<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Condi as VP ensures Obama&#8217;s defeat [updated]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2012/07/12/condi-as-vp-ensures-obamas-defeat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2012/07/12/condi-as-vp-ensures-obamas-defeat/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 20:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: demsaresatanic</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2012/07/12/condi-as-vp-ensures-obamas-defeat/#comment-14340</link>
		<dc:creator>demsaresatanic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 00:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/?p=2747#comment-14340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You likely know nothing about how representative the sample was, or who conducted the poll and how accurate their polls have been in the past. My poll says Condi is a squish and would hurt Rom?s chances, if you can figure out why my poll is of no value perhaps you will understand what tnfriend is saying.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You likely know nothing about how representative the sample was, or who conducted the poll and how accurate their polls have been in the past. My poll says Condi is a squish and would hurt Rom?s chances, if you can figure out why my poll is of no value perhaps you will understand what tnfriend is saying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finrod</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2012/07/12/condi-as-vp-ensures-obamas-defeat/#comment-14293</link>
		<dc:creator>Finrod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 04:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/?p=2747#comment-14293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What it does show is that Rice helps Romney draw the undecided voters.  In every demographic but Tea Partiers, Romney polled multiple points better when Rice was added.

Whether this is something that will help through to Election Day, though, no one can say.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What it does show is that Rice helps Romney draw the undecided voters.  In every demographic but Tea Partiers, Romney polled multiple points better when Rice was added.</p>
<p>Whether this is something that will help through to Election Day, though, no one can say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tnfriendofcoal101368</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2012/07/12/condi-as-vp-ensures-obamas-defeat/#comment-14261</link>
		<dc:creator>tnfriendofcoal101368</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 21:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/?p=2747#comment-14261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dickmorris.com/a-romney-landslide/&quot;&gt;I can see you don&#039;t believe me&lt;/a&gt; perhaps Dick Morris can convince you.  A poll showing Obama 45/41 is in the worst scenario actually reflecting 52/48 Romney in the worst case (meaning he wins with or without Condi) as long as he doesn&#039;t pick Tancredo.  That 52 is actually way more conservative than Morris - he&#039;d say 45 is Obama&#039;s ceiling and Romney gets all the way to 55.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.dickmorris.com/a-romney-landslide/">I can see you don&#8217;t believe me</a> perhaps Dick Morris can convince you.  A poll showing Obama 45/41 is in the worst scenario actually reflecting 52/48 Romney in the worst case (meaning he wins with or without Condi) as long as he doesn&#8217;t pick Tancredo.  That 52 is actually way more conservative than Morris &#8211; he&#8217;d say 45 is Obama&#8217;s ceiling and Romney gets all the way to 55.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tnfriendofcoal101368</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2012/07/12/condi-as-vp-ensures-obamas-defeat/#comment-14257</link>
		<dc:creator>tnfriendofcoal101368</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 21:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/?p=2747#comment-14257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Democrats aren&#039;t going to move to Romney regardless of who the VP pick is unless it is Hiliary Clinton

Republicans are going to move to Romney if you or I were the pick

Undecideds are going to move to Romney if you or I were the pick because they always move away from the incumbent unless he picks Tancredo

I don&#039;t believe voters make their decision based on the VP pick is my point.  The poll determines Condi is popular - it doesn&#039;t say she moves people from Obama to Romney because she doesn&#039;t and neither does anyone else which is the best argument for pick the best person to run the country if you die and to help campaign and raise money.  Neither of those is Condi - because as an evangelical she makes me want to puke at the thought of her being on the ticket and Romney ought to consider I don&#039;t think I am alone there in a group that comprises 1/4 of his base.  (This is another thing the poll leaves out - how many evangelicals stay home - that is really the important one to Romney).  I&#039;d hold my nose and vote for him and choke on the puke...how many wouldn&#039;t.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democrats aren&#8217;t going to move to Romney regardless of who the VP pick is unless it is Hiliary Clinton</p>
<p>Republicans are going to move to Romney if you or I were the pick</p>
<p>Undecideds are going to move to Romney if you or I were the pick because they always move away from the incumbent unless he picks Tancredo</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t believe voters make their decision based on the VP pick is my point.  The poll determines Condi is popular &#8211; it doesn&#8217;t say she moves people from Obama to Romney because she doesn&#8217;t and neither does anyone else which is the best argument for pick the best person to run the country if you die and to help campaign and raise money.  Neither of those is Condi &#8211; because as an evangelical she makes me want to puke at the thought of her being on the ticket and Romney ought to consider I don&#8217;t think I am alone there in a group that comprises 1/4 of his base.  (This is another thing the poll leaves out &#8211; how many evangelicals stay home &#8211; that is really the important one to Romney).  I&#8217;d hold my nose and vote for him and choke on the puke&#8230;how many wouldn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tnfriendofcoal101368</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2012/07/12/condi-as-vp-ensures-obamas-defeat/#comment-14254</link>
		<dc:creator>tnfriendofcoal101368</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 20:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/?p=2747#comment-14254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That though data analysis/administration is my day job and I don&#039;t think the poll is predictive, the thought of &quot;mildly pro choice&quot; on the ticket makes me throw up in my mouth and that could color the analysis (which is why I make it a point in the job to say - I don&#039;t care one or the other - and stick to that philosophy).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That though data analysis/administration is my day job and I don&#8217;t think the poll is predictive, the thought of &#8220;mildly pro choice&#8221; on the ticket makes me throw up in my mouth and that could color the analysis (which is why I make it a point in the job to say &#8211; I don&#8217;t care one or the other &#8211; and stick to that philosophy).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finrod</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2012/07/12/condi-as-vp-ensures-obamas-defeat/#comment-14255</link>
		<dc:creator>Finrod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 20:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/?p=2747#comment-14255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just look at the numbers-- Obama vs Romney and Obama/Biden vs Romney/Rice:

