New York AG’s office that he would have tried to renegotiate for a better price—if Mr. Paulson hadn’t told him not to. When asked several times if this were true at a July Congressional hearing, Mr. Paulson refused to give a straight answer. After one such response, an exasperated Mr. Towns observed, “I’m still trying to find out whether that was a yes or no.”

***

Here’s a theory of this case that won’t help Mr. Cuomo become governor, and won’t help Mr. Towns make headlines, but might even be true and fair: Amid the autumn and winter financial panic, everyone involved was operating under enormous pressure with incomplete information. Federal officials all but ordered Mr. Lewis to buy Merrill and they certainly knew all about the bonuses.

Maybe this is a case in which instead of looking for a villain to punish, our political class should thank Mr. Lewis and BofA for coming to their rescue when they really needed it.

Mike DeVine’s Charlotte Observer, Examiner.com and Minority Report columns

“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

 

COMMENTS

  • pilgrim

    The thing that is always missing whenever I talk with a lefty about greedy bank and insurance CEOs is the inability of them to assign any culpability to a member of Congress for taking money to work legislation that benefits a bank or an insurance company. The only way that any greed can work is if the members of Congress are complicit in getting a bill thru to benefit their favorite. If they refuse to pick one favorite private sector company to have some pull over the competition then the market will decide who wins and who loses. Ken Lewis may not be as angelic as you portray him, but it doesn’t matter if no elected member of Congress meddles in the business that should be left to the market to decide.

  • http://hillbillypolitics.com Steph C

    and other parts where I disagree.

    As CEO Lewis had his hands in the things BofA did that caused them to have to be bailed out in the first place, which is more than Merrill Lynch. B of A was being boycotted at one time because of some of those things.

    However, I think he’s taking a bigger rap than he deserves. Is that good enough?

  • JadedByPolitics

    BOA was one of the MAJOR players in giving toxic loans to illegals along with credit cards and not requiring social security numbers or PROOF of citizenship for either of those items and guess what? They got BURNED! The minute the tide turned the largest portion of NON payed loans or CC’s were by illegals returning home….Bank of America deserved to GO UNDER….NOTHING is to big to fail and NEVER should be!

  • bk

    Do you ever notice how many of these Democrats in Washington “dedicate their lives to public service” and just HAPPEN to wind up as mutli-millionaires even when from modest backgrounds?

    Rangel is a great example. Raised in poverty, he spent four years in fine military service, then the rest of the 50s on scholarship finishing school and getting a law degree. He spent the 60s doing a lot of low pay “social justice” sort of work and was into politics by the end of the decade. He got elected to Congress in 1970 and has been there ever since.

    And now he has forgotten about more assets and investments than most of us who pay his salary will ever see in our lives. The Congresscritters act like they can barely get by on their salaries, yet he manages to become a multi-millionaire while doing virtually nothing other than “public service”. Hmmm.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine
  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    on the loeans for illegals. Was Lewis perfect? No.

  • http://hillbillypolitics.com Steph C

    When we do imperfect things we pay the consequences. Just because Lewis was in charge of hundreds of billions of dollars doesn’t mean he should get a pass.

    Sorry, mike, but we’ll wrangle this one from now until Doomsday… which may not be far off.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    demonize capitalists playbook.

  • JadedByPolitics

    to go under. I don’t have sympathy for any of the major players who felt they could make a buck of illegality. If the left wants to hunt them down and play with them I say go all in. I have more respect for the local credit unions which btw in most states did not engage in any of that illegality with illegals and they are sitting just fine right now and obtw they are not to big to fail.

  • The_Gadfly

    for not taking those actions I would agree with you. But all of those items are things where elected government officials set up rules that groups like ACORN used to effectively put a gun to the CEOs of the banks and tell them to make those loans. It’s the only reason I supported having the government buy the toxic assets back when this first started. Government forced the toxic loans to be made, so government has to clean it up. Forcing the CEOs with the guns to their heads to take the haircuts for government policies is legalized theft. Yeah, I know that means we all have to pay for it. That sucks a whole lot for everybody, and even more for people who have carefully shepherded their resources. But the sad and unpleasant truth is, we collectively put those people in office to represent us. And even if they unfaithfully represented us, we delegated that power to them. And we now bear responsibility for it.

    We know the real crooks have all escaped culpability. They left Merrill long before the buyout, and as Francis and others pointed out in columns way back when, those ‘bonuses’ were what the rest of us would call merit pay for working through the toxic loans left by the real crooks. They ought to have been paid as well. Clean up work is always a bigger job than making the mess.

    Now, I would have no real problem trying to claw back the money from the real culprits, and if there are any lawyers out there who can figure out how to get it from Rahm, and the rest of The Big 0′s pals, more power to them. But my guess is that like all ill gotten gains, it has already been wasted on wine, women, and songs or the modern equivalent thereof.

  • http://hillbillypolitics.com Steph C

    Lewis made some really bad decisions that resulted in some really bad consequences. He deserved to suffer those consequences and he worked hard to turn things around. He is not done suffering those consequences, however, the stockholders are also paying the price for the foolhardiness. Those stockholders include Moms and Pops, as well as the wealthy.

    The irony is that Lewis owned up to the bad behaviors and the left will try to punish him for turning things around because that isn’t what they wanted. He is in an untenable position of damned if he does, damned if he doesn’t. It seems he might be coming around to do the right thing rather than giving in to interest group/government pressure. There is no easy road ahead for him.

    As Mike said, nobody is perfect and I don’t want to shield Mr. Lewis from the consequences of his actions but neither do I want to punish him for the doing the right thing in the end. This is how we learn and grow. There’s a difference between forgiving misdeeds for which we atone and punishing someone unduly no matter the depth of the atonement.

  • http://hillbillypolitics.com Steph C

    the government didn’t have the right to do it through ACORN or any other entity. Instead of capitulating what would have happened if that pressure being brought to bear on B of A was made public immediately rather than after the toxicity reached critical levels?

    I believe it would have been less costly in the end to have fought it all the way through to the Supreme Court rather than capitulate and I believe Mr. Lewis has learned that lesson. However, the consequences are still reverberating through the financial world and Mr. Lewis will have to take his lumps with the rest of them… and us.

    The government doesn’t fix anything. They make us fix it. It’s not their money that is being used but O.P.M.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine
  • JadedByPolitics

    give credit cards and home/car loans to ILLEGALS then I will say they have learned a lesson as of this moment there is no proof to the contrary that they have STOPPED doing that. Bank of America has a long and illustrious relationship with LaRaza http://newsroom.bankofamerica.com/index.php?s=63&item=227

    and Mr. Lewis in particular…so when he STOPS working to help “the race” get ahead perhaps I will take some sympathy on him until then let the hounds feast!

    I think my favorite part of that link is this…

    “Point 4: Re-commit to the Community Reinvestment Act.

    There have been many studies demonstrating that, over the past 32 years, CRA has helped us stabilize urban communities, drive economic growth, and provide economic opportunity to hard-working families that needed it.

    Bank of America has been an ardent supporter of CRA. We?ve earned six ?outstanding? ratings in a row and continue to execute on the largest community development lending and investing initiative in the history of the country: $1.5 trillion over ten years. With the full support of the banking industry, I believe CRA will continue to play a vital role in the economic rebirth of our urban communities.”

    Yes continue to DUMP money into CRA that’s the way to fix those pesky problems BOA is having sure it is.