« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

How might Mitt purge his progressive past

The 29% ceiling on Romney’s support was erected by him, not Southern Evangelicals

Bachmanns and Perrys come and Bachmanns and Perrys go, but Mitt never gets the leftovers, no matter how much he raises Cain. And don’t be fooled by the recent semantic flap over “Christians” and “cults”. Even Reverend Jeffress admitted that he would vote for Mormon Romney over Christian President Barack Obama.

Religion is the least of Mitt’s problems with all Republican voters

No, the former Governor of the Bay State’s problem with Evangelicals, North and South and non-Evangelicals across the Fruited Plain is a matter of trust on conservative issues of mostly an economic variety.

For the record, this Southern Baptist Carolina Gamecock roosted atop Stone Mountain of Georgia supported Mitt Romney as far back as 2007, before and after Fred Thompson’s cameo appearance and think he would be a great President that all Americans would be proud of.

Here’s why:

  • Character? Check. The husband of one wife and father’s family right out of Norman Rockwell’s portfolio could probably rival the Father of our Country in having never told a lie nor chopped down a cherry tree.
  • Competence? Check. Profits are the “Bain” of his business existence.
  • National Security hawk? Check. He kept Salt Lake City Olympians safe after 911.
  • Social Issue conversion believable? Check. He’s a Mormon. Yes, he pandered for Massachusetts soccer mom votes, but we consider his post-fetal tissue embryos as trash pro-life epiphany to be genuine.
  • Debating whiz? Its self evident.

Unfortunately, absent bona fide conservative policies, none of the above will cure what ails America. Laws must be changed in specific ways to lower the debt, balance the budget and but quickly to save the USA from a future as Greece being bitch-slapped by China.

Policy matters most

I have no doubt that his election and many of his policies will foster a recovery of some magnitude from Great Depression II, anemic QE-fueled stock market-driven GDP numbers notwithstanding; and a lowering of the unemployment rate.

Of “some” magnitude. But America can no longer abide milquetoast photo-op bi-partisan government when Republicans get the messes inevitably left over when Americans take leave of their senses and empower liberal Democrat super-majorities.

Which is why we cringed during the recent Bloomberg-Dartmouth Debate as Mitt waxed syrupy about reaching across the aisle to compromise with Democrats.

Compromise didn’t keep Salt Lake safe from terrorists, doesn’t cure cancers of the body and didn’t work a RomneyCare miracle in Massachusetts no matter how slickly one explains away what is and what could have been; and splitting the differences with Reids and Pelosis won’t cure what Obama, Reid and Pelosiwrought.

Save anymore RomneyCare postmortems for your post-Presidency memoirs. Massachusetts arguably had to do damage control due to federal government distortion of the health care and health insurance markets. Mitt will have no such excuse as President of the United States.

In Washington, D.C. he won’t have to compromise with Democrats if nature takes its natural course next November. He will have, dare I say, right-minded conservative Republicans to deal with in Congress, if not like-minded. And if the few Democrats over 39 that remain in the Senate stand in the way, then we don’t pass bills just for the sake of passing a bill and pretending we solved a problem for David Gregory’s sake at NBC. And besides, much can be repealed via budget reconciliation and by a GOP Senate employing the Reid Rule to waive pesky 60-vote requirements not in the Constitution.

The salad days, when Establishment Republicans did little harm and looked so much better than Clintons and Obamas by comparison, ended with the bursting of the housing bubble in 2008 and after the rising of health insurance premiums in Massachusetts and the United States after the passage of RomneyCare andObamaCare, respectively.

Read our lips and make conservative promises

We trust your word sir, coupled with the lesson of the re-election dog that didn’t bark for George H.W. Bush. Therefore, you shall promise to repeal ObamaCarewhether or not it is immediately replaced by 59-point plans you can’t recite or even lay out bullet points for in a website summary (we looked).

You will allow interstate sales of health insurance policies, forthwith. Yes, we appreciate your discovery of the John Adam’s Massachusetts Constitution and the Tenth Amendment right of states to follow bad advice from Samuel Adams within their borders. But the Articles of Confederation were chucked for ferry boat-like monopolies akin to today’s 50 state health insurance monopolies. The interstate commerce clause has surely been abused by Congress and aided and abetted by the Supreme Court, but that clause was inserted by the Framers specifically to foster interstate commerce.