Democrats: 85-7 --&gt; 86-10: +1 Obama, +3 Romney
Republicans: 5-84 --&gt; 5-89: 0 Obama, +5 Romney
Independents: 38-34 --&gt; 41-40: +3 Obama, +6 Romney

College degree: 47-42 --&gt; 48-46: +1 Obama, +4 Romney
No college: 43-42 --&gt; 44-46: +1 Obama, +4 Romney

Men: 42-43 --&gt; 44-47: +2 Obama, +4 Romney
Women: 48-40 --&gt; 48-45: 0 Obama, +5 Romney

About the only one that doesn&#039;t change much is:

Tea Partiers: 9-85 --&gt; 8-86: -1 Obama, +1 Romney

but as you said, Tea Partiers aren&#039;t going to change much based on the VP pick.

Those numbers are a solid improvement across the board in all demographics; Romney is picking up 2/3rds or more of the voters who are persuaded to one side or the other based on the VP pick.  The only way you&#039;re going to explain them away is by showing another poll that has another VP pick showing comparable improvement in Romney&#039;s position.  Good luck finding that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just look at the numbers&#8211; Obama vs Romney and Obama/Biden vs Romney/Rice:</p>
<p>Democrats: 85-7 &#8211;&gt; 86-10: +1 Obama, +3 Romney<br />
Republicans: 5-84 &#8211;&gt; 5-89: 0 Obama, +5 Romney<br />
Independents: 38-34 &#8211;&gt; 41-40: +3 Obama, +6 Romney</p>
<p>College degree: 47-42 &#8211;&gt; 48-46: +1 Obama, +4 Romney<br />
No college: 43-42 &#8211;&gt; 44-46: +1 Obama, +4 Romney</p>
<p>Men: 42-43 &#8211;&gt; 44-47: +2 Obama, +4 Romney<br />
Women: 48-40 &#8211;&gt; 48-45: 0 Obama, +5 Romney</p>
<p>About the only one that doesn&#8217;t change much is:</p>
<p>Tea Partiers: 9-85 &#8211;&gt; 8-86: -1 Obama, +1 Romney</p>
<p>but as you said, Tea Partiers aren&#8217;t going to change much based on the VP pick.</p>
<p>Those numbers are a solid improvement across the board in all demographics; Romney is picking up 2/3rds or more of the voters who are persuaded to one side or the other based on the VP pick.  The only way you&#8217;re going to explain them away is by showing another poll that has another VP pick showing comparable improvement in Romney&#8217;s position.  Good luck finding that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tnfriendofcoal101368</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2012/07/12/condi-as-vp-ensures-obamas-defeat/#comment-14250</link>
		<dc:creator>tnfriendofcoal101368</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 20:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/?p=2747#comment-14250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s not that the one poll doesn&#039;t prove anything - it&#039;s this poll doesn&#039;t prove anything - one way or the other and in fact you don&#039;t have actual data which is my point.  If your asking for a decision about who would be the most popular pick sure Condeleeza Rice - this one poll does indeed tell you that but you can&#039;t extropolate from there that she helps Romney in any way (i.e. that people who would vote for Obama are going to turn and vote for Romney because of Condeleeza Rice).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not that the one poll doesn&#8217;t prove anything &#8211; it&#8217;s this poll doesn&#8217;t prove anything &#8211; one way or the other and in fact you don&#8217;t have actual data which is my point.  If your asking for a decision about who would be the most popular pick sure Condeleeza Rice &#8211; this one poll does indeed tell you that but you can&#8217;t extropolate from there that she helps Romney in any way (i.e. that people who would vote for Obama are going to turn and vote for Romney because of Condeleeza Rice).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finrod</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2012/07/12/condi-as-vp-ensures-obamas-defeat/#comment-14248</link>
		<dc:creator>Finrod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 20:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/?p=2747#comment-14248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And of course one poll doesn&#039;t prove anything, but it&#039;s one more poll than you have for anything you&#039;ve said in this entire thread.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And of course one poll doesn&#8217;t prove anything, but it&#8217;s one more poll than you have for anything you&#8217;ve said in this entire thread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tnfriendofcoal101368</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2012/07/12/condi-as-vp-ensures-obamas-defeat/#comment-14249</link>
		<dc:creator>tnfriendofcoal101368</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 20:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/?p=2747#comment-14249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[and that 4% would move for anyone - Condi does nothing for him but potentially drives evangelicals to finally stay home.  A poll that says Obama/Romney - 45/41 is already great news for Romney.  The best way to read that poll is 55% aren&#039;t voting for Obama.  There is no VP pick out there worth 400 basis point move in this election; if there were Romney would have already picked her and ridden into the sunset.  400 basis points is the size of Obama&#039;s win over McCain in a landslide election.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and that 4% would move for anyone &#8211; Condi does nothing for him but potentially drives evangelicals to finally stay home.  A poll that says Obama/Romney &#8211; 45/41 is already great news for Romney.  The best way to read that poll is 55% aren&#8217;t voting for Obama.  There is no VP pick out there worth 400 basis point move in this election; if there were Romney would have already picked her and ridden into the sunset.  400 basis points is the size of Obama&#8217;s win over McCain in a landslide election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finrod</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2012/07/12/condi-as-vp-ensures-obamas-defeat/#comment-14247</link>
		<dc:creator>Finrod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 20:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/?p=2747#comment-14247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Look at Rice&#039;s numbers across the line-- her appeal is fairly steady no matter which demographic group you look at.  No matter whether you&#039;re talking Dems, Reps, Independents, Men, Women, Tea Partiers, White, Non-White, College, or No College, her support is in a 25-33 range all the way across, with a 30 overall.  Her Tea Party numbers are actually the lowest at 25, but not by much.

