« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Gun rights and ‘hate’ crime laws that breed crime-causing hatred

Gun-owning fathers in homes with good fences, make good neighbors

The shooting of an unarmed Trayvon Martin by George Zimmerman in Sanford, Florida has one again placed the issues of race, hate crimes and gun rights before the American public. Some Democrats have even dusted off their old gun control playbooks more than a decade after they shelved in the wake of electoral defeats attributed to their championing of the issue in the 1990s.

Previously in this space we have argued that the tape of Zimmerman’s neighborhood watch 911 call after spotting Martin “acting suspiciously in the rain” revealed no evidence of racial profiling and that the injection of race into the public discussion by Spike Lee-aided New Black Panther’s posting bounties, Attorney General Holder-praised Revs. Jackson and Sharpton alleging that Blacks are “under attack” in America, with even President Obama himself calling on Americans to search their souls over a shooting victim that looks like an imaginary son of his own would look like, was the height of irresponsibility.

The only “hate crime” we have been able to spot is the one regularly committed by Democrats and the media that assume white Americans must be presumed to be racists, thus requiring the government to afford them the extra-protection of “hate crimes’ legislation” and immunity from laws against vigilantism when a Black man is killed by non-Black men, including so-called “white” Hispanics.

But do hate crime laws really afford any extra protection from racist predators?

The question reminds of the vilification of then presidential candidate George W. Bush for opposing hate crime legislation while governor of the Lone Star State which would have allowed the murderer of James Byrd to have ten years tacked on to his sentence. All Governor Bush did was preside of the white racists murderer’s execution; but for the “civil rights” industry, justice for James Byrd mattered less than that governments maintain a public face riddled with white guilt.

No one ever asks if one of the reasons that the number of incidents of White-on-Black crime are puny as compared to the number of such Black-on-White incidents, is that blacks are constantly sent the message from media-favored Black leaders and Black Presidents with typical (racist) white grandmothers, that even whites that are not grandmothers are also, typically, racist.

It’s hard enough to convict killers with proof beyond a reasonable doubt that they intended to kill their victims, without also forcing juries into a whole other realm of mind and heart reading, especially when there exists no evidence that such examinations deter crime. One of the lessons this former criminal defense lawyer learned many years ago when a client of mine was jailed for contempt of court for rude behavior in the courtroom soon after being found not guilty, is to declare victory and leave the courtroom.

The victory, as best one can be achieved given the biting of the apple by Eve and her progeny, over racism was achieved in America many years ago thanks mainly to how a real reverend named Martin Luther King tapped into the moral consciences of white Americans raised on Judeo-Christian values. Who knows, maybe these Americans could one day even elect as president a man that doesn’t look like them. But if the civil rights industry were to declare victory, they would have to start doing real work.

Those same Judeo-Christian values also inform us concerning proportional punishments, deterrence and crime prevention. 

The “eye for an eye” legal proposition was “progressive” in the time of pagan virgin sacrifices and death sentences for crimes less than murder, rape or treason. Punish one for the intentional removal of the eye, not the condition of the heart of the eye remover. Let one man cleave to one woman and turn their born-wild issue into civilized human beings.

Finally, learn the lesson of Kennesaw, Georgia and apply it not only to the protection of the home, but also the sites of mass murder in public high schools like Columbine and college campuses like Virginia Tech, as March 25th marked the 21st anniversary of that city’s ordinance requiring heads of households (with certain exceptions) to keep at least one firearm in their homes.

The city’s population grew from around 5,000 in 1980 to 13,000 by 1996 (latest available estimate). Yet there have been only three murders: two with knives (1984 and 1987) and one with a firearm (1997). After the law went into effect in 1982, crime against persons plummeted 74 percent compared to 1981, and fell another 45 percent in 1983 compared to 1982.

And it has stayed impressively low. In addition to nearly non-existent homicide (murders have averaged a mere 0.19 per year), the annual number of armed robberies, residential burglaries, commercial burglaries, and rapes have averaged, respectively, 1.69, 31.63, 19.75, and 2.00 through 1998.

Finally, even if many Blacks won’t accept the fact that most Whites accept them as equals, they should still eschew special race-based laws that treat them like perpetual victims needing an Uncle Sam as daddy; and choose instead to embrace the U.S. Constitution whose 13th, 14th and 15th full-citizenship-granting “Civil War” Amendments were opposed by Democrats because, as Chief Justice Roger Taney said in Dred Scott, “[citizenship] would give [blacks] the full liberty to keep and carry arms wherever they want.”