So promise to foster it.

As we stated earlier, those that revere the name of Christ don’t care about the doctrinal tenants of Mormonism. But neither do we want an unconstitutional National Church of Man-Made Global Warming respected by laws and regulations that deny We the People the right to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Human happiness over imagined threats to the polar bear and snail darters.

We all favor reasonable pollution controls and energy efficiency, but by all means we must have energy to fuel modern life and that includes Americans driving huge SUVs and Monster trucks if we please, at reasonable prices the market produces.

Recycling and other environmental fetishes more about moral preening over wine and cheese are so over outside the Beltway. You know, where the votes are and jobs just now ain’t?

You will promise to eschew any policy based on man-made global warming or you will not be nominated by the Grand Old Party. You are going to have a hard time buying it anyway given your progressive past.

And don’t worry, if it turns out that the breath of humans turns out to be harmful to the Earth, there are plenty of tsunami-free zones in Utah and other places inland where we can wait until the second Coming takes our breath away. If you are truly an acolyte of Rev. Al Gore’s gospel, prove it and buy some coastal front property in Arizona to leave to your great-grand children before you tell Americans and the Third World to give up dreams of prosperity.

I lean to Cain, but remain persuadable.

Mike DeVine

Editor - Hillbilly Politics

Co-Founder and Editor - Political Daily

Atlanta Law & Politics columnist –  Examiner.com

“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

More DeVine Gamecock rooster crowings at Modern ConservativeUnified Patriots,  and Conservative Outlooks. All Charlotte Observer and Atlanta Journal-Constitution op-eds archived at Townhall.com.

COMMENTS

  • acat

    To a large extent, personnel is policy, or is at least a litmus test for the true policies of the hiring manager.

    For me, Mitt has show significant problems with personnel.

    Consider the case of Mitt’s 2008 Illinois campaign chair, Bob Kjellander. Being blunt, Bob’s a crooked politician, part of the cross-party corruption known as the Illinois Combine. Bob is part of the problem.

    That Bob is part of the problem was identified quite early by John Kass, whose byline is on page 2 of the Chicago Tribune, and who has done quite a lot to bring sunlight to bear on the Combine.

    Despite the obvious problems with Bob, Romney never moved to distance himself or his campaign from him.

    You can make the case that Illinois, with its’ rather more blue than purple voting history, and its’ late primary, is not a State that Romney really spent much time on. That is, that Bob was a placeholder, information flowed down from the campaign to Bob, and not the other way.

    This may be valid, but .. it does not excuse making a poor choice in the first place, especially when there are young upstart conservatives in the state who are not tainted,and who could use some nationwide exposure.

    Further, I am not convinced that information flowed only one way. Here we get into Romney’s curious answers – on camera – regarding one Patrick Fitzgerald, who was and is the U.S. Attorney for Northern Illinois, and who was responsible for digging into the Combine.

    When asked whether he would reappoint Fitzgerald, whose term would end shortly after whoever won the 2008 race was sworn in, Romney waffled and equivocated.

    This, to me, makes Romney quite suspect. Should Romney win the nomination, I’ll support him and won’t speak a word about this until after he’s won or lost – however I will not expect good things, let alone great.

    Mew

  • westcoastpatriette

    is that he cannot beat Obama.

  • izoneguy

    And Obama’s policies will keep reminding Mitt how bad RomneyCare is.

    CLASS Dismissed

    WASHINGTON ? The Obama administration says it is unable to go forward with a major program in the president?s signature health care overhaul law ? a new long-term care insurance plan.

    Officials said Friday the long-term care program has critical design flaws that can?t be fixed to make it financially self-sustaining.

    Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius told Congress in a letter that she does not see a viable path forward at this time. By law, implementation of the program was contingent on Sebelius certifying it financially sound.

    The program was supposed to be a voluntary insurance plan for working adults regardless of age or health. Workers would pay an affordable monthly premium during their careers, and could collect a modest daily cash benefit if they became disabled later in life.