Your logic would apply to Rubio, though; he only gets 12 percent overall, but 28 percent among Tea Partiers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look at Rice&#8217;s numbers across the line&#8211; her appeal is fairly steady no matter which demographic group you look at.  No matter whether you&#8217;re talking Dems, Reps, Independents, Men, Women, Tea Partiers, White, Non-White, College, or No College, her support is in a 25-33 range all the way across, with a 30 overall.  Her Tea Party numbers are actually the lowest at 25, but not by much.</p>
<p>Your logic would apply to Rubio, though; he only gets 12 percent overall, but 28 percent among Tea Partiers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tnfriendofcoal101368</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2012/07/12/condi-as-vp-ensures-obamas-defeat/#comment-14244</link>
		<dc:creator>tnfriendofcoal101368</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 20:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/?p=2747#comment-14244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Which I will agree, Condi won.  What it was not was a serious data gathering instrument that would tell you voter FI will vote for Obama unless Romney picks Condi in which case voter FI would vote for Romney - mainly because voter FI doesn&#039;t exist.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which I will agree, Condi won.  What it was not was a serious data gathering instrument that would tell you voter FI will vote for Obama unless Romney picks Condi in which case voter FI would vote for Romney &#8211; mainly because voter FI doesn&#8217;t exist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tnfriendofcoal101368</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2012/07/12/condi-as-vp-ensures-obamas-defeat/#comment-14242</link>
		<dc:creator>tnfriendofcoal101368</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 20:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/?p=2747#comment-14242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Voting for Romney anyway - so no one on this list is getting Romney an additional vote.  That is my point which is this  - a VP choice is much more likely to hurt Romney than help him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Voting for Romney anyway &#8211; so no one on this list is getting Romney an additional vote.  That is my point which is this  &#8211; a VP choice is much more likely to hurt Romney than help him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tnfriendofcoal101368</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2012/07/12/condi-as-vp-ensures-obamas-defeat/#comment-14241</link>
		<dc:creator>tnfriendofcoal101368</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 19:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/?p=2747#comment-14241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because you haven&#039;t determined which part of the 4% that Romney moved forward he wouldn&#039;t have gotten anyway.  Let me give you an example, if you asked two questions:

