« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Only Rush-like courage can defeat ObamaDem Left

The press has chosen to exercise their First Amendment freedom via cowardice and Drive-by hits against conservatives to protect their liberal, Democratic Party ideological allies. Big Business, including the NFL, and too many Republicans have also chosen the easy, cowardly path for too long as well, lest they become the focus of the PC-police.

The result of the above is a morally obtuse culture mostly devoid of men with chests, in which those that dare challenge the racial/social orthodoxy have their characters assassinated at the first sign of chest puffing.

Rush Limbaugh has a chest and Courage is the most important virtue

The latest victim of the leftist racists and the cowards is Rush Limbaugh, who dared to dream of being a minority owner of the St. Louis Rams. False quotes were disseminated by the Drive-bys with CNN and others to justify their character assassination but, make no mistake, the real animus against Rush were accurate, non-racist quotes that didn’t comport with the Left’s transmogrified definition of “racist” that dare to treat blacks as the equals of whites, i.e. fair game for fair criticism, parody and satire.

The cowards in this case were NFL owners, their league’s commissioner, and, especially, Dave Checketts, the majority partner in the group seeking an NFL franchise, who had sought out Rush’s participation in the first place knowing that a controversy was likely to arise but who had assured Limbaugh that he would stick with the effort despite same.

Checketts is a man without a chest and it appears that had he shown even the slightest staying power, given the defenses of Rush from many prominent black men, including liberals like Juan Williams (man with a chest), it is very likely that the controversy would have faded.

“One man with courage makes a majority” – Andrew Jackson

It doesn’t take much to win over a majority of We the People, as Rush’s history and that of precursor’s to past conservative Republican victories (but I repeat myself as there are hardly any non-conservative GOP victories).

The Silent Majority carried Nixon to victory, and re-election in a landslide, when he dared to challenge liberal orthodoxy and take courageous actions to push back the communists in Vietnam.

Ford, Bush41, the late-90s GOP and the mid-2000s GOP lost when they moved to the center.

Reagan had the courage to identify evil empires, tax collectors for the welfare state and welfare queens on the way to landslides; Gingrich attacked corrupt Democrats to take over the Peoples’ House for the GOP the first time in forty years; and Bush43 overcame the Bushlied Era to re-election while killing terrorists by the thousands after tax rate cuts.

Rush, attacked as a racist, sexist, bigot, homophobe since going national in 1988 played a major role in the Gingrich Revolution and Bush43′s re-election, all the while increasing his record-breaking radio audience every year despite health setbacks and ubiquitous attacks.

Conservatives win when then show courage against the Left in the media and against the Democratic Party. They lose (see McCain) when they surrender to their dishonorable friends on the left. A large percentage of Democrats will vote for Republicans with chests puffed against liberal democrats.

Has the Democratic Party no shame?

The two parties are not interchangeable, even on issues that the GOP has failed on. ObamaDems first budget deficit of $1.8 TRILLION is three times as large as Bush43′s worst of $400 Billion. (Moreover, Bush43′s worst deficits were passed by Democratic majority congresses – including then Senator Obama – after they re-took control in 2006).

The shamelessness of the Democratic Party has no equal, whether it pertains to their embrace of murderous Mao supporters and/or 911-truthers in the Obama administration; race-baiting poverty-pimps that pretend 21st Century America is barely removed from the Jim Crow South; pretending to be hawks on Afghanistan just to win an election and discredit the Iraw War most all of them voted for; re-defining coup d’etats so they can back despots in Honduras, Cuba and Venezuela; or lionizing Bill Clinton as some sort of moral giant, never once asking him any tough questions about his moral failures.

Uncle Tom’s Cabin and “courage”

One of the main themes of Harriet Beecher Stowe’s classic, which echoes Burke and MLK, is that the “good” plantation owners enabled the longevity of the evil institution of slavery as the best example of how evil triumphs not primarily due to the acts of evil men, but rather due to the inaction of good, yet cowardly men.

Otherwise, how could the concept of courage that required courage in 1860 to speak out against slavery some how, in 2009, require that one have courage to speak out against false race-baiters or to make obvious criticisms of wicked, criminal behavior?

The NFL says that Rush’s statements are too “divisive”, including ones that merely cited obvious media bias that a black quarterback do well and that thuggish behavior hurts the image of the league. Yet, wouldn’t it have been good for the league had Falcon’s owner Arthur Blank made some “divisive” statements to Michael Vick years ago objecting to his posse of lowlifes accompanying him to his late arrivals at training camp and on game days?