    The problem all along has been how to ensure enough healthy people would sign up.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    Mitt has many problems. So do the others. I had a 750-900 word limit. smile

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    We have a great luxury born of tragedy (deep recession) to be particular. That;s why I lean to Cain. Presidents like Obama in the midst of such complete and utter failure, lose and lose badly.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    the new info.

  • acat

    like Mitt should have run for governor of someplace more conservative than the Peoples’ Republic of Massachusetts in 2010 …

    After all, the main thing that’s missing is proof that he can actually govern conservatively.

    Mew

  • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

    nt

  • acat

    the Dems will pull Obama and put in a ringer.

    Mew

  • westcoastpatriette

    Romney’s a cold bucket of spit.

  • westcoastpatriette

    ..

  • acat

    Cheer up. It’s Friday. Go stimulate the economy to the best of your ability.

    Cat’s thinking of going to the movies.

    Mew

  • westcoastpatriette

    That was easy. Enjoy the movie.

  • Scope

    He seems to be MIA. Has anyone seen the GC we all knew around these parts lately? There is some imposter posting here as the GC we all thought we knew. Time to put out am All Points Bulletin to find GC. GC please come home, we all miss you.

  • acat

    we’d all do well to be prepared as G.C. is.

    Hope it doesn’t happen, but ..

    Mew

  • Scope

    before I fight with every word to prevent that disaster from happening. Many are on that same page. To prepare for a possible Romney presidency is to give up fighting the next liberal in the WH. No way no how. To me, this sounds like, well hey you are probably going to have to get those nose plugs out again. No way, no how.

  • aesthete

    I’d vote for it.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    Back in 2007 in Rock Hill, SC near Charlotte, NC. Red Man h2o I met in and on a Kroger parking lot in Tucker, GA today. I bought a pack of Carolina Pride hot dogs or weenies.

  • aesthete

    I tried to recommend… but you know how that goes :(

    Nonetheless, as is my way, I must disagree with one part: I don’t trust Mitt’s conversion at all, and I think that most conservatives can say the same. Converts don’t generally try to lead the marching band first chance they get; they listen and learn from those more learned and more consistent in their faith than them. Would the Catholic Church establish a new convert as an archbishop? Barring something unprecedented, I think the answer would be no.

    There are two reasons for this: the first is that the untempered and untested zeal of the new convert, when not channeled appropriately, can be a liability rather than the asset that it should be. The second is that when it comes to power over peoples’ lives, some converts can unfortunately be operating in bad faith. Even with all of the rules and guardrails established by the Catholic Church when it comes to the priesthood and positions of power within the church, bad apples slip through the cracks and accountability can fail. I am 100% certain that Pope John Paul II didn’t intend for priests under his authority to get away with molesting children, and I certainly don’t believe that the Church as an institution was acting in bad faith, as opposed to some bad apples. Nonetheless, it reflected poorly on it, and the Catholic Church has had to endure some pretty bad PR and see those under its care be abused in the worst way possible — that all could have been avoided with some simple guidelines for accountability which can be easy to forget in good times, but which are painfully remembered when they are forgotten for too long*.

    Likewise, while I don’t personally blame or hate anyone who votes for or supports Romney, I believe that there are foreseeable consequences to voting in at best a convert with no fruits to show for it, and at worst a non-convert acting in bad faith in a cynical attempt to get the Republican party nomination.

    No untested converts leading the party. That’s a rule that can never go wrong, IMO.

    *Disclaimer: I’m a big fan of the Catholic Church in general, and Pope John Paul II in specific — I’m not trying to Catholic bash here, it was just a convenient example to illustrate my point. Sorry if it offends anyone; I tried to word it in the least offensive way possible.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    Please excuse the felt need to acknowledge your femininity. I am a male rooster after all.

    But hey, yesterday I wrote my second pro-Cain column that also defends 9-9-9 and today set a very high bar for Mitt Romney. Very high, and did you se the last line of this column baby!

    smile

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    I wouldn’t blame a President Romney if the Secretary of Agriculture has sex with a cow.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    two smiles?