Q1) Who will you vote for: Romney or Obama?
46% say Obama, 42% Romney, 12% undecided

Q2) which best states your opinion of Obama Care
1. Unconstitutional  2. Universal Health care is a fundamental right 3. Neither
The results are 46% Unconstitutional, 46% Fundamental right, 8% neither

From that response, you know the election is actually no worse for Romney than 46/46 (because Romney hard base is going to call it constitutional and aren&#039;t voting Obama - Obama hard base will call it fundamental and aren&#039;t voting Romney)

Q3) Romney/Rice - Obama/Biden and get 46/46/8 - the best analysis is she is a net zero.  If your response in Q2 was 50 unconstitutional, 46 fundamental right, 4 neither - the proper conclusion would be Condi actually shooed away support.

That&#039;s my point you can&#039;t go from Q1 to Q3 and make any kind of statement with validity - you don&#039;t have enough data about the undecideds.  It is just fallacy to say 15 in every 100 people 3.5 months from a presidential election haven&#039;t decided who they are going to vote for.  

You have to separate out those people who aren&#039;t for whatever reason telling you the truth on Q1 - that is what the control questions do (and there would be more than one control question - I just used an obvious one for illustration).

No one other than Mitt Romney is going to apply the time and resources to put a poll in the field that provides the needed data to mine accurate results and then pay for the mining.  The reason being is well it&#039;s just not worth the expense to anyone else.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because you haven&#8217;t determined which part of the 4% that Romney moved forward he wouldn&#8217;t have gotten anyway.  Let me give you an example, if you asked two questions:</p>
<p>Q1) Who will you vote for: Romney or Obama?<br />
46% say Obama, 42% Romney, 12% undecided</p>
<p>Q2) which best states your opinion of Obama Care<br />
1. Unconstitutional  2. Universal Health care is a fundamental right 3. Neither<br />
The results are 46% Unconstitutional, 46% Fundamental right, 8% neither</p>
<p>From that response, you know the election is actually no worse for Romney than 46/46 (because Romney hard base is going to call it constitutional and aren&#8217;t voting Obama &#8211; Obama hard base will call it fundamental and aren&#8217;t voting Romney)</p>
<p>Q3) Romney/Rice &#8211; Obama/Biden and get 46/46/8 &#8211; the best analysis is she is a net zero.  If your response in Q2 was 50 unconstitutional, 46 fundamental right, 4 neither &#8211; the proper conclusion would be Condi actually shooed away support.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s my point you can&#8217;t go from Q1 to Q3 and make any kind of statement with validity &#8211; you don&#8217;t have enough data about the undecideds.  It is just fallacy to say 15 in every 100 people 3.5 months from a presidential election haven&#8217;t decided who they are going to vote for.  </p>
<p>You have to separate out those people who aren&#8217;t for whatever reason telling you the truth on Q1 &#8211; that is what the control questions do (and there would be more than one control question &#8211; I just used an obvious one for illustration).</p>
<p>No one other than Mitt Romney is going to apply the time and resources to put a poll in the field that provides the needed data to mine accurate results and then pay for the mining.  The reason being is well it&#8217;s just not worth the expense to anyone else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finrod</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2012/07/12/condi-as-vp-ensures-obamas-defeat/#comment-14240</link>
		<dc:creator>Finrod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 19:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/?p=2747#comment-14240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a poll of 901 where 16 percent identify as part of the Tea Party, these numbers are going to have a good deal more variance than the top-line numbers, but still--

Among people who self-identify as part of the Tea Party, their preference for Romney&#039;s VP:

28% Rubio
25% Rice
13% don&#039;t know
9% Ryan
6% Christie
6% Jindal
5% Martinez
4% other
2% Pawlenty
2% McDonnell
1% Portman]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a poll of 901 where 16 percent identify as part of the Tea Party, these numbers are going to have a good deal more variance than the top-line numbers, but still&#8211;</p>
<p>Among people who self-identify as part of the Tea Party, their preference for Romney&#8217;s VP:</p>
<p>28% Rubio<br />
25% Rice<br />
13% don&#8217;t know<br />
9% Ryan<br />
6% Christie<br />
6% Jindal<br />
5% Martinez<br />
4% other<br />
2% Pawlenty<br />
2% McDonnell<br />
1% Portman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finrod</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2012/07/12/condi-as-vp-ensures-obamas-defeat/#comment-14239</link>
		<dc:creator>Finrod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 19:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/?p=2747#comment-14239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/07/18/fox-news-poll-voters-pick-condi-rice-as-romney-running-mate/&quot;&gt;Sec. Rice delivers a bit of a bump for Romney.  In the head-to-head ballot test, 45 percent of voters back Barack Obama and 41 percent Romney, if the election were held today.   Yet the race is tied at 46 percent each when the hypothetical Romney-Rice ticket is matched against the Obama-Biden ticket.&lt;/a&gt;

Independents give the edge to Obama over Romney by four percentage points in response to the ballot question, and are more likely to back the Democratic ticket by one point when the running mates are included.  

