« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Honor veterans by declaring war on PC, i.e. cowardly liars

Today’s national holiday honoring America’s military vets began as a celebration of the Armistice-signing end of The Great War on the “the 11th hour of the 11th day of the 11th month” in 1918. Less than two years earlier, President Woodrow Wilson sent America’s finest “over there” to save Western Civilization from freedom’s enemies.

american flag

But when even our armed forces are so paralyzed by a leftist-inspired “politically correct” American culture that they can’t remove an obvious threat to their own troops, own their own base, and in Texas for God’s sake, I wonder if Liberty itself is in its 11th hour.

We now know that those with the power to remove Major Nidal Hasan for access to our troops were aware of his seditious statements and behavior, including and not limited to: showing a Power Point call for jihad to other medical professionals in the Army; numerous expressions of opposition to America’s wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and sympathy for the call for Muslims to unite against us; his collaboration with an an Imam that inspired three of the 911-hijackers; and numerous e-mail contacts with a known recruiter for al Qaida.

American security agencies investigated the killer of 13 and wounder of more than 50 at Fort Hood and did nothing. It appears that some of the investigations may have been conducted and concluded before the Empathizer-with-Islamists-in-Chief was inaugurated last January. We know that many of Hasan’s threatening actions took place as long ago as 2007, so this PC problem is endemic in the culture and so not necessarily correctable by the presence or absence of a war hawk in the White House.

How many pro-jihad sermons could Hasan have preached to shocked doctors and RNs before his commanding officers would discharge him from his duty to protect Americans from the Islamist terrorists to whom he adheres. Do we simply allow traitors to operate openly rather than risk being called a racist? How many must die for this idiocy.

The term political correctness was first coined by the founder of the evil empire, whose defeat we celebrated two days ago on the 20th anniversary of the Destruction (It didn’t merely “fall” of its own weight) of the Berlin Wall. Vladimir Lenin considered controlling the language to be a necessary predicate to enslaving the masses with Marxism. Lenin also considered lying to be a valid tactic to further the communist faith.

A better term for PC, as Dennis Prager stated on his radio show this week, is: lying cowards.

Lying cowards cry racism and bigotry when it does not exist.

Moreover, the lying cowards in the Drive-by media and on the left want to divert attention from the religious and treasonous aspect of the worst terrorist attack on American soil since 911 (more killed and wounded at the hands of Hasan than via Anthrax or the D.C sniper, who was executed yesterday in Virginia). They want to characterize the killing as “insane” or an “act of passion”, as if that excuses or diminishes the venality of the killings or has any relevance to the failures of our military and national security leaders to take actions to remove his threat from his fellow troops.

What matters is that otherwise intelligent people acted like fools, ignoring the obvious with glazed-over eyes looks and fearing the lying cowards that could call them a bigot more than they feared the likelihood that an obvious enemy of the nation they serve would one day levy war against them.

Which do they fear more today? How many innocent civilians and/or veterans in forts, trade centers or pentagons must die before enough Americans muster the courage to declare war on the PC lying cowards that turn our mental judgments to mush.

Or, has affluence and sloth produced a people too weak to wake up before we go the way of Rome?

Mike DeVine’s Charlotte Observer and Minority Report columns

“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

Originally published @ Examiner.com, where all verification links may be accessed.

COMMENTS

  • Scope

    Hasan, in his powerpoint presentation, had suggested that there would be problems within the military because of asking Muslims to go against those of their own faith in war. I’ve recently read that there have been relaxed rules for particular muslims, such as allowing one to wear a beard. In fact he was pictured on another site today. As I asked above, how many more radical muslims are there in the military? I have to wonder if Hasan knew of at least some others with similar views to his when he warned in 2007 that “there would be problems in the military.” I don’t have much faith with the abolishing of political correctness, even in the face of additional dangers, with Napolitano running to Dubai to calm the muslims, Holder scheduling a speech before CAIR to tell them no backlash will be tolerated, and with the appologizing liar in chief not once using the words, jihad, terror, radical islamists in his speech at the memorial services yesterday.

  • David123

    Roosevelt, that Dem liberal president, rounded up all the Japanese-Americans in west coast states and shipped them to Arkansas. Most were loyal American citizens. Didn’t matter – in 1944 the Supreme Court affirmed that it was constitutional.