  • Scope

    and that is the kindest thing I can say about it. If you are so willing to ask a flip flopper the opportunity to flip flop to meet your expectations, I don’t know where that GC screaming and yelling and kicking about the Republican leadership not “holding the line” disappeared to. Mitt Romney excuses or begging, for him to please denounce his prior long held positions, I guess, is beyond anything I can comprehend. It would have been like asking Jeffrey Dammer (sp) to stop killing people. Romney is who he is. Romney will never be able to change his stripes, ever, just like a zebra.

    Why would you ever even entertain the idea that Romney could or would change? If he did, would you believe him?

    I’m not a Cain supporter either, thank you very much. Cain hasn’t shown the first little indication yet, to date, that he can admit that he has ever said something untoward, or assbackwards, or the best argument for conservatives. On the contrary, he has been on the back side slide of race relations when it comes to muslims, and those blacks that vote Democrat, calling them braindead.

    Cain wants to be seen as the “real” first black president. Great, if that would happen. Cain himself has interjected race into the campaign by denouncing all muslims. If you think you can win over blacks to the Republican party (worthy goal) would you call those you are trying to win over “braindead”?

    That’s only a little bit of my thoughts.

    I am so PO’d that you would post such an article, I could spit. Why in hel1 would you ever give Rom,ney, I mean Romney, a chance to redeem himself, which would only be a false redemption at best. He wants your vote you know.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    can jump. Hence, I lean to Cain. How much clearer can I make it that I am for Cain over Mitt!

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    that Stalin, Mao and Hitler could only do so via suicide! I see Mitt’s chance as at least better than that! smile

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    did you ever change! I was 38 when I saw the light, but I must admit that if you backed me for President I would want to spit more than you do after missing the irony in my latest. Because I am way less qualified than even Mitt! And I’m not for Mitt and doubt he could bridge the gap to cause conservatives to favor him over Cain, Perry or Bachmann…for good reason. xxooxx hope that helps doll…smile

  • onemovoter

    Scope has my utmost respect here and I’m not sure how well those kind of names would go over with her.

    I always try to stay away from those kinds of references and just use political names like liberal or conservative so people know where I’m coming from. I just hope Scope doesn’t get too pissed at those references and report them. You’ve had some interesting and pointed discussions here.

    Just saying….

  • acat

    to get into the part. Especially if it’s a part I don’t want to play.

    Figure I better start memorizing the lines now.

    Mew

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    smile

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    I’m from The South…and lovin’ it!

  • aesthete

    Romney’s several degrees worse. If Romney wants a parrot, there are some beautiful specimens in Australia. My rhetoric is not for sale.

  • californiagold

    I share your concern as well. Contrary to the conventional spin among Romney supporters, I don’t think Romney would have an easy time with Obama. There are numerous reasons a Romney nomination would have trouble….

    1) The base of the party (particularly pro-life evangelicals) would find it difficult to support Romney. Some might stay home on election day, while others will hold their nose and vote against Obama – but not because they like Romney. Without an enthusiastic base, it’s much harder to win.

    2) Limited government indies who oppose socialized medicine would have serious trouble voting for Obama or Romney.

    3) Romney presents an image of a rich Wall St. elitist, and as a result, provides liberals an easy target to campaign against.

    4) Other than the economy, the number one issue is ObamaCare. It’s absolutely nuts to run a republican candidate against Obama who supports a healthcare plan that was the model for ObamaCare. That issue is taken off the table if Romney is the nominee. If the economy improves even just a little, Obama will declare a “trend” and the media will have his back. And if that happens, Romney won’t have any big issues to run on.

  • westcoastpatriette

    Especially, numbers 1 & 3. I keep saying Romney is like a twin brother to Meg Whitman who could not win no matter how many millions she spent. And her opponent ranked right up there with Obama in terms of being abysmal. People just could not connect with her and it is the same with Romney.

  • Flagstaff

    One of at least two.

  • Flagstaff

    He will have, dare I say, right-minded conservative Republicans to deal with in Congress, if not like-minded.

    That part is imperative, no matter who we elect, even if it’s Obama.