In addition, Romney support among Republicans increases by five points (from 84 to 89 percent) with Rice on the ticket.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/07/18/fox-news-poll-voters-pick-condi-rice-as-romney-running-mate/">Sec. Rice delivers a bit of a bump for Romney.  In the head-to-head ballot test, 45 percent of voters back Barack Obama and 41 percent Romney, if the election were held today.   Yet the race is tied at 46 percent each when the hypothetical Romney-Rice ticket is matched against the Obama-Biden ticket.</a></p>
<p>Independents give the edge to Obama over Romney by four percentage points in response to the ballot question, and are more likely to back the Democratic ticket by one point when the running mates are included.  </p>
<p>In addition, Romney support among Republicans increases by five points (from 84 to 89 percent) with Rice on the ticket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finrod</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2012/07/12/condi-as-vp-ensures-obamas-defeat/#comment-14238</link>
		<dc:creator>Finrod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 19:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/?p=2747#comment-14238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So presumably the same people were being asked about Romney vs Obama as Romney/Rice vs Obama/Biden.

Of course, it&#039;s possible to spin this that simply reminding people that Biden is Obama&#039;s VP is enough to drop Obama&#039;s poll numbers 4 points.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So presumably the same people were being asked about Romney vs Obama as Romney/Rice vs Obama/Biden.</p>
<p>Of course, it&#8217;s possible to spin this that simply reminding people that Biden is Obama&#8217;s VP is enough to drop Obama&#8217;s poll numbers 4 points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tnfriendofcoal101368</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2012/07/12/condi-as-vp-ensures-obamas-defeat/#comment-14237</link>
		<dc:creator>tnfriendofcoal101368</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 18:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/?p=2747#comment-14237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are those +4 going to vote Romney anyway...does Obama&#039;s numbers move?  You have to ferret out, these folks...

I say I am undecided but I am voting Romney 
I say I am undecided and I will trully vote for either Obama or Romney

The issue is are the +4 Romney voters anyway (and 80-90% of undecideds are).

No VP candidate is a 400 positive basis point move, put this way do we really believe 4 in every 100 people are making their decision positively based on a VP pick.  

I haven&#039;t seen a poll that is convincing one or the other on Rice.  I suspect I haven&#039;t seen it because only Mitt Romney cares enough to put one that detailed in the field and he is not revealing the results....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are those +4 going to vote Romney anyway&#8230;does Obama&#8217;s numbers move?  You have to ferret out, these folks&#8230;</p>
<p>I say I am undecided but I am voting Romney<br />
I say I am undecided and I will trully vote for either Obama or Romney</p>
<p>The issue is are the +4 Romney voters anyway (and 80-90% of undecideds are).</p>
<p>No VP candidate is a 400 positive basis point move, put this way do we really believe 4 in every 100 people are making their decision positively based on a VP pick.  </p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t seen a poll that is convincing one or the other on Rice.  I suspect I haven&#8217;t seen it because only Mitt Romney cares enough to put one that detailed in the field and he is not revealing the results&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: demsaresatanic</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2012/07/12/condi-as-vp-ensures-obamas-defeat/#comment-14236</link>
		<dc:creator>demsaresatanic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 17:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/?p=2747#comment-14236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[like American Idol?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>like American Idol?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finrod</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2012/07/12/condi-as-vp-ensures-obamas-defeat/#comment-14232</link>
		<dc:creator>Finrod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 17:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/?p=2747#comment-14232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They polled Romney vs Obama and Romney/Rice vs Obama/Biden.  Romney trailed by 4 in the former and was tied in the latter.  Sorry, this was several days ago so I don&#039;t have a link.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They polled Romney vs Obama and Romney/Rice vs Obama/Biden.  Romney trailed by 4 in the former and was tied in the latter.  Sorry, this was several days ago so I don&#8217;t have a link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trimulchio</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/2012/07/12/condi-as-vp-ensures-obamas-defeat/#comment-14093</link>
		<dc:creator>trimulchio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 19:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/gamecock/?p=2747#comment-14093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[between &quot;governing&quot; (with consultants like Dr. Rice) and &quot;winning the election?&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>between &#8220;governing&#8221; (with consultants like Dr. Rice) and &#8220;winning the election?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