Blank was afraid to criticize a black man for behavior that would have gotten a white man suspended.

We saw in the Limbaugh affair an exercise of arbitrary power akin to what we fear from a too powerful government. Our culture is sick, and the only way in can be cured is thru courage.

tmr logo

Courage is the indispensable virtue required to stop America from Slouching inexorable towards Gomorrah. Absent courage, the majority of We the People will continue to settle for filing mere Minority Reports.

More DeVine examinations on race.

Mike DeVine’s Charlotte Observer and Minority Report columns

“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

COMMENTS

  • pilgrim

    While you’re at it, please reserve just a smidgeon of your outrage or disgust for those lukewarm conservatives who contribute to the destruction of race relations and to the advancement of liberal causes by pandering to false characterizations of authentic conservatives, such as Rush, who aren’t afraid to stand up for the truth, even when it will subject them to virulently fraudulent charges of racism or other slanders.

    The lukewarm ones who have no chest actually deserve more than a smidgen of outrage. I have heard more than I can stomach folks who will judge how successful someone will be based upon how the press covers this person. This is crazy. We need the courage of Rush to stand on our principles notwithstanding how the press covers the story.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    due to the history of the country. Marginal dems come to us when we speak out against the libs in no uncertain terms.

  • penguin2

    astute manner. It has been fascinating reading about your journey.

    Your statement “Blank was afraid to criticize a black man for behavior that would have gotten a white man suspended,” IMO, sums up the entire problem in race relations today. Justice, accountability and responsibility are not being dispensed evenly. As long as that is the way society does business, it can not eliminate the racial tension. Whenever a “race card” is played it is calling for a double standard.
    Reasonable people who seek to do what is right, find that unacceptable.

    Someday you should put all of this in a book. :)

  • JadedByPolitics
  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine
  • E Pluribus Unum

    Your reference to Burke is right on – (paraphrased) all it takes for evil to reign is for good men to do nothing. Nothing describes the ascendancy of Obama and his fellow Marxist-Alinskyite-Maoists like that.

  • scatmann2000

    …i’m a lifelong repub and a libertarian/conservative, but using words like”courage” to talk about Rush is as silly as saying he’s “objective”. He strikes me as the opposite.

    He’s wildly entertaining and it’s great how he twists the knickers of idiot left-wingers, but he has done more to take intelligence out of American conservatism than anyone, at least until Mr Beck arrived.

  • http://conservablogs.com/theconservativecrawfish/ reelman

    OBAMA-WEEN FOR J. CARTER OBAMA

    DRUDGE OCTOBER 2009:

    ?Obama under fire over falling dollar?
    Alarm over debt draws together diverse coalition?
    Budget deficit hits $1.4 trillion for ?09?
    Thousands Line Up For Stimulus Money in Detroit?
    House Republicans Press Obama on Jobs Creation?
    Shouts of ?Stop printing money? greet Dem congressman at townhall?
    GAO: Criminals have been hired for census work?
    House ethics committee prepares Democrat Rangel announcement? Developing?
    DEMS PLOT ?SECOND STIMULUS?.
    Gold hits record high close to $1,064? Obama Dollar Retreats Most Against Commodities in Wealth Shift?
    Long journey downward? Oil prices near high for year?
    Bleak job market boosts military recruitment;
    Meets all goals for first time since 1973? NYC Homeless Numbers At ?All-Time High??
    Cuba gives ?socialism lite? a try as recession deepens? Gold spikes to new record high?
    Dollar slumps to 14-month low?
    2009 federal deficit surges to $1.42 trillion?
    Experts: Pelosi Value-Added Tax Devastating
    PARTY! Obamas big on White House gigs?
    PAPER: Excuses wearing thin for president, media pals?
    WIRE: Higher jobless rates could be new normal?
    Dems paying off Docs to support ObamaCare?
    Reid Carving Out Favors for States?
    BUCHANAN: Traditional Americans are losing their nation?
    We are ?worried? about weak dollar: Eurogroup chief?
    After Stimulus: 49 of 50 States Have Fewer Jobs!
    *6 Million Jobs Shy of Administrations? Projections? ?

    The menace has over 3 more years of pacifist secular socialist enemas for us?then America will be scourged?suckas.
    Fax your congress?there is NOTHING else you can do at this point?the kooks have the votes.

    http://conservablogs.com/theconservativecrawfish

  • UpLateAgain

    about tyranny existing where the people fear the government, and liberty being the reverse. It is even more true when the fear of government is exhibited by the media. We’ve seen this recently with Obama’s war on Fox, and the comparative lack of outrage by the Mainly Irrelevant Media.