    My preference would have been for the Supreme Court to have sent the case back to trial court with instructions to see if the forced relocation of persons was still justified in 1944, based on the improved military situation. However, in 1942, relocating potential 5th columnists away from potential invasion sites was definitely the right thing to do, as well as not violating anyone’s constitutional rights.

    Today, people who spew hatred, jihad, and support for America’s enemies need to be booted out of the military and watched.

    By the way, this idea that a Moslem never kills another Moslem sure would be news to Sadaam Hussein, Iran’s theocrats, and all those Palestinians who throw other Palestinians off the tops of buildings.

  • Scope

    Apparently the PC in the Army is more pervasive than one woud have ever possibly known.

    http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZmJhMDE5NDk2NjUyMjNmNjA3NTBlZjhjMjhmOWJlMzY=

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine
  • OccamsRazor

    .

  • aunum

    being a pu*sy, or at least it does to me.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine
  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    even though I have argued that it was arguably justifiable during a war and within his powers as Commander in chief, but a close call. In any event, I do think that many detained would have been entitled to civil damages, even if not entitled to Habeas Corpus until the cessation of hostilities.

  • cwilson

    .

  • http://andrightlyso.com/ civil_truth

    In Israel, certain of the ultra-Orthodox are exempted from the otherwise universal military service requirement, which is a source of societal tension. I’m not acquainted with the specifics. Practicing Hasidim would find it virtually impossible to serve in the military.

    On the other hand, your question does pertain to less strict Orthodox Jews, and my understanding is that a fair number do serve in the U.S. military, which means that a level of accomodation would have had to be worked out.

    Anyone here with specific knowledge is invited to correct or elaborate.

  • southcoast

    We should not be afraid to call a spade a spade.
    The void created by a cowed and dull witted populace has permitted political correctness to flourish.

  • http://redlense.blogspot.com/ jlynnr

    And here’s the rub. The majority of the PC nonsense and enforcement comes from the civilians working with/for/(against?) the military, not the active duty members themselves. One must ask, who is yanking Casey’s strings? Or is he truly just PC fodder?

    I’ve said it before, the civilianizing of our military will be part of its downfall. The military needs to boot out the civilians and let the military deal with the military.

  • aesthete

    by the (mostly white) upper- and political class in the West Coast, particularly on the part of “”, and that it was spurred on by racism and fear of the “yellow peril”. Though it may have legally fallen under the purview of the President’s war powers, it was still an egregious and wicked use of said powers. To paraphrase the Apostle Paul, though all is permissible under wartime powers, not all is good. (As an aside, I don’t think that a President’s powers should ever be so expansive, even during wartime — I don’t want for us to constantly be at war Eurasia, thank you very much.)

  • Achance

    was one of the key proponents of it in his capacity as Attorney General of California. You can get a liberal’s head to explode fairly reliably though by telling them that Warren was a Republican and was appointed to the USSC by a Republican. Actually, both as AG and Governor of CA he was nominated by both the Republican and Democrat Parties.

  • http://hillbillypolitics.com Steph C

    not only in this but in other ways over the last couple of decades. Ask some of the older veterans about some of the profound changes to operating procedures the Army went through since Bush 1 and stepped up more with Clinton. Old Army and New Army isn’t just about technology.

  • UpLateAgain

    After 9-11, we as a nation were supposed to report suspicious activity when we saw it. Yet when passengers on a plane in Minneapolis did so, the ‘Flying Imams’ were allowed to successfully sue because the Democrats killed the legislative provision that would have protected such whistle-blowers.

    The PC that we now see is an outgrowth of just such decisions.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine
  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine
  • lycurgus

    video of the Commander of Fort Hood praising the resilience of our HEROES:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0IbRQVqDxXc

    when I see our troops, I know PC is no match

    really, its the easiest battle we’ve had since the Spainards back in the 1890s

  • mschmitt
  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    The traitor was sure easier to take down than Al Qaeda in Iraq.

  • mschmitt
  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens
  • lycurgus

    he put the balls back

  • lycurgus

    these cowards are marked in ignominy