    We are spending so much time worrying about the selection of our presidential candidate, and that is important, of course, but it is over-archingly important that we elect a conservative House and Senate, including the ouster of squishy Repubs in primaries and replacement of lefty Dems in the general election. If we do that, the various shortcomings of each of our guys will be overcome by the wiser heads in Congress, i.e., by the checks of the balance.

    A 9-9-9 plan will not pass as proposed. Obamacare will be repealed. So will Dodd-Frank. And it won’t matter who the President is, as long as it isn’t The Won.

    But we must elect a conservative Congress.

  • californiagold

    I followed this race very closely, and the conventional wisdom among the political class was that Whitman would win in a landslide against Jerry Brown. During the primary season, Whitman was considered the “most electable”, she had tons of money, and polled way ahead of Jerry Brown…. just as Romney is doing now against Obama.

    The problem for Whitman was that after she won the republican nomination, she had nothing to run on against Brown other than her perceived “electability”. The base didn’t trust her, and she ended up losing to a guy who most pundits thought had no chance of winning. (The parallels to Romney vs. Obama are striking.)

    The point is, history has proven time and time again that it would be unwise for republican primary voters to cast their ballot based primarily on a candidate’s perceived ‘electability”. More often than not, that strategy has failed.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    re-elected by a long shot. The best arguments against Romney are not that he can’t beat Obama easily. Better argument is that we needn’t settle for a moderate. Any of oru conservative scan and would beat Obama too.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    Scope!

  • Ausonius

    Mr. Devine is choosing his title words carefully!

    “May” means that the odds are more likely, above 50%. This distinction has been lost ever more among newer generations. “Might” makes right, I suppose!

    On Thursday in the “Wall Street Journal” Daniel Henninger echoed what I and have others have said here repeatedly: a President Romney will have to be forced to take conservative positions, will have to be forced to support and sign conservative legislation.

    The only way to force that – and there is no guarantee of success on every or even on a majority of issues – is with a Conservative Republican Congress. Please keep in mind Senator Scott Brown of Massachusetts. How well has that worked out?

    Remember the ending of that old song, based on an ancient Middle Eastern fable?

    “Ah shut up, stupid woman,”
    Said the snake with a grin
    “You knew I was a snake
    Before you took me in.”

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    I do like to position myself for all possible contingencies. But I lean to Cain. His plans for the tax code, EPA and other regs etc is a jobs plan Reagan would marvel at.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    it was just the opposite! lol

  • http://www.whyromney.com Ryan Larsen

    He repeatedly tried for large tax cuts, he tried to instate a death penalty, he tried tort reform, he refused to go along with cap and trade, etc.

    So you do have a record of him governing conservatively. Unfortunately, the “governor” part is not enough in a liberal state like MA.

  • http://www.whyromney.com Ryan Larsen

    and check out the facts re: global warming!

    By the way, you may have heard Rush saying that Mitt is the same as Obama on Global Warming. That is not true at all, lol.

    I need to run, and will probably not be back on redstate today, but here are some facts Rush needs to get into his hands (I believe people are feeding him incomplete info):

    “As governor, I explored joining with other New England states to create a carbon dioxide cap-and-trade program for our electric utilities … But when I met with the state’s leading manufacturers, they produced estimates of 30 percent increases in rates … I didn’t sign on.” – No Apology, p.244 hardcover

    Yes, the Perry ad is a smear. Sorry, there’s no other word for it. The “true” Christian is a lyin’ for Texas.

    In his book, Romney also explains reasons to be skeptical of claims made by climate scientists. Then he says “for the sake of argument” let’s assume they are right. And he goes on to explain why the extreme proposals that Democrats want, like cap and trade, are worthless.

    And as far as his statement that man is contributing “some” to warming, I answer that in the Q&A at whyromney:

    Romney does not dispute temperature readings which show a warming trend, however Romney does not blame this all on man and does not believe drastic measures are necessary or practical. Mitt Romney rejects “cap and trade” and all other actions which would hurt the economy. Instead, he favors other solutions such as expanding use of natural gas and nuclear power.

    Romney does acknowledge that man is responsible for “some” warming, but is quick to state that we don’t know how much. Romney’s position is entirely accurate. Even if we set aside the question of greenhouse gases, the mere act of burning fossil fuels generates heat which otherwise would not be released. This is a relatively tiny amount of heat, but enough to have “some” effect. Similarly, man’s corresponding carbon emissions have “some” effect on warming, through the greenhouse effect. No one disputes that carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas – not Glenn Beck, not Rush Limbaugh, not Mitt Romney. The dispute over global warming is not about whether man contributes to warming, but whether the amplification effect of that warming surpasses the earth’s moderating forces. For instance, the warming caused by man’s carbon emissions enables the atmosphere to hold slightly more water. Since water also acts as a greenhouse gas, this in turn creates slightly more warming which then allows even more water to be held in the atmosphere, which creates more warming and more water, in a repeating cycle. This is the amplifying effect which global warming enthusiasts, from Al Gore to Al Franken, believe is getting out of control. But climate is extremely complex and has many moderating factors which we don’t even understand.

    No one knows how much the earth will moderate the amplification cycle. And that goes both ways. The climate scientists don’t know, the global warming enthusiasts don’t know, and the climate change skeptics don’t know. So, how can anyone criticize Mitt Romney’s observation that man is contributing “some” to global warming?

    Until Romney’s critics can answer “how much?” they have no grounds for criticizing him.

    - Ryan

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    co2 regs since then. It just worries us when he pays respect to the false religion of MMGW.

    more later

  • http://www.whyromney.com Ryan Larsen

    you’ll change your mind about that. If it makes you feel better, Romney does very well in the match-up polls against Obama.

    :)

  • acat

    There’s arguably more proof of Palin doing so.

    Did he really want to do all these conservative things, or was he primping his resume?

    Mew

  • http://www.whyromney.com Ryan Larsen

    then yes it will worry you.

    But if you look at what Mitt actually said, and his record, you’ll find he’s being honest and reasonable. And it puts him in a stronger position to take on the AGW crowd, because he’s in a position to calmly explain to them that their solutions won’t work. And that’s exactly what Mitt is doing.

    In other words, Mitt is using honey rather than vinegar. And maybe we shouldn’t fault him for that.

  • http://www.whyromney.com Ryan Larsen

    I plan on posting diaries concerning all the issues that people have concerns about regarding Mitt. On what issues do you believe he didn’t govern conservatively enough? And why?

    Thanks.

  • http://www.whyromney.com Ryan Larsen

    on why you have concerns about Mitt.

  • http://www.whyromney.com Ryan Larsen

    “Converts don?t generally try to lead the marching band first chance they get”

    You might not remember this, but in early 2007, even before he announced, the other candidates were already ganging up on Mitt, attacking him on abortion. Everyone from Huckabee to McCain to Brownback was piling on. That’s why Mitt tried to make clear to everyone that he was pro-life. I can see how you might interpret that as “trying to lead the band,” but in fact it was a defensive posture while trying to not appear “on the defensive.”

  • http://www.whyromney.com Ryan Larsen

    Is that they know so much that isn’t so.

  • intensity

    …kidding me??? Look at the post below….

  • http://www.whyromney.com Ryan Larsen

    the lines you’ll be learning will be 100% true. No shame in that.

  • Justin Spagnolo (standardcandle)

    He can repent and move on… in some other role… not as President… unless enough people vote for him in the primaries… something we should try to avoid all together.

  • http://www.whyromney.com Ryan Larsen

    And saw it.

    Tell me something you “know to be so.”

  • acat

    Ingredients:

    1 banana
    2 scoops french vanilla ice cream
    4 tbsp chocolate syrup (Hershey special dark if available)
    Whipped cream (if desired)
    Maraschino cherry (if desired)
    3 tbsp banana liqueur* (substitute 2 tbsp rum)

    Warnings:

    Serve in glass or ceramic dishes only, don’t use the disposable stuff for this!
    Serve outdoors or in areas that DON’T have sprinklers!
    This recipe should be prepared under adult supervision ONLY.

    Preparation:

    Peel banana.
    “butterfly” the banana lengthwise Do not cut all the way through.
    Place two scoops of ice cream in a ceramic or glass dish.
    Place the banana over the ice cream so that it forms a “reservoir” near the center of the dish.
    Dribble the chocolate syrup over the bananas and ice cream. Garnish with whipped cream and cherry.

    Immediately before serving, pour the liqueur into the reservoir.

    Ignite the liqueur with a long fireplace match. Eat once the flames go out. (that’ll mean most of the alcohol has boiled off…)

    Don’t eat and drive!

    Mew

    * The banana liqueur, after it flames out, will taste like bananas, so for a more “pure” flaming banana split, it’s recommended.

  • acat

    Take a few minutes, plug “Kjellander Romney acat site:redstate.com” into google. (or bing, if you prefer)

    Personnel is policy, and Mitt’s got a lousy track record.

    Mew

  • Justin Spagnolo (standardcandle)

    However he says things that signify he hasn’t seen the light all the way… he backpeddles and he tries his best to carve out distinctions that may excuse his past …

    He fails to communicate yea yea nay nay and that causes much of the feelings people have in distrust.

    He should acknowledge his mistakes and ask people to join him in moving forward…

  • onemovoter

    Because you completely mangled what actually is perceived to be believed as what CO2 and other gases actually do in the earth’s environment.

    NASA’s satellite data over the last 20 years has produced information showing that CO2 has much less of a warming effect than what is currently used as a standard in global warming models.

    Also recently a group of Swiss scientists concluded an ongoing experiment to see what actually is the seed for cloud formation. They found out that through their closed environment, it was cosmic rays that was the seed, and our sun’s activity or lack there of, caused more or less cosmic rays to reach the earth’s atmosphere. Environmental scientists do state that cloud cover and rain have a huge impact on temperature here.

    These 2 findings have blown away any argument over the AGW crowd and their beliefs that man is responsible. Mitt should read up on this latest info and join the rest of us that have a brain and use it.

    By the way, you should check out my latest diary:
    http://www.redstate.com/onemovoter/2011/10/15/dancing-with-the-devil-romney-style/
    Read the links to see who Romney has been dancing with. Working with the lunatic left is not my idea of a good idea.

  • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

    something that MR. Romney is very fond of doing.

  • http://www.ssce.net/Web-Articles/Web-articles-indexed-authors.html#authors-l JLenardDetroit

    it is MORON-ism!!! Sorry to have to admit that such a large portion of Americans are absolute MORONS. I still, however, want a real Conservative, not one (Romney) trying to play one now!!!!

  • Remington_Steele

    Good read GC, and I totally agree with your analysis. Very creative use of the candidates names… had me laughing there. :)

    For those that want the hard painful way to find Romney’s 59 point plan. Do the following:

    1. go to www.mittromney.com/jobs
    2. click on Full PDF button. PDF is shown on page. Stupid thing now is that you have to scroll to the end of the document (pg 154).

    Romney obviously needs a better way to present the short version, the 59 point version and the 160 page version… whoa.

  • http://www.whyromney.com Ryan Larsen

    I know your tricks.

  • http://www.whyromney.com Ryan Larsen

    I’ll take a look at that. What other concerns do you have about Mitt?

  • http://www.whyromney.com Ryan Larsen

    but his critics aren’t very fond of considering any of his alleged problems independently of the others. That’s pretty good for building camaraderie with other critics, but it’s an impediment to learning.

  • http://www.whyromney.com Ryan Larsen

    “you completely mangled what actually is perceived to be believed as what CO2 and other gases actually do in the earth?s environment.”

    You might want to check that mangled syntax.

    “CO2 has much less of a warming effect than what is currently used as a standard in global warming models.”

    So, it has some effect. That’s what Romney said. He never said the models were correct.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    And you can hold all the smugness with the “if we had just read what you write” BS. We read what you write, ad nauseum, and we disagree or find it irrelevant to the issue. OK? We rad your stuff and we know what Mitt’s record is and what he said in response to the questions and we know a suck up to the left when we hear one.

    So that if we all killed ourselves that the temp of the Earth would lower. Surely Mitt doesn’t waste his breath on such insignificancies when he answes questions from the Dem Party aka MSM Media and “admit” that humans “contribute” to global warming.

    Of course conservatives would prefer a candidate that didn’t feel the need to satisfy the faux science crowd of lib intimidaters to one that does, like Mitt. One that isn’t intimidated by the Left on their climate change religion would be be MORE reliably not prone to passing laws that would limit out liberty and ability to make money over some worship of a particular temperature.