Democrats were also the ones that passed race-based “Jim Crow” laws after the failures of Reconstruction to keep blacks unarmed and the Democratic Party has continued to this day, despite the passage of the Civil Rights act of 1964, to betray the King “content of character’” legacy to favor laws based on race as if Jim Crow never died but just changed sides.

Mike DeVine

Atlanta Law & Politics columnist –  Examiner.com

Editor - Hillbilly Politics

Co-Founder and Editor - Political Daily

“One man with courage makes a majority.” – Andrew Jackson

More DeVine Gamecock rooster crowings at Unified Patriots,  and all  Charlotte Observer and Atlanta Journal-Constitution op-eds archived at Townhall.com.

COMMENTS

  • George Neitz

    My thoughts exactly Mike

  • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

    Don’t go getting sexist on us. My husband has even given me a couple of guns for Christmas presents.

    One of my favorite articles about the law in Kennesaw is here.

    By the way, our tea party (Rainy Day Patriots) holds its monthly meetings now at Hoover Tactical Firearms. It’s just a nice touch.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    I’m a bit scared of guns and not of death! smile…But I am an absolutist on the right to protect oneself with arms as per the 2nd Amendment

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    to emphasize how much better the issue of crime would be if children had both parents in the home.

  • APA Guy

    Rec’d with pleasure.

  • Vegas_Rick

    I had the misfortune of spending all day, every day of this week, with a liberal professor from a major Arizona university. Today was a good day though. I had two free hours to discuss this diary and Ann Coulter’s recent column on the history of gun control and racism. At one point he became practically apoplectic and stormed out of the room. Great fun.

    Good job, GC.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    that’s hard to do. Thx guy

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    nt

  • Flagstaff

    Nice touch.

  • Flagstaff

    is not the heat! It’s the leftist tilt of the three major state universities.

    Not that it’s any different anywhere else.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    I don’t right many gun rights columns. i think the last one was to praise the Supreme Court decision a few years ago that affirmed the right to keep and bear arms in one’s home.

  • Viet71

    Was trained in criminal law before criminal law became political.

    The Right should reject the notion that the criminal law draws upon political values that change yearly.

    Criminal law is rooted in traditional ideas of right and wrong.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    amen

  • kowalski

    And I sleep better, and have slept better, every night since 2009 when I bought my first pistols, one of which I keep within arms reach every time I turn in for the night, and the other of which I carry on a regular basis.

    Anyone who isn’t a proven criminal should be able to also as an American.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    enteaa

  • kowalski

    When you’re living in a building almost alone in the middle of a semirural area trying and in the process of evicting a couple tenants who have lied to you up, down and sideways ***AND*** are in Superior Court in a case involving an attempted murder, in the middle of the winter, when the police are only on duty 5 or 6 days a week, and you’re 20 miles from the nearest State Police barracks, after midnight, some strange things happen.

    Like, say, on that night in the middle of that winter, with eight inches of still-falling snow on the ground, while you’re alone in the building, someone pulls into the back driveway in a 4-wheel drive with big, bright halogen lights, and a very loud exhaust, and starts revving the engine for a full 10 minutes, “Vrrooooooom. Vroooooooooom.” Shaking the walls of the building.

    Almost goading you to walk out the door into the blinding lights and snow.

    And you sit there and think: “Let’s see. What do I have to protect myself with if this is something bad or worse? Well, I have this here broom stick. I could chuck a barbell at them. Oh, and I’ve got a paring knife and a small folder. And of course, my good looks and charming personality.”

    That’s not enough. And the night it happened I realized very pointedly it wasn’t enough and went the next morning after the plows cleared the road and bought my Smith and Wesson 4040PD.

    And I’ve slept a lot better ever since.

  • acat

    Every Right in the Bill Of Rights has an assumed Responsibility.

    Unfortunately for us, the Founding Fathers apparently assumed people would remember…

    Mew

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    cock-a-doodle-do

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    sweet dreams

  • kowalski

    Except that sometimes they are not going to arrive or are going to arrive too late. I have a very good relationship with my local police, and they will tell you frankly there are times and places where they simply cannot be, at least not in a timely way, particularly in an era of unprecedented belt-tightening. After midnight in the middle of a snowstorm in a semirural area when the local PD is closed is one of those times and the bad guys know it. The store next to my building was robbed 3 times in 2009, late at night. Nobody has been apprehended as far as I know.