    Obama has overtly threatened to treat them like Fox if they take up a cause Fox has set in motion. If ever there was a sign we are looking at tyranny, this is it. They clearly fear the administration or are at least unwilling to recognize that a perception that they fear the administration has the same effect.

    Thank God we have some people in media left with the courage of a Limbaugh….. or a Beck, Hannity, Ingraham, Levin, Boortz, Church, Wilkow, or Savage.

    They, along with Fox, are going to be ever more and more heavily targeted in the coming times, and their courage is going to be ever more heavily tested.

    Good comments GC.

  • gmann2009

    I am a conservative. The Republican Party is filled with weak kneed, pathietic political animals who feel career and getting lelected first, then maybe country.

    What prevents me, and countless others from contributing to this party of weak, is their complete denial of their role in picking a Liberal like McCain who helped get Obama elected.

    I don’t dislike John. He’s certainly a patriot. BUT HE IS NOT a conservative. EVERY time this party thinks they need a MODERATE…they LOSE.

    Why is the Republican Party not rising up HOWLING about the abuse Rush took? They should be HOWLING..instead this weak group politicians are AFRAID and until they quit this and take the LIBTARDS on directly, this congress will be controlled by Liberals.

    It will courage..absolutely.

  • scatmann2000

    Sorry, but what is the big deal about people complaining about Rush? He’s been nasty to them, he (and we) should only expect the same in return. The weak-kneed responses–”oh people are being mean to Rush, mis-quoting him” are embarrassing. It’s this lack of backbone, along with the desire for everyone to be a dittohead that is hurting our party. Obama is a charismatic guy with a mix of good and mostly terrible ideas. Confront him (and the idiots around him) with better ideas instead of stupid whining and name calling, and then Republican party can be the most relevant again.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine
  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine
  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    It is a big deal to falsely accuse someone of racism and it is against the law to defame someone with false quotes. It is precisely because the left can’t refute Rush’s ideas that they name call. The whiners are the namecallers.

  • Leopard1996

    That issue being if you speak against this administration or their policies you will be shut out and marginalized, and possibly forced to be unemployed.

    The same thing was kinda done in the 50′s, it was called the HUAC, and the hollywood blacklist. If that was wrong then, this is wrong now.

  • http://andrightlyso.com/ civil_truth

    I’ve long felt that courage is what’s going to make the difference in standing up to incipient tyranny – at the early stage when it can be nipped in the bud.

    When Hitler reoccupied the Rhineland, leaders having the courage to stand up could have brought down the whole Nazi house of cards with little damage. Instead, they shrunk back, and it not too much later it took huge courage and the blood of tens of millions to do the job in the end, and even then the outcome was not assured until near the end.

    Similarly, Obama and company can be stopped with courage – and once the patina of invincibility wears through, then the push back will be easier. On the other hand, if people let themselves be intimidated or try to appease, that will just encourage even more tyrannical behavior and make reversal that much more painful.

    And I just love the C.S. Lewis reference – amazing how apposite he is for our age, even almost a half-century since his leaving for a better land.

    Recommended, although a bit tardily.

  • penguin2

    Seriously, do you have any knowledge on how Rush and Snerdly met up and how long they’ve been working together?

  • scatmann2000

    Rush has made a great living making incendiary, at times inaccurate (or at least distorted), often racially charged comments. He;s a big boy, and I think he can handle a little name calling, especially since that’s the game he plays.

    Irving Kristol and Bill Buckley had ideas, and the left had real problems refuting them. Rush tells women to sit on fire hydrants, thinks vaccines are invented to kill people, and evokes Nazis and Mao to describe people he disagrees with. He is making conservatism stupid, and it’s not good for the country.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine
  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine
  • MacAoidh

    …you wouldn’t seem to know intelligence if it bit you in the crotch.

    There is more intelligent and insightful political discourse on Rush and Beck’s shows than virtually anywhere else in the media. Perhaps neither are your cup of tea because that discourse isn’t served up on a bed of effete snobbery a la Peggy Noonan or David Brooks – but I might remind you those are the people who sold conservatism down the river in the first place.

  • MacAoidh

    Nuff said.