    Did you know that before man walked the earth and before the first Model T spit out the first carbon, that half of the states of NC, SC and GA were under the Atlantic? And that Bill Clinton warned that we could lose 50 feet of Mnahattan in 50 years? Egad! Where will the Knicks play.

    Like I said, worried about global warming or the new “climate change”? Move inland. Kansas and Utah are tsunami free zones.

    smile

    PS Given Mitt’s past, and yes, we are happy that while he attends the Al Gore’s Church he says he would NOT act on his new religion. Thanks for small favors. But a lower key approach might be the better course to defend Mitt….smile

  • Ausonius

    I do not know: that is the problem. He has had his feet in both conservative and leftist camps: he has been all over the place e.g. on abortion and regulation of businesses. Bu that is the definition of an East Coast Republican politician.

    In the end…

    RomneyCare was NOT a conservative solution to health-care problems: reducing government intrusion into markets and thereby reducing the distortions in price would be a conservative solution.

    In the end…

    “Closing loopholes” in tax laws meant that for a good number of people and businesses their taxes increased. I dislike the verbal tap-dancing from politicians who tell us that “closing loopholes” is NOT a tax increase. If you want to reform taxation, then reform taxation by reducing rates BEFORE you eliminate loopholes. Don’t say that by “increasing fees” on businesses you are NOT raising taxes: a fee is a tax. Admit it: and do not claim that a fee will not affect the average person: yes, most of the time it will, because it will add to the cost of doing business. I can agree that his increased fee for using public courses will not affect the average person not playing golf. But other general fees on businesses add to the cost of doing business.

    A Conservative looks to cut regulation, to cut or eliminate fees. Again, I can agree that Romney indeed did do this at times, when he was governor.

    Yes, I know that his agenda gave Massachusetts a surplus in its budget. Yes, I know that he had to work with a hostile state legislature in a hideously Blue state that loves class warfare. I know that he vetoed a good number of idiotic bills and that his vetoes were over-ridden.

    Yes, I will vote for him if he gets the nomination. But will he be able to rise to the challenge for the present crisis and offer a truly two-legged Conservative stance ?

    “Timid” is the word right now, which again shows his East Coast Republicanism: see the following article.

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904537404576554692126810066.html?mod=djemEditorialPage_h

  • acat

    I can sum it up this way. I would prefer just about any of the other GOP candidates over Mitt Romney. The two exceptions I can think of are Buddy Roemer and Ron Paul.

    Mew

  • http://www.whyromney.com Ryan Larsen

    I responded quite low-key to someone falsely accusing me of “completely mangling” science. Then you give me a not-so-low-key reply, demanding I be more low-key?

    Moreover, you don’t even attempt to factually back up your claim that Mitt follows Al Gore’s religion. You only say that you are aware of things and have read things, but you don’t point out anything Mitt has said that you actually disagree with on the merits.

    Mitt’s critics can’t win on the facts, and I suspect that’s why they get so emotional and accuse others of being mean for pointing out the facts.

  • reggie182

    Romney had studied, lived, and worked in Massachusetts since the early 70s. I’m assuming that’s the primary reason why he chose to run there.

    Had he gone off to a conservative state to begin a political career as a “carpetbagger” I’m not sure how far he would have gotten.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    my bad

  • publious

    Romney signing his health care legislation into law acknowledging his “friend and collaborator Ted Kennedy….

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LpKJEohuick

  • reggie182

    It’s just the others in the field seem a lot less poised to beat him.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    the 49ers. I’m a big Lion Calvin Johnson, Atlanta, GT Ramblin’ Wreck fan….

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    JS

  • gekster

    They had to lose sometime, and this loss might bring them back to reality, and make them a better team.
    At least that’s what I’m hoping. ;)

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    to knee injury for the season….oh well

  • rightwingmom52

    Coach Dooley, “Nobody’s gonna feel sorry for South Carolina,” except he said “Tennessee.”

    But I do sympathize. We’ve lost Hunter, Bray and a couple of others. Sigh. Roll Tide.