    I could have called 9-1-1 that night, gotten the State Police and the dispatch still would have taken 20-30 minutes – at least. And that’s a looooooooooong time when a stranger is in your driveway in the middle of the winter. Also, whoever it was pulled into the driveway and had direct access to the electrical services. With a couple of screwdrivers they could have cut the power.

    Then what do you do? Cry?

  • rightlane1111
  • vangoghssister

    When and how did the Republican Party lose ownership of being the champions of civil rights and the abolishment of slavery? Why have so many conveniently forgotten the Democrats were (and still are) the ones who fought so hard to keep slavery and oppose every single bit of civil rights legislation until the 1960s, including the 14th and 15th amendments? And let’s not forget the KKK.

    It is beyond me why anyone would admit to being a Democrat, given the history of that party. Even more puzzling is why Blacks are overwhelmingly registered Democrats. Why isn’t someone in the public eye willing to stand up and point all of this out? Everyone needs to be reminded that the real history of the Democrat party is shameful and filled with hate towards the very people they profess to be so concerned about. Aaarrrggghh!!!

  • norris

    the police are only minutes away.

  • norris

    the police are only minutes away.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    more later

  • Don T.

    I would agree with all of the above. I endorse 2d Amendment rights and the defense, and exercise, of those rights. A right not exercised is a right that could be lost. I would add, not only do I carry a firearm in my car and have one readily available in my home, but I also carry a firearm on my person just about everywhere I go. Why? Because a policeman is too heavy, one. And two, I can’t predict when I may be confronted with a criminal bent on harming me.

  • kowalski

    Barack Obama said in The Audacity of Hope back in 2006:

    “I believe in keeping guns out of our inner cities, and that our leaders must say so in the face of the gun manufacturers’ lobby.”

    If you think about that statement for even a millisecond, he didn’t say: “I believe in keeping guns out of the hands of criminals and strengthening the rights of law-abiding citizens to own them.” His intent is almost the diametrical opposite.

    The most charitable reading of that sentence is that he believes that the people who live in “inner cities” are not really full citizens, and that they have to have guns “kept out” because, presumably, they aren’t capable of owning them responsibly – even to defend themselves.

    What’s the difference between a law abiding person who lives in Hyde Park in Chicago and someone who lives 40 or 50 miles away in Indiana, in terms of their basic humanity and capacity to responsibly own a gun? Apparently for Barack Obama, geography is everything – and those people who live inside his walls shall be deemed incapable.

  • kowalski

    Cities like Chicago, if they tried as hard as they do to enforce their own City Stickers laws, could easily establish a testing and licensing system whereby citizens of their City could go through a process to receive a firearms license – either for home defense and/or concealed carry. My guess is that as an agency it would take about 50 people to staff and maintain – a tiny, tiny fraction of the City government.

    In fact, I can think of a number of ways to make it completely budget-neutral and self-funding, and they could restore the basic right of self-defense to a lot of people who have been denied it for far, far too long.

    They don’t want to do it because they have an ideological aversion to it and really, at this point, an almost racist pedantic view that the people who are their “Wards” are incapable of being trusted as full citizens of their Country.

  • kowalski

    They’re admitting that they’ve failed their own citizens and the only way (they think) to ‘manage’ them is to keep them down. And people wonder why Farrakhan has so many fervent acolytes! The City of Chicago deems *almost all* of its people to be second class citizens when it comes to their 2nd Amendment rights.

  • davenj1

    which I wholeheartedly agree with on an unfettered basis for every law-abiding citizen, I have a serious problem with hate crime legislation whether applied to blacks, gays, or anyone else. Killing is wrong regardless of the race of the victim and it totally denies the concept of “justice being color blind.” In fact, it codifies the exact opposite!!!!!

  • eyes2see

    Couldn’t agree more regarding the “Hate Crimes” issue. Always thought they violated the “Equal Protection” concept anyway. A victim is a victim whether the perpetrator’s heart was filled with hate or not. Another divisive shame foisted upon us by populist politicians.

  • http://www.marklaiminger.org Lammo

    you may have to wait for the rest of your life for the police to bring theirs.

    The only responsible thing for a citizen to do is to take responsibility for his/her own safety. Once you acknowledge that the only decisions left are brand, caliber, magazine/cylinder size and barrel length. I personally prefer Glocks, YMMV.