  • scatmann2000

    I guess dismissing someone as not “serious” is one way to go. before i do though–I’m not sure what the ‘issue at hand’ is that you wish addressed. My original comment is that people who whine that rush is picked on is ironic at best, given his history, and my comments have been related to that, with the related thought that his level of commentary has diluted the smarts representing the right.

    as for specifics, I said Limbaugh has made plenty of racially charged comments, so numerous it’s tough to know where to start, but a few specifics would his comment that liberal media wanted Donovan McNabb to succeed because he’s black, and that a typical NFL game resembles a battle between Crips and Bloods, and that every composite crime sketch looks like Jesse Jackson.

    I also notice that you have not made a specific case for defamation, and that you really want to do ignore any opinion that does not conform with your own. Why think yourself when Rush can do it for you?

  • Richard Mullins

    yeah you and the rest of the nutball left. Why don’t you take yourself and get lost.

  • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

    Change your handle to something less filthy, please. Do it before you post again, in fact.

  • Richard Mullins

    for all the posts that he’s done are here in this diary and all because it has Rush in title(I think he has RDS[Rush Derangement Syndrome]).

  • Achance

    I don’t know that Rush ever actually said any of that other than the remark about McNabb, who is at best a mediocre QB who had an awful time learning the pro offense and accurately reading defenses yet was treated by the media as some sort of second coming. You do know what the barbed wire tattoos that so many of the players mean? Though most of them can’t legitimately wear them to symbolize their time in jail, many would be in jail were they not in the NFL. And, the composite crime sketch may or may not look like Jesse Jackson, but the odds are pretty good the sketch will look Black.

    You know, if I cared what lefties thought, I’d be offended that the mind-numbed robots that haven’t examined a thing that their lefty teachers and the populare media told them have the audacity to believe first that they indeed do think and second that conservatives don’t and merely follow.

  • Achance

    but there was, and remains, a real threat and real communists in touch with CPUSA, NKVD/KGB, and the GRU as well as plenty of not formally affiliated homegrown Soviet sympathizers.

  • redneck_hippie
  • Leopard1996

    I was addressing the things that Libs use to beat the drum constantly that “McCarthyism” (False labeling I give no credit to) was so evil and wrong and destroyed so many people. If these same people are going to bitch that the perceived wrongs of HUAC and McCarthyism were wrong, then to be logically consistent this is wrong as well.

  • bs
  • penguin2

    and disingenuous. You’re just here to throw out Leftist hate talking points. Your comment: “he has done more to take intelligence out of American conservatism than anyone,” Really? Rush has been around longer than any of the other Conservative Talk Radio hosts. If it wasn’t for him, conservatism would not have made the comeback it did in ’94, or the things that are happening now. And your little spear thrown at Beck, I didn’t miss either.

    I think you have it mixed up. It is your side that is lacking intelligent thinking. Your first mistake…you think conservatives are not as smart as you. Your insults don’t bother me personally, your words just show shallow thinking.

  • bs

    Frankly, I always become suspicious when I hear someone claim that they’re a “lifelong Republican” and/or conservative. That’s usually moby talk.

  • penguin2

    Those mobies/trolls sure end up demonstrating that very common characteristic!

    I think he is a moby. To many arrows slung out, and nothing to balance them.

  • scatmann2000

    I may be a nutball, but i’m not on the left; i’m a lifelong republican and conservative…it just kills me that if you think Rush is less than a god then you’re evil. i just want to conservatism to be smart, open and consistent again.

    funny how some people talk about anyone who disagrees being marginalized or vilified;-)

  • scatmann2000

    …about the idiot PC academic crowd. It would be laughable if it weren’t so dangerous. As another poster notes, blind adherence leads to loss of freedom.

    and, like you I’m not 100% sure if Limbaugh said all those things, as these things are tough to vet. I’m not even saying those statements are wrong–my only point is that when he makes statements (distorted or not) he’s doing so with the intention of ticking someone off…all i’m saying is he and his fans should not be so outraged when people do the same in return. if you can’t take it….

    and, I like In Vino Vertias…Nunc Est Bibendum!

  • scatmann2000

    I can’t wait to go to your blog and read more wit and wisdom like that

  • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

    http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2009/10/20/only-rush-like-courage-can-defeat-obamadem-left/#comment-6722

    Ta.

  • http://www.redstate.com/tnjim TNJim
  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    Defamation has been admitted by the many apologies and retractions re the two quotes re slavery and Ray.

    But that the MSM could think that were true is evidence of mass ignorance, negligence and contempt for Rush’s mass audience to imagine he could have such an audience if those years old quotes were true.

    The crips/bloods quote mirrored Goodell and others when they changed the rules on celebrations a few years ago.

    more later in new column this week

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine